Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of CHF6467 after single and repeated ascending doses in subjects with diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers (DFU).

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2018-001724-19
    Trial protocol
    BG  
    Global end of trial date
    06 Jan 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    04 Feb 2022
    First version publication date
    04 Feb 2022
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    CLI-06467AA1-01
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04077671
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.
    Sponsor organisation address
    Via Palermo 26/A, Parma, Italy, 43122
    Public contact
    Clinical Trial Trasparency, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., clinicaltrials_info@chiesi.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Trial Trasparency, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., clinicaltrials_info@chiesi.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    19 Nov 2021
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    06 Jan 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To assess: - the safety and tolerability of single and multiple days topical dosing with CHF6467 in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU); - the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of systemically available drug following single and multiple days topical dosing with CHF6467 in patients with DFU; - the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of multiple days topical dosing with CHF6467 on the healing of DFU over a 12-week period; - the potential for immunogenicity through the evaluation of the presence of CHF6467 anti-drug antibodies (ADA).
    Protection of trial subjects
    This clinical study was performed in accordance with the principles that have their origin in the declaration of Helsinki, and with local regulations. The study was carried out in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) notes for guidance on Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (ICH/CPMP/135/95). Before the start of the study, all patients gave their written informed consent to participate in the study after having been informed of the nature and implications of the study. The study consisted of two parts: - Part 1 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, serial Cohort design in patients with neuropathic DFUs. - Part 2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose, off-set parallel group design in patients with neuropathic DFUs.
    Background therapy
    CHF6467, human NGF (hNGF) P61S R100E, is a recombinant and “painless” form of hNGF. The mutation on arginine R100 in mature NGF is linked to the rare human genetic disease hereditary sensory autonomic neuropathy type V (HSAN V). In HSAN V subjects, a mutation in the NGFβ gene (exon 3, nucleotide C661T), changing arginine R100 to a tryptophan, determines the complete loss of pain perception without affecting most neurological functions. In addition to the pain-related R100E mutation, CHF6467 harbours a second “tagging” P61S mutation, which replaces the proline residue at position 61 of hNGF with the serine residue present in murine NGF (mNGF). In vitro and in vivo data have confirmed that CHF6467 maintains neurotrophic and neuroprotective properties identical to NGF in a variety of cell assays, while displaying a significantly reduced pain-inducing activity in vivo. CHF6467 has shown promising efficacy in accelerating the healing of wounds in diabetic mice, without any indication of the induction of pain or hyperalgesia.
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    16 Oct 2018
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 94
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    94
    EEA total number of subjects
    94
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    67
    From 65 to 84 years
    27
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    In Part1, a total of 38 subjects were screened: 33 were randomised and divided into 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D) of 8 subjects each (except for Cohort B which included 9 patients) and 5 failed screening. In Part 2, a total of 82 subjects were screened: 61 were randomised into one of 2 Cohorts (E, F) with 30 patients in Cohort E and 31 in Cohort F.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    The screening was performed from 3 to 21 days prior to randomisation (Part 1) and prior to run-in period (Part 2). The eligibility (inclusion/exclusion criteria) was assessed, medical history, concomitant medications were recorded, and clinical serology, haematology, chemistry, urinalysis, vital sign, ECG, ulcer size measurement were performed.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Treatment Period Part 1 and Part 2 (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Part 1: Cohort A (SD1) CHF6467
    Arm description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort A consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 0.3 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CHF6467
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Cutaneous solution
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    CHF6467 was a colourless aqueous solution for topical administration as single doses given in the morning through 1 mL topical graduated syringe using the necessary dilution steps to reach the final concentration which for Cohort A corresponds to: 0.3 μg/mm² (two steps of dilution, final concentration of 0.03 mg/mL). Doses have been standardised in terms of volume/mm² of ulcer size by serial dilution of CHF6467 at the initial concentration of 1 mg/mL with the corresponding amount of diluent.

    Arm title
    Part 1: Cohort B (SD2) CHF6467
    Arm description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort B consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 1.0 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 3 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CHF6467
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Cutaneous solution
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    CHF6467 was a colourless aqueous solution for topical administration as single doses given in the morning through 1 mL topical graduated syringe using the necessary dilution steps to reach the final concentration which for Cohort B corresponds to: 1.0 μg/mm² (one steps of dilution, final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL). Doses have been standardised in terms of volume/mm² of ulcer size by serial dilution of CHF6467 at the initial concentration of 1 mg/mL with the corresponding amount of diluent.

    Arm title
    Part 1: Cohort C (SD3) CHF6467
    Arm description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort C consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 3 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CHF6467
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Cutaneous solution
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    CHF6467 was a colorless aqueous solution for topical administration as single doses given in the morning through 1 mL topical graduated syringe using the necessary dilution steps to reach the final concentration which for Cohort C corresponds to: 3 μg/mm² (one step of dilution, final concentration of 0.3 mg/mL). Doses have been standardised in terms of volume/mm² of ulcer size by serial dilution of CHF6467 at the initial concentration of 1 mg/mL with the corresponding amount of diluent.

    Arm title
    Part 1: Cohort D (SD4) CHF6467
    Arm description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort D consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 6 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CHF6467
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Cutaneous solution
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    CHF6467 was a colourless aqueous solution for topical administration as single doses given in the morning through 1 mL topical graduated syringe using the necessary dilution steps to reach the final concentration which for Cohort D corresponds to: 6 μg/mm² (one steps of dilution, final concentration of 0.6 mg/mL). Doses have been standardised in terms of volume/mm² of ulcer size by serial dilution of CHF6467 at the initial concentration of 1 mg/mL with the corresponding amount of diluent.

    Arm title
    Part 1: Placebo
    Arm description
    Part 1_Includes subjects from Cohorts A, B, C, D who received placebo and are respectively: Cohort A_2 subjects Cohort B_3 subjects Cohort C_2 subjects Cohort D_2 subjects
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CHF6467 - Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Cutaneous solution
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo was a colourless aqueous solution for topical administration as single doses given in the morning through 1 mL topical graduated syringe.

    Arm title
    Part 2: Cohort E (MD1) CHF6467
    Arm description
    Part 2: Multiple ascending doses in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending doses, parallel group design in 2 Cohorts (E, F). During Part 2, two total dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically applied as a once daily (q.d.) regimen, for 14 consecutive days according to an escalation scheme. Cohort E consisted of 17 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 1 μg/mm²/day for 14 consecutive days q.d., and 10 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CHF6467
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Cutaneous solution
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    Multiple doses of CHF6467 - total daily dose 1 μg/mm²/day given q.d. plus SoC. Topical administration of Active Drug was given under a q.d. dosing regimen in order to achieve a total daily dose of 1 μg/mm² through graduated topical syringe. Dose was standardised in terms of volume/mm² of ulcer size (10 μL/mm²) by serial dilution (if required) of CHF6467 at the initial concentration of 1 mg/mL with the corresponding amount of vehicle.

    Arm title
    Part 2: Cohort F (MD2) CHF6467
    Arm description
    Part 2: Multiple ascending doses in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending doses, parallel group design in 2 Cohorts (E, F). During Part 2, two total dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically applied as a once daily (q.d.) regimen, for 14 consecutive days according to an escalation scheme. Cohort F consisted of 18 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 3 μg/mm²/day for 14 consecutive days q.d., and 10 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CHF6467
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Cutaneous solution
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    Multiple doses of CHF6467 - total daily dose 3 μg/mm²/day given q.d. plus SoC. Topical administration of Active Drug was given under a q.d. dosing regimen in order to achieve a total daily dose of 3 μg/mm² through graduated topical syringe. Dose was standardised in terms of volume/mm² of ulcer size (10 μL/mm²) by serial dilution (if required) of CHF6467 at the initial concentration of 1 mg/mL with the corresponding amount of vehicle.

    Arm title
    Part 2: Placebo
    Arm description
    Part 2_Includes subjects from Cohorts E, F who received placebo and are respectively: Cohort E_10 subjects Cohort F_10 subjects
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CHF6467 - Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Cutaneous solution
    Routes of administration
    Topical use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo was a colourless aqueous solution, topically administered, multiple ascending doses given under a q.d. dosing regimen through a graduated topical 1 mL syringe.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Part 1: Cohort A (SD1) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort B (SD2) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort C (SD3) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort D (SD4) CHF6467 Part 1: Placebo Part 2: Cohort E (MD1) CHF6467 Part 2: Cohort F (MD2) CHF6467 Part 2: Placebo
    Started
    6
    6
    6
    6
    9
    20
    21
    20
    Completed
    6
    6
    6
    6
    8
    17
    18
    17
    Not completed
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    3
    3
    3
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    -
    -
    -
    -
    1
    3
    3
    2
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort A (SD1) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort A consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 0.3 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort B (SD2) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort B consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 1.0 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 3 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort C (SD3) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort C consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 3 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort D (SD4) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort D consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 6 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Part 1_Includes subjects from Cohorts A, B, C, D who received placebo and are respectively: Cohort A_2 subjects Cohort B_3 subjects Cohort C_2 subjects Cohort D_2 subjects

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Cohort E (MD1) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 2: Multiple ascending doses in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending doses, parallel group design in 2 Cohorts (E, F). During Part 2, two total dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically applied as a once daily (q.d.) regimen, for 14 consecutive days according to an escalation scheme. Cohort E consisted of 17 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 1 μg/mm²/day for 14 consecutive days q.d., and 10 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Cohort F (MD2) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 2: Multiple ascending doses in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending doses, parallel group design in 2 Cohorts (E, F). During Part 2, two total dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically applied as a once daily (q.d.) regimen, for 14 consecutive days according to an escalation scheme. Cohort F consisted of 18 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 3 μg/mm²/day for 14 consecutive days q.d., and 10 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Part 2_Includes subjects from Cohorts E, F who received placebo and are respectively: Cohort E_10 subjects Cohort F_10 subjects

    Reporting group values
    Part 1: Cohort A (SD1) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort B (SD2) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort C (SD3) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort D (SD4) CHF6467 Part 1: Placebo Part 2: Cohort E (MD1) CHF6467 Part 2: Cohort F (MD2) CHF6467 Part 2: Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    6 6 6 6 9 20 21 20 94
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    4 4 4 3 7 15 18 12 67
        From 65-84 years
    2 2 2 3 2 5 3 8 27
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    58.2 ± 11.8 60.2 ± 11.5 62.3 ± 10.3 62.5 ± 9.2 57.8 ± 8.9 58.0 ± 9.1 56.7 ± 8.6 60.8 ± 8.4 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    1 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 14
        Male
    5 5 5 5 7 17 18 18 80
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        White
    6 6 6 6 9 20 21 20 94
    Body Mass Index (BMI)
    Units: kg/m2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    32.39 ± 3.25 30.51 ± 5.52 28.93 ± 2.74 31.20 ± 4.26 31.23 ± 3.57 29.957 ± 5.319 29.338 ± 5.116 29.342 ± 3.067 -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort A (SD1) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort A consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 0.3 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort B (SD2) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort B consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 1.0 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 3 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort C (SD3) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort C consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 3 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort D (SD4) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1: Single ascending dose in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, parallel group design in 4 Cohorts (A, B, C, D). During Part 1, four single dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically according to an escalating dose regimen. Cohort D consisted of 6 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 6 μg/mm² ulcer area, and 2 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Part 1_Includes subjects from Cohorts A, B, C, D who received placebo and are respectively: Cohort A_2 subjects Cohort B_3 subjects Cohort C_2 subjects Cohort D_2 subjects

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Cohort E (MD1) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 2: Multiple ascending doses in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending doses, parallel group design in 2 Cohorts (E, F). During Part 2, two total dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically applied as a once daily (q.d.) regimen, for 14 consecutive days according to an escalation scheme. Cohort E consisted of 17 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 1 μg/mm²/day for 14 consecutive days q.d., and 10 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Cohort F (MD2) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 2: Multiple ascending doses in subjects with neuropathic DFUs. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending doses, parallel group design in 2 Cohorts (E, F). During Part 2, two total dose levels of CHF6467 were administered topically applied as a once daily (q.d.) regimen, for 14 consecutive days according to an escalation scheme. Cohort F consisted of 18 subjects that received the active drug CHF6467 at a dose of 3 μg/mm²/day for 14 consecutive days q.d., and 10 subjects dosed with matching placebo. The doses to be administered were adapted based on the actual ulcer area.

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Part 2_Includes subjects from Cohorts E, F who received placebo and are respectively: Cohort E_10 subjects Cohort F_10 subjects

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - Safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - Safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - Safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - Safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Placebo - Safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PD population included all subjects from Safety set, also having evaluable PD data (ulcer tissue measurements) in at least one timepoint after the first administration of the study drug and without any major protocol deviation affecting PD evaluation.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PD population included all subjects from Safety set, also having evaluable PD data (ulcer tissue measurements) in at least one timepoint after the first administration of the study drug and without any major protocol deviation affecting PD evaluation.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PD population included all subjects from Safety set, also having evaluable PD data (ulcer tissue measurements) in at least one timepoint after the first administration of the study drug and without any major protocol deviation affecting PD evaluation.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - PK set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PK population included all subjects from the safety set excluding subjects without any valid PK measurement and with major protocol deviations affecting PK evaluations.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - PK set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PK population included all subjects from the safety set excluding subjects without any valid PK measurement and with major protocol deviations affecting PK evaluations.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - PK set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PK population included all subjects from the safety set excluding subjects without any valid PK measurement and with major protocol deviations affecting PK evaluations.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - PK set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PK population included all subjects from the safety set excluding subjects without any valid PK measurement and with major protocol deviations affecting PK evaluations.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PK population included all subjects from the safety set excluding subjects without any valid PK measurement and with major protocol deviations affecting PK evaluations.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The PK population included all subjects from the safety set excluding subjects without any valid PK measurement and with major protocol deviations affecting PK evaluations.

    Primary: 1_Part 1 - Abnormal SBP and DBP Change from baseline - Any post-baseline timepoint

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    1_Part 1 - Abnormal SBP and DBP Change from baseline - Any post-baseline timepoint [1]
    End point description
    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured after at least 5 min rest in supine position. Vital signs could be repeated at the discretion of the Investigator for the purposes of safety or to confirm eligibility. Baseline is defined as pre-dose value on Day 1 of each treatment for Cohorts A, B, C and D. The number of subjects contributing to the data is indicated (Cohort A, B, C and D). Then, presented values are representative results of all post-dose time points. The following change from baseline abnormality categories was defined: • > 20mmHg for systolic blood pressure; • > 10mmHg for diastolic blood pressure.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    At any timepoint: On Day 1 at pre-dose, 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 h post-dose, on Day 2 at 24 h post-dose, on Day 3 at 48 h post-dose, on Day 4 at 72 h post-dose, and at follow-up.
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical evaluation was performed. The focus of the primary end points was safety. Evaluation of the safety data was done descriptively
    End point values
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    6
    6
    6
    6
    9
    Units: subjects
        SBP > 20 mmHg
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
        DBP > 10 mmHg
    2
    0
    1
    2
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: 2_Part 1 - Abnormal QTcF Change from baseline - Any timepoint

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    2_Part 1 - Abnormal QTcF Change from baseline - Any timepoint [2]
    End point description
    QtcF is QT corrected for the heart rate with the Fridericia formula and derived from triplicate 12-lead ECG parameters extracted from Holter.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    On Day 1 at 15, 30, 45 min and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, and 14 h post-dose. On Day 2 at 24 h post-dose. On screening using the time-matched points from Day 1.
    Notes
    [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical evaluation was performed. The focus of the primary end points was safety. Evaluation of the safety data was done descriptively.
    End point values
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    6
    6
    6
    6
    9
    Units: subjects
        QTcF <= 30 msec
    5
    6
    6
    5
    9
        30 <= QTcF change from Baseline <= 60 msec
    1
    0
    0
    1
    0
        QTcF change from baseline > 60 msec
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: 3_Part 1 - Heart rate (0-24 h) - Change from Baseline

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    3_Part 1 - Heart rate (0-24 h) - Change from Baseline
    End point description
    Data were derived from measurements using 12-lead ECG, extracted from 24 h Holter monitoring. For 12-lead ECG parameter extracted from Holter (HR) the baseline value is defined at each time point as the time-matched triplicate (mean values) at screening. For HR0-24 extracted from Holter the baseline value is the HR0-24 value at screening. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    24 h 12-lead digital Holter ECG recording: at screening visit, on Day 1 from at least 90 min prior to dosing up to at least 24 h post-dose, on Day 2, and at follow-up.
    End point values
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - Safety Part 1: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    6
    6
    6
    6
    9
    Units: bpm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -7.8 ± 6.2
    -8.7 ± 7.8
    -8.2 ± 5.1
    -3.7 ± 4.2
    -8.4 ± 6.0
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 SD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    HR0-24 extracted from Holter: Mean difference vs. placebo in change from baseline was calculated for HR0-24 for each dose level and 90% CI derived using ANCOVA models with treatment as fixed effect and baseline as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - Safety v Part 1: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    15
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [3]
    P-value
    = 0.954
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.2
         upper limit
    4.8
    Notes
    [3] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 SD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    HR0-24 extracted from Holter: Mean difference vs. placebo in change from baseline was calculated for HR0-24 for each dose level and 90% CI derived using ANCOVA models with treatment as fixed effect and baseline as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Part 1: Placebo - Safety v Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - Safety
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    15
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [4]
    P-value
    = 0.736
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -1
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6
         upper limit
    4
    Notes
    [4] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    3_CHF6467 SD3 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    HR0-24 extracted from Holter: Mean difference vs. placebo in change from baseline was calculated for HR0-24 for each dose level and 90% CI derived using ANCOVA models with treatment as fixed effect and baseline as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - Safety v Part 1: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    15
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [5]
    P-value
    = 0.802
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.8
         upper limit
    4.3
    Notes
    [5] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    4_CHF6467 SD4 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    HR0-24 extracted from Holter: Mean difference vs. placebo in change from baseline was calculated for HR0-24 for each dose level and 90% CI derived using ANCOVA models with treatment as fixed effect and baseline as covariate.
    Comparison groups
    Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - Safety v Part 1: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    15
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [6]
    P-value
    = 0.163
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    4.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.8
         upper limit
    9.2
    Notes
    [6] - Adjusted mean difference

    Primary: 4_Part 2 - Abnormal SBP and DBP - Any post-baseline timepoint

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    4_Part 2 - Abnormal SBP and DBP - Any post-baseline timepoint [7]
    End point description
    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured after at least 5 min rest in supine position. Vital signs could be repeated at the discretion of the Investigator for the purposes of safety or to confirm eligibility.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    On Day 1 and on the day of last administration (Day 14) at pre-dose and 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 h post-dose, from Day 2 to Day 13 at pre-dose in the morning, and on Day 15 (24 h post-dose after Day 14 administration), at follow-up.
    Notes
    [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical evaluation was performed. The focus of the primary end points was safety. Evaluation of the safety data was done descriptively.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    20
    21
    20
    Units: subjects
        SBP > 20 mmHg
    4
    2
    1
        DBP > 10 mmHg
    10
    2
    4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: 5_Part 2 - Abnormal QTcF Change from baseline - Any post-dose timepoint

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    5_Part 2 - Abnormal QTcF Change from baseline - Any post-dose timepoint [8]
    End point description
    QTcF is QT corrected for the heart rate with the Fridericia formula and derived from triplicate 12-lead ECG parameters extracted from Holter.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    On Day 1 at 15, 30, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 h post-dose and at 24 h post-on Day 1 dose (Day 2), on the last administration day (Day 14) at 15, 30, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 24 h post-dose.
    Notes
    [8] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical evaluation was performed. The focus of the primary end points was safety. Evaluation of the safety data was done descriptively.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    20
    21
    20
    Units: subjects
        QTcF <=30 msec
    17
    20
    19
        30 <= QTcF change from Baseline <= 60 msec
    3
    1
    1
        QTcF change from Baseline > 60 msec
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: 6_Part 2 - Abnormal QTcF Change from baseline - Day 1 Any timepoint

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    6_Part 2 - Abnormal QTcF Change from baseline - Day 1 Any timepoint [9]
    End point description
    QTcF is QT corrected for the heart rate with the Fridericia formula and derived from triplicate 12-lead ECG parameters extracted from Holter.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    On Day 1 at 15, 30, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 h post-dose and at 24 h post-on Day 1 dose (Day 2), on the last administration day (Day 14) at 15, 30, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 24 h post-dose.
    Notes
    [9] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical evaluation was performed. The focus of the primary end points was safety. Evaluation of the safety data was done descriptively.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    20
    21
    20
    Units: subjects
        QTcF <=30 msec
    18
    20
    19
        30 <= QTcF change from Baseline <= 60 msec
    2
    1
    1
        QTcF change from baseline > 60 msec
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: 7_Part 2 - Abnormal QTcF Change from Baseline - Day 14 Any timepoint

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    7_Part 2 - Abnormal QTcF Change from Baseline - Day 14 Any timepoint [10]
    End point description
    QTcF is QT corrected for the heart rate with the Fridericia formula and derived from triplicate 12-lead ECG parameters extracted from Holter.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    On Day 1 at 15, 30, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 h, post-dose and at 24 h post-on Day 1 dose (Day 2), on the last administration day (Day 14) at 15, 30, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 24 h post-dose.
    Notes
    [10] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical evaluation was performed. The focus of the primary end points was safety. Evaluation of the safety data was done descriptively.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    19
    20
    20
    Units: subjects
        QTcF <=30 msec
    17
    20
    20
        30 <= QTcF change from Baseline <= 60 msec
    2
    0
    0
        QTcF change from baseline > 60 msec
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: 8_Part 2 - Abnormal Heart rate (0-24 h) Change from baseline - Day 1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    8_Part 2 - Abnormal Heart rate (0-24 h) Change from baseline - Day 1
    End point description
    ECG Mean Heart Rate (beats/min) Change from Baseline to Treatment Day 1, 24 h. Data are presented as mean and Standard Deviation.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    24 h 12-lead digital Holter ECG recording: at screening visit, on Day 1 and last administration day (Day 14) from at least 90 min prior to dosing up to at least 24 h post-dose. At Day 28 follow-up.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    16
    18
    Units: bpm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -4.1 ± 6.7
    -7.4 ± 9.2
    -3.7 ± 5.9
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    HR0-24 extracted from Holter: Mean difference vs. placebo in change from baseline was calculated for HR0-24 for each dose level and 90% CI derived using ANCOVA models with treatment as fixed effect and baseline as covariate. Estimates was provided for Day 1 and Day 14.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Placebo - Safety v Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    34
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [11]
    P-value
    = 0.669
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.6
         upper limit
    4.4
    Notes
    [11] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    HR0-24 extracted from Holter: Mean difference vs. placebo in change from baseline was calculated for HR0-24 for each dose level and 90% CI derived using ANCOVA models with treatment as fixed effect and baseline as covariate. Estimates was provided for Day 1 and Day 14.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety v Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    34
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [12]
    P-value
    = 0.308
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -2.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.6
         upper limit
    1.3
    Notes
    [12] - Adjusted mean difference

    Primary: 9_Part 2 - Abnormal Heart rate (0-24 h) Change from baseline - Day 14

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    9_Part 2 - Abnormal Heart rate (0-24 h) Change from baseline - Day 14
    End point description
    ECG Mean Heart Rate (beats/min) Change from Baseline to Treatment Day 14, 24 h. Data are presented as mean and Standard Deviation.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    24 h 12-lead digital Holter ECG recording: at screening visit, on Day 1 and last administration day (Day 14) from at least 90 min prior to dosing up to at least 24 h post-dose. At Day 28 follow-up.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects analysed
    17
    17
    17
    Units: bpm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -6.1 ± 9.1
    -8.6 ± 8.1
    -4.8 ± 5.0
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    HR0-24 extracted from Holter: Mean difference vs. placebo in change from baseline was calculated for HR0-24 for each dose level and 90% CI derived using ANCOVA models with treatment as fixed effect and baseline as covariate. Estimates was provided for Day 1 and Day 14.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - Safety v Part 2: Placebo - Safety
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    34
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [13]
    P-value
    = 0.722
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.8
         upper limit
    4.3
    Notes
    [13] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    HR0-24 extracted from Holter: Mean difference vs. placebo in change from baseline was calculated for HR0-24 for each dose level and 90% CI derived using ANCOVA models with treatment as fixed effect and baseline as covariate. Estimates was provided for Day 1 and Day 14.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Placebo - Safety v Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - Safety
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    34
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [14]
    P-value
    = 0.197
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -2.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6.2
         upper limit
    0.8
    Notes
    [14] - Adjusted mean difference

    Secondary: 10_Part 1 - Cmax - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    10_Part 1 - Cmax - PK
    End point description
    Cmax is the value of the maximum plasma concentration of CHF6467. Dose proportionality (assessed considering the absolute individual dose) of CHF6467 for Cmax was evaluated using the power model, including the log-transformed PK parameters as dependent variables and the log-transformed CHF6467 dose as fixed effect. The slope for log-transformed dose (ß) was estimated with its 90% CI to examine dose proportionality. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was not reported but was performed. The results are described below: The 90% CI of the slope of Cmax did not include 1, indicating that CHF6467 Cmax did not increase dose-proportionally but less than dose-proportionally between 1 µg/mm2 and 6 µg/mm2.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The Cmax of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 72 h post-dose after four single ascending topical doses (CHF6467 SD1 0.3 μg/mm2; CHF6467 SD2 1 μg/mm2; CHF6467 SD3 3 μg/mm2; CHF6467 SD4 6 μg/mm2) in subjects with DFU.
    End point values
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    2 [15]
    4 [16]
    5 [17]
    5 [18]
    Units: pg/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    1.27 ± 0.948
    8.58 ± 5.46
    4.58 ± 3.61
    9.67 ± 9.22
    Notes
    [15] - PK population
    [16] - PK population
    [17] - PK population
    [18] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 11_Part 1 - AUC 0-t - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    11_Part 1 - AUC 0-t - PK
    End point description
    AUC 0-t is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, computed using the linear trapezoidal rule. Dose proportionality (assessed considering the absolute individual dose) of CHF6467 for AUC 0-t was evaluated using the power model, including the log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters as dependent variables and the log transformed CHF6467 dose as fixed effect. The slope for log-transformed dose (ß) was estimated with its 90% CI to examine dose proportionality. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was not reported but was performed. The results are described below: The 90% CI of the slope of AUC 0-t included 1, suggesting that CHF6467 AUC 0-t increased dose proportionally. However, it can be noted that the point estimate (PE) was not close to 1 and that the mean AUC 0-t values were comparable for both 1 µg/mm² and 6 µg/mm² doses and the inter‑subject variability was high.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The AUC 0-t of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 72 h post-dose after four single ascending topical doses (CHF6467 SD1 0.3 μg/mm²; CHF6467 SD2 1 μg/mm²; CHF6467 SD3 3 μg/mm²; CHF6467 SD4 6 μg/mm²) in subjects with DFU.
    End point values
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    1 [19]
    4 [20]
    4 [21]
    5 [22]
    Units: pg.h/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    6.25 ± 0
    43.4 ± 28.5
    53.8 ± 74.7
    43.1 ± 36.9
    Notes
    [19] - PK population CHF6467 SD1 SD= Not Calculated
    [20] - PK population
    [21] - PK population
    [22] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 12_Part 1 - Tmax - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    12_Part 1 - Tmax - PK
    End point description
    Tmax is the time of the maximum plasma concentration of CHF6467, obtained directly from the experimental data without interpolation. Data are presented as median (minimum-maximum).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The Tmax of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 72 h post-dose after four single ascending topical doses (CHF6467 SD1 0.3 μg/mm2; CHF6467 SD2 1 μg/mm2; CHF6467 SD3 3 μg/mm2; CHF6467 SD4 6 μg/mm2) in subjects with DFU.
    End point values
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    2 [23]
    4 [24]
    5 [25]
    5 [26]
    Units: hours
        median (full range (min-max))
    3.40 (0.75 to 6.05)
    2.50 (2.0 to 3.0)
    2.0 (0.75 to 6.0)
    2.0 (0.50 to 2.0)
    Notes
    [23] - PK population
    [24] - PK population
    [25] - PK population
    [26] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 13_Part 2 - Cmax - Day 1 - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    13_Part 2 - Cmax - Day 1 - PK
    End point description
    Cmax is the value of the maximum plasma concentration of CHF6467. The dose proportionality (assessed as absolute individual dose) of CHF6467 for Cmax was evaluated using the power model, including the log-transformed PK parameters as dependent variables and the log-transformed dose as fixed effect. The analysis was performed separately on Day 1 and on the last administration day. The slope for log-transformed dose (ß) was estimated with its 90% CI to examine dose proportionality. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    After repeated q.d. CHF6467 topical doses for 14 days in subjects with DFU, the Cmax of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 24 h post-dose after the first dose and 336 h post-dose (i.e., 14 days after the last CHF6467 application) after the last dose.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    14 [27]
    10 [28]
    Units: pg/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    2.37 ± 1.54
    3.77 ± 3.64
    Notes
    [27] - PK population
    [28] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 14_Part 2 - Cmax - Day 14 - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    14_Part 2 - Cmax - Day 14 - PK
    End point description
    Cmax is the value of the maximum plasma concentration of CHF6467. The dose proportionality (assessed as absolute individual dose) of CHF6467 for Cmax was evaluated using the power model, including the log-transformed PK parameters as dependent variables and the log-transformed dose as fixed effect. The analysis was performed separately on Day 1 and on the last administration day. The slope for log-transformed dose (ß) was estimated with its 90% CI to examine dose proportionality. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    After repeated q.d. CHF6467 topical doses for 14 days in subjects with DFU, the Cmax of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 24 h post-dose after the first dose and 336 h post-dose (i.e., 14 days after the last CHF6467 application) after the last dose.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    10 [29]
    9 [30]
    Units: pg/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    1.93 ± 1.24
    5.90 ± 7.39
    Notes
    [29] - PK population
    [30] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 15_Part 2 - AUC 0-t - Day 1 - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    15_Part 2 - AUC 0-t - Day 1 - PK
    End point description
    AUC 0-t is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, computed using the linear trapezoidal rule. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    After repeated q.d. CHF6467 topical doses for 14 days in subjects with DFU, the AUC 0-t of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 24 h post-dose after the first dose and 336 h post-dose (i.e., 14 days after the last CHF6467 application) after the last dose.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    14 [31]
    10 [32]
    Units: pg.h/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    7.77 ± 8.31
    27.7 ± 48.9
    Notes
    [31] - PK population
    [32] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 16_Part 2 - AUC 0-t - Day 14 - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    16_Part 2 - AUC 0-t - Day 14 - PK
    End point description
    AUC 0-t is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, computed using the linear trapezoidal rule. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    After repeated q.d. CHF6467 topical doses for 14 days in subjects with DFU, the AUC 0-t of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 24 h post-dose after the first dose and 336 h post-dose (i.e., 14 days after the last CHF6467 application) after the last dose.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    10 [33]
    9 [34]
    Units: pg.h/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    26.5 ± 65.6
    131 ± 201
    Notes
    [33] - PK population
    [34] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 17_Part 2 - AUC 0-12 - Day 1 - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    17_Part 2 - AUC 0-12 - Day 1 - PK
    End point description
    AUC 0-12 is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours post-dose of CHF6467. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    After repeated q.d. CHF6467 topical doses for 14 days in subjects with DFU, the PK of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 12 h post-dose after the first dose and 336 h post-dose (i.e., 14 days after the last CHF6467 application) after the last dose.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    2 [35]
    2 [36]
    Units: pg.h/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    22.4 ± 1.15
    67.1 ± 44.0
    Notes
    [35] - PK population
    [36] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 18_Part 2 - AUC 0-12 - Day 14 - PK

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    18_Part 2 - AUC 0-12 - Day 14 - PK
    End point description
    AUC 0-12 is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours post-dose of CHF6467. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    After repeated q.d. CHF6467 topical doses for 14 days in subjects with DFU, the PK of CHF6467 was studied in serum up to 12 h post-dose after the first dose and 336 h post-dose (i.e., 14 days after the last CHF6467 application) after the last dose.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    1 [37]
    6 [38]
    Units: pg.h/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    27.2 ± 0
    54.7 ± 62.8
    Notes
    [37] - PK population SD=Not Calculated
    [38] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 19_Part 2 - Ulcer Area (cm²) Actual Values - Baseline - PD

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    19_Part 2 - Ulcer Area (cm²) Actual Values - Baseline - PD
    End point description
    Ulcer tissue measurements was performed following the standard of care procedure at the time points indicated in the Timeframe. Area (in cm²), volume (in cm³), average depth (in mm), maximum depth (in mm), perimeter (in cm), tissue type 1 to 7 presence (yes/no), and tissue type 1 to 7 percentage, if present and measured. Tissue types: - Type 1: Granulating tissue/Granulation - Type 2: Hypergranulating tissue/Hypergranulation - Type 3: Epithelizing tissue/epithelial - Type 4: Healed tissue/healthy - Type 5: Scab/Eschar - Type 6: Necrotic tissue/Slough - Type 7: Other/not classified Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Timing of the ulcer measurements - During treatment period: daily assessments (from Day 1 to Day 15) - During the follow-up period: weekly assessments (Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 49, Day 56, Day 63, Day 70, Day 77, Day 84).
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects analysed
    20 [39]
    20 [40]
    20 [41]
    Units: cm2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    4.190 ± 0.770
    3.620 ± 0.841
    3.745 ± 0.737
    Notes
    [39] - PD population
    [40] - PD population
    [41] - PD population
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The model for repeated measures (MMRM) is linear mixed model including treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and baseline by visit interaction as covariates. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Placebo - PD set v Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [42]
    P-value
    = 0.691
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.13
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.81
         upper limit
    0.54
    Notes
    [42] - MMRM model
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The model for repeated measures (MMRM) is linear mixed model including treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and baseline by visit interaction as covariates. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [43]
    P-value
    = 0.761
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.55
         upper limit
    0.75
    Notes
    [43] - MMRM Model
    Statistical analysis title
    3_CHF6467 MD1 VS CHF6467 MD2
    Statistical analysis description
    The model for repeated measures (MMRM) is linear mixed model including treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and baseline by visit interaction as covariates. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [44]
    P-value
    = 0.495
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.23
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.91
         upper limit
    0.45
    Notes
    [44] - MMRM Model

    Secondary: 20_Part 2 - Ulcer Area (cm²) Change from baseline - Day 14 - PD

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    20_Part 2 - Ulcer Area (cm²) Change from baseline - Day 14 - PD
    End point description
    Ulcer tissue measurements was performed following the standard of care procedure at the time points indicated in the Timeframe. Area (in cm²), volume (in cm³), average depth (in mm), maximum depth (in mm), perimeter (in cm), tissue type 1 to 7 presence (yes/no), and tissue type 1 to 7 percentage, if present and measured. Tissue types: - Type 1: Granulating tissue/Granulation - Type 2: Hypergranulating tissue/Hypergranulation - Type 3: Epithelizing tissue/epithelial - Type 4: Healed tissue/healthy - Type 5: Scab/Eschar - Type 6: Necrotic tissue/Slough - Type 7: Other/not classified Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Timing of the ulcer measurements - During treatment period: daily assessments (from Day 1 to Day 15) - During the follow-up period: weekly assessments (Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 49, Day 56, Day 63, Day 70, Day 77, Day 84).
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects analysed
    19 [45]
    20 [46]
    20 [47]
    Units: cm2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -1.626 ± 0.892
    -1.395 ± 0.630
    -1.630 ± 0.761
    Notes
    [45] - PD population
    [46] - PD population
    [47] - PD population
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    P-values and estimates are based on an MMRM model on Change From Baseline including Treatment, Visit, Baseline, Treatment by Visit interaction and Treatment by Baseline interaction as effects. An unstructured covariance matrix is assumed and Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    39
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [48]
    P-value
    = 0.761
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.76
         upper limit
    0.56
    Notes
    [48] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    P-values and estimates are based on an MMRM model on Change From Baseline including Treatment, Visit, Baseline, Treatment by Visit interaction and Treatment by Baseline interaction as effects. An unstructured covariance matrix is assumed and Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [49]
    P-value
    = 0.428
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.25
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.38
         upper limit
    0.89
    Notes
    [49] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    3_CHF6467 MD1 VS CHF6467 MD2
    Statistical analysis description
    P-values and estimates are based on an MMRM model on Change From Baseline including Treatment, Visit, Baseline, Treatment by Visit interaction and Treatment by Baseline interaction as effects. An unstructured covariance matrix is assumed and Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    39
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [50]
    P-value
    = 0.292
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.35
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.02
         upper limit
    0.31
    Notes
    [50] - Adjusted mean difference

    Secondary: 21_Part 2 - Ulcer Area (cm²) Change from baseline - Day 84 - PD

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    21_Part 2 - Ulcer Area (cm²) Change from baseline - Day 84 - PD
    End point description
    Ulcer tissue measurements were performed following the standard of care procedure at the time points indicated in the Timeframe. Area (in cm²), volume (in cm³), average depth (in mm), maximum depth (in mm), perimeter (in cm), tissue type 1 to 7 presence (yes/no), and tissue type 1 to 7 percentage, if present and measured. Tissue types: - Type 1: Granulating tissue/Granulation - Type 2: Hypergranulating tissue/Hypergranulation - Type 3: Epithelizing tissue/epithelial - Type 4: Healed tissue/healthy - Type 5: Scab/Eschar - Type 6: Necrotic tissue/Slough - Type 7: Other/not classified Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Timing of the ulcer measurements - During treatment period: daily assessments (from Day 1 to Day 15) - During the follow-up period: weekly assessments (Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 49, Day 56, Day 63, Day 70, Day 77, Day 84).
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects analysed
    17
    18
    17
    Units: cm2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -3.224 ± 1.513
    -2.844 ± 0.720
    -2.835 ± 1.229
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    P-values and estimates are based on an MMRM model on Change From Baseline including Treatment, Visit, Baseline, Treatment by Visit interaction and Treatment by Baseline interaction as effects. An unstructured covariance matrix is assumed and Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    34
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [51]
    P-value
    = 0.541
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.24
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.04
         upper limit
    0.55
    Notes
    [51] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    P-values and estimates are based on an MMRM model on Change From Baseline including Treatment, Visit, Baseline, Treatment by Visit interaction and Treatment by Baseline interaction as effects. An unstructured covariance matrix is assumed and Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    35
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [52]
    P-value
    = 0.605
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.97
         upper limit
    0.57
    Notes
    [52] - Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis title
    3_CHF6467 MD1 VS CHF6467 MD2
    Statistical analysis description
    P-values and estimates are based on an MMRM model on Change From Baseline including Treatment, Visit, Baseline, Treatment by Visit interaction and Treatment by Baseline interaction as effects. An unstructured covariance matrix is assumed and Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    35
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [53]
    P-value
    = 0.913
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.04
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.85
         upper limit
    0.76
    Notes
    [53] - Adjusted mean difference

    Secondary: 22_Part 2 - Time to Healing (days) >= 50%

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    22_Part 2 - Time to Healing (days) >= 50%
    End point description
    Time to healing (days) is the date of healing (depending on the degree of healing as listed above). Four different degrees of healing were computed at a given day as follow: A) Healed_50 (Y/N) = ≥50% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); B) Healed_66 (Y/N) = ≥66% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); C) Healed_75 (Y/N) = ≥75% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); D) Healed_100_CH (Y/N) = 100% ulcer area reduction (no more ulcer) also considered as the 100% of healed tissue (Tissue type 4) (complete healing). The subjects who contributed to the following statistical analyses of time to healing were all subjects in the PD set (both healed and non-healed subjects).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 14, 21, 28, 56, and 84
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects analysed
    20 [54]
    20 [55]
    20 [56]
    Units: days
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    21.2 ± 19.6
    23.1 ± 20.1
    16.8 ± 10.2
    Notes
    [54] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/13
    [55] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/17
    [56] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/16
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD1 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.148
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD2 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.886
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing (Days)
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    3_CHF6467 MD1 VS CHF6467 MD2
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD1 vs CHF6467 MD2.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.205
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: 23_Part 2 - Time to Healing (days) >= 66%

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    23_Part 2 - Time to Healing (days) >= 66%
    End point description
    Time to healing (days) is the date of healing (depending on the degree of healing as listed above). Four different degrees of healing were computed at a given day as follow: A) Healed_50 (Y/N) = ≥50% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); B) Healed_66 (Y/N) = ≥66% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); C) Healed_75 (Y/N) = ≥75% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); D) Healed_100_CH (Y/N) = 100% ulcer area reduction (no more ulcer) also considered as the 100% of healed tissue (Tissue type 4) (complete healing). The subjects who contributed to the following statistical analyses of time to healing were all subjects in the PD set (both healed and non-healed subjects).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 14, 21, 28, 56, and 84
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects analysed
    20 [57]
    20 [58]
    20 [59]
    Units: days
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    32.2 ± 15.0
    30.2 ± 16.6
    29.5 ± 19.9
    Notes
    [57] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/12
    [58] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/15
    [59] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/15
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD1 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.152
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD2 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.797
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    3_CHF6467 MD1 VS CHF6467 MD2
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD1 vs CHF6467 MD2.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.245
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: 24_Part 2 - Time to Healing (days) >= 75%

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    24_Part 2 - Time to Healing (days) >= 75%
    End point description
    Time to healing (days) is the date of healing (depending on the degree of healing as listed above). Four different degrees of healing were computed at a given day as follow: A) Healed_50 (Y/N) = ≥50% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); B) Healed_66 (Y/N) = ≥66% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); C) Healed_75 (Y/N) = ≥75% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); D) Healed_100_CH (Y/N) = 100% ulcer area reduction (no more ulcer) also considered as the 100% of healed tissue (Tissue type 4) (complete healing). The subjects who contributed to the following statistical analyses of time to healing were all subjects in the PD set (both healed and non-healed subjects).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 14, 21, 28, 56, and 84.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects analysed
    20 [60]
    20 [61]
    20 [62]
    Units: days
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    40.8 ± 18.8
    42.0 ± 19.8
    40.8 ± 20.1
    Notes
    [60] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/12
    [61] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/13
    [62] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/13
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD1 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Placebo - PD set v Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.672
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD2 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.916
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    3_CHF6467 MD1 VS CHF6467 MD2
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD1 vs CHF6467 MD2.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.752
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: 25_Part 2 - Time to Healing (days) 100%

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    25_Part 2 - Time to Healing (days) 100%
    End point description
    Time to healing (days) is the date of healing (depending on the degree of healing as listed above). Four different degrees of healing were computed at a given day as follow: A) Healed_50 (Y/N) = ≥50% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); B) Healed_66 (Y/N) = ≥66% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); C) Healed_75 (Y/N) = ≥75% ulcer area reduction (also considered as the % of healed tissue); D) Healed_100_CH (Y/N) = 100% ulcer area reduction (no more ulcer) also considered as the 100% of healed tissue (Tissue type 4) (complete healing). The subjects who contributed to the following statistical analyses of time to healing were all subjects in the PD set (both healed and non-healed subjects).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 14, 21, 28, 56, and 84.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects analysed
    20 [63]
    20 [64]
    20 [65]
    Units: days
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    43.4 ± 12.5
    59.5 ± 14.8
    47.4 ± 18.7
    Notes
    [63] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/5
    [64] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/2
    [65] - PD population number of patients/number of patients with data: 20/5
    Statistical analysis title
    1_CHF6467 MD1 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD1 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.983
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    2_CHF6467 MD2 VS Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD2 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Placebo - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.226
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    3_CHF6467 MD1 VS CHF6467 MD2
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison between treatments was performed using the following contrasts (P vs MD1, P vs MD2, MD1 vs MD2). Curves were compared by the two-sided Log-Rank test. Values present the Log-Rank test results for the comparison of CHF6467 MD1 vs CHF6467 MD2.
    Comparison groups
    Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PD set v Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PD set
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.216
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    median time to healing
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: 26_ Part 1 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Day 1 and Day 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    26_ Part 1 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Day 1 and Day 24
    End point description
    The potential for immunogenicity was determined by assessing the presence of CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA). No subjects were reported with the presence of CHF6467 ADAs in Part 1.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The Blood samples were collected for the determination of CHF6467 anti-drug antibodies (ADA) presence and titer when appropriate at Day 1, pre-dose and Day 24.
    End point values
    Part 1: Cohort A - SD1 - CHF6467 - 0.3 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort B - SD2 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort C - SD3 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm² - PK set Part 1: Cohort D - SD4 - CHF6467 - 6 μg/mm² - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    6 [66]
    6 [67]
    6 [68]
    6 [69]
    Units: subjects
        (Day 1) No
    6
    6
    6
    6
        (Day 24) No
    6
    6
    6
    6
    Notes
    [66] - PK population
    [67] - PK population
    [68] - PK population
    [69] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 27_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Treatment Day 1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    27_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Treatment Day 1
    End point description
    The potential for immunogenicity was determined by assessing the presence of CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA). No subjects were reported with the presence of CHF6467 ADAs in Part 2 on Day 1.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The Blood samples were collected for the determination of CHF6467 anti-drug antibodies (ADA) presence and titer when appropriate at day 1, pre-dose, Day 15, and follow-up Day 24, Day 52, and Day 80.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    20 [70]
    21 [71]
    Units: subjects
        No
    20
    21
        Yes
    0
    0
    Notes
    [70] - PK population
    [71] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 28_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Treatment Day 15

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    28_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Treatment Day 15
    End point description
    The potential for immunogenicity was determined by assessing the presence of CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA). One subject had a positive ADA screening test on Day 15 after application of placebo (titer of 1), which was likely a false positive result.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The Blood samples were collected for the determination of CHF6467 anti-drug antibodies (ADA) presence and titer when appropriate at Day 1, pre-dose, Day 15, and follow-up Day 24, Day 52, and Day 80.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    19 [72]
    20 [73]
    Units: subjects
        No
    19
    20
        Yes
    0
    0
    Notes
    [72] - PK population
    [73] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 29_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Follow Up Day 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    29_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Follow Up Day 24
    End point description
    The potential for immunogenicity was determined by assessing the presence of CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA). One subject had a positive ADA screening test on follow-up Day 24 (titer of 10) after application of CHF6467 MD2.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The Blood samples were collected for the determination of CHF6467 anti-drug antibodies (ADA) presence and titer when appropriate at Day 1, pre-dose, Day 15, and follow-up Day 24, Day 52, and Day 80.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    19 [74]
    19 [75]
    Units: subjects
        No
    19
    18
        Yes
    0
    1
    Notes
    [74] - PK population
    [75] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 30_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Follow Up Day 52

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    30_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Follow Up Day 52
    End point description
    The potential for immunogenicity was determined by assessing the presence of CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA). One subject had a positive ADA screening test on follow-up Day 52 (titer of 5) after application of CHF6467 MD2.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The Blood samples were collected for the determination of CHF6467 anti-drug antibodies (ADA) presence and titer when appropriate at Day 1, pre-dose, Day 15, and follow-up Day 24, Day 52, and Day 80.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    18 [76]
    18 [77]
    Units: subjects
        No
    18
    17
        Yes
    0
    1
    Notes
    [76] - PK population
    [77] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 31_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Follow Up Day 80

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    31_Part 2 - CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies Presence - Follow Up Day 80
    End point description
    The potential for immunogenicity was determined by assessing the presence of CHF6467 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA). One subject had a positive ADA screening test on follow-up Day 80 (titer of 1) after application of CHF6467 MD2.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The Blood samples were collected for the determination of CHF6467 anti-drug antibodies (ADA) presence and titer when appropriate at Day 1, pre-dose, Day 15, and follow-up Day 24, Day 52, and Day 80.
    End point values
    Part 2: Cohort E - MD1 - CHF6467 - 1 μg/mm²/day - PK set Part 2: Cohort F - MD2 - CHF6467 - 3 μg/mm²/day - PK set
    Number of subjects analysed
    17 [78]
    18 [79]
    Units: subjects
        No
    17
    17
        Yes
    0
    1
    Notes
    [78] - PK population
    [79] - PK population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the Informed Consent signature until the subject’s study participation ends (study completion or discontinuation).
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    21.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort A (SD1) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1 of the study: Subjects who received a single dose of CHF6467 (total dose 0.3 μg/mm²)

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort B (SD2) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1 of the study: Subjects who received a single dose of CHF6467 (total dose 1 μg/mm²).

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort C (SD3) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1 of the study: Subjects who received a single dose of CHF6467 (total dose 3 μg/mm²).

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Cohort D (SD4) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 1 of the study: Subjects who received a single dose of CHF6467 (total dose 6 μg/mm²).

    Reporting group title
    Part 1: Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Part 1 of the study: Subjects who received a single dose of Placebo.

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Cohort E (MD1) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 2 of the study: Subjects who received a multiple doses of CHF6467 for 14 consecutive days (total daily dose 1 μg/mm²/day).

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Cohort F (MD2) CHF6467
    Reporting group description
    Part 2 of the study: Subjects who received a multiple doses of CHF6467 for 14 consecutive days (total daily dose 3 μg/mm²/day).

    Reporting group title
    Part 2: Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Part 2 of the study: Subjects who received a multiple doses of Placebo for 14 consecutive days.

    Serious adverse events
    Part 1: Cohort A (SD1) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort B (SD2) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort C (SD3) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort D (SD4) CHF6467 Part 1: Placebo Part 2: Cohort E (MD1) CHF6467 Part 2: Cohort F (MD2) CHF6467 Part 2: Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Part 1: Cohort A (SD1) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort B (SD2) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort C (SD3) CHF6467 Part 1: Cohort D (SD4) CHF6467 Part 1: Placebo Part 2: Cohort E (MD1) CHF6467 Part 2: Cohort F (MD2) CHF6467 Part 2: Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 6 (33.33%)
    2 / 6 (33.33%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    4 / 6 (66.67%)
    2 / 9 (22.22%)
    9 / 20 (45.00%)
    8 / 21 (38.10%)
    13 / 20 (65.00%)
    Investigations
    Blood glucose increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    2 / 20 (10.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    2
    0
    0
    Blood creatine increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Gastric pH decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertensive crisis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    2 / 6 (33.33%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Cardiac disorders
    Tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Atrial fibrillation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    1 / 21 (4.76%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Atrial tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    1 / 21 (4.76%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Supraventricular tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Ventricular extrasystoles
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Ventricular tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    1 / 21 (4.76%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    3 / 6 (50.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    2 / 21 (9.52%)
    3 / 20 (15.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    3
    0
    1
    2
    4
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Hyperchlorhydria
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    1 / 6 (16.67%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    1 / 6 (16.67%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    Toothache
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    1 / 21 (4.76%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 6 (16.67%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    1 / 9 (11.11%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    1 / 21 (4.76%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    1
    Rhinorrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    1 / 21 (4.76%)
    3 / 20 (15.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    3
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Rash macular
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    2 / 21 (9.52%)
    4 / 20 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    2
    4
    Diabetic foot infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Erysipelas
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Respiratory tract infection viral
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Coronavirus infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hypoglycaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 6 (16.67%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
    0 / 9 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    0 / 21 (0.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    14 May 2019
    A substantial protocol amendment (CTP version 3.0, dated 21 March 2019) was created to list and clarify all changes implemented in the protocol from version 1.0, dated 9 July 2018 to version 3.0, dated 21 March 2019. Below listed the main changes: - An additional secondary objective was added; - In the study population of Part 2, Texas grade 2A (deeper ulcers) was added to allow the recruitment of DFU subjects with ulcer located at metatarsal level where the nature of the ulcer could involve the exposure of tendon, bone, or joint capsule as per the Texas grade 2A description. Moreover, the definition of the depth (e.g., inclusion criterion 6) was clarified; - Exclusion criterion 2 (points a and g) was clarified; - Exclusion criterion 3 was rephrased; - In the study design of Part 2, the dose regimen was made flexible and the run-in period description was updated according to the changes in inclusion criterion 6; - Throughout Part 2, a new section on microbiology assessments was added; - The statistical analysis section was adapted; - The early withdrawal assessments were listed and clarified; - A new section was created to regulate the possibility of re-screening subjects at discretion of the Principal Investigator.
    20 Dec 2019
    A substantial protocol amendment (CTP version 4.0, dated 8 November 2019) was created to record the following changes: - Change of site location; - The time window for the study drug administration has been enlarged; - IMP dose options for the Cohort F have been clarified.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun Apr 28 22:46:21 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA