Clinical Trial Results:
Imaging of tumour microenvironment in patients with oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using RGD PET/CT imaging.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2019-001843-37 |
Trial protocol |
NL |
Global end of trial date |
01 Apr 2024
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
05 Jun 2025
|
First version publication date |
05 Jun 2025
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
52649
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Radboud University Medical Center
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 GA
|
||
Public contact |
Department Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, +31 243613651, evelein.vangenugten@radboudumc.nl
|
||
Scientific contact |
Department Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, +31 243613651, evelein.vangenugten@radboudumc.nl
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Interim
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 May 2025
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
01 Apr 2024
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study is to assess the differences in [68Ga]Ga-RGD2 uptake and CT perfusion parameters between HPV+ HNSCC tumours and HPV- HNSCC tumours in patients who will be treated with chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the changes in [68Ga]Ga-RGD2 uptake and CT perfusion parameters in tumours before and during chemoradiotherapy will be investigated.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
To minimize hospital visits, scans were planned on days of already existing hospital visits needed for standard of care - where possible.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Jul 2019
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 9
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
9
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
9
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
4
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
5
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
All patients that met the inclusion criteria were asked to participate in the trial, and availability of logistics of study visists was checked. If these criteria were met, the patient could participate. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
- | |||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
9 | |||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
9 | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
HPV negative | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ga RGD
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
bolus of 200 MBQ plusminus 10%
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
HPV positive | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ga RGD
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
bolus of 200 MBQ plusminus 10%
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
HPV negative
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
HPV positive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
HPV positive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
It is proven that besides more broad carcinogenesis patterns, oropharyngeal carcinomas can develop due to the lingering humane papilloma virus in the throat. This subtype of patients have higher survival rate, but is it still unknown what the exact mechanism is behind these differences in survival. Therefore we aim to compare patients where HPV presence is proven on the tumor tissue with patients where this virus was not detected.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
HPV negative
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
It is proven that besides more broad carcinogenesis patterns, oropharyngeal carcinomas can develop due to the lingering humane papilloma virus in the throat. This subtype of patients have higher survival rate, but is it still unknown what the exact mechanism is behind these differences in survival. Therefore we aim to compare patients where HPV presence is proven on the tumor tissue with patients where this virus was not detected.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
HPV negative
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
HPV positive
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
HPV positive
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
It is proven that besides more broad carcinogenesis patterns, oropharyngeal carcinomas can develop due to the lingering humane papilloma virus in the throat. This subtype of patients have higher survival rate, but is it still unknown what the exact mechanism is behind these differences in survival. Therefore we aim to compare patients where HPV presence is proven on the tumor tissue with patients where this virus was not detected.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
HPV negative
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
It is proven that besides more broad carcinogenesis patterns, oropharyngeal carcinomas can develop due to the lingering humane papilloma virus in the throat. This subtype of patients have higher survival rate, but is it still unknown what the exact mechanism is behind these differences in survival. Therefore we aim to compare patients where HPV presence is proven on the tumor tissue with patients where this virus was not detected.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Uptake of 68Ga-RGD2 in tumor lesions [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Measured on the 68Ga-RGD2 PET/CT made pre-treatment
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: For interim analysis we used arithmetic mean and standard deviation. Statistics will be used in the paper to be published |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
CT perfusion paramters [2] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Measured on the CT perfusion scan made pre-treatment
|
||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: For interim analysis we used arithmetic mean and standard deviation. Statistics will be used in the paper to be published |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
within the time frame of patient participation
|
||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
CTC | ||
Dictionary version |
5.0
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: There are no (S)AEs as it is a diagnostic IMP |
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||||||
Date |
Amendment |
||||||
16 Oct 2020 |
Reduction of number of scans to speed up inclusion |
||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
None reported |