Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2018-002130-20
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:1.4
    National Competent Authority:UK - MHRA
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:GB - no longer in EU/EEA
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2019-06-19
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedUK - MHRA
    A.2EudraCT number2018-002130-20
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Research on Efficacy of Teriparatide use in the Return of recruits to Normal duty.
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Study of Teriparatide in Stress Fracture Healing: RETURN
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    Study of Teriparatide in Stress Fracture Healing: RETURN
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code number1.4
    A.5.4Other Identifiers
    Name:EudraCT Number:2018-002130-20
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    B.1.3.4CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
    B.4.2Country
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationNorwich Clinical Trials Unit
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointAnn Marie Swart
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressUniversity of East Anglia
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityNorwich
    B.5.3.3Post codeNR4 7TJ
    B.5.3.4CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.5.4Telephone number01603597306
    B.5.6E-maila.swart@uea.ac.uk
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Terrosa
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderGedeon Richter Plc
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameTerrosa
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Suspension for injection in cartridge
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNTeriparatide
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeAS1
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit µg/ml microgram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number250
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name FORSTEO
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderEli Lilly Nederland B.V.
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationNetherlands
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameFORSTEO
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection in pre-filled pen
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNTeriparatide
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeAS2
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit µg/µl microgram(s)/microlitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number250
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSolution for injection in pre-filled pen
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSubcutaneous use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Healthy individuals with stress fractures.
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Healthy individuals with stress fractures.
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Body processes [G] - Bones and nerves physological processes [G11]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 20.1
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10042212
    E.1.2Term Stress fracture
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10022117 - Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 20.1
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10042212
    E.1.2Term Stress fracture
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10022117 - Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary outcome for the trial will be the improvement in radiological healing by 2 grades or more, ‘or complete healing’, indicated by a grade of zero, at 8 weeks post-randomisation.

    Assessed by MRI using the modified Fredericson Stress Fracture Grading System High-Signal Short TI Inversion Recovery (STIR) Image.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    The secondary outcomes will be as follows:

    -Does PTH reduce the time to radiological healing (as assessed by MRI scanning at weeks 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 (five in total)).
    * Where participants are still assessed as not clinically healed, the treatment phase will be extended to 6-months, necessitating 2 further scans at weeks 20 and 24. These participants will therefore undergo a maximum of 7 MRI scans in total.

    This may be extended to 7 scans in total however,

    -Proportion assessed as ‘Clinically Healed’. Clinical assessments will be carried out twice a week at ITC(C) following an MRI grade 0 by a local researcher.

    - Healing as a composite assessment of healing by MRI and clinical assessment.

    - Time from randomisation to discharge from rehabilitation. Completion of rehabilitation will be assessed using Army standard measures.

    - Pain symptoms using a visual analogue pain scale in a diary to be completed weekly and analysed as a change from baseline to 16 weeks (24 weeks in an unh
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1) Signed informed consent and able to comply with protocol;
    2) Aged 18 to 40 years;
    3) Lower limb stress fracture, confirmed by MRI scan;
    4) Undergoing phase 1 or 2 training within an Army training establishment;
    5) Baseline blood tests within reference range (see table 3 for more details). Minor abnormalities will be assessed by the PI. Patients will still be eligible if these are felt to be of no clinical importance and this decision is documented by the PI;
    6) Participant is able to adhere to visit requirements.


    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1) Hypersensitivity to the active Parathyroid Hormone substance or any of the excipients listed in the SPC.
    2) Pre-existing hypercalcaemia
    3) Patients with skeletal malignancies or bone metastases.
    4) Any contraindications that would prevent the participant from undergoing an MRI scan.
    5) Concurrent therapy that, in the investigators opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study medication.
    6) Pregnancy, suspected pregnancy or breastfeeding. Female participants must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and be willing and able to use a birth control method which may be considered as “highly effective”, as per the Clinical Trial Facilitation Group (CTFG) guidance.*
    7) Severe renal impairment. Participants with moderate renal impairment will be treated with caution at the Principal Investigator’s discretion and in accordance with the SmPC.
    8) Metabolic bone diseases including hyperparathyroidism and Paget's disease of the bone.
    9) Unexplained elevations of alkaline phosphatase.
    10) Prior external beam or implant radiation therapy to the skeleton.
    11) Patients participating in a concurrent drug trial.
    12) Presentation with open epiphyses during the diagnostic MRI scan.
    13) Participants with depression, as identified by completion of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Baseline.

    **As per the CTFG guidance and for the purposes of this trial, a woman is considered of childbearing potential (WOCBP), i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12-months without an alternative medical cause. A high follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the postmenopausal range may be used to confirm a post-menopausal state in women not using hormonal contraception or hormonal replacement therapy. However in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhea, a single FSH measurement is insufficient.

    In accordance with CTFG guidance, methods that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly, are considered as “highly effective” birth control methods. Such methods include:
    - Combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (either oral, intravaginal or transdermal);
    - Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (either oral, injectable or implantable);
    - Intrauterine device (IUD);
    - Intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS);
    - Bilateral tubal occlusion;
    - Vasectomised partner;
    - Sexual abstinence. (Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated for the duration of the participant’s treatment period during the trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant.)
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    The primary outcome for the trial will be the improvement in radiological healing by 2 grades or more, ‘or complete healing’, indicated by a grade of zero, at 8 weeks post-randomisation (assessed using the modified Fredericson Stress Fracture Grading System by MRI and High-Signal Short TI Inversion Recovery (STIR) Image).

    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    MRI scans will be performed at weeks 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 (5 in total). Radiological healing will be assessed using the modified Fredericson Stress Fracture Grading System by MRI and High-Signal Short TI Inversion Recovery (STIR) Image.
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    Secondary outcomes will be as follows:

    • Proportion assessed as ‘Clinically Healed’. Clinical assessments will be carried out twice a week at ITC(C) following an MRI grade 0 by a blinded researcher.
    • Healing as a composite assessment of healing by MRI and clinical assessment.
    • Time from randomisation to discharge from rehabilitation. Completion of rehabilitation will be assessed using Army standard measures.
    • Pain symptoms using a visual analogue pain scale in a diary to be completed weekly and analysed as a change from baseline to 16 weeks (24 weeks in an unhealed fracture).
    • Quality of life (assessed by SF36 Questionnaire) and any other appropriate questionnaires used by the army to assess readiness to return to training.
    • Adverse Events including the number and severity of Adverse Reactions.

    MRI scans will be performed at weeks 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 (5 in total). Radiological healing will be assessed by MRI using the modified Fredericson Stress Fracture Grading System and High-Signal Short TI Inversion Recovery (STIR) Image.
    The scale proposed by Beck et al. will be used to assess clinical healing.

    Further Exploratory outcomes are as follows:

    • Biochemical responses to treatment (assessed in blood and urine samples) at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16. This will be extended to weeks 20 and 24 for participants that remain in the trial. Laboratory technicians analysing the samples will be blinded.
    • Changes in bone density and micro architecture, assessed by DXA at the hip and spine between the point of randomisation and week 16, and HRpQCT at the distal radius (non-dominant arm) and distal tibia (non-fractured limb) between the point of randomisation and weeks 16 or 24. The images will be processed by by a blinded, experienced researcher.
    • Differences in the physical activity levels between the treatment and control arm from the point of randomisationto week 16, or week 24 in the case of an unhealed fracture. A wrist-mounted, tri-axial accelerometer (GENEActiv, Activinsights, Kimbolton, UK) will be worn by up to 20 participants (10 in each arm) to assess physical activity throughout the trial.
    • Long term future fracture rate of the treatment fracture group versus standard care will be compared at 5 years following delivery of the final report.

    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    • Proportion assessed as ‘Clinically Healed’. Clinical assessments will be carried out at weeks 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 (5 in total) in line with MRI scans and continue to weeks 20 and 24 in the case of an unhealed fracture.

    • Pain symptoms using a visual analogue pain scale in a diary to be completed weekly and analysed as a change from baseline to 16 weeks (24 weeks in an unhealed fracture).

    • Quality of life (assessed by SF36 Questionnaire) and any other appropriate questionnaires used by the army to assess readiness to return to training.

    • Time from randomisation to assessed as ‘Clinically Healed’. Proportion assessed as ‘Clinically Healed’. Clinical assessments will be carried out every two working days following an MRI grade 0 by a blinded researcher.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response Yes
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open Yes
    E.8.1.3Single blind Yes
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other Yes
    E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
    Treatment as usual
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned2
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    The end of the trial is defined as 3 months following the last follow-up visit of the last patient randomised, or the time of the last data collection (e.g. during Longer-Term Follow-Up), whichever is later’.
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months3
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days30
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months3
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days30
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.4.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.5.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.1.6.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 136
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) No
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations No
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state136
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    All participants randomised to receive teriparatide will continue on the intervention for 16-weeks. At the end of this period, any patients with unhealed fractures will remain on the treatment for a further 8-weeks. Within this time the literature suggests that all fractures will be healed limiting the need for ongoing supply.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 1
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2019-08-02
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2020-02-07
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusGB - no longer in EU/EEA
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 02 18:39:17 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA