Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A prospective, Phase 3, multi-center, single-arm, imaging study investigating the safety and diagnostic performance of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET ligand in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2019-003381-40
    Trial protocol
    DE   FI   NL  
    Global end of trial date
    21 Jun 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    31 Dec 2023
    First version publication date
    31 Dec 2023
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    BED-PSMA-301
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    IND Number: 141,561
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ireland Ltd
    Sponsor organisation address
    6th Floor, Grand Canal Square, Dublin, Ireland, Dublin 2
    Public contact
    PSMA Clinical Manager, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Inc, +1 9199998670, contact@blueearthdx.com
    Scientific contact
    PSMA Clinical Manager, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Inc, +1 9199998670, contact@blueearthdx.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    18 Feb 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    21 Jun 2021
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    21 Jun 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central blinded image evaluation [BIE]) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). At least one positive pelvic LN on PET (N1) and one positive lymph node (LN) as determined by histopathology (pN1) on the same side of the pelvis (left or right) will be deemed a True Positive (TP) at the patient level.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines on Good Clinical Practice (GCP). In addition, all relevant regulations and guidance were followed, including United States (US), European Union (EU) and national legislation. As this study was conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, relevant guidance from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) was followed, including, but not limited to, the FDA Guidance for Industry, Investigators, and Institutional Review Boards - Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (March 2020; updated 30 Aug 21) and the EMA Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Version 4, 04 Feb 21). Prior to study initiation in each country, the study was authorized by the relevant Regulatory Agency/Competent Authority. All applicable privacy regulations (e.g. US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] 1996; EU General Data Protection Regulation 2018; United Kingdom [UK] Data Protection Act 2018) were adhered to.
    Background therapy
    None
    Evidence for comparator
    None
    Actual start date of recruitment
    02 Mar 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 18
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 86
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 238
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 14
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    356
    EEA total number of subjects
    118
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    163
    From 65 to 84 years
    193
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    This study was from 02 Mar 20 (first patient, screening visit) and 18 Feb 22 (database lock), with the last patient, last visit on 21 Jun 21. It was conducted at 34 activated study sites (31 recruited) in 4 countries. Of the 372 patients screened, 356 patients met all the study eligibility criteria. 16 patients were screen failures so not included

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Baseline safety evaluations performed at screening (Visit 1) comprised vital signs, focused physical examination and recording of any adverse events (AEs) from the time of informed consent.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Single Arm (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Not applicable
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Not applicable

    Arms
    Arm title
    Single Arm
    Arm description
    All patients who received the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) injection
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    rhPSMA-7.3 (18F)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    rhPSMA-7.3 (18F)
    Other name
    flotufolastat F18
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous bolus use
    Dosage and administration details
    All patients were planned to receive a single dose of IMP, with an administered activity of 8 mCi (296 MBq) ± 20% of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F), delivered as an IV bolus injection followed by a 10 mL fast 0.9% sodium chloride flush. The mass dose administered was less than 100 µg/patient. rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) was supplied as a sterile, aqueous solution for IV administration either in a multi-dose vial sealed with a synthetic rubber closure and aluminum overseal or in a single unit dose syringe depending on the manufacturing location.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Single Arm
    Started
    356
    Completed
    356

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Single Arm
    Reporting group description
    The FAS comprised 356 patients who were scheduled to receive the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) injection and met the inclusion/exclusion criteria

    Reporting group values
    Single Arm Total
    Number of subjects
    356 356
    Age categorical
    Age in years split into 2 groups
    Units: Subjects
        < 65 years
    163 163
        ≥ 65 years
    193 193
    Age continuous
    Age in years
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    64.9 ( 6.98 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Gender as Male or Female
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    0 0
        Male
    356 356
    Race
    Race split into 3 substantive categories and also those for whom it was not reported
    Units: Subjects
        Black or African American
    30 30
        White
    289 289
        Other
    4 4
        Not Reported
    33 33
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity split into 2 substantive groups and those for whom it was not reported
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    17 17
        Non-Hispanic or Latino
    311 311
        Not Reported
    28 28
    Total Gleason Score
    Gleason score (defined by the International Society of Urological Pathologists) was based on prostate biopsy.
    Units: Subjects
        =7
    160 160
        =8
    87 87
        =9
    97 97
        =10
    6 6
        ≤ 6
    6 6
    Gleason Grade Group (GGG)
    GGG (defined by the International Society of Urological Pathologists) was based on prostate biopsy.
    Units: Subjects
        =1
    6 6
        =2
    50 50
        =3
    110 110
        =4
    87 87
        =5
    103 103
    TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) Stage T
    TNM Stage T
    Units: Subjects
        T1
    16 16
        T1a
    2 2
        T1c
    127 127
        T2
    58 58
        T2a
    18 18
        T2b
    25 25
        T2c
    33 33
        T3
    20 20
        T3a
    21 21
        T3b
    12 12
        T3c
    1 1
        T4
    2 2
        TX
    9 9
        Missing
    12 12
    TNM Stage M
    TNM Stage M
    Units: Subjects
        M0
    290 290
        M1
    4 4
        M1a
    1 1
        M1b
    1 1
        MX
    48 48
        Missing
    12 12
    Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Characterization (ng/mL)
    PSA Characterization (ng/mL)
    Units: Subjects
        0 to 0.5
    0 0
        >0.5 to 1.0
    0 0
        >1.0 to 2.0
    2 2
        >2.0 to 5.0
    62 62
        >5.0 to 10.0
    134 134
        >10.0
    158 158
    Baseline Risk Category
    Baseline Risk Category. High-risk or Very-high risk defined as meeting any one of these criteria: T-stage T3 (including T3a and T3b) or T4, GGG 4 or 5, Primary Gleason pattern 5, or PSA >20 ng/mL..
    Units: Subjects
        High-risk or Very-high risk
    241 241
        Immediate-risk
    115 115
    TNM Stage N
    TNM Stage N
    Units: Subjects
        N0
    284 284
        N1
    11 11
        NX
    49 49
        Missing
    12 12
    Body Mass Index
    Body mass index on Day 1
    Units: Kg/m2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    28.20 ( 4.341 ) -
    Time since initial cancer diagnosis
    Time since initial cancer diagnosis relative to the date of informed consent.
    Units: Months
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    2.9 ( 10.27 ) -
    Time since last PSA measurement
    Time since last PSA measurement
    Units: Months
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    2.5 ( 2.83 ) -
    Last PSA Measurement (ng/mL)
    Last PSA measurement (ng/mL)
    Units: ng/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    15.090 ( 18.2450 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Single Arm
    Reporting group description
    All patients who received the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) injection

    Subject analysis set title
    EAP
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Full analysis

    Primary: Specificity Reader 1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Specificity Reader 1
    End point description
    The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Patients were to receive treatment within 60 days post-IMP administration, with treatment decision based on rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET and conventional imaging.
    End point values
    Single Arm EAP
    Number of subjects analysed
    226
    226
    Units: percentage
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    92.9 (88.8 to 95.9)
    92.9 (88.8 to 95.9)
    Statistical analysis title
    Specificity
    Statistical analysis description
    The co-primary endpoint of patient-level specificity (TN/[TN+FP]) of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET (determined by central BIE) to detect PLN metastases compared to surgical pathology, was performed using the EAP. The hypothesis was: H0: Specificity ≤Sp0 versus H1: Specificity >Sp0 (Sp0=performance goal of 82.5%, based on high specificity of other PSMA ligands used for lymph node staging. Specificity % with corresponding 95% CIs were estimated for 3 blinded readers and the majority evaluation.
    Comparison groups
    Single Arm v EAP
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    452
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [1]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [2]
    Method
    Exact binomial
    Parameter type
    Percentage
    Point estimate
    92.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    88.8
         upper limit
    95.9
    Notes
    [1] - The analysis was performed using a 1-sided 0.025 exact binomial test. In addition to the rates, exact 2-sided 95% CIs were provided. If the predefined goal was met by the same 2 of 3 blinded independent readers (both tests reached statistical significance [P<0.05] for the same 2 readers), the study was considered to have successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) in detecting N1 disease.
    [2] - H0: Specificity ≤ 82.5%

    Primary: Specificity Reader 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Specificity Reader 2
    End point description
    The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Patients were to receive treatment within 60 days post-IMP administration, with treatment decision based on rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET and conventional imaging.
    End point values
    Single Arm EAP
    Number of subjects analysed
    226
    226
    Units: percentage
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    93.8 (89.8 to 96.6)
    93.8 (89.8 to 96.6)
    Statistical analysis title
    Specificity
    Statistical analysis description
    The co-primary endpoint of patient-level sensitivity (TP/[TP+FN]) of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET (determined by central BIE) to detect PLN metastases compared to surgical pathology, was performed using the EAP. The hypothesis was: H0: Sensitivity ≤Se0 versus H1: Sensitivity >Se0 (Se0=performance goal of 22.5%, based on low sensitivity of other PSMA ligands used for lymph node staging. Sensitivity % with corresponding 95% CIs were estimated for 3 blinded readers and the majority evaluation.
    Comparison groups
    Single Arm v EAP
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    452
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [3]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [4]
    Method
    Exact binomial
    Parameter type
    Percentage
    Point estimate
    93.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    89.8
         upper limit
    96.6
    Notes
    [3] - The analysis was performed using a 1-sided 0.025 exact binomial test. In addition to the rates, exact 2-sided 95% CIs were provided. If the predefined goal was met by the same 2 of 3 blinded independent readers (both tests reached statistical significance [P<0.05] for the same 2 readers), the study was considered to have successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) in detecting N1 disease.
    [4] - H0: Sensitivity ≤ 82.5%

    Primary: Specificity Reader 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Specificity Reader 3
    End point description
    The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Patients were to receive treatment within 60 days post-IMP administration, with treatment decision based on rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET and conventional imaging.
    End point values
    Single Arm EAP
    Number of subjects analysed
    226
    226
    Units: percentage
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    96.9 (93.7 to 98.7)
    96.9 (93.7 to 98.7)
    Statistical analysis title
    Specificity
    Statistical analysis description
    The co-primary endpoint of patient-level specificity (TN/[TN+FP]) of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET (determined by central BIE) to detect PLN metastases compared to surgical pathology, was performed using the PPN. The hypothesis was: H0: Specificity ≤Sp0 versus H1: Specificity >Sp0 (Sp0=performance goal of 82.5%, based on high specificity of other PSMA ligands used for lymph node staging. Specificity % with corresponding 95% CIs were estimated for 3 blinded readers and the majority evaluation.
    Comparison groups
    Single Arm v EAP
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    452
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [5]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [6]
    Method
    Exact binomial
    Parameter type
    Percentage
    Point estimate
    96.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    93.7
         upper limit
    98.7
    Notes
    [5] - The analysis was performed using a 1-sided 0.025 exact binomial test. In addition to the rates, exact 2-sided 95% CIs were provided. If the predefined goal was met by the same 2 of 3 blinded independent readers (both tests reached statistical significance [P<0.05] for the same 2 readers), the study was considered to have successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) in detecting N1 disease.
    [6] - H0: Specificity ≤ 82.5%

    Primary: Sensitivity Reader 1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sensitivity Reader 1
    End point description
    The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Patients were to receive treatment within 60 days post-IMP administration, with treatment decision based on rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET and conventional imaging.
    End point values
    Single Arm EAP
    Number of subjects analysed
    70
    70
    Units: percentage
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    30.0 (19.6 to 42.1)
    30.0 (19.6 to 42.1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Sensitivity
    Statistical analysis description
    The co-primary endpoint of patient-level sensitivity (TP/[TP+FN]) of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET (determined by central BIE) to detect PLN metastases compared to surgical pathology, was performed using the PPN. The hypothesis was: H0: Sensitivity ≤Se0 versus H1: Sensitivity >Se0 (Se0=performance goal of 22.5%, based on low sensitivity of other PSMA ligands used for lymph node staging. Sensitivity % with corresponding 95% CIs were estimated for 3 blinded readers and the majority evaluation.
    Comparison groups
    Single Arm v EAP
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    140
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [7]
    P-value
    = 0.09 [8]
    Method
    Exact binomial
    Parameter type
    Percentage
    Point estimate
    30
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    19.6
         upper limit
    42.1
    Notes
    [7] - The analysis was performed using a 1-sided 0.025 exact binomial test. In addition to the rates, exact 2-sided 95% CIs were provided. If the predefined goal was met by the same 2 of 3 blinded independent readers (both tests reached statistical significance [P<0.05] for the same 2 readers), the study was considered to have successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) in detecting N1 disease.
    [8] - H0: Sensitivity ≤ 22.5%

    Primary: Sensitvity Reader 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sensitvity Reader 2
    End point description
    The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Patients were to receive treatment within 60 days post-IMP administration, with treatment decision based on rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET and conventional imaging.
    End point values
    Single Arm EAP
    Number of subjects analysed
    70
    70
    Units: Percentage
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    27.1 (17.2 to 39.1)
    27.1 (17.2 to 39.1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Sensitivity
    Statistical analysis description
    The co-primary endpoint of patient-level sensitivity (TP/[TP+FN]) of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET (determined by central BIE) to detect PLN metastases compared to surgical pathology, was performed using the PPN. The hypothesis was: H0: Sensitivity ≤Se0 versus H1: Sensitivity >Se0 (Se0=performance goal of 22.5%, based on low sensitivity of other PSMA ligands used for lymph node staging. Sensitivity % with corresponding 95% CIs were estimated for 3 blinded readers and the majority evaluation.
    Comparison groups
    Single Arm v EAP
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    140
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [9]
    P-value
    = 0.213 [10]
    Method
    Exact binomial
    Parameter type
    Percentage
    Point estimate
    27.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    17.2
         upper limit
    39.1
    Notes
    [9] - The analysis was performed using a 1-sided 0.025 exact binomial test. In addition to the rates, exact 2-sided 95% CIs were provided. If the predefined goal was met by the same 2 of 3 blinded independent readers (both tests reached statistical significance [P<0.05] for the same 2 readers), the study was considered to have successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) in detecting N1 disease.
    [10] - H0: Sensitivity ≤ 22.5%

    Primary: Sensitivity Reader 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sensitivity Reader 3
    End point description
    The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Patients were to receive treatment within 60 days post-IMP administration, with treatment decision based on rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET and conventional imaging.
    End point values
    Single Arm EAP
    Number of subjects analysed
    70
    70
    Units: Percentage
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    22.9 (13.7 to 34.4)
    22.9 (13.7 to 34.4)
    Statistical analysis title
    Sensitivity
    Statistical analysis description
    The co-primary endpoint of patient-level sensitivity (TP/[TP+FN]) of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET (determined by central BIE) to detect PLN metastases compared to surgical pathology, was performed using the PPN. The hypothesis was: H0: Sensitivity ≤Se0 versus H1: Sensitivity >Se0 (Se0=performance goal of 22.5%, based on low sensitivity of other PSMA ligands used for lymph node staging. Sensitivity % with corresponding 95% CIs were estimated for 3 blinded readers and the majority evaluation.
    Comparison groups
    Single Arm v EAP
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    140
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [11]
    P-value
    = 0.518 [12]
    Method
    Exact binomial
    Parameter type
    Percentage
    Point estimate
    22.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    13.7
         upper limit
    34.4
    Notes
    [11] - The analysis was performed using a 1-sided 0.025 exact binomial test. In addition to the rates, exact 2-sided 95% CIs were provided. If the predefined goal was met by the same 2 of 3 blinded independent readers (both tests reached statistical significance [P<0.05] for the same 2 readers), the study was considered to have successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) in detecting N1 disease.
    [12] - H0: Sensitivity ≤ 22.5%

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    All AEs were recorded throughout the study from informed consent at screening until the last study visit. AEs reported in EudraCT are treatment-emergent.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    AEs were coded using MedDRA and data listed by patient, including study site, patient identifier, age, race, AE (MedDRA SOC, PT and verbatim term), dates of onset and resolution, duration, CTCAE toxicity grade, seriousness, action taken, outcome and causality. Deaths, SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were also listed by patient
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    23
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Full Safety Population (FSP)
    Reporting group description
    All patients who received the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) injection. The FSP was used for all safety summaries.

    Serious adverse events
    Full Safety Population (FSP)
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 356 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Full Safety Population (FSP)
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    28 / 356 (7.87%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Tracheal deviation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Vascular disorders
    Aortic aneurysm
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 356 (0.56%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    Thrombophlebitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Cardiac disorders
    Atrial fibrillation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Nervous system disorders
    Dysgeusia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 356 (1.40%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Chills
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Injection site pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 356 (0.84%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Peripheral swelling
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Proctalgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 356 (0.84%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Pelvic pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Nervousness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Haematuria traumatic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Lower urinary tract symptoms
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Bone pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Spinal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Infections and infestations
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hyperkalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 356 (0.28%)
         occurrences all number
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    07 Jan 2020
    Several updates based on feedback from the US FDA. Update: studies evaluating 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET or 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET in the Study Rationale, including addition of point estimate ranges for the studies quoted. Clarify: study rationale that the study was to be performed in patients eligible for curative intent, locoregional therapy. Clarify: baseline conventional imaging was required if not performed in the 60 days prior to screening. Clarify: assessment of objectives and endpoints was based on central BIE. Add: exploratory objective added to “evaluate the number of PET-positive pelvic LNs by central BIE as compared to the number of pathologic positive LNs (by local histopathology analysis) in each region”, with corresponding endpoint. Clarifiy: dose of IMP could be 8 mCi (296 MBq) ± 20% rhPSMA-7.3 (18F). Add: to allow discussion of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET results and further procedures/treatment plan to be conducted by telephone at the clinician’s discretion. Clarify: physical examination would be focused in nature. Clarify: safety follow-up visit was to be conducted within 1 to 3 days post-IMP administration. Add: interim look at the percentage of pN1 and pN0 patients after enrollment of 150 patients. Amend: inclusion criterion 4 to remove primary treatment with EBRT. Clarify: additions to standard of care surgical treatments for patients with M0 and M1 disease on local PET interpretation. Clarify: added to confirmatory imaging when used as SoT. Define: unrelated AE updated. Update: sample size and number of evaluable patients required before enrollment will stop, plus the number of positive and negative cases required for enrollment to stop. Update: analysis sets. Clarify: rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) would be considered effective in detecting N1 disease if the co-primary endpoints were met by the same 2 of 3 readers. Other minor typographical edits and clarifications.
    04 Jun 2020
    Germany specific Several updates to implement feedback from BfArM: Add: text on the replacement of patients who dropout. Exclusion criterion added for patients with known hypersensitivity to the active substance or any excipients of the IMP.
    01 Jul 2020
    Patient safety and BfArM feedbackfeedback (COVID-19): Add: latest NCCN Guidelines. Combine: exploratory objectives/endpoints 2 & 3. Extend: screening: 28-45 days (COVID-19). Add: Visits 1 and 2 combined option, screening evaluation could occur on day of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) administration (COVID-19) and clarify that the procedure was to combine IMP manufacture visits. Extend: safety follow-up visit to within 1-5 days (COVID-19). Extend: period from Visit 2 to the scheduled surgery and/or follow up procedures up to 60 (COVID-19). Clarify: study population to be treatment naïve and receive standard of care and clarifications added to inclusion criteria risk definitions. Add: exclusion criterion for patients with hypersensitivity to active substance or any IMP excipient. Add: baseline conventional imaging to be performed at least 24 hours prior to the investigational rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET scan. Add: focused physical examination could be performed by a clinician and could be by telephone. Specify: when collected, pre-sacral LNs to be placed in a separate packet from other specimens prior to pathology assessment. Increase: from 2-3 central readers for the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET scans and the information they were provided add: Independent Review Charter. Clarify: conventional imaging performed at non-participating institutions allowed if scans were reviewed by study site. Add: text on replacement of dropouts. Amend: time from end of injection of rhPSMA-7 (18F) to imaging start from 50-90 mins to 50-70 mins. Update: SAE reporting email address and clarify SAEs to be reported immediately. Add: criteria to temporarily halt/stop enrollment. Add: exclude patients with known hypersensitivity to the active substance or any IMP excipient. Add: option for remote study monitoring (COVID-19). Clarify: urgent safety measures may include amendments made due to the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure patient safety by minimizing SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Minor typographical edit.
    29 Sep 2020
    Updates to implement feedback from BfArM: Remove: reference to remote consent and pre-screening via telephone contact, which were not permitted in Germany. Administrative change to update the Medical Monitor details.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 04 13:10:00 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA