Clinical Trial Results:
Modulating the Vaginal Microbiome after Implantation Failure -
A randomized placebo controlled study of lactobacilli supplements
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2018-002376-41 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
27 Feb 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Mar 2022
|
First version publication date |
08 Mar 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
¨noMICINT
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
The Fertility Clinic, Zealand Region
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Lykkebaekvej 14, Koege, Denmark,
|
||
Public contact |
Fertilitetsklinikken, University Hospital Zealand, 0045 59484270,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Fertilitetsklinikken, University Hospital Zealand, 0045 59484270,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 Sep 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
27 Feb 2021
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
27 Feb 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Investigate change of microbiome in population after treatment with Vivag Plus or placebo over the course of two months.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
We used an intervention with a known side-effect profile and known harmless side-effects.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
15 Apr 2019
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 77
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
77
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
77
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
77
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Patient with an unfavourable vaginal microbiome were offered to participate in the study. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Study population Women aged 18–40 years referred to the Fertility Clinic who prior to fertility treatment had been diagnosed with an unfavorable vaginal microbiome were invited to participate in the study | |||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
77 | |||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
74 | |||||||||
Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
|
||||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
Pregnancy: 1 | |||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
COVID-19: 1 | |||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
Consent withdrawn by subject: 1 | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial period (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer | |||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
The pharmacy of the Capital Region of Denmark conducted the randomization using a computer-based randomization program (www.randomization.com) and labeled all drug packages
to ensure blinding of both clinicians and participants to the content of the packages. Unblinding was not carried out until after completion of the study when all data had been entered and the statistical analysis plan c
|
|||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
lactobacillus treatment | |||||||||
Arm description |
The intervention consisted of gelatin capsules containing more than 108 CFU of Lactobacillus gasseri EB01 DSM14869 and more than 108 CFU Lactobacillus rhamnosus PB01 DSM14870. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Vivag
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, hard
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Vaginal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1 vaginal capsule pr day (before nighttime) for 10 days
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
placebo group | |||||||||
Arm description |
The placebo formulation was identical in appearance and texture to the study intervention but devoid of bacterial strains. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
placebo
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, hard
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Vaginal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1 vaginal capsule pr day (before nighttime) for 10 days.
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: 77 patients were included in the study but three patient dropped out before the intervention. Therefor did they neither received the intervention og had the first and second sample (primary- and secondary outcome), and they were not included in the analyses. This according to the prespecified protocol. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
lactobacillus treatment
|
||
Reporting group description |
The intervention consisted of gelatin capsules containing more than 108 CFU of Lactobacillus gasseri EB01 DSM14869 and more than 108 CFU Lactobacillus rhamnosus PB01 DSM14870. | ||
Reporting group title |
placebo group
|
||
Reporting group description |
The placebo formulation was identical in appearance and texture to the study intervention but devoid of bacterial strains. |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Improvement in the vaginal microbiome after intervention | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary outcome measure was dichotomous: improvement or no improvement in vaginal microbiome profile occurring in the period between the baseline sample and the first sample after the intervention. An improvement was defined as a shift in profile from low to medium, medium to high, or low to high, whereas no improvement was defined as no change, high to medium, or medium to low
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
For each patient the timeframe was from 1-3 month: From baseline sample to the first sample after intervention.
This covering the 15th of April 2019 to the 27th of February 2021.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - One sample could not be analysed. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Chi-square | |||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
lactobacillus treatment v placebo group
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
73
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
Chi-squared | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.72
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.38 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.38 | |||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Improvement in the vaginal microbiome after intervention one menstrual cycle after intervention | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Improvement in the vaginal microbiome was defined as a change in the microbiome profile from low to medium, low to high, or medium to high from the baseline sample to the second sample (secondary outcome) or from the baseline sample to the second sample (secondary outcome), whereas no improvement was defined as no change or deterioration.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
For each patient the timeline was from baseline sample to the second sample (the menstrual cycle after the intervention).
This covering from the 15th of April 2019 to the 27th of February 2021.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - One sample could not be analysed and one sample could not be collected due to COVID-19. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Chi-square | |||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
lactobacillus treatment v placebo group
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
72
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
Chi-squared | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.92
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.47 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.8 | |||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From the inclusion of the first patient to the last patients last visit (=finished with the study), which was the second sample visit (secondary outcome):
15th of april 2019 to 27th of February 2021.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Throughout the study participants will be questioned about adverse events (AE=an unexpected medical event) and adverse reactions (AR= an unexpected/unintended response to a medical product) at every visit to the clinic. AE and AR will be registered in the trial clinical case reports and reported to the Sponsor within 24 hours.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
The Danish Medicines | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
89,stk 2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Lactobacillus group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The lactobacillus treatment will consist of Vivag Plus vaginal supplements. The vaginal capsules consist of cultures of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The placebo formulation was identical in appearance and texture to the study intervention but devoid of bacterial strains. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |