Clinical Trial Results:
An open label study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in the prophylactic treatment of persistent headache attributed to mild traumatic injury to the head
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2018-003943-46 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
09 Mar 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Mar 2021
|
First version publication date |
28 Mar 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
081018
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Danish Headache Center
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
V, Valdemar Hansensvej 5, Glostrup, Denmark, 2600
|
||
Public contact |
Henrik Schytz, Danish Headache Center, 45 28761824, henrik.winther.schytz.01@regionh.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Henrik Schytz, Danish Headache Center, 38633863 28761824, henrik.winther.schytz.01@regionh.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
06 Apr 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
09 Mar 2020
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
09 Mar 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the effect of ERENUMAB on change in the monthly average number of headache days with moderate or severe intensity from baseline to week 9-12 in patients with persistent post-traumatic headache (PPTH)
To evaluate the effect of ERENUMAB on change in the monthly average number of headache days from baseline to week 9-12 in PPTH patients
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study consisted of treatment of post-traumatic headache patients
|
||
Background therapy |
The same as investigated | ||
Evidence for comparator |
N.A: | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Feb 2019
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 100
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
100
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
100
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
100
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Danish Headache Center and from neurological departments and rehabilitation centers in the Capital Region of Denmark as well as the Region of Southern Denmark. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Patients included males and females aged 18 to 65 years with a history of persistent headache attributed to mild TBI. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
4 weeks
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Active | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Active | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Erenumab
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
140 mg s.c.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||
Period 2 title |
Week 12
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Week 9-12
|
||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Week 9-12 | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Open label | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Active
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Week 9-12
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Primary | |||||||||
End point description |
Mean change in number of monthly headache days of moderate to severe intensity
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
from baseline (4-week pretreatment period) to week 9–12
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - None |
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Descriptive | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
See article
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
Active v Week 9-12
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
178
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
other [2] | |||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | |||||||||
Method |
descriptive | |||||||||
Parameter type |
Descriptive | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
Notes [2] - see article |
|
|||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
from first injection to week 9–12.
|
||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Overall, 100 patients received at least one dose of erenumab and were included in the tolerability and safety analyses. Seventy-eight patients reported at least
one adverse event, with the most common ones being constipation (n = 30) and injection-site reactions (n = 15). Of the former, nine patients reported recurrent episodes of constipation
|
||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
Oxford | ||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
All patients
|
||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
This was an open label study | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493206 |