Clinical Trial Results:
Biological standarization of allergic extracts of wild grasses: Phleum pratense, Lolium perenne, Poa pratensis y Dactylis glomerata and its mixture to determinate their biological activity, the In House Reference Preparation, measures in Histamine unit equivalents (HEP) in sensitized patients
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2019-002644-24 |
Trial protocol |
ES |
Global end of trial date |
18 Feb 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
26 Dec 2024
|
First version publication date |
26 Dec 2024
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Biological standarization of wild grasses |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
DIA-STA-11-01-19
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Diater S.A.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Avda Gregorio Peces Barba, nº 2, Leganés - Madrid, Spain, 28024
|
||
Public contact |
Medical Department, DIATER, Laboratorio de Diagnóstico y Aplicaciones Terapéuticas, S.A., 34 9149660131419, departamento.medico@diater.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Medical Department, DIATER, Laboratorio de Diagnóstico y Aplicaciones Terapéuticas, S.A., 34 9149660131419, departamento.medico@diater.com
|
||
Sponsor organisation name |
Diater S.A.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Avda Gregorio Peces Barba, nº 2, Leganés - Madrid, Spain, 28024
|
||
Public contact |
M. Munoz, M. Munoz, m.munoz@diater.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
M. Munoz, M. Munoz, 34 914966013, m.munoz@diater.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
14 Feb 2022
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
18 Feb 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate in vivo the concentration of the allergenic extracts of wild grass pollen individually: Phleum pratense, Lolium perenne, Poa pratensis and Dactylis glomerata and their mixture that provoked a papule of a size equivalent to that produced by a solution of Histamine dihydrochloride at 10 mg/ml. And standardize the allergenic extracts in biological units.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Each potential subject was adequately informed of the aims, method, anticipated benefits and potential
hazards of the study and the discomfort that it might entail. All of them were informed that they were
free to participate in the study and stop their participation at any time. Participants had the opportunity
to make all kind of questions about the study, and every subject confirmed his or her participation by
filling in and signing the informed consent form. Written informed consent was obtained from each subjects prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures
|
||
Background therapy |
NA | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
06 Oct 2020
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 31
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
31
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
31
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
31
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Recruitment period (from the date of the first site ready to recruit to the date for the last patient entered into the study): October 2020 to February 2021. FPFV: 6 October 2020; LPLV: 18 February 2021 31 patients were enrolled. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
The patients were allocated to the the following arm: EXPERIMENTAL GROUP: 31 patients who had been diagnosed positive for any of the allergens of the study by SPT Specific IgE positive received the allergenic extracts of wild grass pollen individually: Phleum pratense, Lolium perenne, Poa pratensis and Dactylis glomerata and their mixture. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Blinding implementation details |
NA
|
||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment arm | ||||||
Arm description |
Patients who had been diagnosed positive for any of the allergens of the study by SPT Specific IgE positive | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Phleum pratense, Lolium perenne, Poa pratensis y Dactylis glomerata and its mixture
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
V04CL
|
||||||
Other name |
NA
|
||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for skin-prick test
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Cutaneous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The test consisted the direct application of the four concentrations of the experimental allergenic extract (10 mg/ml; 1 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml and 0.01 mg/ml), together with the prick mixture of grasses (10 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml and 0.01 mg/ml), the positive control of Histamine and the negative control of saline solution each allergen upon the skin and the performance of a Prick test
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Treatment arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients who had been diagnosed positive for any of the allergens of the study by SPT Specific IgE positive | ||
Subject analysis set title |
PP population
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Reporting group values ITT Population PP population
Number of subjects [1] 31
Phleum pratense 31 26
Lolium perenne 31 21
Poa pratensis 31 26
Dactylis glomerata 31 27
Mixture of wild grasses 31 26
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
To evaluate in vivo the concentration of allergic extracts of wild grasses individually and its mixture | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The Biological standarization consisted the direct application of the four concentrations of the experimental allergenic extracts (10 mg/ml; 1 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml and 0.01 mg/ml), together with the prick mixture of grasses (10 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml and 0.01 mg/ml), the positive control of histamine and the negative control of saline solution upon the skin and the performance of a Prick test. Where the Prick test gave a positive response, the areas of erythema and papules, were measured (mm2).
The skin tests were used to obtain the optimum allergen extract concentrations that provoked a response with the same wheal area to that obtained with the positive control solution of histamine dihydrochloride 10 mg/mL reaction.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
The primary variable was the area of papule (mm2) produced on the skin after application of the extracts
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Outcome | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Statistical analysis description: Validated and protected Microsoft Excel specifically designed for these analyses
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment arm v PP population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
52
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Post-hoc
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [1] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
> 95 [2] | ||||||||||||
Method |
linear regression analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.85
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.5 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The geometric mean of the areas of the papules (mm2) of each patient was calculated for each of the dilution series of each extract, as well as that of the positive control solution of histamine dihydrochloride 10 mg/mL. For each subject, a linear regression analysis was performed using the least squares method. [2] - NA |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From enrollment to 1 week after completion of the skin tests. The administration of a prick test is a very safe technique with few adverse events in the literature
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
NA
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
3
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: The administration of a prick test is a very safe technique with few adverse events in the literature |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |