Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2018-002930-19
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:XBR1001
    National Competent Authority:Latvia - SAM
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Completed
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2019-02-20
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedLatvia - SAM
    A.2EudraCT number2018-002930-19
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A Phase III Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Xlucane versus Lucentis® in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    A study to determine the effectiveness and safety of the study drug Xlucane compared to Lucentis® in people with the wet form of age-related macular degeneration (wAMD). (The active ingredient in both Xlucane and Lucentis® is ranibizumab. Neither you nor the study doctors will know which treatment you receive).
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    Xplore
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberXBR1001
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorXbrane Biopharma
    B.1.3.4CountrySweden
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportXbrane Biopharma
    B.4.2CountrySweden
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationXbrane Biopharma
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointDina Jurman
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressBanvaktsvägen 22
    B.5.3.2Town/ citySolna
    B.5.3.3Post codeSE-171 48
    B.5.3.4CountrySweden
    B.5.4Telephone number+46 70 266 84 58
    B.5.6E-maildina.jurman@xbrane.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameXlucane (proposed Ranibizumab biosimilar)
    D.3.2Product code Xlucane
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravitreal use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNRanibizumab
    D.3.9.1CAS number 347396-82-1
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeXlucane
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameRANIBIZUMAB
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB22314
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number0.5
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Lucentis®
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderNovartis Europharm Limited
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameLucentis®
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravitreal use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNLucentis®
    D.3.9.1CAS number 347396-82-1
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameRANIBIZUMAB
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB22314
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number0.5
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Wet Age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Wet AMD
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Eye Diseases [C11]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 20.0
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10071129
    E.1.2Term Neovascular age-related macular degeneration
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10015919 - Eye disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that the biosimilar candidate Xlucane is equivalent to Lucentis® in subjects with wAMD as assessed by the change in BCVA from Baseline to Week 8.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    The secondary objectives of the study are as follows:
    • Evaluate the efficacy of Xlucane vs Lucentis® in subjects with wAMD based on central foveal thickness (CFT) measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), area of choroidal neovascularization, and presence of leakage assessed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA)
    • Evaluate the safety of Xlucane vs Lucentis®
    • Evaluate the systemic exposure of Xlucane vs Lucentis® in subjects participating in pharmacokinetics (PK) evaluation
    • Evaluate immunogenicity (ie, anti-ranibizumab antibodies and NAb) of Xlucane vs Lucentis®
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study Yes
    E.2.3.1Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives
    A PK substudy is incorporated in the proposed phase III clinical trial to permit an assessment for similarity in systemic exposure following Xlucane and Lucentis® administration.
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. Written and signed informed consent form obtained at Screening before any study related procedures are performed.
    2. Willingness and ability to undertake all scheduled visits and assessments as judged by the investigator.
    3. Newly diagnosed, active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye. Note: active CNV indicates the presence of leakage as evidenced by fluorescein angiography (FA) and intra- or subretinal fluid as evidenced by optical coherence tomography (OCT), which must be confirmed by the central reading center during Screening:
    a. The area of CNV must be ≥ 50% of the total lesion area in the study eye, and
    b. Total lesion area ≤ 9.0 disc areas (DA) in size (including blood, scars, and neovascularization) as assessed by FA in the study eye
    4. BCVA of ≤ 73 and ≥ 49 ETDRS letter score in the study eye using the ETDRS chart (20/40 to 20/100 Snellen equivalent) at Screening.
    5. Fellow eye should not be expected to need any anti-VEGF treatment for the duration of study participation.
    6. Age ≥ 50 years at Screening.
    7. Male and female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to completely abstain or agree to use an appropriate method of contraception from the time of signing the informed consent form and for the duration of study participation through 3 months after the last dose of study drug.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1. Any previous intervention, including pharmacological treatment, laser, and/or surgery for wAMD in either eye; (Exception: Vitamin supplementation for AMD prevention).
    2. Any previous vitreoretinal surgery in the study eye for any cause.
    3. Any previous IVT treatment, including any anti-VEGF medications, steroids, and/or any other investigational medication in either eye.
    4. The use of long-acting steroids, either systemic or intraocular in any eye, in the 18 months before planned initiation of study treatment. (Note: Current or planned Iluvien® [fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal], implantation during the study is prohibited.)
    5. Subfoveal fibrosis, atrophy, or scarring extending > 50% of total lesion area in the study eye as assessed by the investigator at Screening and confirmed by the central reading center prior to Randomization.
    6. Choroidal neovascularization in either eye due to non-AMD causes (eg, DME, RVO, ocular histoplasmosis, trauma) as assessed by FA and confirmed by central reading center.
    7. Active or recent (within 28 days prior to Randomization) intraocular, extraocular, and periocular inflammation or infection in either eye.
    8. History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye.
    9. Infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye.
    10. Unmedicated intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 30 mm Hg at Screening in either eye.
    11. Topical ocular corticosteroids administered for ≥ 30 consecutive days in the study eye within 90 days prior to Screening.
    12. Spherical equivalent of the refractive error in the study eye demonstrating more than 8 diopters of myopia.
    13. Corneal transplant or corneal dystrophy in the study eye.
    14. History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the study eye.
    15. History of macular hole in the study eye.
    16. Retinal pigment epithelial tear or rip involving the macula in the study eye as assessed by FA and confirmed by the central reading center.
    17. Current vitreous hemorrhage in the study eye.
    18. Subretinal hemorrhage that is ≥ 50% of the total lesion area in the study eye, or if the subretinal hemorrhage involves the fovea is 1 or more DA (≥ 2.54 mm2) in size in the study eye, as assessed by FA and confirmed by the central reading center.
    19. Other intraocular surgery (including cataract surgery) in the study eye within the 3 months prior to Baseline. The yttrium aluminum garnet [YAG] posterior
    capsulotomy is allowed no later than 4 weeks prior to Screening.
    20. Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye (eg, cataract or diabetic retinopathy) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could require treatment during the study period to prevent or treat loss of visual acuity.
    21. Significant media opacities (including cataract) in the study eye interfering with BCVA assessment or fundus imaging (FA/FP/OCT).
    22. Aphakia or absence of the posterior capsule in the study eye, unless it occurred as a result of a YAG posterior capsulotomy in association with prior posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
    23. Presence of advanced glaucoma or optic neuropathy that involves or threatens the central visual field in the study eye (as judged by the investigator).
    24. History of glaucoma filtering surgery or ALT in the study eye (Exception: Laser iridotomy and SLT are allowed).
    25. Uncontrolled ocular glaucoma or hypertension in the study eye, defined as IOP ≥ 25 mm Hg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication.
    26. Any previous systemic anti-VEGF treatment (eg, bevacizumab).
    27. Contraindication for Lucentis® (hypersensitivity to ranibizumab or to any of the study treatment excipients).
    28. Current treatment for active systemic infection.
    29. Females who are pregnant, nursing, planning a pregnancy during the study, or of childbearing potential and not using a reliable method of contraception and/or not willing to use a reliable method of contraception during their participation in the study. A pregnancy test administered to women of
    childbearing potential at the Screening Visit (prior to treatment) must be negative for the patient to receive study medication.
    30. Participation in another clinical trial within the previous 3 months or any other clinical trial of anti-angiogenic drugs.
    31. Reasonable suspicion of other disease or condition that might render the subject at a high risk of treatment complications or otherwise confound interpretation of the study results (as judged by the investigator).
    32. PK subgroup only: Contraindication for additional blood sampling (as judged by the investigator).
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    1. Efficacy Endpoint
    The change in BCVA letters at Week 8 compared to Baseline using the ETDRS protocol will be analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). An MMRM approach will be fitted with geographical region of the country where enrolled, visit, eye color (light iris vs dark iris), treatment, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, with the baseline BCVA letters and baseline BCVA letters-by-visit interaction as a covariates. The treatment differences from the model at Week 8 will be evaluated and a 95% two-sided CI for the least squares mean difference between groups will be calculated. To prove the 2 products to be biosimilar, the confidence limits for this difference have to be within the equivalence margin of 3 letters in the PPS.

    Other Safety Endpoints
    The following endpoints (as well as the change from Baseline when applicable) will be summarized:
    • Injection site reactions
    • Vital signs (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure)
    • Clinical chemistry (creatinine, AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total bilirubin, albumin, total protein, sodium, potassium, chloride, glucose, uric acid, total cholesterol, triglycerides, calcium, and phosphorus)
    • Immunogenicity (ie, anti-ranibizumab antibodies and NAb)

    3. Pharmacokinetics
    The PK data analysis will be performed using the PK Set. The ranibizumab PK concentrations will be summarised by treatment and listed individually. Descriptive statistics on the PK parameters (C0, predose; C1, time point 23 hours [± 60 minutes] after the first dose on Day 1; and C6, time point 23 ours [± 60 minutes] after the sixth dose on Week 20) will be presented.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    When all subjects have completed their 6-month assessments, an unmasked analysis of efficacy and safety endpoints as well as PK and immunogenicity will be performed. The aim of this analysis is to obtain results without waiting for the full follow-up of the subjects. This analysis will not affect the further conduct of the study.
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
    The following continuous secondary endpoints will be analyzed in a similar fashion to the primary efficacy endpoint:
    • Change in BCVA letters at Week 4, Week 12, Week 16, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 52 compared to Baseline using the ETDRS protocol
    • Change in total size of choroidal neovascular leakage area in the study eye measured by FA at Week 24 and Week 52 compared to Baseline
    • Change in total size of choroidal neovascularization in the study eye measured by FA at Week 24 and Week 52 compared to Baseline
    • Change in Central Foveal Thickness (CFT) in the study eye measured by OCT at Week 2, Week 4, Week 8,Week 16, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 52 compared to Baseline
    • Changes in the size and/or number of intraretinal cystoid space (cysts), subretinal fluid, and retinal pigment epithelium detachments in the study eye measured by qualitative morphology-based OCT
    The following secondary endpoints will be analysed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel test and the 95% stratified Newcombe CI (by randomization stratification group) will be presented for the difference in proportions between groups.
    • Percentage of subjects with loss of <15 letters using ETDRS, evaluated as change at Week 4, Week 8, Week 24, and Week 52 compared to Baseline in the study eye
    • Percentage of subjects with gain of ≥15 letters using ETDRS, evaluated as change at Week 4, Week 8, Week 24, and Week 52 compared to Baseline in the study eye
    • Percentage of subjects without intra- or subretinal fluid in the study eye (ie, completely dry) at Week 24 and Week 52
    • Percentage of subjects with retinal pigment
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Timepoints for evaluation of secondary endpoints are listed in the endpoint description above.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic Yes
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence Yes
    E.6.9Dose response Yes
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others Yes
    E.6.13.1Other scope of the trial description
    Immunogenicity
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) Yes
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other Yes
    E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
    Lucentis
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned0
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA60
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Bulgaria
    Czech Republic
    Estonia
    Hungary
    India
    Israel
    Latvia
    Lithuania
    Poland
    Romania
    Russian Federation
    Slovakia
    Spain
    Ukraine
    United States
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months10
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years1
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months10
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 180
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 400
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state15
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 210
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 580
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2019-05-13
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2019-04-23
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
    P.Date of the global end of the trial2021-11-11
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 03 11:28:34 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA