E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Anxiety pre-general anaesthesia |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Anxiety pre-general anaesthesia |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Psychiatry and Psychology [F] - Behaviours [F01] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | HLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10002869 |
E.1.2 | Term | Anxiety symptoms |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10037175 - Psychiatric disorders |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10054711 |
E.1.2 | Term | Postoperative pain |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10022117 - Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10049989 |
E.1.2 | Term | Agitation postoperative |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10022117 - Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10002855 |
E.1.2 | Term | Anxiety |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10037175 - Psychiatric disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The main aim of this study is to assess whether melatonin is as good as midazolam, in reducing pre-operative anxiety in children prior to general anaesthesia for Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), ophthalmologic and dental surgery. It will be evaluated using the m-YPAS score over various timepoints prior to surgery. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Feasibility objectives: To undertake an internal pilot trial to determine the feasibility of a full-scale trial, in terms of: • Recruitment • Retention (adverse events reporting and PHBQ follow-up) • Allocation concealment & blinding
Efficacy objectives: To evaluate if melatonin, in relation to midazolam is: • Superior in dealing with secondary efficacy outcomes (anaesthetic turnaround time, recovery time) • Non inferior in dealing with secondary efficacy outcomes (anaesthetic failure rate)
Safety objectives: • To evaluate if melatonin, in relation to midazolam is superior in dealing with secondary safety outcomes (PAED, VSR, FPS-R, analgesia requirements, post-hospitalisation behaviour questionnaire (PHBQ), nausea & vomiting, respiratory suppression, orientation and cognitive/psychomotor function) • To describe Serious Adverse Events data (summarised both at patient level and event level) and report listings between the different arms.
Qualitative objectives: An integrated qualit |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Yes |
E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives |
Title: Personalised text message versus standard text message prompts for increasing trial participant response to telephone follow-up in the Melatonin for Anxiety prior to General anaesthesia In Children (MAGIC) trial: embedded randomised controlled trial
This sub-study is not relevant to this application since it does not test the drug intervention. |
|
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Children aged 5-14 years undergoing elective dental, ophthalmological or ENT surgery under general anaesthesia. 2. Pragmatically assessed by healthcare professionals as requiring premedication as per local standard care for high/expected high levels of preoperative distress prior to elective dental/ENT/ophthalmological surgery under general anaesthetic, including known negative experiences, failed anaesthesia, parents displaying high levels of distress, additional/special needs or judged as unable to tolerate general anaesthetic without premedication 3. ASA grades I & II 4. Parent or person with parental responsibility able to give written, informed consent and child willing to assent
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Not undergoing elective, day-case dental, ophthalmological or ENT surgery under general anaesthesia 2. Not displaying level of anxiety that would usually warrant premedication under the standard NHS care pathway 3. Reason for premedication other than anxiety 4. Current prescription of melatonin, midazolam or other non-permitted drug (please see section 7.11.2) 5. Obstructive sleep apnoea 6. ASA grades III, IV & V 7. Severe learning disability rendering child unable to communicate even with specialised support
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Preoperative distress by modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS).
|
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Baseline and then:
1. Start of transfer to TAU 2. Entry to TAU 3. Administration of anaesthesia
|
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Efficacy endpoints: • Emergence agitation (PAED index) • Postoperative sedation (Vancouver Sedation Recovery Scale, recovery time) • Postoperative pain (Revised Faces Pain Scale, FPS-R; postoperative analgesia requirements, intraoperative local anaesthetic amount) • Failed anaesthesia • Orientation and cognitive/psychomotor function (Cooperation score, modified post-box test)
Parent-reported: • STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) – parental anxiety; self-reported • Post-discharge behaviour, eating, anxiety, aggression, apathy and sleep disturbance (Post-Hospital Behaviour Questionnaire; PHBQ)
Harms/Adverse Events
Qualitative endpoints: • Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with children, parents, those recruiting to the trial and clinical team members
Economic endpoints: • Cost-effectiveness analysis; resource use, health-related quality of life; CHU9D questionnaire, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness (cost per QALY and cost per successful procedure).
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Efficacy endpoints: - PAED, VSR and FPS-R indices to be recorded every 10 minutes in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) until stage 2 anaesthetic recovery is completed. - Cooperation score, modified post-box test at baseline and post-surgery - STAI at baseline only - PHBQ at 14 days phone call only - AEs collected at transfer to, peri- & post-surgery and at 14 days phone call
Qualitative endpoints: - interviews to be held up to a few weeks post-surgery
Economic endpoints: - CHU9D to be completed at baseline and 14 days phone call |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 20 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
LVLS -The study will end after the last follow-up visit of the last study participant. Sites will be closed once data cleaning is completed and the regulatory authority and ethics committee have been informed. |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 6 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 14 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 1 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 6 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 14 |