Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43845   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7282   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2018-001545-13
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:54767414MMY3019
    National Competent Authority:Czechia - SUKL
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Trial now transitioned
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2018-09-17
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedCzechia - SUKL
    A.2EudraCT number2018-001545-13
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A Phase 3 Study Comparing Daratumumab, VELCADE (bortezomib), Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (D-VRd) with VELCADE, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) in Subjects with Untreated Multiple Myeloma and for Whom Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant is Not Planned as Initial Therapy
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    A Clinical Study to Compare Daratumumab, VELCADE (bortezomib), Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (D-VRd) with VELCADE, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) in Subjects with Untreated Bone Marrow Cancer and for Whom Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant is Not Planned as Initial Therapy
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code number54767414MMY3019
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorJanssen-Cilag International N.V.
    B.1.3.4CountryBelgium
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportJanssen Research & Development, LLC
    B.4.2CountryUnited States
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationJanssen-Cilag International N.V.
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointClinical Registry group
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressArchimedesweg 29
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityLeiden
    B.5.3.3Post code2333 CM
    B.5.3.4CountryNetherlands
    B.5.4Telephone number+31715242166
    B.5.5Fax number+31715242110
    B.5.6E-mailClinicalTrialsEU@its.jnj.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Darzalex
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderJanssen- Cilag International NV
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community Yes
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation numberEU/3/13/1153
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameDaratumumab co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)
    D.3.2Product code JNJ-54767414
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNDARATUMUMAB
    D.3.9.1CAS number 945721-28-8
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeJNJ-54767414
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameHUMAX-CD38
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB175772
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number120
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Multiple Myeloma
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Bone marrow cancer
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 21.0
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10028228
    E.1.2Term Multiple myeloma
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004864
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease Yes
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective is to determine if the addition of daratumumab to VRd will improve overall minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate compared with VRd alone.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    ●To determine if the addition of daratumumab to VRd will improve clinical outcome as measured by:
    -PFS
    -MRD negativity rate at 1 year
    -Durability of MRD negativity
    -ORR of very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and rate of complete response (CR) or better
    -Time to response
    -Duration of response
    -Time to next treatment
    -Progression-free survival on the next line of therapy (PFS2; defined as time from randomization to progression on the next line of therapy or death, whichever comes first)
    -Overall survival (OS)
    ●To evaluate medical resource utilization
    ●To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of daratumumab
    ●To determine the immunogenicity of daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20)
    ●To assess the safety profile of daratumumab + VRd (D-VRd)
    ●To evaluate clinical efficacy (ie, overall MRD negativity rate and PFS) of daratumumab when added to VRd in cytogenetic high-risk subgroups
    ●To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1.Newly diagnosed and not considered candidate for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation due to:
    ●Being age ≥65years,or
    ●age 18-65years with presence of comorbid condition(s) likely to have a negative impact on tolerability of high-dose chemotherapy with SCT or who refuse high-dose chemotherapy with SCT as initial treatment
    2.Diagnosis of multiple myeloma as documented per International Myeloma Working Group Criteria:Monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow ≥10% or presence of a biopsy proven plasmacytoma and documented multiple myeloma satisfying at least one of the calcium,renal,anemia,bone(CRAB)criteria or biomarkers of malignancy criteria:
    CRAB criteria:
    1.Hypercalcemia:serum calcium >0.25mmol/L (>1mg/dL) higher than upper limit of normal (ULN) or >2.75mmol/L (>11mg/dL)
    2.Renal insufficiency:creatinine clearance <40mL/min or serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (>2mg/dL)
    3.Anemia:hemoglobin >2g/dL below the lower limit of normal or hemoglobin <10g/dL
    Please see the complete list of criteria 2 in the Protocol Am on pg.38 and 39.
    3.Must have measurable disease,as assessed by central laboratory,defined by any of the following:
    - IgG,IgA,IgM,IgD,or IgE multiple myeloma:Serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein) level ≥1.0g/dL or urine M-protein level ≥200mg/24 hours;or
    - Light chain multiple myeloma without measurable disease in serum or urine:Serum Ig FLC ≥10mg/dL and abnormal serum Ig kappa lambda FLC ratio
    4.Eastern cooperative oncology group(ECOG) performance status score of 0,1 or2
    5.Clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria during the Screening Phase:
    a.hemoglobin ≥ 7.5 g/dL (≥ 5 mmol/L) (without prior RBC transfusion within 7 days before the laboratory test; recombinant human erythropoietin use is permitted);
    b.absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.0 x 109/L (granulocyte colony stimulating factor [G-CSF] use is permitted)
    c.platelet count ≥ 70x109/L for subjects in whom <50% of bone marrow nucleated cells are plasma cells; otherwise platelet count >50×109/L (transfusions are not permitted within 7 days)
    d.aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2.5 x ULN
    e.alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5 x ULN
    f.total bilirubin ≤1.5 x ULN, except in subjects with congenital bilirubinemia,such as Gilbert syndrome (direct bilirubin ≤2.0 x ULN)
    g.Estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥30 mL/min.Creatinine clearance can be calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (Appendix 8 [Section 10.8]) or eGFR (MDRD; Appendix 9 [Section10.9]), or CKD-epi formula or for subjects
    with over- or underweight, CrCl may be measured from a 24-hours urine collection using the formula provided in Appendix 8 [Section 10.8]). If Cockcroft-Gault formula is used and body mass index (BMI) is ≥30 kg/m2 then adjusted body weight should be used in calculation (Appendix 8 [Section 10.8])
    h.corrected serum calcium ≤13.5 mg/dL (≤3.4 mM/L);or free ionized calcium ≤6.5 mg/dL (≤1.6 mM/L)
    6.Female subjects of reproductive childbearing potential must commit to either abstain continuously from heterosexual sexual intercourse or to use 2 methods of reliable birth control simultaneously during the Treatment Period,during any dose interruptions,and for 3months after the last dose of any component of the treatment regimen.Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study drug.This birth control method must include one highly effective form of contraception (tubal ligation,intrauterine device,hormonal [birth control pills,injections,hormonal patches,vaginal rings or implants]or partner’s vasectomy)and one additional effective contraceptive method (male latex or synthetic condom,diaphragm,or cervical cap).Contraception must begin 4weeks prior to dosing.Reliable contraception is indicated even where there has been a history of infertility,unless due to hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy
    7.A woman of childbearing potential must have 2 negative serum or urine pregnancy tests at Screening,first within 10to14 days prior to dosing and the second within 24hours prior to dosing.For requirements during the Treatment Phase
    8.A woman must agree not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes)for the purposes of assisted reproduction during the study and for a period of 3months after receiving the last dose of any component of the treatment regimen
    9.Male subjects of reproductive potential who are sexually active with females of reproductive potential must always use a latex or synthetic condom during the study and for 3months after discontinuing study treatment (even after a successful vasectomy)
    10.Male subjects of reproductive potential must not donate sperm during the study or for 3months after the last dose of study treatment

    Please refer to Protocol for completed list of inclusion criteria
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Any potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
    1. Frailty index of ≥2 according to Myeloma Geriatric Assessment score.
    2.1 Prior therapy for multiple myeloma other than a short course of corticosteroids (not to exceed 40 mg of dexamethasone, or equivalent per day, total of 160 mg dexamethasone or equivalent).
    3. Prior or concurrent invasive malignancy (other than multiple myeloma) within 5 years of date of randomization (exceptions are adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or other noninvasive lesion that in the opinion of the investigator, with concurrence with the sponsor’s medical monitor, is considered cured with minimal risk of recurrence within 3 years).
    4. Peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain Grade 2 or higher, as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 5.
    5.1 Focal radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization with the exception of palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic pain management. Radiotherapy within 14 days prior to randomization on measurable extramedullary plasmacytoma is not permitted even in the setting of palliation for symptomatic management.
    6. Plasmapheresis within 28 days of randomization.
    7. Clinical signs of meningeal involvement of multiple myeloma.
    8. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <50% of predicted. (FEV1 testing is required for subjects suspected of having COPD).
    9. Moderate or severe persistent asthma within the past 2 years, uncontrolled asthma of any classification. (Subjects who have controlled intermittent asthma or controlled mild persistent asthma are allowed in the study).
    10.2 Subject is:
    a. Known to be seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
    b. seropositive for hepatitis B (defined by a positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]). Subjects with resolved infection (ie, subjects who are HBsAg negative but positive for antibodies to total hepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc] and/or antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs]) must be screened using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) measurement of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels. Those who are PCR positive will be excluded. EXCEPTION: Subjects with serologic findings suggestive of HBV vaccination (anti-HBs positivity as the only serologic marker) AND a known history of prior HBV vaccination, do not need to be tested for HBV DNA by PCR.
    c. Known to be seropositive for hepatitis C virus (HCV; anti-HCV antibody positive or HCV-RNA quantitation positive), except in the setting of a sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as aviremia at least 12 weeks after completion of antiviral therapy.
    11. Concurrent medical or psychiatric condition or disease (such as but not limited to, systemic amyloidosis, POEMS, active systemic infection, uncontrolled diabetes, acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease) that is likely to interfere with study procedures or results, or that in the opinion of the investigator would constitute a hazard if enrolled in the study.
    12. Has clinically significant cardiac disease, including:
    ● Myocardial infarction within 6 months before signing the informed consent form (ICF), or unstable or uncontrolled disease/condition related to or affecting cardiac function (eg, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association Class III-IV; Appendix 18)
    ● Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities
    ● Screening 12-lead ECG showing a baseline QT interval as corrected by Frederica’s formula (QTcF) >470 msec.
    13. Received a strong CYP3A4 inducer within 5 half-lives prior to randomization
    14. Allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to boron or mannitol, corticosteroids, monoclonal antibodies or human proteins, or their excipients, or sensitivity to mammalian-derived products or lenalidomide.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Overall MRD negativity rate, which is defined as the proportion of subjects who have achieved MRD negative status (at 10^-5) by bone marrow aspirate after randomization and prior to progressive disease (PD) or subsequent anti myeloma therapy. Subjects who have achieved MRD negative status on or after PD or after the switch to subsequent anti-myeloma therapy before PD, will not be considered MRD negative in the primary endpoint analysis.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    One year after the last subject is administered their first dose of study treatment
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    1. PFS defined as the duration from the date of randomization to either progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever comes first. Disease progression will be determined according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. For subjects who have not progressed and are alive, data will be censored at the last disease evaluation before the start of any subsequent anti-myeloma therapy.
    2. MRD negativity rate at 1 year.
    3. Durable MRD negativity rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have achieved MRD negative status (at 10^-5) at 2 bone marrow aspirate examinations that are a minimum of 1 year apart, without any examination showing MRD positive status in between.
    4. Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who achieve PR or better responses prior to subsequent anti-myeloma therapy in accordance with the IMWG criteria, during or after the study treatment.
    5. VGPR or better rate is defined as the proportion of subjects achieving VGPR and CR (including stringent complete response [sCR]) prior to subsequent anti-myeloma therapy in accordance with the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment.
    6. CR or better rate is defined as the proportion of subjects achieving CR or sCR prior to subsequent anti-myeloma therapy in accordance with the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment.
    7. Progression-free survival on the next line of therapy is defined as the time from randomization to progression on the next line of treatment or death, whichever comes first. Disease progression will be based on investigator judgment. Subjects who are still alive and not yet progressed on the next line of treatment will be censored on the last date of followup.
    8. Overall survival is measured from the date of randomization to the date of the subject’s death due to any cause. If the subject is alive or the vital status is unknown, then the subject’s data will be censored at the date the subject was last known to be alive.
    9. Time to response is defined as the time between the randomization and the first efficacy evaluation at which the subject meets all criteria for PR or better.
    10. Duration of response is calculated from the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of PD, as defined in the IMWG evaluation before the start of any subsequent anti-myeloma therapy.
    11. Clinical efficacy (i.e., overall MRD negativity rate and PFS) of D-VRd in high-risk molecular subgroups compared with VRd alone.
    12. Pharmacokinetic concentrations of daratumumab.
    13. Incidence of anti-daratumumab antibodies.
    14. Prevalence and incidence of anti-rHuPH20 antibodies.
    15. Mean change from baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) core 3-item (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the multiple myeloma 20-item (EORTC QLQ-MY20), and EuroQol Five Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) scales.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    1. 7. & 11. From randomization to either PD or death, whichever comes first
    2. At 1 year
    3. From one year onwards
    4. 5. 6. 9. & 10. Screening (within 28 days before randomization), Every 3 weeks of Cycles 1-8, Every 4 weeks for 30 months then every 8 weeks until PD (Cycles 9 and above)
    8. From first dose of study drug until end of study (approximately 6 years 5 months)
    12. Day (D)1 of Cycles 1-8, D1 of every 3rd cycle until PD & Every 16 weeks & start of subsequent therapy & 4 weeks after start of subsequent therapy
    13. Predose on D1 of C1, C3, C9, C12, D4 on C1, C3 and at post-treatment week 4 & 8
    14. & 15. Predose on D1 of C1, C9, C12 and at post-treatment week 4 & 8
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic Yes
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others Yes
    E.6.13.1Other scope of the trial description
    Immunogenicity Analyses and Biomarkers Analyses
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled No
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open Yes
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group No
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned5
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA54
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Brazil
    Canada
    Israel
    Japan
    Korea, Republic of
    United States
    Turkey
    Czechia
    France
    Germany
    Netherlands
    Poland
    Spain
    United Kingdom
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    The end of study is defined as the later date between the primary PFS analysis (162 events observed) and 5 years after the last subject is randomized.
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years6
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months6
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years6
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months6
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 36
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 324
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state25
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 175
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 360
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    The sponsor will ensure that subjects benefiting from treatment with daratumumab will be able to continue receiving treatment after the end of the study.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2018-12-03
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2018-11-22
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusTrial now transitioned
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 18 23:33:22 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA