E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
High blood glucose in pregnant women |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Female diseases of the urinary and reproductive systems and pregancy complications [C13] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 21.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10018210 |
E.1.2 | Term | Gestational diabetes mellitus |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004868 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
We would like to assess how well ursodeoxycholic acid works at controlling glucose levels in overweight or obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus, compared to metformin, which is the most commonly used treatment. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
- We would like to see how each treatment changes the lipid metabolism of both mothers and babies. - We would like to find out if the new treatment is well accepted by women. - We will conduct continuous glucose monitoring. We would like to assess if the information produced by this device offers a more informative assessment to the single glucose test. - We would like to measure the impact on blood vessels and blood pressure as this may affect the health of women with GDM. - We would like to compare adverse outcomes in the pregnancy and fetus.
We are also conducting a mechanistic sub-study which intends to look at the gut microbiome of different groups, to assess how these medicines affect the hormonal system, glucose and lipid composition.
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Yes |
E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives |
GUARD MEC (Mechanistic) V1.0
We want to assess whether UDCA and metformin differentially alter gut microbiome and whether this is associated with a change in endocrine signalling, serum glucose levels and lipid composition.
158 participants will be recruited for GUARD and 40 additional controls for GUARD MEC. Total of 198 participants.
|
|
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Women between 16 and 45 years of age with GDM diagnosed at 26+0 to 30+6 weeks’ gestation in accordance with the NICE guidelines (one or more glucose concentrations of ≥5.6 mmol/l fasting or ≥7.8 mmol/l 2 hours after a standard 75g OGTT, and requiring pharmacological treatment). 2. Overweight or obese (Booking BMI ≥25 kg/m2) 3. Planned antenatal, birth intrapartum and postpartum care at the participating centre (i.e. not planning to move before delivery).
Eligibility criteria for GUARD MEC is included in the protocol in section 19. |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Unwilling/unable to give written informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study protocol 2. Multiple pregnancies (twins, triplets etc) in current pregnancy 3. Congenital anomaly on ultrasound requiring fetal medicine input 4. Previous diagnosis of diabetes outside pregnancy 5. HbA1c at booking of current pregnancy of >48 mmol/mol or ≥6.5% (if available) 6. Significant pre-pregnancy comorbidities that increase risk in pregnancy, for example renal failure, severe liver disease, transplantation, cardiac failure, psychiatric conditions requiring in-patient admission (within previous year) in the opinion of the responsible clinician or the CI. 7. Significant co-morbidity in the current pregnancy, nephropathy (estimated GFR <60ml/min), other physical or psychological conditions likely to interfere with the conduct of the study and/or interpretation of the trial results in the opinion of the responsible clinician or the CI. 8. Not fluent in English and absence of interpreter or translation services (ie telephone translation services) 9. Participating in another intervention study where the results could influence GDM-related endpoints, in the opinion of the responsible clinician or the CI, or participation in a CTIMP during current pregnancy. 10. Known allergy/hypersensitivity/intolerance to the active substance or excipients or patients taking any medications which are contraindicated as per IMP SmPC (as per Section 5.7 of the protocol).
Eligibility criteria for GUARD MEC is included in the protocol in section 19. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Maternal fasting glucose concentration at 36 weeks' gestation measured with a blood sample |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
- Quality of Life assessment (EQ-5D-5L) at baseline and Follow up 2, and treatment satisfaction scores at Follow up 2.
- Biomedical and clinical maternal outcomes: 1. Glucose metabolism at baseline, follow up 1 and 2 assessed by: a) Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to assess glycaemic control. This will determine the percentage time spent within target (glucose levels 3.9-7.8mmol/L), percentage time spent above target (>7.8mmol/l and ≥6.7mmol/l), time spent below target (≤3.5 and ≤3.0 mmol/l), measures of glucose variability including glucose standard variation (SD), co-efficient of variation (CV), frequency and duration of glycaemic excursions measured by the area under the curve (AUC) for the pre-specified glucose thresholds. b) Serum concentrations of 1,5-anhydroglucitol; a novel marker of short-term glycaemia 4,43 c) HbA1c concentration; a conventional marker of medium-term glycaemia 2. Lipid metabolism at Follow up 2 assessed by blood triglyceride, total cholesterol, calculated LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and free fatty acid concentrations 3. Biochemical analysis of maternal blood for liver function tests at Follow up 2 (ALT, bilirubin, ALP), bile acids, C reactive protein (including highly sensitive analyses) 4. Proportion of women requiring insulin treatment (time until treatment and total dose of insulin required) 5. Maternal gestational weight change at 36 weeks compared to weight at first trimester screening visit. 6. Measurement of vascular responses at Follow up 1 and 2, including: i) maternal pulse wave velocity (PWV), with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, ii) central arterial pressure (cP), and iii) augmentation index (AIx) 7. Estimated blood loss at time of delivery.
- Biomedical and clinical neonatal outcomes at birth: 1. Mode of birth (rates of caesarean section (CS),(elective & emergency), assisted vaginal birth and spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) 2. Gestational age at birth 3. Apgar scores @ 5 minutes post birth 4. Occurrence of shoulder dystocia 5. Cord blood C-peptide, triglyceride, total cholesterol, calculated LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, free fatty acid concentrations and lipid composition by mass spectrometry 6. Infant birth weight (customised birth weight percentile51, proportion of babies born large for gestational age (LGA), proportion of babies born small for gestational age (SGA) 7. Neonatal morbidity (treatment for neonatal hypoglycaemia, neonatal jaundice, respiratory distress or birth trauma) 8. Neonatal intensive care and special care unit admission (duration of hospital stay) 9. Stillbirth and neonatal death
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
All endpoints will be measured at 32 and 36 week's of gestation, and at birth. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 3 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
The end of the trial will be defined as database lock, once all recruits have completed all the study related visits, and the data has been entered in the eCRF and cleaned. In our experience, database lock in a multi-centre study can be a very long process, which leaves very limited time to submit the final study report. This allows us more time to prepare the analysis and engage with the relevant committees and PPIs before we submit our reports. |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 2 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 1 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 2 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 1 |