E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), also known as Osler– Weber–Rendu disease (in specific patients with gastrointestinal bleedings) |
Morbus Osler (Patienten mit Morbus Osler und gastrointestinalen Blutungen) |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Patients suffering from HHT/Rendu-Osler-Weber disease and bleeding from the stomach/bowel |
Patienten mit Morbus Osler und Blutungen im Magen-Darm Bereich |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities [C16] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | Yes |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To investigate the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues in decreasing the transfusion requirements in patients with HHT and GI bleeding who are refractory to endoscopic therapy. |
Untersuchung der Effektivität von Somatostatin Analoga hinsichtlich der Reduktion von Transfusionen bei Patienten mit HHT und gastrointenstinalen Blutungen, bei denen eine endoskopische Intervention nicht ausreichte |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Investigate the effectiveness of octreotide on: decreasing the endoscopic treatment frequency, increasing the quality of life, decreasing fatigue and epistaxis symptoms and costeffectiveness. |
Untersuchung der Effektivität von Somatostatin Analoga hinsichtlich der Reduktion der Häufigkeit gastronintestinaler endoskopiescher Interventionen, Verbesserung der Lebensqualität und Steigerung der Müdigkeit, Epistaxis-Symptomatik und Kosteneffektivität |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: • Patients older than 18 years with written informed consent. • Diagnosis of HHT: either confirmed by genetic testing or the Curaçao criteria (definite diagnosis) (7). • Presence of endoscopic proven GI AVM manifestations / telangiectasias confirmed within the last 12 months (upper and/or lower endoscopy and/or capsule endoscopy). • Endoscopic refractory: at least 1 endoscopic APC, laser, or other endoscopic treatment modality performed in the past 5 years. • Diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). IDA is defined as: o At least one serum ferritin below < 30 ug/l within the last 6 months requiring iron infusion above or equal to 1 g and/or o Hemoglobin below 5.6 mmol/l (9.0 g/dl) or are in need of transfusions due to anemia related symptoms within the last 6 months and o The absence of other common causes of anemia (Vitamin B12 and/or folate deficiency in patients with macrocytic anemia and bone marrow disorders in patients with pancytopenia) • Substantial transfusion dependency: at least 4 blood units and / or intravenous iron in the 6 months prior to study inclusion. |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: • Liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh C, • Insulinoma, • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus as defined by HbA1c >64 mmol/ml, despite adequate therapy, • Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome • Symptomatic cholecystolithiasis (possible side-effect octreotide) Chronic or acute pancreatitis • Bradycardia (heart rate below 50)* • Hypersensitivity to the active ingredient (octreotide) or to auxiliary materials of the study medication • Severe disease/comorbidities with a life expectancy < 1 year • Use of chemotherapy and / or ciclosporin • Pregnancy or nursing women or women who have a pregnancy wish during the study period. • Women of childbearing potential who do not have a confirmed menstrual period and a negative, highly sensitive urine or serum pregnancy test < 7 days before inclusion • Women of childbearing potential who do not use a highly effective contraceptive measure (according to section 4.1 of the Recommendations related to contraception and pregnancy testing in clinical trials of the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA)) or refuse to maintain this measure during the entire treatment-and relevant systemic exposure period.(25) • Women of childbearing potential who refuse to undergo additional pregnancy testing during the treatment period • Use of other anti-angiogenic drug treatment (thalidomide and/or bevacizumab • Use of hormonal (estrogen) therapy and/or antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid) to treat anemia due to telangiectasia with sufficient effect. However, when patients are red blood cell transfusion or iron infusion dependent despite these treatment options and are naïve to octreotide treatment, patients are still eligible for inclusion. *If a patient has a heart rate below 60 and uses cardiovascular medication that affect the heart rate (e.g. beta blockers and calcium channel blockers) the prescribing specialist (or another competent specialist) will be consulted about the possibility to adjust the dose of these medicines. Patients with a heartrate below 50 (despite dose adjustments) will be excluded from participation. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The difference in the number of patients in the treatment arm and the number of patients in the observational arm with a ‘successful response’. A successful response is defined as a decrease of ≥50% in the number of red blood cell transfusions and/or number of IV iron infusions (per 500mg) given between baseline period (26 weeks prior to study inclusion) and during the treatment study period (26 weeks). Patients who do not have a successful response (patients with a decrease of <50%) will be counted as treatment failures. NB Patients who exclusively or primarily used IV iron infusions at baseline and required (more) red blood cell transfusions during the treatment study period will be counted as treatment failures regardless of their percentual decrease in IV iron infusions. Patients who exclusively or primarily used red blood cell transfusions at baseline and required (more) iron infusions during the treatment study period will be counted as treatment failures if their total number of red blood cell transfusions and iron infusions during the treatment study period exceeds half of the total number of red blood cell transfusions (and iron infusions) during baseline. NB The exact preparation and dosage of IV iron infusions should be noted for each infusion. The preparation of IV iron should be kept consistent at baseline and during study period. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
26 weeks prior to study inclusion and during the treatment study period (26 weeks) |
26 Wochen vor Studieneintritt und 26 Wochen währen der Medikamentenapplikation |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
The absolute mean and median difference and the percentage mean and median difference between baseline (26 weeks prior to study inclusion) and the treatment study period (26 weeks) of patients in the treatment arm compared to patients in the observational arm in: - Number of red blood cell transfusions - Number of Intravenous iron infusions (per 500mg) - Number of endoscopic treatments The absolute mean and median difference and the percentage mean and median difference at baseline (< 7 days before inclusion) and after 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 26 weeks of the study period between patients in the treatment arm and patients in the observational arm in the value of: - Hemoglobin and ferritin levels The absolute mean and median difference and the percentage mean and median difference between baseline (26 weeks prior to study inclusion) and the treatment study period (26 weeks) of patients in the treatment arm compared to patients in the observational arm in: - Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS): which include quality of life (measured by the SF-36), level of fatigue (measured by the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI)-20) and epistaxis severity (measured by the ESS tool). The absolute mean and median difference and the percentage mean and median difference in the number of (S)AE’s during the treatment study period (26 weeks) between patients in the treatment arm and patients in the observational arm. The absolute mean and median difference and the percentual mean and median difference between baseline (26 weeks prior to study inclusion) and the treatment study period (26 weeks) of patients in the treatment arm compared to patients in the observational arm in cost effectiveness. Cost effectiveness will be defined by measuring the healthcare costs. The following volumes of healthcare will be registering in Case Record Forms (CRF): (co) medication, visits and consultations to specialists or other health care professionals, lab and imagine techniques, operations, general practitioners and hospitalizations. The volumes of healthcare will be multiplied with the respective (Dutch) cost prices to get the healthcare costs (see economic evaluation). |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
0 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 30 weeks (follow up) |
0 Wochen, 4 Wochen, 12 Wochen, 26 Wochen, 30 Wochen (Follow-up) |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
Standardtherapie |
Standard of Care |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 3 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 6 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
France |
Germany |
Italy |
Netherlands |
United Kingdom |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 3 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 2 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 1 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |