Clinical Trial Results:
Randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Loxoprofen sodium 60 mg tape medicated plaster vs. placebo in the local symptomatic and short-term treatment of pain in acute strains, sprains or bruises of the extremities following blunt trauma, e.g. sports injuries
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2019-001038-32 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
19 Mar 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
04 Apr 2021
|
First version publication date |
04 Apr 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
48-03LXPU
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Lead Chemical Co. Ltd.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
77-3 Himata, Toyama, Japan, 930-0912
|
||
Public contact |
Dr. Regenold GmbH, Dr. Regenold GmbH, +49 763282260, info@regenold.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Dr. Regenold GmbH, Dr. Regenold GmbH, +49 763282260, info@regenold.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
28 Sep 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
19 Mar 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Evaluate the efficacy of a loxoprofen sodium 60 mg tape medicated plaster, applied once a day, compared with placebo for up to 7 days, in male and female subjects with acute blunt, soft tissue injuries of the limbs (i.e. sports injuries). The study had a double-blind, randomized, multi-center, placebo-controlled, parallel group design.
Patients were randomized soon after the injury (from injury to initial treatment not >6 h). After the randomization Visit (V) 1 = Baseline, Day (D) 1, patients returned to the study center for post-baseline visits. Patients applied the plaster approximately every 24 hours for the following 7 days witnessed by clinical trial staff at the trial center for the first 5 days, then alone at home.
Patients assessed pain-on-movement (POM) and spontaneous pain-at-rest (PAR), as well as efficacy and safety of the treatment at each study visit i.e. V1 (D1), V2 (D1 or D2), V3 (D2), V4 (D3), V5 (D4), V6 (D5), and Final visit V7 (D7 ± 1D).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The clinical trial protocol and amendments were approved by local ethics committees/Institutional Review Boards and Competent Authorities. The clinical trial was conducted in accordance with good clinical practice (GCP) and the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained in writing prior to any trial-related activities.
Patients were monitored for adverse events throughout participation in the study.
|
||
Background therapy |
Standard care by rest, ice, compression (non-occlusive bandage), or elevation (RICE) at the discretion of the Investigator. Rescue medication (paracetamol) except for the 6 hours immediately preceding Visit 5 (72 h). | ||
Evidence for comparator |
None. Abbreviations used in this study entry AE=Adverse event ANCOVA=Analysis of covariance AUC=Area under the curve CI=Confidence interval D=Day GCP=Good Clinical Practice h=hour LSMeans = Least Square Means PAR=Pain-at-rest POM=Pain-on-movement V=Visit VAS=Visual Analogue Scale | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
15 Nov 2019
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 127
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
127
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
127
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
127
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Overall 127 adult male and female patients were recruited. All patients had acute blunt, soft-tissue injury or contusion (such as sports injuries) of the upper or lower limb. The trial was performed in 3 study centers in Germany. | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Patients were eligible for enrollment according to the trial inclusion and exclusion criteria. The size of injury was measured by the Investigator at randomisation (V1). The size had to be at least 25 cm2 and at most 120 cm2, based on the largest perpendicular diameters. | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall treatment (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
The identity of the treatments was concealed by the use of study drugs that were all identical in packaging, labeling, schedule of administration, appearance, and odor.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Loxoprofen sodium | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received Loxoprofen sodium 60 mg tape medicated plaster applied once a day for up to 7 days. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Loxoprofen sodium
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Loxoprofen sodium hydrate
|
|||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Medicated plaster
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Transdermal use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Loxoprofen sodium 60 mg tape medicated plaster was applied once a day, for up to 7 days.
Active ingredient: Loxoprofen sodium hydrate 68 mg (60 mg as anhydrate).
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received placebo plasters that were applied once a day for up to 7 days. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Medicated plaster
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Transdermal use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Placebo plaster applied once a day, for up to 7 days.
Placebo plaster did not contain the active ingredient but was otherwise indistinguishable from the investigational drug tape medicated plaster.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Loxoprofen sodium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received Loxoprofen sodium 60 mg tape medicated plaster applied once a day for up to 7 days. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received placebo plasters that were applied once a day for up to 7 days. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Loxoprofen sodium
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received Loxoprofen sodium 60 mg tape medicated plaster applied once a day for up to 7 days. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received placebo plasters that were applied once a day for up to 7 days. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
1_Pain-on-movement (POM) -- post treatment at 72 h | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Pain-on-movement (POM) at injured site in mm, measured using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Visit 5 (Day 4, 72 h after start of the treatment).
POM was assessed in mm on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = ‘no pain’, and 100 mm = ‘extreme pain’.
Results are expressed as absolute change from baseline (baseline values minus post-baseline values).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (pre treatment Day 1), post treatment at 72 h (Day 4).
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Full Analysis Set [2] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
POM Visit 5 (72 h post treatment) | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Pain-on-movement at Visit 5 (72 h post treatment).
ANCOVA – Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline VAS pain-on-movement, as covariate.
LS Means treatment effect at V5 (72h post treatment), [Placebo minus Loxoprofen] in (mm).
LSMeans = Least Square Means
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [3] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
23.1
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
18 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
28.2 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
2.6
|
||||||||||||
Notes [3] - ANCOVA= Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
2_AUC for pain-on-movement (POM) -- post treatment at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 168 h | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Area under the curve (AUC) over time between baseline and the first 24, 48, 72, 96, and 168 h of treatment, for POM, as measured by visual analogue scale (VAS).
POM was assessed in mm on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = ‘no pain’, and 100 mm = ‘extreme pain’.
AUC was presented as ordinate = POM score in mm, abscissa = time after treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (pre treatment, Day 1), post treatment at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 168 h.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - Full Analysis Set [5] - Full Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
1_AUC (0-24 h) for POM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Results shown represent the LS Mean difference for [Placebo minus Loxoprofen sodium], in mm*h.
AUC=Area-under-the-curve; ANCOVA=Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline as covariate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
156.4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
99.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
213.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
28.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
2_AUC (0-48 h) for POM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Results shown represent the LS Mean difference for [Placebo minus Loxoprofen sodium], in mm*h.
AUC=Area-under-the-curve; ANCOVA=Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline as covariate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
582.3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
427.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
736.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
78.1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
3_AUC (0-72 h) for POM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Results shown represent the LS Mean difference for [Placebo minus Loxoprofen sodium], in mm*h.
AUC=Area-under-the-curve; ANCOVA=Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline as covariate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1115.2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
852.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1377.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
132.7
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
4_AUC (0-96 h) for POM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Results shown represent the LS Mean difference for [Placebo minus Loxoprofen sodium], in mm*h.
AUC=Area-under-the-curve; ANCOVA=Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline as covariate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1632.6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
1274.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1990.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
180.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
5_AUC (0-168 h) for POM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Results shown represent the LS Mean difference for [Placebo minus Loxoprofen sodium], in mm*h.
AUC=Area-under-the-curve; ANCOVA=Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline as covariate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2711.2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
2136.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3285.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
290.2
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
3_Pain-on-movement (POM) -- post treatment at 24, 48, 96, and 168 h | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pain-on-movement (POM) at injured site in mm, measured using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
POM was assessed in mm on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = ‘no pain’, and 100 mm = ‘extreme pain’.
Results are expressed as absolute change from baseline (baseline values minus post-baseline values).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (pre treatment Day 1), post treatment at 24, 48, 96, and 168 h.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Full Analysis Set [7] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
1_POM (0-24 h) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANCOVA – Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline VAS pain-on-movement, as covariate.
LS Means treatment effect at respective visit, [Placebo minus Loxoprofen] in (mm).
LSMeans = Least Square Means
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
15.9
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
11.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
20.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
2.3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
2_POM (0-48 h) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANCOVA – Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline VAS pain-on-movement, as covariate.
LS Means treatment effect at respective visit, [Placebo minus Loxoprofen] in (mm).
LSMeans = Least Square Means
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
21.2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
16.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
26.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
2.6
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
3_POM (0-96 h) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANCOVA – Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline VAS pain-on-movement, as covariate.
LS Means treatment effect at respective visit, [Placebo minus Loxoprofen] in (mm).
LSMeans = Least Square Means
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
20
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
15.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
24.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
2.2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
4_POM (0-168 h) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANCOVA – Analysis-of-covariance with the factors treatment group, center, and baseline VAS pain-on-movement, as covariate.
LS Means treatment effect at respective visit, [Placebo minus Loxoprofen] in (mm).
LSMeans = Least Square Means
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
9.6
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
6.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
12.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
1.6
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
4_Pain-at-rest (PAR) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pain-at-rest (PAR) at injured site at 24, 48, and 72 h post treatment.
PAR was assessed in mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 mm = ‘no pain’, and 100 mm = ‘extreme pain’.
Results are expressed as absolute change from baseline (baseline values minus post-baseline values).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (pre treatment, Day 1), post treatment at 24, 48, 72 h.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [8] - Full Analysis Set [9] - Full Analysis Set |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
1_PAR (0-24 h) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
LSMeans and p-values from ANCOVA with treatment and site as fixed effects and baseline PAR assessment as a covariate.
LSMeans = Least Square Means
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0002 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
5.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
2.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
8.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
1.5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
2_PAR (0-48 h) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
LSMeans and p-values from ANCOVA with treatment and site as fixed effects and baseline PAR assessment as a covariate.
LSMeans = Least Square Means
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
7.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
10.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
1.4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
3_PAR (0-72 h) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
LSMeans and p-values from ANCOVA with treatment and site as fixed effects and baseline PAR assessment as a covariate.
LSMeans = Least Square Means
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Means Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
5.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
10.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
1.2
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
5_Time to meaningful reduction (30%) of pain-on-movement (POM) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Time to meaningful (30%) reduction of POM.
A meaningful reduction of pain was defined as a reduction of 30% from baseline, measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for POM.
POM was assessed in mm on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = ‘no pain’, and 100 mm = ‘extreme pain’.
Results are expressed as the number of patients reaching a meaningful (30%) reduction of POM during the respective time interval.
Time to meaningful (30%) reduction of pain in hours (h):
Loxoprofen sodium, Median: 23.5 h, 95% CI: (23.1, 24.0)
Placebo, Median: 69.1 h, 95% CI: (48.5, 71.7)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (pre treatment, Day 1), post treatment at 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 192 h.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [10] - Full Analysis Set [11] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Time to meaningful reduction (30%) of POM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
6_Time to optimal reduction (50%) of pain-on-movement (POM) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Time to optimal (50%) reduction of POM.
An optimal reduction of pain was defined as a reduction of 50% from baseline, measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for POM.
POM was assessed in mm on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = ‘no pain’, and 100 mm = ‘extreme pain’.
Results are expressed as the number of patients reaching an optimal (50%) reduction of POM during the respective time interval.
Time to optimal (50%) reduction of pain in hours (h):
Loxoprofen sodium, Median: 47.3 h, 95% CI: (44.8, 47.8)
Placebo, Median: 95.6 h, 95% CI: (71.9, 166.6)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (pre treatment, Day 1), post treatment at 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 192 h.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [12] - Full Analysis Set [13] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Time to optimal reduction (50%) of POM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
7_Responder rate -- at least 50% reduction of POM at 72 h | |||||||||
End point description |
Responder rate.
The responder rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% reduction of POM on Day 4 (72 h), compared with baseline.
Results are expressed as the number of responders reaching that level of POM reduction.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (pre treatment, Day 1), post treatment at 72 h (Day 4).
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [14] - Full Analysis Set [15] - Full Analysis Set |
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Responder rate on Day 4 (72 h) | |||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0444 | |||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
8_Clinical global assessment of efficacy -- 48 h -- (Investigator) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical global assessment of efficacy at V4 (48 h post treatment), assessed by the Investigator
The investigator's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the investigator had to answer was:
Considering all the ways this treatment has affected the patient since he/she started in the study, how well is he/she doing?
The response options were: ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’, or 'very poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 4 (48 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [16] - Full Analysis Set [17] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 4 (48 h) -- Investigator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
9_Clinical global assessment of efficacy -- 72 h -- (Investigator) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical global assessment of efficacy at V5 (72 h post treatment), assessed by the Investigator.
The investigator's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the investigator had to answer was:
Considering all the ways this treatment has affected the patient since he/she started in the study, how well is he/she doing?
The response options were: ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’, or 'very poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 5 (72 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [18] - Full Analysis Set [19] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 5 (72 h) -- Investigator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
10_Clinical global assessment of efficacy -- 168 h -- (Investigator) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical global assessment of efficacy at V7 (168 h post treatment), assessed by the Investigator.
The investigator's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the investigator had to answer was:
Considering all the ways this treatment has affected the patient since he/she started in the study, how well is he/she doing?
The response options were: ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’, or 'very poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 7 (168 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [20] - Full Analysis Set [21] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 7 (168 h) -- Investigator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
11_Clinical global assessment of efficacy -- 48 h -- (Patient) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical global assessment of efficacy at V4 (48 h post treatment), assessed by the patient.
The patient's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the patient had to answer was:
Considering all the ways this treatment has affected you since you started in the clinical trial, how well are you doing?
The response options were: ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’, or 'very poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 4 (48 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [22] - Full Analysis Set [23] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 4 (48 h) -- Patient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
12_Clinical global assessment of efficacy -- 72 h -- (Patient) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical global assessment of efficacy at V5 (72 h post treatment), assessed by the patient.
The patient's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the patient had to answer was:
Considering all the ways this treatment has affected you since you started in the clinical trial, how well are you doing?
The response options were: ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’, or 'very poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 5 (72 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [24] - Full Analysis Set [25] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 5 (72 h) -- Patient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
13_Clinical global assessment of efficacy -- 168 h -- (Patient) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical global assessment of efficacy at V7 (168 h post treatment), assessed by the patient.
The patient's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the patient had to answer was:
Considering all the ways this treatment has affected you since you started in the clinical trial, how well are you doing?
The response options were: ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’, or 'very poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 7 (168 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [26] - Full Analysis Set [27] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 7 (168 h) -- Patient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
126
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
14_Treatment assessment -- 48 h -- (Patient) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Treatment assessment at V4 (48 h post treatment), assessed by the patient.
The patient's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the patient had to answer was:
How do you rate this medication as a treatment for the pain of your soft tissue injury/contusion?
The response options were: ‘excellent’, ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, or ‘poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 4 (48 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [28] - Full Analysis Set [29] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 4 (48 h) -- Patient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
15_Treatment assessment -- 72 h -- (Patient) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Treatment assessment at V5 (72 h post treatment), assessed by the patient.
The patient's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the patient had to answer was:
How do you rate this medication as a treatment for the pain of your soft tissue injury/contusion?”
The response options were: ‘excellent’, ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, or ‘poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 5 (72 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [30] - Full Analysis Set [31] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 5 (72 h) -- Patient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
127
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
16_Treatment assessment -- 168 h -- (Patient) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Treatment assessment at V7 (168 h post treatment), assessed by the patient.
The patient's opinion on the global efficacy assessment of the IMP on the following 5-point Likert scale was documented.
The question that the patient had to answer was:
How do you rate this medication as a treatment for the pain of your soft tissue injury/contusion?”
The response options were: ‘excellent’, ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’, or ‘poor’.
The results are shown as the number of patients per response category.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 7 (168 h post treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [32] - Full Analysis Set [33] - Full Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visit 7 (168 h) -- Patient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Loxoprofen sodium v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
126
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From the time of signing the informed consent form and to trial completion or discontinuation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Safety analysis set was used to evaluate the adverse events.
Safety analysis set = Full analysis set, defined as all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
22.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Loxoprofen sodium
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received Loxoprofen sodium 60 mg tape medicated plaster applied once a day for up to 7 days. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received placebo plasters that were applied once a day for up to 7 days. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None. |