Clinical Trial Results:
Pilot dose conversion study of extended release tacrolimus, Envarsus from standard twice daily tacrolimus in paediatric renal transplant recipients.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2018-003595-13 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
31 Jan 2023
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Feb 2024
|
First version publication date |
08 Feb 2024
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Abstract |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
17CS079
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Derby Road, Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
|
||
Public contact |
Dr Jon Jin Kim, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, jonjin.kim@nuh.nhs.uk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Dr Jon Jin Kim, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, jonjin.kim@nuh.nhs.uk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
20 Oct 2023
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
31 Jan 2023
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
31 Jan 2023
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
This pilot study aims to provide dosing guidelines for the conversion of twice daily preparations of tacrolimus to Envarsus. To do this, we will compare pharmacokinetics of Envarsus to standard twice daily tacrolimus. The following values will be obtained:
1) Maximum concentration (Cmax)
2) Time to maximum concentration (Tmax)
3) 24 hour area under the curve (AUC)
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Participants complied with the study protocol.
Serious adverse events were reported and assessed according to stipulated time frames.
Study was monitored by the data monitoring committee.
|
||
Background therapy |
Patients continued all other concomittent medication including other immunosuppression as directed by the medical care team. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
20 Jan 2020
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 5
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
5
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
0
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
5
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
13 patients were screened and 7 patients consented. 2 patients did not proceed to the trial: 1 patient passed the age of 18 when the trial was paused during COVID-19 pandemic. 1 patient (under 11 years of age) developed unstable kidney function before any trial procedures (other than consenting) and did not start the study. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
13 patients were screened by the direct care medical team based on review of hospital records. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Twice daily tacrolimus
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Twice daily tacrolimus | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tacrolimus (immediate release)
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
Adoport
|
||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, hard
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Baseline dose based on current management by direct care team.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||
Period 2 title |
Extended release tacrolimus
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Extended release tacrolimus | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tacrolimus, prolonged release
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
L04AD02
|
||||||
Other name |
Envarsus
|
||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants switched from twice daily tacrolimus to prolonged release tacrolimus based on the total daily dose ratio of 1:0.7 respectively.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Twice daily tacrolimus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Twice daily tacrolimus
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Extended release tacrolimus
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximum concentration (Cmax) [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Pharmacokinetic study was performed at baseline on twice daily tacrolimus and after stable drug levels on extended release tacrolimus.
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No statistical comparisons were performed (as stated in the protocol) as this was a pilot study. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to maximum concentration (Tmax) [2] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
As previous
|
||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No statistical comparisons were performed (as stated in the protocol) as this was a pilot study. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Area under the curve (24 hour) [3] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
As previous
|
||||||||||||
Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No statistical comparisons were performed (as stated in the protocol) as this was a pilot study. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Patients were followed up for 6 months after conversion.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Post conversion to prolonged release formulation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: No non-serious adverse reports (new or worsening of symptoms) were reported by subjects. There were no episodes of rejection or worsening of kidney function, though these were prespecified in the protocol as not included in the adverse event reporting as they ar part of the secondary study outcomes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
None reported |