Clinical Trial Results:
A phase IIa, placebo-controlled, double blind, randomised multicentre pilot study to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the monoclonal antibody ATH3G10 in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2018-003676-12 |
Trial protocol |
SE DK NL |
Global end of trial date |
12 Mar 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
03 Nov 2021
|
First version publication date |
03 Nov 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ATH3G10-006
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03991143 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Athera Biotechnologies AB
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Olof Palmes gata 29, Stockholm, Sweden, 11122
|
||
Public contact |
James Hall, CEO, Athera Biotechnologies AB, +46 8501 37000, j.hall@athera.se
|
||
Scientific contact |
James Hall, CEO, Athera Biotechnologies AB, +46 8501 37000, j.hall@athera.se
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
21 Apr 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
12 Mar 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The main goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a single administration of ATH3G10 in patients presenting with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki that are consistent with International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH)/Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to initiation of the study.
To avoid antibody aggregates in the solution, the investigational medicinal product (IMP) was passed through a 0.2 μm filter just before the connection to the intravenous catheter. If a patient experienced an adverse event assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
Patients previously exposed to ATH3G10 were excluded.
Any apparent side effect experienced by a patient was assessed from the time of the IMP dose and throughout the the study (until the 12-month follow-up visit, Visit 5) and were reported as adverse events (AEs).
|
||
Background therapy |
No background therapy was used in this study. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
No comparator was used in this study. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Feb 2019
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Safety | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
1 Years | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 16
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Sweden: 60
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 6
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
82
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
82
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
38
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
44
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The first patient’s first visit in the study (first patient screened) was on 2019-04-25 and the last patient’s last visit was on 2021-03-12. | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 82 patients were screened. All 82 patients (43 patients in the ATH3G10 group and 39 patients in the placebo group) were randomised and treated, as planned. | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Visit 1- prior to treatment
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor, Subject | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
This was a double-blinded study, the treatment was blinded to the patient, the Investigators and the personnel administrating the IMP. The Investigator could only break the treatment code if the appropriate future management of the patient necessitated knowledge of current treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
ATH3G10 | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to the ATH3G10 group. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ATH3G10
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The test product, ATH3G10, was a clear to slightly opalescent, colourless to faintly yellowish concentrated solution in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The vials were sealed with bromobutyl rubber stoppers, covered with aluminium caps and stored at 2-8 °C.
Each patient received a single intravenous dose of the IMP within 120 minutes of the PCI procedure start, defined as the time when the guide wire was passed through the stenosis. To avoid antibody aggregates in the solution, the IMP was passed through a 0.2 μm filter just before the connection to the intravenous catheter. If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to the placebo group. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The placebo was a sterile sodium chloride 0.9% solution for infusion in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The reference product was stored at 2-8 °C.
If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Visit 1- treatment
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
This was a double-blinded study, the treatment was blinded to the patient, the Investigators and the personnel administrating the IMP. The Investigator could only break the treatment code if the appropriate future management of the patient necessitated knowledge of current treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
ATH3G10 | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ATH3G10
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The test product, ATH3G10, was a clear to slightly opalescent, colourless to faintly yellowish concentrated solution in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The vials were sealed with bromobutyl rubber stoppers, covered with aluminium caps and stored at 2-8 °C.
Each patient received a single intravenous dose of the IMP within 120 minutes of the PCI procedure start, defined as the time when the guide wire was passed through the stenosis. To avoid antibody aggregates in the solution, the IMP was passed through a 0.2 μm filter just before the connection to the intravenous catheter. If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of placebo at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The placebo was a sterile sodium chloride 0.9% solution for infusion in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The reference product was stored at 2-8 °C.
If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 3
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 3 title |
Visit 2- MRI examination
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
This was a double-blinded study, the treatment was blinded to the patient, the Investigators and the personnel administrating the IMP. The Investigator could only break the treatment code if the appropriate future management of the patient necessitated knowledge of current treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
ATH3G10 | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ATH3G10
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The test product, ATH3G10, was a clear to slightly opalescent, colourless to faintly yellowish concentrated solution in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The vials were sealed with bromobutyl rubber stoppers, covered with aluminium caps and stored at 2-8 °C.
Each patient received a single intravenous dose of the IMP within 120 minutes of the PCI procedure start, defined as the time when the guide wire was passed through the stenosis. To avoid antibody aggregates in the solution, the IMP was passed through a 0.2 μm filter just before the connection to the intravenous catheter. If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The placebo was a sterile sodium chloride 0.9% solution for infusion in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The reference product was stored at 2-8 °C.
If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 4
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 4 title |
Visit 3- 3-month follow-up and 2nd MRI
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
This was a double-blinded study, the treatment was blinded to the patient, the Investigators and the personnel administrating the IMP. The Investigator could only break the treatment code if the appropriate future management of the patient necessitated knowledge of current treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
ATH3G10 | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ATH3G10
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The test product, ATH3G10, was a clear to slightly opalescent, colourless to faintly yellowish concentrated solution in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The vials were sealed with bromobutyl rubber stoppers, covered with aluminium caps and stored at 2-8 °C.
Each patient received a single intravenous dose of the IMP within 120 minutes of the PCI procedure start, defined as the time when the guide wire was passed through the stenosis. To avoid antibody aggregates in the solution, the IMP was passed through a 0.2 μm filter just before the connection to the intravenous catheter. If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of placebo at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The placebo was a sterile sodium chloride 0.9% solution for infusion in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The reference product was stored at 2-8 °C.
If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 5
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 5 title |
Visit 4- 6-month follow-up
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
This was a double-blinded study, the treatment was blinded to the patient, the Investigators and the personnel administrating the IMP. The Investigator could only break the treatment code if the appropriate future management of the patient necessitated knowledge of current treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
ATH3G10 | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ATH3G10
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The test product, ATH3G10, was a clear to slightly opalescent, colourless to faintly yellowish concentrated solution in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The vials were sealed with bromobutyl rubber stoppers, covered with aluminium caps and stored at 2-8 °C.
Each patient received a single intravenous dose of the IMP within 120 minutes of the PCI procedure start, defined as the time when the guide wire was passed through the stenosis. To avoid antibody aggregates in the solution, the IMP was passed through a 0.2 μm filter just before the connection to the intravenous catheter. If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of placebo at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The placebo was a sterile sodium chloride 0.9% solution for infusion in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The reference product was stored at 2-8 °C.
If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 6
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 6 title |
Visit 5- 12-month follow-up
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
This was a double-blinded study, the treatment was blinded to the patient, the Investigators and the personnel administrating the IMP. The Investigator could only break the treatment code if the appropriate future management of the patient necessitated knowledge of current treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
ATH3G10 | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ATH3G10
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The test product, ATH3G10, was a clear to slightly opalescent, colourless to faintly yellowish concentrated solution in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The vials were sealed with bromobutyl rubber stoppers, covered with aluminium caps and stored at 2-8 °C.
Each patient received a single intravenous dose of the IMP within 120 minutes of the PCI procedure start, defined as the time when the guide wire was passed through the stenosis. To avoid antibody aggregates in the solution, the IMP was passed through a 0.2 μm filter just before the connection to the intravenous catheter. If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of placebo at Visit 1. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The placebo was a sterile sodium chloride 0.9% solution for infusion in 10 mL clear type 1 glass vials filled with 5 mL. The reference product was stored at 2-8 °C.
If a patient experienced an AE assessed as related to the IMP during the slow injection, the dosing was to be immediately stopped. If the dosing was stopped due to technical reason (e.g. change of needle), a re-start of dosing was allowed within 30 minutes.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
ATH3G10
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to the ATH3G10 group. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to the placebo group. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
ATH3G10
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to the ATH3G10 group. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to the placebo group. | ||
Reporting group title |
ATH3G10
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of placebo at Visit 1. | ||
Reporting group title |
ATH3G10
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
ATH3G10
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of placebo at Visit 1. | ||
Reporting group title |
ATH3G10
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of placebo at Visit 1. | ||
Reporting group title |
ATH3G10
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of 250 mg of ATH3G10 at Visit 1. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to receive a single dose of placebo at Visit 1. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
ATH3G10- FAS
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all randomised patients who received 1 dose of IMP and for whom at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment was made.
The FAS included 78 patients (41 patients in the ATH3G10 group and 37 patients in the placebo group). There were 4 patients (2 in the ATH3G10 group and 2 in the placebo group) that were excluded from the FAS because they had no post-baseline efficacy data, due to early withdrawal.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo- FAS
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all randomised patients who received 1 dose of IMP and for whom at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment was made.
The FAS included 78 patients (41 patients in the ATH3G10 group and 37 patients in the placebo group). There were 4 patients (2 in the ATH3G10 group and 2 in the placebo group) that were excluded from the FAS because they had no post-baseline efficacy data, due to early withdrawal.
|
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LV EDVi) Least squares (LS) mean | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary objective was to investigate effects on left ventricular remodelling as change in end diastolic volume measured by MRI.
The primary endpoint, change in LV EDVi from Visit 2 to Visit 3, was analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model to test for the difference between treatment with ATH3G10 and placebo. The model included the treatment group as fixed effect and LV EDVi at Visit 2 as covariate. The model included the change from Visit 2 to Visit 3 as dependent variable. The active treatment group was tested against the placebo group and the null hypothesis that the mean difference in change in LV EDVi is equal to zero was tested against the two-sided alternative hypothesis that the difference is not equal to zero.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
The primary endpoint was the comparison of the change in LV EDVi between Visit 2 (Day 2 to 4 after IMP administration) and Visit 3 (Day 60 to 180 after IMP administration).
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in LV EDVi change from V2 to V3 | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The primary endpoint was the comparison of the change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LV EDVi) between Visit 2 (V2, i.e., Day 2 to 4 after IMP administration) and Visit 3 (V3, i.e., Day 60 to 180 after IMP administration).
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
ATH3G10- FAS v Placebo- FAS
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
78
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
> 0.05 [1] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (net) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-3.48
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-9.63 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.67 | |||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Difference in LS Means (95% CI): -3.48 (-9.63, 2.67) p-value = 0.263 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
LV EDVi arithmetic mean [2] | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary objective was to investigate effects on left ventricular remodelling as change in end diastolic volume measured by MRI.
The primary endpoint, change in LV EDVi from Visit 2 to Visit 3, was analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model to test for the difference between treatment with ATH3G10 and placebo. The model included the treatment group as fixed effect and LV EDVi at Visit 2 as covariate. The model included the change from Visit 2 to Visit 3 as dependent variable. The active treatment group was tested against the placebo group and the null hypothesis that the mean difference in change in LV EDVi is equal to zero was tested against the two-sided alternative hypothesis that the difference is not equal to zero.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
The primary endpoint was the comparison of the change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LV EDVi) between Visit 2 (Day 2 to 4 after IMP administration) and Visit 3 (Day 60 to 180 after IMP administration).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The statistical analysis "Difference in LV EDVi change from V2 to V3" applies also to this primary endpoint. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Myocardial Salvage index (MSi) at Visit 2- LS mean | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The secondary objective was to investigate effects on MSi measured by MRI.
The secondary efficacy variable, MSi at Visit 2, was analysed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model to test for the difference between treatment with ATH3G10 and placebo. The model included the treatment group as fixed effect.
The active treatment group was tested against the placebo group and the null hypothesis that the mean difference in MSi is equal to zero was tested against the two-sided alternative hypothesis that the difference is not equal to zero.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
The secondary endpoint was the comparison of MSi at Visit 2 (Day 2 to 4 after IMP administration).
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in MSi at Visit 2 | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The secondary endpoint was the comparison of MSi at Visit 2 (Day 2 to 4 after IMP administration).
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
ATH3G10- FAS v Placebo- FAS
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
78
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
> 0.05 [3] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.13
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-10.47 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
10.21 | |||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Difference in LS Means (95% CI) at Visit 2: -0.13 (-10.47, 10.21) p-value = 0.980 |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
MSi at Visit 2- arithmetic mean | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The secondary objective was to investigate effects on MSi measured by MRI.
The secondary efficacy variable, MSi at Visit 2, was analysed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model to test for the difference between treatment with ATH3G10 and placebo. The model included the treatment group as fixed effect.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
The secondary endpoint was the comparison of MSi at Visit 2 (Day 2 to 4 after IMP administration).
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
AEs were reproted from the time of IMP administration and until the end of the study (i.e., Visit 1-treatment to Visit 5- 12 month follow-up).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
22.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
ATH3G10
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to the ATH3G10 group. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients were allocated to the placebo group. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
04 Apr 2019 |
The first clinical study protocol (CSP) version used for patient enrolment in Sweden was CSP Version 2.0, dated 2019-01-07. Substantial amendment 2.0 led to CSP Version 3.0, dated 2019-04-04. The CSP version used for patient enrolment in Denmark was CSP Version 4.0, while CSP Version 3.0 was used in The Netherlands.
Substantial amendment 2.0 included:
1) clarification of the defiinition of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) start. “PCI less than 4 hours after symptom onset” was replaced by “Start of PCI, defined as when the guide wire is passed through the stenosis, less than 4 hours after symptom onset”
2) clarification of the allowed time window of the IMP administration. “IMP will be administered as soon as possible after randomization and within 120 minutes of performed PCI procedure.” was replaced by “IMP will be administered as soon as possible after randomization and within 120 minutes of start of the PCI procedure, defined as when the guide wire is passed through the stenosis.”
3) Addition/update of assesements. “12-lead ECG” was replaced by “ECG monitoring at visit 1 and 2” and
“Blood sampling for other biomarkers related to cardiovascular disease” was added for visit 1 (baseline sample).”
|
||
23 Oct 2019 |
Substantial amendment 3.0 led to CSP Version 4.0, dated 2019-10-23 (first CSP verison used for enrollment in Denmark) and included:
1) The use of Gadolinium-based contrast agents has been associated with severe reactions (Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis, NSF) in patients with severely reduced renal function. Clinical use is therefore contraindicated below an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 for all Gadolinium based contrast agents. Since no direct clinical benefit is gained by the study patients from the examination a conservative limit for the use of contrast agents, eGFR 50 mLl/min/1.73 m2, was initially selected. An increasing amount of clinical evidence suggests that the above mentioned risk for NSF is very low, if at all present for macrocyclic chelate complex contrast agents. (Young et al., Eur Radiol. 2019). As a consequence, the lower eGFR limit was changed from 50 to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. As a further safety precaution in the eGFR interval 30 to 50mL/min/1.73m2 half the dose of contrast (macrocyclic chelate complex agents) was employed.
2) There is no literature available showing the time course of very early changes in cardiac dimensions following a ST elevation infarction, but it is likely that the mechanisms driving these changes are in place early after reperfusion. Therefore, it was desirable that the initial measurement of cardiac dimensions was carried out as soon as it was clinically and logistically acceptable for the patients to undergo an MRI investigation, as the result wouls be used as the baseline dimensions. For patients admitted shortly before weekends it was not be possible to perform MRI within 72 hours, but 96 hours were possible. The visit window for MRI baseline examination was therefore changed to within 96 hours.
3) Requirement that physical examination, blood pressure and ECG assessments must be performed “before the MRI examination” was removed to facilitate MRI booking.
4) Additional sites were added to increase recruitment.
|
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |