Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43861   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    An investigator-blinded, active controlled, randomized, two parallel group, multi-dose clinical trial to prove the non-inferior efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum P 17630 100.000.000 CFU soft vaginal capsules (Proge Farm s.r.l.) versus miconazole nitrate 400 mg vaginal soft capsules in vaginal candidiasis.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2018-003095-12
    Trial protocol
    BG  
    Global end of trial date
    05 May 2020

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    13 Dec 2021
    First version publication date
    13 Dec 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    LPP17630-C-018
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Proge Farm s.r.l.
    Sponsor organisation address
    Largo Guido Donegani 4/A, Novara, Italy, 28100
    Public contact
    Clinical Trials Information, R&D Solutions srl, info@rdsolutions.it
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Trials Information, R&D Solutions srl, info@rdsolutions.it
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    05 May 2020
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    14 Apr 2020
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    05 May 2020
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority efficacy of LJ LACTO - Lactobacillus plantarum P 17630 100.000.000 CFU (Test) versus DAKTARIN - miconazole nitrate 400 mg soft capsules in patients with clinically symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis. The evaluation of the following symptoms: pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness will be done using a daily VAS scale.
    Protection of trial subjects
    No protections were established in the study protocol
    Background therapy
    No treatments were used across all arm/groups in the trial
    Evidence for comparator
    Daktarin 400 mg soft gelatine capsules is indicated for the local treatment of vulvovaginal candidosis and superinfections due to Gram-positive bacteria. Furthermore the comparator present the same pharmaceutical form as the Test and it present a comparable treatment period to the studied product.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    11 Sep 2019
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 200
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    200
    EEA total number of subjects
    200
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    200
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Start date:11th September 2019 End date:26th February 2020 MC Comac Medical, 3 Urvich str, 1612 Sofia–Bulgaria; MC-1-Sevlievo EOOD, 60 Nikola Petkov Str., 5402 Sevlievo–Bulgaria; MBAL Trakia, bulevard Patriarh Evtimiy 84, 6004 Stara Zagora–Yugoiztochen–Bulgaria; Deva Maria University Hosp., Al. Stamboliiski str., 8000 Burgas, Vetren-Bulgaria

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    The present study was carried-out in 200 female patients with a medical history, physical and neurological examinations that support a clinical diagnosis of clinically symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    200
    Number of subjects completed
    200

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Experimental arm Reference
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    DAKTARIN® - miconazole nitrate 400 mg soft vaginal capsules
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Reference
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Vaginal capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Vaginal use
    Dosage and administration details
    DAKTARIN® - miconazole nitrate 400 mg soft vaginal capsules (Reference) by vaginal route each day, for a period of 3 consecutive days starting from the evening of Visit 1.During Visit 2, if the physician judged their complete recovery the patients stopped the therapy, otherwise their continue the assigned treatment for other 3 days

    Arm title
    Experimental arm Test
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    LJ LACTO - Lactobacillus plantarum P 17630 100.000.000 CFU soft vaginal capsules
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Test
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Vaginal capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Vaginal use
    Dosage and administration details
    LJ LACTO - Lactobacillus plantarum P 17630 100.000.000 CFU soft vaginal capsules (Test) by vaginal route each day, for a period of 3 consecutive days starting from the evening of Visit 1.During Visit 2, if the physician judged their complete recovery the patients stopped the therapy, otherwise their continue the assigned treatment for other 3 days

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test
    Started
    100
    100
    Completed
    97
    99
    Not completed
    3
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    3
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    overall trial
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    overall trial Total
    Number of subjects
    200 200
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    200 200
        From 65-84 years
    0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    33.31 ± 6.39 -
    Gender categorical
    Female patients with a medical history, physical and neurological examinations that support a clinical diagnosis of clinically symptomatic Vulvovaginal candidiasis were selected for the study.
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    200 200
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Visit 1
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Eligibility criteria for diagnosis of VVC: clinical symptoms (pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness)

    Subject analysis set title
    Visit 2
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness

    Subject analysis set title
    Visit 3
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness

    Subject analysis set title
    Visit 4
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness

    Subject analysis sets values
    Visit 1 Visit 2 Visit 3 Visit 4
    Number of subjects
    200
    198
    152
    196
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    200
    198
    152
    196
        From 65-84 years
    0
    0
    0
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    33.31 ± 6.39
    33.38 ± 6.37
    33.08 ± 6.43
    33.37 ± 6.41
    Gender categorical
    Female patients with a medical history, physical and neurological examinations that support a clinical diagnosis of clinically symptomatic Vulvovaginal candidiasis were selected for the study.
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    200
    198
    152
    196

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Experimental arm Reference
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    Experimental arm Test
    Reporting group description
    -

    Subject analysis set title
    Visit 1
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Eligibility criteria for diagnosis of VVC: clinical symptoms (pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness)

    Subject analysis set title
    Visit 2
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness

    Subject analysis set title
    Visit 3
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness

    Subject analysis set title
    Visit 4
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    pruritus, discharge, pain, dryness

    Primary: Pruritus comparison V1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pruritus comparison V1
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Visit 1
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 1
    Number of subjects analysed
    100
    100
    200
    Units: VAS scale
        number (not applicable)
    100
    100
    200
    Statistical analysis title
    Pruritus Statistical significant difference V1
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    200
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.058
         upper limit
    0.5184
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Pruritus comparison V2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pruritus comparison V2
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V2
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    99
    99
    198
    Units: VAS scale
        number (not applicable)
    99
    99
    198
    Statistical analysis title
    Pruritus Statistical significant difference V2
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Test v Experimental arm Reference
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    198
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.9816
         upper limit
    0.2341
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Pruritus comparison V3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pruritus comparison V3
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V3
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 3
    Number of subjects analysed
    73
    79
    152
    Units: VAS scale
        number (not applicable)
    73
    79
    152
    Statistical analysis title
    Pruritus Statistical significant difference V3
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    152
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.8069
         upper limit
    0.0421
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Pruritus comparison V4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pruritus comparison V4
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V4
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 4
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    99
    196
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    97
    99
    196
    Statistical analysis title
    Pruritus Statistical significant difference V4
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    196
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.5194
         upper limit
    0.1526
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Discharge comparison V1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Discharge comparison V1
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V1
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    100
    100
    200
    Units: VAS scale
        number (not applicable)
    100
    100
    200
    Statistical analysis title
    Discharge Statistical significant difference V1
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    200
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.6169
         upper limit
    0.7369
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Discharge comparison V2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Discharge comparison V2
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V2
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    99
    99
    198
    Units: VAS scale
        number (not applicable)
    99
    99
    198
    Statistical analysis title
    Discharge Statistical significant difference V2
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    198
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.8185
         upper limit
    0.3034
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Discharge comparison V3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Discharge comparison V3
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V3
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 3
    Number of subjects analysed
    73
    79
    152
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    73
    79
    152
    Statistical analysis title
    Discharge Statistical significant difference V3
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    152
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.6891
         upper limit
    0.145
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Dscharge comparison V4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Dscharge comparison V4
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V4
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 4
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    99
    196
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    97
    99
    196
    Statistical analysis title
    Discharge Statistical significant difference V4
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    196
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.4041
         upper limit
    0.1446
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Pain comparison V1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pain comparison V1
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V1
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 1
    Number of subjects analysed
    100
    100
    200
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    100
    100
    200
    Statistical analysis title
    Pain Statistical significant difference V1
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    200
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.855
         upper limit
    0.795
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Pain comparison V2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pain comparison V2
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V2
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    99
    99
    198
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    99
    99
    198
    Statistical analysis title
    Pain Statistical significant difference V2
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    198
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.7865
         upper limit
    0.1401
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Pain comparison V3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pain comparison V3
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V3
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 3
    Number of subjects analysed
    73
    79
    152
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    73
    79
    152
    Statistical analysis title
    Pain Statistical significant difference V3
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    152
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.1669
         upper limit
    0.7814
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Pain comparison V4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pain comparison V4
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V4
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 4
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    99
    196
    Units: VAS scale
        number (not applicable)
    97
    99
    196
    Statistical analysis title
    Pain Statistical significant difference V4
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Test v Experimental arm Reference
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    196
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.3912
         upper limit
    0.1024
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Dryness comparison V1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Dryness comparison V1
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V1
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 1
    Number of subjects analysed
    100
    100
    200
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    100
    100
    200
    Statistical analysis title
    Dryness Statistical significant difference V1
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    200
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.5895
         upper limit
    1.35
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Dryness comparison V2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Dryness comparison V2
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V2
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    99
    99
    198
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    99
    99
    198
    Statistical analysis title
    Dryness Statistical significant difference V2
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    198
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.5992
         upper limit
    0.3567
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Dryness comparison V3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Dryness comparison V3
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V3
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 3
    Number of subjects analysed
    73
    79
    152
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    73
    79
    152
    Statistical analysis title
    Dryness Statistical significant difference V3
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    152
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.2207
         upper limit
    0.0959
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Primary: Dryness comparison V4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Dryness comparison V4
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    V4
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 4
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    99
    198
    Units: VAS Scale
        number (not applicable)
    97
    99
    198
    Statistical analysis title
    Dryness Statistical significant difference V4
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    196
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.327
         upper limit
    0.0063
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Secondary: Interleukin IL6 comparison V1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Interleukin IL6 comparison V1
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    V1
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 1
    Number of subjects analysed
    99
    100
    199
    Units: pg/mL
    99
    100
    199
    Statistical analysis title
    IL6 Statistical significant difference V1
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    199
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -10.38
         upper limit
    17.05
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Secondary: Interleukin IL6 comparison V2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Interleukin IL6 comparison V2
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    V2
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    90
    186
    Units: pg/mL
    96
    90
    186
    Statistical analysis title
    IL6 Statistical significant difference V2
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    186
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.825
         upper limit
    6.281
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Secondary: Interleukin IL6 comparison V3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Interleukin IL6 comparison V3
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    V3
    End point values
    Experimental arm Reference Experimental arm Test Visit 3
    Number of subjects analysed
    68
    70
    138
    Units: pg/mL
    68
    70
    138
    Statistical analysis title
    IL6 Statistical significant difference V3
    Comparison groups
    Experimental arm Reference v Experimental arm Test
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    138
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.386
         upper limit
    3.17
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Adverse events were evaluated on Visit 1, Visit2, Visit 3 and Follow-up.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    21.0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: No non-serious and/or serious adverse events were recorded through the entire study period neither by the investigator neither by the patients.

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 25 16:55:22 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA