Clinical Trial Results:
Low dose catheter directed thrombolysis for acute intermediary-high risk pulmonary embolism.
|
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2018-003564-31 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
21 Jan 2025
|
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
22 Jan 2026
|
First version publication date |
22 Jan 2026
|
Other versions |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
|
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
190580-001
|
||
|
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03854266 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
|
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Aarhus University Hospital
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
|
||
Public contact |
Asger Andersen, Aarhus University Hospital, 45 26363226, asger.andersen@clin.au.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Asger Andersen, Aarhus University Hospital, 45 26363226, asger.andersen@clin.au.dk
|
||
|
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
|
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
21 Jan 2025
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
21 Jan 2025
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
21 Jan 2025
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
|
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To investigate if low dose catheter directed fibrinolysis for 2 h is superior to unfractioned heparin with regards to unloading the right ventricle in acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study adhered to Danish laws of ethics and management of personal data. The study was approved by “Datatilsynet”, the Regional Ethics Committee and Lægemiddelstyrelsen. The study adhered to the standards of good clinical practice and was monitored by the local GCP unit. The study has payed the outmost respect to the included patients mental and physical health and their personal integrity.
The patients included in the trial was exposed to an extra CTA which exposes the patient to 4-8 msievert which approximates the background radiation a person receives over 3 years and increases the risk of a fatal cancer from 25% to 25.045%. Patients randomized to CDT received an additional 1-2 msievert from the fluoroscopy. The patients included in this study had an estimated 30 day mortality of 15% and solid preliminary data suggest the treatment to be effective and safe. Therefore it is the investigators opinion that the benefits of doing this study outweighed the risks.
The treatment is considered safe and previous studies suggest that this approach may be better than conventional therapy. All patients will be monitored closely during the study period and in the catheterization laboratorium when treated with low dose heparin. The invasive procedure will be performed by a trained invasive cardiologist whose expertise is to catheterize the pulmonary circulation. Using the low dose short period regime suggested in this protocol there have not been reported any bleedings in clinical studies.
|
||
Background therapy |
Standard unfractionated heparin infusion. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
The treatment of low and intermediate-low risk pulmonary embolism patients is anticoagulation and for high-risk patients treatment it is reperfusion. These treatment strategies are well documented, but in patients with intermediate-high risk the choice of treatment is more tricky. Anticoagulation does not introduce a quick relief of the struggling right ventricle and despite being effective at reducing thrombus burden, the risk of major bleedings outweighs the benefit of systemic thrombolysis. The optimal treatment should quickly reduce thrombus mass without increasing bleeding risk. Based on this principle, local catheter based trombolysis (CDT) could be ideal. In combination with low frequency ultrasound, CDT unloads the right ventricle more efficiently than anticoagulation and without increasing bleeding risk. And it has been reported to be as effective to use a low dose of the fibrinolytic agent for a shorter period of time making the approach more applicable in the clinical setting. The ultrasound assisted CDT is however more complicated to use and more expensive than conventional CDT and it is highly speculative if ultrasound have any additive effect to CDT alone . But, there are no data from randomized trials that have investigated the effect of CDT in PE. This wasthe first randomized trial to investigate if low dose CDT is superior to anticoagulation in PE. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Apr 2019
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
|
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 60
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
60
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
60
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
26
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
34
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Between August 2020 and October 2024, 60 patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE were randomized to receive UFH plus CDT (n = 30) or UFH alone (n = 30). | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Patients presenting with acute PE at one of the hospitals in the two Danish regions were eligible if they were older than 17 years and younger than 81 years, had symptom onset within 14 days before diagnosis, and had acute intermediate-high risk PE according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall study period (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Single blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Data analyst [1] | ||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Analyst of CT data was blinded to the study arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
Unfractionated Heparin alone | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Standard treatment is unfractionated heparin infusion alone. Treatment is initiated at the time of study inclusion. Initial dose is 80 IE/kg bolus followed by 18 IE/kg as continuous infusion with dose adjustment every 6 h and once daily when APTT is 1.5-2.3 times control value. Dose adjustment is guided by APTT according to ESC guidelines | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
Catheter Directed Thormbolysis + Unfractionated Heparin | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients randomized to CDT were transferred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory and treated within 48 hours of PE diagnosis. The procedure was performed by experienced interventional cardiologists under continuous hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring. Two Uni*Fuse side-hole infusion catheter (AngioDynamics, USA) (one for each lung) were placed for all patients. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) was infused at a dose of 4 mg per catheter over 2 hours (2 mg/h, diluted in saline at an infusion rate of 35 mL/h). Patients also recieved UFH similar to controls. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Actilyse
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Alteplase
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solution for solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravascular use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A continuous infusion of Actilyse 2 mg/h mixed in saline for an infusion rate of 35 ml/h in two catheters administered to the pulmonary circulation for a total time of 2 h. Total dosage of 8 mg.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Actilyse
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Alteplase
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solution for solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravascular use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A continuous infusion of Actilyse 2 mg/h mixed in saline for an infusion rate of 35 ml/h in two catheters administered to the pulmonary circulation for a total time of 2 h. Total dosage of 8 mg.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [1] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial. Justification: The person analyzing the CT scans at baseline and 24 hour follow up was blinded to the treatment arm. The investigators and patients were not blinded. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Unfractionated Heparin alone
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Standard treatment is unfractionated heparin infusion alone. Treatment is initiated at the time of study inclusion. Initial dose is 80 IE/kg bolus followed by 18 IE/kg as continuous infusion with dose adjustment every 6 h and once daily when APTT is 1.5-2.3 times control value. Dose adjustment is guided by APTT according to ESC guidelines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Catheter Directed Thormbolysis + Unfractionated Heparin
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients randomized to CDT were transferred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory and treated within 48 hours of PE diagnosis. The procedure was performed by experienced interventional cardiologists under continuous hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring. Two Uni*Fuse side-hole infusion catheter (AngioDynamics, USA) (one for each lung) were placed for all patients. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) was infused at a dose of 4 mg per catheter over 2 hours (2 mg/h, diluted in saline at an infusion rate of 35 mL/h). Patients also recieved UFH similar to controls. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Unfractionated Heparin alone
|
||
Reporting group description |
Standard treatment is unfractionated heparin infusion alone. Treatment is initiated at the time of study inclusion. Initial dose is 80 IE/kg bolus followed by 18 IE/kg as continuous infusion with dose adjustment every 6 h and once daily when APTT is 1.5-2.3 times control value. Dose adjustment is guided by APTT according to ESC guidelines | ||
Reporting group title |
Catheter Directed Thormbolysis + Unfractionated Heparin
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients randomized to CDT were transferred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory and treated within 48 hours of PE diagnosis. The procedure was performed by experienced interventional cardiologists under continuous hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring. Two Uni*Fuse side-hole infusion catheter (AngioDynamics, USA) (one for each lung) were placed for all patients. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) was infused at a dose of 4 mg per catheter over 2 hours (2 mg/h, diluted in saline at an infusion rate of 35 mL/h). Patients also recieved UFH similar to controls. | ||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Right ventricular to left ventricular diameter ratio | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Change from baseline to 24 hours follow up compared between the two arms.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Paired t-test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Catheter Directed Thormbolysis + Unfractionated Heparin v Unfractionated Heparin alone
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
58
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.01 | ||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
CT obstruction score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Change in obstruction score from baseline to 24 hours follow up.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Paired t-test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Catheter Directed Thormbolysis + Unfractionated Heparin v Unfractionated Heparin alone
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
58
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.26 | ||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Mortality | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
30 day mortality
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Major bleedings | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 hours
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Minor bleeding | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 hours
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
3 months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
None | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
UFH alone
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
UFH + CDT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
| Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
| Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
| Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
| None reported | |||||||