Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Investigation of efficacy and safety of semaglutide s.c. once-weekly versus placebo in subjects with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and compensated liver cirrhosis

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2018-004484-31
    Trial protocol
    GB   DE   FR   ES  
    Global end of trial date
    10 Jun 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    22 Jun 2022
    First version publication date
    22 Jun 2022
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    NN9931-4492
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT03987451
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    U1111-1224-4062
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Novo Nordisk A/S
    Sponsor organisation address
    Novo Allé, Bagsvaerd, Denmark, 2880
    Public contact
    Clinical Reporting Office (2834), Novo Nordisk A/S, clinicaltrials@novonordisk.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Reporting Office (2834), Novo Nordisk A/S, clinicaltrials@novonordisk.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    21 Jun 2021
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    22 Apr 2021
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    10 Jun 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To investigate the effect of semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) 2.4 mg once-weekly on liver fibrosis compared with placebo in subjects with Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) and compensated fibrosis stage 4
    Protection of trial subjects
    The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice, including archiving of essential documents, (2016) and 21 US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 312.
    Background therapy
    Not applicable
    Evidence for comparator
    Not applicable
    Actual start date of recruitment
    18 Jun 2019
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 5
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 5
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 51
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    71
    EEA total number of subjects
    15
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    55
    From 65 to 84 years
    16
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    The trial was conducted at 38 sites in 5 countries as follows (number of sites that screened subjects/ number of sites that randomised subjects): United States (24/19); United Kingdom (4/3); Germany (3/2); France (5/3); Spain (2/2).

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive once-weekly either semaglutide or placebo subcutaneously as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Arm description
    Subjects were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide for 48 weeks. Subjects initially received 0.24 milligrams (mg) of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks until the target dose of 2.4 mg was reached: 0.24 mg (week 1 to week 4), 0.5 mg (week 5 to week 8), 1.0 mg (week 9 to week 12), 1.7 mg (week 13 to week 16), 2.4 mg (week 16 to week 48).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Semaglutide B 3.0 mg/ml PDS290
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide for 48 weeks. Subjects initially received 0.24 milligrams (mg) of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks until the target dose of 2.4 mg was reached: 0.24 mg (week 1 to week 4), 0.5 mg (week 5 to week 8), 1.0 mg (week 9 to week 12), 1.7 mg (week 13 to week 16), 2.4 mg (week 16 to week 48).

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Subjects were to receive once weekly s.c. injection of placebo matched to semaglutide (0.24 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) for 48 weeks.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects were to receive once weekly s.c. injection of placebo matched to semaglutide (0.24 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) for 48 weeks.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo
    Started
    47
    24
    Completed
    45
    23
    Not completed
    2
    1
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    1
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Reporting group description
    Subjects were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide for 48 weeks. Subjects initially received 0.24 milligrams (mg) of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks until the target dose of 2.4 mg was reached: 0.24 mg (week 1 to week 4), 0.5 mg (week 5 to week 8), 1.0 mg (week 9 to week 12), 1.7 mg (week 13 to week 16), 2.4 mg (week 16 to week 48).

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects were to receive once weekly s.c. injection of placebo matched to semaglutide (0.24 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) for 48 weeks.

    Reporting group values
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    47 24 71
    Age Categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        <65 years
    37 18 55
        65<= to <75 years
    10 6 16
    Age Continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    59.9 ± 7.1 58.7 ± 9.7 -
    Gender Categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    31 18 49
        Male
    16 6 22

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Reporting group description
    Subjects were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide for 48 weeks. Subjects initially received 0.24 milligrams (mg) of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks until the target dose of 2.4 mg was reached: 0.24 mg (week 1 to week 4), 0.5 mg (week 5 to week 8), 1.0 mg (week 9 to week 12), 1.7 mg (week 13 to week 16), 2.4 mg (week 16 to week 48).

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects were to receive once weekly s.c. injection of placebo matched to semaglutide (0.24 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) for 48 weeks.

    Primary: At Least One Stage of Liver Fibrosis Improvement With No Worsening of NASH (Yes/No) (worsening defined as an increase of at least one stage of either lobular inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning or steatosis according to the NASH CRN criteria)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    At Least One Stage of Liver Fibrosis Improvement With No Worsening of NASH (Yes/No) (worsening defined as an increase of at least one stage of either lobular inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning or steatosis according to the NASH CRN criteria)
    End point description
    NASH resolution defined by NASH clinical research network (CRN) as lobular inflammation of 0 or 1; hepatocellular ballooning reduced to 0; both criteria were necessary conditions. Hepatocellular ballooning ranges from 0-2; lobular inflammation ranges from 0-3, higher scores indicate more severe hepatocellular ballooning/lobular inflammation. Worsening of NASH defined by increase of at least 1 stage of either lobular inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning or steatosis. Worsening of fibrosis defined by increase in fibrosis at least 1 stage of Kleiner fibrosis classification: fibrosis stages range from 0-4, higher scores indicate greater fibrosis (0=None, 4=Cirrhosis). Endpoint evaluated based on data from in-trial period which started on date of randomisation visit and ended on first of following dates (both inclusive): follow-up visit (week 55); withdrawal of consent; last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); death. Full analysis set: all randomised subjects.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From baseline (week 0) to visit 12 (week 48)
    End point values
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    47
    24
    Units: Percentage of subjects
        number (not applicable)
    10.6
    29.2
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The common odds ratio between semaglutide and placebo adjusting for baseline diabetes was estimated along with exact 95% confidence interval based on conditioning on the marginal 2×2 tables.
    Comparison groups
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    71
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0867
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.28
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.06
         upper limit
    1.24

    Secondary: Relative Change in Liver Fat Content (%) Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Relative Change in Liver Fat Content (%) Measured by MRI-PDFF
    End point description
    Relative change in liver fat content (measured in %) is presented as ratio to baseline. It was assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) that utilized a gradient echo sequence with low flip angle to minimize T1 bias, corrected T2* decay (due to iron overload) via modeling of fat signal as a superposition of multiple frequency components from 5 different lipid types, was applied in each of 9 Couinaud segments. Technique improved fat quantification accuracy for entire liver permitting quantification of small changes following pharmacological intervention. Endpoint evaluated based on data from in-trial period which started on date of randomisation visit and ended on first of following dates (both inclusive): follow-up visit (week 55); withdrawal of consent; last contact with subject (for subjects lost to follow-up); death. Full analysis set (FAS): all randomised subjects. Number of subjects analysed = Number of subjects who contributed to the analysis
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From baseline (week 0) to visit 12 (week 48)
    End point values
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    38
    18
    Units: Ratio of liver fat content
        geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation)
    0.62 ± 63.38
    1.01 ± 34.46
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: NASH Resolution (Yes/No) (defined by the NASH CRN as lobular inflammation 0 – 1 and ballooning 0)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    NASH Resolution (Yes/No) (defined by the NASH CRN as lobular inflammation 0 – 1 and ballooning 0)
    End point description
    NASH resolution defined by NASH clinical research network as lobular inflammation of 0 or 1 and hepatocellular ballooning reduced to 0; both criteria were necessary conditions. Hepatocellular ballooning ranges from 0-2; lobular inflammation ranges from 0-3, with higher scores indicating more severe hepatocellular ballooning or lobular inflammation. Worsening of fibrosis defined by an increase in fibrosis at least one stage of Kleiner fibrosis classification: fibrosis stages range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating greater fibrosis (0=None, 4=Cirrhosis). Endpoint was evaluated based on data from in-trial period which started on date of randomisation visit and ended on first of following dates (both inclusive):1) follow-up visit (week 55); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with subject (for subjects lost to follow-up); 4) death. FAS included all randomised subjects.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From baseline (week 0) to visit 12 (week 48)
    End point values
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    47
    24
    Units: Percentage of subjects
        number (not applicable)
    34.0
    20.8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change in Stage of Fibrosis According to the NASH CRN Fibrosis Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in Stage of Fibrosis According to the NASH CRN Fibrosis Score
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects who had improved, worsened, had no change in fibrosis stage from baseline to week 48 or missing data is presented. Degree of fibrosis defined by Kleiner fibrosis staging system, range from 0-4: F0 (absence of fibrosis), F1 (portal/perisinusoidal fibrosis), F2 (perisinusoidal & portal/periportal fibrosis), F3 (septal/bridging fibrosis) through F4 (cirrhosis); higher scores indicate greater fibrosis. Improvement defined as at least 1 stage decrease; Worsening by at least 1 stage increase; No change is no change in fibrosis stage and missing refers to subjects with missing outcomes. Endpoint evaluated based on data from in-trial period which started on date of randomisation visit and ended on first of following dates (both inclusive): follow-up visit (week 55); withdrawal of consent; last contact with subject (subjects lost to follow-up); death. FAS: all randomised subjects. Number of subjects analysed = Number of subjects who contributed to the analysis
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From baseline (week 0) to visit 12 (week 48)
    End point values
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    47
    24
    Units: Percentage of subjects
    number (not applicable)
        Improvement
    12.8
    33.3
        Worsening
    0.0
    0.0
        No change
    72.3
    62.5
        Missing
    14.9
    4.2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Relative Change in Liver Stiffness Measured by MRE

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Relative Change in Liver Stiffness Measured by MRE
    End point description
    Relative change in Liver Stiffness from baseline to week 48 is presented as ratio to baseline. Liver stiffness was measured by MRI using a Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) technique and measured in kilopascal. MRE is a technology that uses MRI imaging with low-frequency vibrations to create a visual map (elastogram) that shows stiffness of the liver. Endpoint was evaluated based on data from in-trial period which started on date of randomisation visit and ended on first of following dates (both inclusive):1) follow-up visit (week 55); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with subject (for subjects lost to follow-up); 4) death. FAS included all randomised subjects. Number of subjects analysed = Number of subjects who contributed to the analysis
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From baseline (week 0) to visit 12 (week 48)
    End point values
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    35
    21
    Units: Ratio of liver stiffness
        geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation)
    0.87 ± 22.24
    0.98 ± 28.51
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) According to the NASH CRN Criteria

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) According to the NASH CRN Criteria
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects who had worsened, improved or had no change in total Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) activity score from baseline to week 48 or missing data is presented. Worsening defined as an increase of at least 1 in the NAS; Improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 1 in the NAS; while no change corresponds to no change in NAS and missing refers to subjects with missing outcomes for NAS from baseline to week 48. NAS was calculated as the sum of scores for steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocyte ballooning (0 to 2). Therefore, it is assessed on a scale of 0-8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Endpoint was evaluated based on data from in-trial period which started on date of randomisation visit and ended on first of following dates (both inclusive):1) follow-up visit (week 55); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with subject (for subjects lost to follow-up); 4) death. FAS included all randomised subjects.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From baseline (week 0) to visit 12 (week 48)
    End point values
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    47
    24
    Units: Percentage of subjects
    number (not applicable)
        Improvement
    61.7
    58.3
        Worsening
    2.1
    16.7
        No change
    21.3
    20.8
        Missing
    14.9
    4.2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
    End point description
    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject administered or using a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or usage. All AEs reported here are Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). TEAE is defined as an event that had onset date during the on-treatment period. Endpoint was evaluated based on data from on-treatment period which started on the date of first administration of trial product and ended on the date of whatever comes first of: a) last dose of trial product + 49 days (7 half-lives of semaglutide), b) follow-up visit (week 55), or c) end of the in-trial period. Safety analysis set included all subjects receiving at least one dose of randomised treatment.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From baseline (week 0) to week 55
    End point values
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    47
    24
    Units: Events
        number (not applicable)
    290
    85
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From week 0 to week 55. Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all subjects who received at least one dose of randomised treatment.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    All AEs here are TEAEs, defined as an event that had onset date during on-treatment period. On-treatment period started on the date of first administration of trial product and ended on the date of whatever comes first of: last dose of trial product + 49 days (7 half-lives of semaglutide); follow-up visit (week 55), or end of the in-trial period.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    24
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects were to receive once weekly s.c. injection of placebo matched to semaglutide (0.24 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) for 48 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Reporting group description
    Subjects were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide for 48 weeks. Subjects initially received 0.24 milligrams (mg) of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks until the target dose of 2.4 mg was reached: 0.24 mg (week 1 to week 4), 0.5 mg (week 5 to week 8), 1.0 mg (week 9 to week 12), 1.7 mg (week 13 to week 16), 2.4 mg (week 16 to week 48).

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    6 / 47 (12.77%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Road traffic accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal compression fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Spinal claudication
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    Vitreous detachment
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Impaired gastric emptying
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Inguinal hernia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholelithiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Hypoxia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Calculus urinary
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Suicide attempt
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Osteoarthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal osteoarthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hypokalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 47 (2.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    15 / 24 (62.50%)
    38 / 47 (80.85%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    2 / 47 (4.26%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    2
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    4 / 47 (8.51%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    4
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    4 / 47 (8.51%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    7
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain upper
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    5 / 47 (10.64%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    8
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    6 / 47 (12.77%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    6
    Abdominal distension
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    3 / 47 (6.38%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    3
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    9 / 47 (19.15%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    13
    Dyspepsia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    5 / 47 (10.64%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    5
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    3 / 47 (6.38%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    3
    Dysphagia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    3 / 47 (6.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    3 / 47 (6.38%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    3
    Eructation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    6 / 47 (12.77%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    19
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 24 (16.67%)
    21 / 47 (44.68%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    34
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    8 / 47 (17.02%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    10
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    4 / 47 (8.51%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    4
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    3 / 47 (6.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 24 (12.50%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    0
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    3 / 47 (6.38%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    4
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    3 / 47 (6.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    4
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 24 (16.67%)
    3 / 47 (6.38%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    3
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    2 / 47 (4.26%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    2
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    0 / 47 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Decreased appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
    6 / 47 (12.77%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    6

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    27 Apr 2020
    Following changes were made in this amendment: • To align with requirements as per regulatory guidance regarding primary endpoint in NASH trials, the former secondary endpoint was changed to the primary endpoint: “At least one stage of liver fibrosis improvement with no worsening of NASH after 48 weeks (yes/no) (worsening defined as an increase of at least one stage of either lobular inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning or steatosis according to the NASH CRN criteria).” • As a consequence of the above, the former primary endpoint was changed to the secondary endpoint: "Relative change from baseline (week 0) to week 48 in liver stiffness measured by MRE." • To ensure complete follow-up of primary endpoint assessment, liver biopsies were needed at week 48 for subjects who discontinued treatment during the trial (visit 12 A). • To reflect the change in primary endpoint, the primary estimand was changed accordingly. • Clarification of various procedures and assessments

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 27 10:05:05 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA