| E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
| E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
| Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) |
|
| E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
|
| E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04] |
| MedDRA Classification |
| E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
| E.2 Objective of the trial |
| E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Part I: To determine the recommended Phase 3 dose of venetoclax in combination with AZA as maintenance therapy in subjects with AML who have achieved CR or CRi with conventional chemotherapy
Part II: To evaluate if venetoclax in combination with AZA as maintenance therapy improves relapse-free survival (RFS) comparing to BSC in subjects with AML who have achieved CR + CRi with conventional chemotherapy.
|
|
| E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
•To evaluate if venetoclax in combination with AZA as maintenance therapy improves overall survival (OS) in comparison to BSC
•To evaluate the safety of venetoclax in combination with AZA as maintenance therapy in comparison to BSC
•To evaluate if venetoclax in combination with AZA as maintenance therapy improves the MRD conversion rate among subjects who are MRD-positive at study initiation in comparison to BSC
•To evaluate if venetoclax in combination with AZA as maintenance therapy compared to BSC delays time to deterioration in Global Health Status (GHS)/(QoL) score as measured by procedures outlined in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire - Core 30 item (EORTC QLQ C30) scoring manual
•To evaluate if venetoclax in combination with AZA as maintenance therapy has impact on fatigue when compared to BSC based on PRO assessment of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(PROMIS)Fatigue Short Form (SF) 7a
|
|
| E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
| E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Subject must be ≥ 18 years old, have newly diagnosed AML with intermediate or adverse risk cytogenetics, have confirmed CR or CRi following completion of planned induction and consolidation chemotherapy, have achieved first CR + CRi within 4 months of enrollment or no more than 75 days since last dose of conventional chemotherapy, and have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 2.
The key laboratory requirements are as follows:
•creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/minute; calculated by the Cockcroft Gault formula or measured by 24-hour urine collection;
•bilirubin < 3.0 × upper limit of normal (ULN) (adequate liver function);
•absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/µL;
platelets ≥ 100,000/mm3. |
|
| E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
History of APL.
History of active central nervous system involvement with AML. |
|
| E.5 End points |
| E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Part I: The primary endpoint is dose-limiting toxicities of venetoclax in combination with AZA
Part II:Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) |
|
| E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Timepoint for part I: After approximately 20 subjects have been treated for at least 28 days
Timepoint for part II: The time from randomization to the date of relapse or the date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. |
|
| E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
•Overall Survival: OS is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of death.
•Minimal Residual Disease: The MRD conversion rate is defined as the proportion of subjects deemed MRD positive (≥ 10-3) at study initiation who converted to MRD of < 10-3 in the bone marrow after randomization or initiation of treatment.
•Patient-Reported Outcomes: GHS/QoL scale from the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores will be assessed and computed according to procedures outlined in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. Time to deterioration in GHS/QoL is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause or first-time decrease of ≥ 5 points from baseline.
•Patient-Reported Outcomes: Fatigue will be assessed using the PROMIS Fatigue SF 7a global fatigue score and calculated according to the procedure outlined in the PROMIS fatigue scoring manual. The impact on fatigue score will be evaluated by the change from baseline at all scheduled visits.
|
|
| E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
•Overall Survival: OS is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of death.
•The MRD conversion rate is defined as the proportion of subjects deemed MRD positive (≥ 10-3) at study initiation who converted to MRD of < 10-3 in the bone marrow after randomization or initiation of treatment.
•Time to deterioration in GHS/QoL is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause or first-time decrease of ≥ 5 points from baseline.
•The impact on fatigue score will be evaluated by the change from baseline at all scheduled visits."
|
|
| E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
| E.6 | Scope of the trial |
| E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
| E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
| E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
| E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
| E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
| E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
| E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | Yes |
| E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
| E.6.9 | Dose response | Yes |
| E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | Yes |
| E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
| E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
| E.6.13 | Others | No |
| E.7 | Trial type and phase |
| E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
| E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
| E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
| E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
| E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
| E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
| E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
| E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
| E.8 Design of the trial |
| E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
| E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
| E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
| E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
| E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
| E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
| E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
| E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
| E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
| E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
| E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
| E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
| E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
| Best Supportive Care (BSC) |
|
| E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
| E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
| E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
| E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 11 |
| E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
| E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 57 |
| E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
| E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
| E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
| E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
| Australia |
| Brazil |
| Canada |
| China |
| Czech Republic |
| France |
| Germany |
| Greece |
| Hungary |
| Italy |
| Japan |
| Korea, Republic of |
| Russian Federation |
| Spain |
| Taiwan |
| Turkey |
| United Kingdom |
| United States |
|
| E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
| E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
| The end-of-study is defined as the date of the last subject's last visit or date of the last follow-up contact, whichever is later. |
|
| E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 5 |
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 2 |
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 5 |
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 6 |
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |