Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44343   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7372   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    ADalimumab Vs. conventional ImmunoSupprEssion for uveitis (ADVISE)Trial

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2019-002366-12
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    09 Sep 2024

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    06 Jun 2025
    First version publication date
    06 Jun 2025
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    Protocolversion1.0
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT03828019
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Johns Hopkins Bloomberg SPH
    Sponsor organisation address
    410 N Washington Street, Baltimore, United States, 21231
    Public contact
    Elizabeth Sugar, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (SPH), +1 410 614 7837, esugar2@jhu.edu
    Scientific contact
    Elizabeth Sugar, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (SPH), +1 410 614 7837, esugar2@jhu.edu
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    09 Sep 2024
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    09 Sep 2024
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    09 Sep 2024
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The ADVISE Trial is a randomized, parallel-treatment, comparative effectiveness trial, comparing adalimumab to conventional immunosuppression for the treatment of non-infectious, intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides. Based on the preliminary data we assume that adalimumab will be superior to conventional immunosuppression for successful corticosteroid-sparing with no clinically important increase in uveitis symptoms namely inactive uveitis and prednisone <7.5 mg/day for 2 visits >28 days apart by 6 months of follow-up.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The protocol and consent were approved by the IRB/Ethics of participating centers before beginning recruitment of patients. All participants signed a consent statement and medical record release form as well as HIPAA – complaint privacy practices acknowledgment prior to participation in the study. Surveillance of uveitis and treatment complications is conducted throughout the study; any such complications encountered are managed by the best medical judgment of the treating ophthalmologist. These events are recorded on study data forms and are submitted to the CC. Summaries of these data are reviewed by the DSMC at each meeting. Important, serious, or unusual adverse events require expedited reporting to the CC and are reviewed by the CC Safety Officer, who makes the determination as to whether the event meets the criteria for a safety report and whether expedited review by DSMC Safety Officer is warranted. The CC Safety Officer follows all serious adverse events through resolution. All serious and unexpected events possibly related to uveitis treatment will be reported as safety reports to the NEI project officer, the FDA, the pharmaceutical supplier (where appropriate), and all clinical centers in accordance with FDA regulations. The CC and clinical centers will submit all safety reports as expedited reports to their IRBs. Reports of serious events not deemed to be unexpected will be submitted to the CC IRB, to the IRB of the clinical center in which the event was reported, as well as to any other study center IRBs, which require such reports. Confidentiality of patient data will be maintained in accordance with legal regulations. Protected health information (PHI) not be transmitted to the CO, CC, RC, or to other ADVISE sites. PHI collected for study purposes, possibly including name, social security number, address, and other such personal data will be kept solel
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    19 Aug 2019
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Australia: 23
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 192
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    227
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    3
    Adults (18-64 years)
    199
    From 65 to 84 years
    25
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    The trial was conducted at 27 clinical centers in the United States (19), the United Kingdom (5), Australia (2), and Canada (1). Eligible patients were adults or adolescents >13 years age, with active or recently-active (within 60 days) non-infectious, intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis for whom immunosuppression was indicated.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Screening details: 338 screened, 227 randomized 111 Excluded Major reasons for exclusion were; Patient preference (20%) inactive Uveitis (7%) Medication issues (29%) Medical condition (23%)

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall study 12 months (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Visual acuity and ophthalmic reading center graders were masked as to treatment assignment

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Adalimumab (ADA)
    Arm description
    Adalimumab administeredby subcutaneous injectionat dosage and frequencyspecified below; totalduration of treatment is 12months. Adults (≥ 18 years of age)and adolescents ≥30 kg:80 mg as initial dose; oneweek later by 40 mg then40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents <30 kg: 40 mgas initial dose; one weeklater 20 mg then 20 mgevery 2 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Adalimumab
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Humira
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Injection
    Routes of administration
    Injection
    Dosage and administration details
    Adalimumab administeredby subcutaneous injectionat dosage and frequencyspecified below; totalduration of treatment is 12months. Adults (≥ 18 years of age)and adolescents ≥30 kg:80 mg as initial dose; oneweek later by 40 mg then40 mg every two weeks.Adolescents <30 kg: 40 mgas initial dose; one weeklater 20 mg then 20 mgevery 2 weeks. Adalimumab (ADA):Adalimumab is a fully-human monoclonalantibody to tumor necrosisfactor (TNF-α), which isapproved by the U.S. FDAfor the treatment of non-infectious intermediate,posterior, and panuveitidesin adults and children 2years of age and older

    Arm title
    Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Arm description
    Conventionalimmunosuppressive agentselected by studyophthalmologist at doseand frequency specifiedbelow;12 month treatmentduration. Azathioprine: initially 2mg/kg/day; max dose 200mg/day. Methotrexateinitially 15mg/wk; max dose25 mg/wk. Mycophenolateinitially 1 gm twice a day(BID); max dose1.5 gmBID. Cyclosporine(Sandimmune - dose 2.5mg/kg BID and Neoraldose 2 mg/kg BID.Tacrolimus initially 1 mgBID; max dose 3 mg BID.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Azathioprine:
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Imuran
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    initially 2mg/kg/day; max dose 200mg/day.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Methotrexate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet, Injection
    Routes of administration
    Oral use, Injection
    Dosage and administration details
    Methotrexate initially 15mg/wk; max dose25 mg/wk.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Mycophenolate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    CellCept
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Mycophenolateinitially 1 gm twice a day(BID); max dose1.5 gmBID

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Cyclosporine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Sandimmune, Neoral
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    dose 2.5mg/kg BID

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tacrolimus
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Prograf
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    initially 1 mg BID; max dose 3 mg BID.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Adalimumab (ADA) Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Started
    114
    113
    Completed
    109
    98
    Not completed
    5
    15
         Physician decision
    1
    -
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    2
    6
         Incarcerated
    1
    -
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    9

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Adalimumab (ADA)
    Reporting group description
    Adalimumab administeredby subcutaneous injectionat dosage and frequencyspecified below; totalduration of treatment is 12months. Adults (≥ 18 years of age)and adolescents ≥30 kg:80 mg as initial dose; oneweek later by 40 mg then40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents <30 kg: 40 mgas initial dose; one weeklater 20 mg then 20 mgevery 2 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Reporting group description
    Conventionalimmunosuppressive agentselected by studyophthalmologist at doseand frequency specifiedbelow;12 month treatmentduration. Azathioprine: initially 2mg/kg/day; max dose 200mg/day. Methotrexateinitially 15mg/wk; max dose25 mg/wk. Mycophenolateinitially 1 gm twice a day(BID); max dose1.5 gmBID. Cyclosporine(Sandimmune - dose 2.5mg/kg BID and Neoraldose 2 mg/kg BID.Tacrolimus initially 1 mgBID; max dose 3 mg BID.

    Reporting group values
    Adalimumab (ADA) Conventional Immunosuppression (CID) Total
    Number of subjects
    114 113 227
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    44 (34 to 55) 44 (34 to 59) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    75 78 153
        Male
    39 35 74
    Race
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    0 1 1
        Asian
    8 4 12
        Black
    21 20 41
        White
    81 82 163
        More than 1 race
    1 2 3
        Unknow
    3 4 7
    Type of uveitis
    Units: Subjects
        Intermediate
    8 10 18
        Anterior and intermediate
    20 12 32
        birdshot
    23 26 49
        Multifocalchoroiditis with panuveitis
    10 9 19
        Serpiginouschoroiditis
    2 4 6
        Punctate innerchoroiditis
    3 2 5
        Sympatheticophthalmia
    2 2 4
        Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada diseaseearly stage
    7 6 13
        Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada diseaselate stage
    1 4 5
        Isolated retinalvasculitis orpanuveitis withretina
    28 23 51
        Isolatedchoroiditis orpanuveitis withchoroiditis
    10 15 25
    On immunotherapy at baseline
    Was the patient taking an immunotherapy medication (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus ) at baseline. Randomization was stratified by whether the participant was receiving no or 1 immunosuppressive drug at baseline.
    Units: Subjects
        No Immunotherapy
    90 88 178
        On immunotherapy
    24 25 49
    Starting trial corticosteroid dose
    Indicates whether patient was to begin the trial on a daily dose of corticosteroid >= 30 mg or less than 30 mg.
    Units: Subjects
        steroid dose < 30 mg
    29 28 57
        steroid dose >=30 mg
    85 85 170
    Best corrected visual acuity
    Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart(5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart.Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity. (85 standard letters =20/20 vision)
    Units: Standard lettersEDTRS eyechart
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    -
    Retinal thickness at the center subfield
    Measure Description: Central subfield thickness asmeasured by OCT at a fundus photograph reading center.Values > 300 are indicative of macular edema.
    Units: um retinal thickness
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    -
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA)
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Eyes with uveitis from participants assigned to ADAL. Each patient can contribute one or both eyes to the analysis set. Randomization was per person.

    Subject analysis set title
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Eyes with uveitis from participants assigned to ADAL. Each patient can contribute one or both eyes to the analysis set. Randomization was per person.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA) Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Number of subjects
    214
    220
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
        Newborns (0-27 days)
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
        Children (2-11 years)
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
        Adults (18-64 years)
        From 65-84 years
        85 years and over
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
        Male
    Race
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        American Indian or Alaska Native
        Asian
        Black
        White
        More than 1 race
        Unknow
    Type of uveitis
    Units: Subjects
        Intermediate
        Anterior and intermediate
        birdshot
        Multifocalchoroiditis with panuveitis
        Serpiginouschoroiditis
        Punctate innerchoroiditis
        Sympatheticophthalmia
        Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada diseaseearly stage
        Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada diseaselate stage
        Isolated retinalvasculitis orpanuveitis withretina
        Isolatedchoroiditis orpanuveitis withchoroiditis
    On immunotherapy at baseline
    Was the patient taking an immunotherapy medication (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus ) at baseline. Randomization was stratified by whether the participant was receiving no or 1 immunosuppressive drug at baseline.
    Units: Subjects
        No Immunotherapy
        On immunotherapy
    Starting trial corticosteroid dose
    Indicates whether patient was to begin the trial on a daily dose of corticosteroid >= 30 mg or less than 30 mg.
    Units: Subjects
        steroid dose < 30 mg
        steroid dose >=30 mg
    Best corrected visual acuity
    Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart(5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart.Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity. (85 standard letters =20/20 vision)
    Units: Standard lettersEDTRS eyechart
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    81 (71 to 87)
    81 (71 to 86)
    Retinal thickness at the center subfield
    Measure Description: Central subfield thickness asmeasured by OCT at a fundus photograph reading center.Values > 300 are indicative of macular edema.
    Units: um retinal thickness
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    255 (229 to 318)
    247 (219 to 282)

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Adalimumab (ADA)
    Reporting group description
    Adalimumab administeredby subcutaneous injectionat dosage and frequencyspecified below; totalduration of treatment is 12months. Adults (≥ 18 years of age)and adolescents ≥30 kg:80 mg as initial dose; oneweek later by 40 mg then40 mg every two weeks. Adolescents <30 kg: 40 mgas initial dose; one weeklater 20 mg then 20 mgevery 2 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Reporting group description
    Conventionalimmunosuppressive agentselected by studyophthalmologist at doseand frequency specifiedbelow;12 month treatmentduration. Azathioprine: initially 2mg/kg/day; max dose 200mg/day. Methotrexateinitially 15mg/wk; max dose25 mg/wk. Mycophenolateinitially 1 gm twice a day(BID); max dose1.5 gmBID. Cyclosporine(Sandimmune - dose 2.5mg/kg BID and Neoraldose 2 mg/kg BID.Tacrolimus initially 1 mgBID; max dose 3 mg BID.

    Subject analysis set title
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA)
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Eyes with uveitis from participants assigned to ADAL. Each patient can contribute one or both eyes to the analysis set. Randomization was per person.

    Subject analysis set title
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Eyes with uveitis from participants assigned to ADAL. Each patient can contribute one or both eyes to the analysis set. Randomization was per person.

    Primary: Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 6 Months AfterRandomization

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success Within the First 6 Months AfterRandomization
    End point description
    Corticosteroid-sparing success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits >= 28 days apart while on <= 7.5 mg/day of corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid sparing between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    At 6 months
    End point values
    Adalimumab (ADA) Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    105
    Units: Proportion with corticosteroid sparing
        number (confidence interval 5%)
    0.69 (0.60 to 0.77)
    0.54 (0.44 to 0.64)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment effect Odds ratio ADA/CID
    Statistical analysis description
    Odds ratio ADA / CID Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid outcomes (sparing and cessation) between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix
    Comparison groups
    Adalimumab (ADA) v Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    217
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.029
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.86
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.06
         upper limit
    3.25

    Secondary: Corticosteroid discontinuation at 6 months

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Corticosteroid discontinuation at 6 months
    End point description
    Corticosteroid discontinuation success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits >= 28 days apart after discontinuing corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid discontinuation between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months and 12 months.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    6 months
    End point values
    Adalimumab (ADA) Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    105
    Units: cumulative proportion
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.15 (0.09 to 0.24)
    0.11 (0.06 to 0.18)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment effect Odds Ratio ADA/CID
    Statistical analysis description
    Greater that 1 indicates ADA was superior in participants achieving cessation of corticosteroid treatment
    Comparison groups
    Adalimumab (ADA) v Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    217
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.3
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.53
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.67
         upper limit
    3.46

    Secondary: Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success at 12 months

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Corticosteroid-sparing Treatment Success at 12 months
    End point description
    on <= 7.5 mg/day of corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid sparing between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At 12 months
    End point values
    Adalimumab (ADA) Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects analysed
    109
    98
    Units: Proportion with corticosteroid sparing
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.86 (0.78 to 0.92)
    0.77 (0.67 to 0.84)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment effect Odds ratio ADA/CID
    Statistical analysis description
    Odds ratio ADA / CID Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid outcomes (sparing and cessation) between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix
    Comparison groups
    Adalimumab (ADA) v Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    207
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.077
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.89
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.93
         upper limit
    3.83

    Secondary: Corticosteroid discontinuation at 12 months

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Corticosteroid discontinuation at 12 months
    End point description
    Corticosteroid discontinuation success is defined as achieving inactive uveitis for two consecutive visits >= 28 days apart after discontinuing corticosteroids. Uveitis status (active vs inactive) is determined by the study ophthalmologist after reviewing the eye exam and imaging. Steroid dose and uveitis activity from visit months 6,8,10 and 12 were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit logistic regression models to compare the cumulative proportion of corticosteroid discontinuation between the two treatment groups over time while accounting for correlation between replicate measurements on the same individual with an unstructured covariance matrix. Results were reported at 6 months and 12 months.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    12 months
    End point values
    Adalimumab (ADA) Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects analysed
    109
    98
    Units: Cumulative proportion
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.55 (0.45 to 0.64)
    0.40 (0.30 to 0.50)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment effect Odds Ratio ADA/CID
    Statistical analysis description
    Greater that 1 indicates ADA was superior in participants achieving cessation of corticosteroid treatment
    Comparison groups
    Conventional Immunosuppression (CID) v Adalimumab (ADA)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    207
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.028
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.85
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.06
         upper limit
    3.19

    Secondary: Best Corrected Visual Acuity Change at 12 Months

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Best Corrected Visual Acuity Change at 12 Months
    End point description
    Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 12 months. Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity (85 letters is 20/20 vision). Visual acuity data was collected at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12 and estimated at 12 months with a mixed model.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    12 months
    End point values
    Adalimumab (ADA) Conventional Immunosuppression (CID) Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA) Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [1]
    0 [2]
    198
    188
    Units: Standard letters ETDRS
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    ( to )
    ( to )
    3.6 (1.3 to 5.8)
    3.2 (1.7 to 4.6)
    Notes
    [1] - Analysis sets were eyes
    [2] - Analysis sets were eyes
    Statistical analysis title
    VA Difference in change from baseline ADA - CID
    Statistical analysis description
    Mixed effects models were used with a linear link. The fixed effects included initial steroid dose and immunosuppression use at baseline. Additional visit indicators (months 1-12) and corresponding treatment by visit interaction terms. An unstructured correlation was used to model repeated measurements by eye . A person-level random intercept was added to account for between-eye correlations.
    Comparison groups
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA) v Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    386
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.77
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    0.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.3
         upper limit
    3.1

    Secondary: Macular Edema at 12 Months of Follow up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Macular Edema at 12 Months of Follow up
    End point description
    Macular edema is defined as central retinal thickness greater than or equal to 300 micrometers as measured by a masked grader's review of OCT images. Greater retinal thickness is associated with poorer vision. Outcome measure is the odds ratio comparing macular edema at 12 months to baseline macular edema. Macular edema was measured at baseline and months 3, 6, and 12. The odds ratio at 12 months was estimated with a mixed model.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    12 months
    End point values
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA) Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Number of subjects analysed
    198
    188
    Units: odds ratio
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.34 (0.23 to 0.51)
    0.63 (0.42 to 0.94)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment effect - ratio of odds ratios
    Statistical analysis description
    Mixed effects models with a log link were used to assess treatment differences . The outcome measure was the odds ratio of having macular edema (OCT central subfield thickness > 300 um) at 12 months compared to baseline (BL). The treatment effect was the ratio of Odds ratios (ADA/CID) at 12 months. Values less than one indicate improvement in macular edema for the ADA treatment group relative to the CID group. Decrease in subfield thickness is good
    Comparison groups
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA) v Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    386
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.028
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Ratio of odds ratios
    Point estimate
    0.55
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.31
         upper limit
    0.94

    Secondary: Hepatoxicity - elevated levels or AST or ALT by 12 months

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Hepatoxicity - elevated levels or AST or ALT by 12 months
    End point description
    Cumulative proportion of participants having elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) greater than twice the upper level of normal by 12 months. Elevated levels of AST and ALT may indicate decline in liver function. Lab values of AST and ALT were measured at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10, and 12 and the cumulative proportion of participants with elevated lab values by 12 months was estimated by Kaplan Meier methods.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    12 months
    End point values
    Adalimumab (ADA) Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects analysed
    111
    110
    Units: Cumulative proportion of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    2 (0 to 5)
    10 (4 to 16)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment effect hazard ratio ADA/CID
    Statistical analysis description
    Kaplan Meier techniques and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate this outcome
    Comparison groups
    Adalimumab (ADA) v Conventional Immunosuppression (CID)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    221
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.014
    Method
    Regression, Cox
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.16
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.04
         upper limit
    0.7

    Secondary: Cataract surgery by 12 months

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Cataract surgery by 12 months
    End point description
    Cumulative proportion of uveitis eyes having cataract surgery by 12 months. Whether the patient had cataract surgery in the prior time period was determined at baseline and months 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,12 and the cumulative proportion of eyes having cataract surgery by12 months was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    12 months
    End point values
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA) Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Number of subjects analysed
    176
    172
    Units: Cumulative proportion of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    2 (0 to 5)
    11 (4 to 17)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment effect hazard ratio ADA/CID
    Comparison groups
    Eyes with uveitis from Arm 1 (ADA) v Eyes with uveitis from Arm 2 (CID)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    348
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.009
    Method
    Regression, Cox
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.21
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.07
         upper limit
    0.67

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Over 12 months of study.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Non serious events were collected in both systemic and non-systemic forms. Systematic collections was asking participants if they experienced any new occurrence of a specify diagnosis, event, or side effect symptom on the case report form at each clinic visit. Non-systemic data was collected by asking if the patient experienced any other events.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    4
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    All participants in Arm 1 with follow up after baseline visit
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    All participants in Arm 2 with follow up after baseline visit
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    All participants in Arm 1 with follow up after baseline visit All participants in Arm 2 with follow up after baseline visit
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    16 / 113 (14.16%)
    13 / 110 (11.82%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Investigations
    Intraocular pressure increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    2 / 110 (1.82%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    basal cell carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    ocular lymphoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    atrial fibrillation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 110 (0.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    cardiovascular disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    2 / 110 (1.82%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 110 (0.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
    Miscarriage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    iris bombe
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Uveitic glaucoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 113 (1.77%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Visual acuity reduced
    Additional description: More than 6 lines of visual acuity loss
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 113 (4.42%)
    1 / 110 (0.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cataract
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 110 (0.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Retinal detachment
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Social circumstances
    Miscarriage of partner
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
    Additional description: Hospitalized for evaluation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Enteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    2 / 110 (1.82%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Inflammatory bowel disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 110 (0.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Nephrolithiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 110 (0.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Appendicitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    2 / 110 (1.82%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hyperglycemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 110 (0.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyperkalemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 110 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    All participants in Arm 1 with follow up after baseline visit All participants in Arm 2 with follow up after baseline visit
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    108 / 113 (95.58%)
    104 / 110 (94.55%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Appetite disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    38 / 113 (33.63%)
    46 / 110 (41.82%)
         occurrences all number
    38
    46
    Nervous system disorders
    dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 113 (5.31%)
    5 / 110 (4.55%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    5
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    76 / 113 (67.26%)
    78 / 110 (70.91%)
         occurrences all number
    76
    78
    Tremor
         subjects affected / exposed
    43 / 113 (38.05%)
    60 / 110 (54.55%)
         occurrences all number
    43
    60
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    76 / 113 (67.26%)
    87 / 110 (79.09%)
         occurrences all number
    76
    87
    Impaired healing
         subjects affected / exposed
    28 / 113 (24.78%)
    44 / 110 (40.00%)
         occurrences all number
    28
    44
    Eye disorders
    Epiretinal membrane
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 113 (15.04%)
    20 / 110 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    17
    20
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    46 / 113 (40.71%)
    48 / 110 (43.64%)
         occurrences all number
    46
    48
    Diahrrhea
         subjects affected / exposed
    42 / 113 (37.17%)
    46 / 110 (41.82%)
         occurrences all number
    42
    46
    Gingival swelling
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 113 (20.35%)
    24 / 110 (21.82%)
         occurrences all number
    23
    24
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    42 / 113 (37.17%)
    52 / 110 (47.27%)
         occurrences all number
    42
    52
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    15 / 113 (13.27%)
    18 / 110 (16.36%)
         occurrences all number
    15
    18
    Mouth ulcer
         subjects affected / exposed
    21 / 113 (18.58%)
    23 / 110 (20.91%)
         occurrences all number
    21
    23
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Acne
         subjects affected / exposed
    32 / 113 (28.32%)
    36 / 110 (32.73%)
         occurrences all number
    32
    26
    Alopecia
         subjects affected / exposed
    38 / 113 (33.63%)
    52 / 110 (47.27%)
         occurrences all number
    38
    52
    Easy bruising
         subjects affected / exposed
    55 / 113 (48.67%)
    59 / 110 (53.64%)
         occurrences all number
    55
    59
    Hair growth abnormal
         subjects affected / exposed
    21 / 113 (18.58%)
    23 / 110 (20.91%)
         occurrences all number
    21
    23
    Rash
         subjects affected / exposed
    34 / 113 (30.09%)
    32 / 110 (29.09%)
         occurrences all number
    34
    32
    Swelling face
         subjects affected / exposed
    51 / 113 (45.13%)
    67 / 110 (60.91%)
         occurrences all number
    51
    67
    Psychiatric disorders
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    60 / 113 (53.10%)
    67 / 110 (60.91%)
         occurrences all number
    60
    67
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    77 / 113 (68.14%)
    79 / 110 (71.82%)
         occurrences all number
    77
    79
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Muscular weakness
         subjects affected / exposed
    44 / 113 (38.94%)
    53 / 110 (48.18%)
         occurrences all number
    44
    53
    Myalgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    77 / 113 (68.14%)
    84 / 110 (76.36%)
         occurrences all number
    77
    84
    Infections and infestations
    Covid-19 infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 113 (9.73%)
    17 / 110 (15.45%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    17
    Upper respiratory infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 113 (7.08%)
    2 / 110 (1.82%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    2
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Fat redistribution
         subjects affected / exposed
    30 / 113 (26.55%)
    30 / 110 (27.27%)
         occurrences all number
    30
    30
    Fluid retension
         subjects affected / exposed
    46 / 113 (40.71%)
    51 / 110 (46.36%)
         occurrences all number
    46
    51

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Jun 14 02:57:34 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA