Clinical Trial Results:
Immunogenicity and Safety of an Investigational Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine Versus Nimenrix® or NeisVac-C® in Healthy Toddlers 12 to 23 Months of Age
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2018-003790-10 |
Trial protocol |
DK DE FI |
Global end of trial date |
14 Oct 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v2(current) |
This version publication date |
03 Sep 2021
|
First version publication date |
28 Jun 2021
|
Other versions |
v1 |
Version creation reason |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
MEQ00065
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03890367 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
U1111-1217-2456 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Sanofi Pasteur
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
14 Espace Henry Vallée, Lyon, France, 69007
|
||
Public contact |
Trial Transparency Team, Sanofi Pasteur, Contact-US@sanofi.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Trial Transparency Team, Sanofi Pasteur, Contact-US@sanofi.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
Yes
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
14 Jun 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
14 Oct 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Sequential approach: To demonstrate for serogroup C: - the non-inferiority of the hSBA seroprotection rate (titers>= 1:8) after MenACYW conjugate or Nimenrix® vaccination. If this non-inferiority was demonstrated, then to demonstrate - the non-inferiority in terms of GMT. If this non-inferiority was demonstrated, then to demonstrate - the superiority in terms of GMT. If this superiority was demonstrated, then to demonstrate - the superiority of the seroprotection rate or to demonstrate for serogroup C: - the non-inferiority of the rSBA seroprotection rate after MenACYW conjugate or NeisVac-C® vaccination. If this non-inferiority was demonstrated, then to demonstrate - the non-inferiority in terms of GMT. If this non-inferiority was demonstrated, then to demonstrate - the superiority in terms of GMT. The primary objective will be met if the non-inferiority of the hSBA seroprotection rate versus Nimenrix® or the non-inferiority of rSBA seroprotection rate versus NeisVac-C® was met.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Vaccinations were performed by qualified and trained study personnel. Subjects with allergy to any of the vaccine components were not vaccinated. After vaccination, subjects were also kept under clinical observation for 30 minutes to ensure their safety. Appropriate medical equipment were also available on site in case of any immediate allergic reactions.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
12 Sep 2019
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 108
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Finland: 313
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 286
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
707
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
707
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
707
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Study subjects were enrolled in 29 active centers in Denmark, Germany and Finland from 12 September 2019 to 03 September 2020. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 707 subjects were enrolled and randomised in the study. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Data analyst, Assessor, Subject | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
The study has a modified double-blind design that is the study contained an unblinded vaccine administrator while the rest of the study team, including laboratory technicians in charge of executing the serological testing, remained blinded to the subjects’ group allocations throughout the study.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine on Day 0. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Meningococcal Polysaccharide (Serogroups A, C, Y, and W) Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.5 milliliters (mL), intramuscular, single dose.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of Nimenrix vaccine on Day 0. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Meningococcal group A, C, W-135 and Y Conjugate Vaccine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
NIMENRIX®
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solvent for solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.5 mL, intramuscular, single dose.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of NeisVac-C vaccine on Day 0. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Meningococcal Group C Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine Adsorbed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
NeisVac-C®
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.5 mL, intramuscular, single dose.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine on Day 0. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of Nimenrix vaccine on Day 0. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of NeisVac-C vaccine on Day 0. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine
|
||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine on Day 0. | ||
Reporting group title |
Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of Nimenrix vaccine on Day 0. | ||
Reporting group title |
Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of NeisVac-C vaccine on Day 0. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Antibody Titers >=1:8 Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by Serum Bactericidal Assay Using Human Complement (hSBA) Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or Nimenrix® (Non-inferiority Analysis) [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Antibody titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by hSBA. Analysis was performed on hSBA per-protocol analysis set (PPAS) which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 2 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, Nimenrix®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
425
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [2] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Percentage | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
10.43
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
5.68 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
16.2 | ||||||||||||
Notes [2] - The two-sided 97.5 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated based on the Wilson score method without continuity correction. The non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 97.5% CI of the percentage difference between compared groups was greater than (>) -10%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) of Antibodies Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by hSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or Nimenrix® (Non-inferiority Analysis) [3] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
GMT titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by hSBA. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. Analysis was performed on hSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 2 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, Nimenrix®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
425
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [4] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
GMT Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
16.3
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
12.7 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
21 | ||||||||||||
Notes [4] - The two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs was calculated using normal approximation of log-transformed titers. The non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs between compared groups was >1/1.5. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
GMTs of Antibodies Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by hSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or Nimenrix® (Superiority Analysis) [5] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
GMT titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by hSBA. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. Analysis was performed on hSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 2 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, Nimenrix®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
425
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [6] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
GMT Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
16.3
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
12.7 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
21 | ||||||||||||
Notes [6] - The two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs was calculated using normal approximation of log-transformed titers. The superiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs between compared groups was >1. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Antibody Titers >=1:8 Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by hSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or Nimenrix® (Superiority Analysis) [7] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Antibody titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by hSBA. Analysis was performed on hSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [7] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 2 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, Nimenrix®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
425
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [8] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Percentage | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
10.43
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
5.68 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
16.2 | ||||||||||||
Notes [8] - The two-sided 97.5% CI was calculated based on the Wilson score method without continuity correction. The superiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 97.5% CI of the percentage difference between compared groups was >0%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Antibody Titers >=1:8 Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by Serum Bactericidal Assay Using Baby Rabbit Complement (rSBA) Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or NeisVac-C (Non-inferiority Analysis) [9] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Antibody titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by rSBA. Analysis was performed on rSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [9] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 3 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, NeisVac-C®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
428
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [10] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Percentage | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-2.3 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.28 | ||||||||||||
Notes [10] - The two-sided 97.5% CI was calculated based on the Wilson score method without continuity correction. The non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 97.5% CI of the percentage difference between compared groups was >-10%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
GMTs of Antibodies against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by rSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or NeisVac-C® (Non-inferiority Analysis) [11] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
GMT titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by rSBA. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. Analysis was performed on rSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [11] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 3 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, NeisVac-C®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
428
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [12] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
GMT Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.32
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.06 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.64 | ||||||||||||
Notes [12] - The two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs was calculated using normal approximation of log-transformed titers. The non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs between compared groups was > 1/1.5. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
GMTs of Antibodies against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by rSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or NeisVac-C® (Superiority Analysis) [13] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
GMT titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by rSBA. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. Analysis was performed on rsBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [13] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 3 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, NeisVac-C®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
428
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [14] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
GMT Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.32
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.06 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.64 | ||||||||||||
Notes [14] - The two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs was calculated using normal approximation of log-transformed titers. The superiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs between compared groups was >1. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Antibody Titers >=1:8 Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by rSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or Nimenrix® (Non-inferiority Analysis) [15] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Antibody titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by rSBA. Analysis was performed on rSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [15] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 2 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, Nimenrix®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
423
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [16] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Percentage | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
5.24
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.83 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
9.85 | ||||||||||||
Notes [16] - The two-sided 97.5% CI was calculated based on the Wilson score method without continuity correction. The non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 97.5% CI of the percentage difference between compared groups was >-10%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
GMTs of Antibodies Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by rSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or Nimenrix® (Non-inferiority Analysis) [17] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
GMT titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by rSBA. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. Analysis was performed on rSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [17] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 2 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, Nimenrix®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
423
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [18] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
GMT Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
6.8
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
5.04 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
9.18 | ||||||||||||
Notes [18] - The two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs was calculated using normal approximation of log-transformed titers. The non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs between compared groups was >1/1.5. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
GMTs of Antibodies Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by rSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or Nimenrix® (Superiority Analysis) [19] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
GMT titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by rSBA. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. Analysis was performed on rSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [19] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 2 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, Nimenrix®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
423
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [20] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
GMT Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
6.8
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
5.04 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
9.18 | ||||||||||||
Notes [20] - The two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs was calculated using normal approximation of log-transformed titers. The superiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs between compared groups was >1. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Subjects With Antibody Titers >=1:8 Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by hSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or NeisVac-C® (Non-inferiority Analysis) [21] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Antibody titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by hSBA. Analysis was performed on hSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [21] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 3 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, NeisVac-C®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
430
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [22] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Percentage | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-2.71 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.67 | ||||||||||||
Notes [22] - The two-sided 97.5% CI was calculated based on the Wilson score method without continuity correction. The non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 97.5% CI of the percentage difference between compared groups was >-10%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
GMTs of Antibodies Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by hSBA After Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or NeisVac-C® (Non-inferiority Analysis) [23] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
GMT titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by hSBA. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. Analysis was performed on hSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [23] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 3 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, NeisVac-C®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
430
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [24] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
GMT Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.27
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.82 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.84 | ||||||||||||
Notes [24] - The two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs was calculated using normal approximation of log-transformed titers. The non-inferiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs between compared groups was >1/1.5. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
GMTs of Antibodies Against Meningococcal Serogroup C Measured by hSBA Following Vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine or NeisVac-C® (Superiority Analysis) [25] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
GMT titers against Meningococcal Serogroup C were measured by hSBA. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. Analysis was performed on hSBA PPAS which was a subset that included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study vaccine and had a valid post-vaccination serology result. The subjects who presented protocol deviations were excluded from PPAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 30 (post-vaccination)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [25] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Data was planned to be collected and analysed for Group 1 and Group 3 only, as pre-specified in protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine, NeisVac-C®: Serogroup C | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine v Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
430
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [26] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
GMT Ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.27
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
97.5% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.82 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.84 | ||||||||||||
Notes [26] - The two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of post-vaccination GMTs was calculated using normal approximation of log-transformed titers. The superiority was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% CI of the ratio of GMTs between compared groups was >1. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Unsolicited adverse event (AE) data were collected from Day 0 (pre-vaccination) up to Day 30 (post-vaccination). The solicited reactions (SR) were collected within 7 days post-vaccination. Serious AEs data were collected up to 30 days post-vaccination.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Analysis was performed on Safety Analysis Set which included all subjects who had received one dose of study vaccine and were analysed according to the vaccine they actually received.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
23.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group 1: MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine on Day 0. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group 2: Nimenrix® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of Nimenrix vaccine on Day 0. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group 3: NeisVac-C® Vaccine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Healthy, toddlers aged 12 to 23 months received a single dose of NeisVac-C vaccine on Day 0. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||||||
Date |
Amendment |
||||||
15 May 2020 |
Following changes were made: number of study centers revised from 20 to 31 centers in European countries; changed end of study period to 4th quarter (Q4) 2020; revised number of study subjects; changed 675 total subjects to 705 total subjects; changed number of subjects in each group from 225 to 235; text modified/added to reflect impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the planned sample size; to reflect change in sample size from 675 to 705 subjects; text modified/added to reflect impact of COVID-19 on the planned sample size; added new abbreviation for COVID-19; additional section and text for COVID-19 risk assessment per European Union regulatory guidelines; to delineate which tasks would be done by the blinded/unblinded staff; to delineate tasks are for investigator or designate; to reflect changes to clarify blood sample procedures; changed date of final clinical study report to Q2 2021; to add text for amendment 1 justification; concomitant medications updated to reflect COVID-19 changes.
|
||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
None reported |