E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Liver cirrhosis with small oesophageal varices |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Liver disease with scarring of the liver tissue; and swelling of the veins within the gullet due to raised blood pressure of the main blood vessels carrying blood to the liver. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Body processes [G] - Digestive System and Oral Physiological Phenomena [G10] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10024667 |
E.1.2 | Term | Liver cirrhosis |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004871 |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 21.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10055489 |
E.1.2 | Term | Esophageal varices in cirrhosis of liver |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004856 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
1.To determine the clinical effectiveness of the reduction in variceal haemorrhage in patients treated with carvedilol versus placebo at 3 years. 2.To determine the cost-effectiveness of Carvedilol in patients with small oesophageal varices.
|
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
1.At 1-year after participant recruitment opens, to assess feasibility of: recruitment, retention acceptability, with progression criteria outlined in internal pilot 1. 2.At 2.5-years, to estimate the control arm 1-year variceal bleed rate, with progression criteria outlined in internal pilot 2. 3.To determine additional clinical benefits of Carvedilol versus placebo for: reduction of variceal size progression, need to initiate endoscopic management of varices (endoscopic band ligation (EBL)), deterioration in liver function (assessed by MELD score and Child-Pugh grade) and all-cause mortality. 4.To investigate how this is best delivered in primary care, by general practice, using qualitative approaches and GP interviews to examine barriers and enablers to implementation.
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Yes |
E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives |
Mechanism of beta-blockade on bacterial translocation in portal hypertension (MBOP) study. Version 1, 22Nov2019 Primary Objective: To characterise bacterial translocation and the microbial-immuno-metabolic response in patients with cirrhosis and small varices receiving carvedilol or placebo with the aim of demonstrating a reduction in bacterial translocation and inflammatory response due to carvedilol resulting in reduced all cause decompensation. |
|
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
o Age 18 years and over
o Cirrhosis and portal hypertension, defined by any 2 of the following: 1) Characteristic clinical examination findings; one or more of: Characteristic liver function tests •Haematological panel •Coagulation profile abnormalities 2)Characteristic radiological findings; one or more of •Heterogeneous liver with irregular contour •splenomegaly •ascites •varices •recanalized umbilical vein 3) FibroScan liver stiffness measurement >15 kPa without other explanation 4) Fibrosis score > stage 4 on liver biopsy (presence of a relevant fibrosis score by biopsy does not require additional clinical examination / radiological / FibroScan supporting evidence)
oSmall oesophageal varices diagnosed within the last 6 months, defined as ≤5 mm in diameter or varices which completely disappear on moderate insufflation at gastroscopy.
oNot received a beta-blocker in the last week
oCapacity to provide informed consent
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
o Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension o Medium/large oesophageal varices (current or history [decreasing in size without curative therapy), defined as >5 mm in diameter o Gastric (IGV and GOV2), duodenal, rectal varices with or without evidence of recent bleeding. For gastric varices, this includes: IGV-1 and IGV-2 (isolated gastric varices) GOV2 (gastric varices continuing into the cardia) Note GOV1 (gastric varices continuing into the lesser curve) are not an exclusion if present with small oesophageal varices o Previous variceal haemorrhage o Previous band ligation or glue injection of oesophageal and/or gastric varices o Red signs accompanying varices at endoscopy o Known intolerance to beta blockers o Contraindications to beta blocker use: • Heart rate <50 bpm • Known 2nd degree or higher heart block • Sick sinus syndrome • Systolic blood pressure <85 mmHg • Chronic airways obstruction (asthma/COPD) • Floppy Iris Syndrome • CYP2D6 Poor Metaboliser • History of cardiogenic shock • History of severe hypersensitivity reaction to beta-blockers • Untreated phaeochromocytoma • Severe peripheral vascular disease • Prinzmetal angina • NYHA IV heart failure o Unable to provide informed consent o Child Pugh C cirrhosis o Already receiving a beta-blocker for another reason that cannot be discontinued o Graft cirrhosis post liver transplantation o Evidence of active malignancy without curative therapy planned o Pregnant or lactating women o Women of child bearing potential not willing to use adequate contraception during the period of IMP dosing (1 week washout period) o Patients who have been on a CTIMP within the previous 3 months
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
1. Time to first variceal haemorrhage (as defined by Baveno IV criteria). 2. Cost-utility of NSBB over trial follow-up to 3 years.
|
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
1. Estimation of the 1, and 3-year oesophogeal variceal bleed rate by allocation, and associated number needed to treat. 2. Progression to oesophageal medium/large varices at gastroscopy requiring clinical intervention. 3. Development of gastric, duodenal or ectopic varices 4. Composite of oesophageal progression in variceal size and bleeding as per 1 and 2 by 3 years. 5. Progression of gastric, duodenal or ectopic varices 6. Survival (Overall, liver-related, cardiovascular-related). 7. Quality of life, EQ-5D-5L. 8. Decompensation as evidenced by one or more of the following: • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (ascitic fluid cell PMN cell count >250/mm3). • New hepatic encephalopathy (Defined by West-Haven Grade >1 (overt HE)). • New or worsening ascites defined by clinical examination or ultrasound. 9. Progression in Child Pugh grade. 10. Progression in MELD score. |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Baseline to 3 years unless explicitely stated above |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | Yes |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes |
E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |
Triple blind (participant, investigator, analyst) |
|
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 39 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 5 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 9 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 5 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 9 |