Clinical Trial Results:
Multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of early surfactant therapy versus expectant management in late preterm and early term infants with respiratory distress.
|
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2019-003764-45 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
27 May 2025
|
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
13 Jun 2026
|
First version publication date |
13 Jun 2026
|
Other versions |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
|
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
UOL0727
|
||
|
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
|
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
University of Leicester
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Research Governance Office, Research & Enterprise Division, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 7RH
|
||
Public contact |
Professor Elaine M Boyle, University of Leicester, 0116 252 5447, eb124@leicester.ac.uk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Professor Elaine M Boyle, University of Leicester, 0116 252 5447, eb124@leicester.ac.uk
|
||
|
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
|
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
27 May 2025
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
27 May 2025
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
27 May 2025
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
|
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The main objectives for the SurfON trial are:
(i) To compare duration of neonatal hospital stay in infants randomised to receive early surfactant versus those who received expectant management (standard hospital care)
(ii) To compare incidence of severe respiratory failure in infants randomised to receive early surfactant therapy versus those who received expectant management
(iii) To investigate the effects of early surfactant therapy versus expectant
management on perinatal secondary outcomes, and
(iv) To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early surfactant therapy versus expectant
management.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Surfactant is routinely used in babies and there are no extra risks involved from taking part in the study.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
02 Sep 2020
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
|
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 1515
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
1515
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
0
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
877
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
638
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
||
|
||||||||||
|
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Recruitment ran from September 2020 to April 2025, with a five-month pause from February to July 2022. Across 50 participating centres (NICUs, LNUs and Special Care Units), 1515 infants were enrolled out of a target of 1522. | |||||||||
|
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Infants with respiratory distress admitted to NNU were screened; parents approached for consent, sometimes antenatally. Eligibility confirmed at randomisation. Inclusion: 34+0–38+6 wks, ≤24 h, respiratory distress, need for NIV, consent. Exclusion: major anomalies, no survival, prior intubation/surfactant, HIE, airway or neuromuscular disorder | |||||||||
|
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Trial Entry
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
This is not a blinded trial. The IMP will be dispensed from the hospital stock through routine prescription.
|
|||||||||
|
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
|
Arm title
|
Early Surfactant | |||||||||
Arm description |
Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
CUROSURF (R)
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Endotracheopulmonary instillation
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Endotracheopulmonary use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The recommended starting dose for the IMP is 100–200 mg/kg (1.25–2.5 ml/kg), administered in a single dose as soon as possible after diagnosing Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The administration of the IMP will be as per local site policy and procedure and may be completed by an ANNP, once eligibility is confirmed by a clinician or ANNP. As part of the intervention in this trial, surfactant will be given to infant as soon as possible after randomisation.
|
|||||||||
|
Arm title
|
Expectant Management | |||||||||
Arm description |
Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT). | |||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
Period 2
|
||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Trial Analysis
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
This is not a blinded trial. The IMP will be dispensed from the hospital stock through routine prescription.
|
|||||||||
|
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
|
Arm title
|
Early Surfactant | |||||||||
Arm description |
Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
CUROSURF (R)
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Endotracheopulmonary instillation
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Endotracheopulmonary use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The recommended starting dose for the IMP is 100–200 mg/kg (1.25–2.5 ml/kg), administered in a single dose as soon as possible after diagnosing Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The administration of the IMP will be as per local site policy and procedure and may be completed by an ANNP, once eligibility is confirmed by a clinician or ANNP. As part of the intervention in this trial, surfactant will be given to infant as soon as possible after randomisation.
|
|||||||||
|
Arm title
|
Expectant Management | |||||||||
Arm description |
Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT). | |||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Early Surfactant
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Expectant Management
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Early Surfactant
|
||
Reporting group description |
Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised. | ||
Reporting group title |
Expectant Management
|
||
Reporting group description |
Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT). | ||
Reporting group title |
Early Surfactant
|
||
Reporting group description |
Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised. | ||
Reporting group title |
Expectant Management
|
||
Reporting group description |
Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT). | ||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Length of infant's hospital stay after birth | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Number of days from birth to discharge home.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Notes [1] - Outcome data missing (n = 9) Infant died (n = 1) [2] - Outcome data missing (n = 3) Infant died (n = 2) |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Length of Hospital Stay (HR) | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression of length of hospital stay, deaths excluded (not censored)
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1500
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [3] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Hazard ratio (HR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.98
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.78 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.22 | ||||||||||||
| Notes [3] - Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression of length of hospital stay, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included in the model as random effects. |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of severe respiratory failure | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [4] - Outcome data missing (n = 2) [5] - Outcome data missing (n = 2) |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Incidence of Severe Respiratory Failure (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk ratio for severe respiratory failure, analysed using Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1511
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [6] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.92
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.75 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.14 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [6] - Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Incidence of Severe Respiratory Failure (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk difference for severe respiratory failure, analysed using Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1511
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [7] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.02
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.06 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.02 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [7] - Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Total duration of neonatal unit stay (days) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Notes [8] - Outcome data missing (n = 7) [9] - Outcome data missing (n = 3) |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Total duration of NNU stay (days) | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Quantile regression on the median total duration of neonatal (NNU) stay in days.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Expectant Management v Early Surfactant
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [10] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Median difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.58 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.58 | ||||||||||||
| Notes [10] - Quantile model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects. |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Duration of mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube (days) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [11] - Outcome data missing (n = 2) [12] - Outcome data missing (n = 2) |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Duration of mechanical ventilation via an ET tube | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Negative binomial regression on the duration of mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal (ET) tube, in days.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1511
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [13] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate ratio | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.29
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.94 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.78 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [13] - Negative binomial regression on the duration of mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal due to zero inflated data. Negative binomial regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation and centre were treated as fixed effects, and multiple births was treated as a random effect. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Duration of non-invasive respiratory support | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Notes [14] - Outcome data missing (n = 2) [15] - Outcome data missing (n = 2) |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Duration of non-invasive respiratory support | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Quantile regression on the median duration of non-invasive respiratory support, using positive airway pressure or high flow, in days.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1511
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [16] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Median difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.5
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.93 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.07 | ||||||||||||
| Notes [16] - Quantile regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects. |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a chest drain | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [17] - Outcome data missing (n = 7) [18] - Outcome data missing (n = 3) |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a drain | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk ratio for pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a chest drain, analysed using Poisson regression.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [19] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.42
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.15 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.13 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [19] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a drain | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk difference for pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a chest drain, analysed using Poisson regression.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [20] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.01
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.03 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [20] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Days of mother-infant separation | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Notes [21] - Outcome data missing (n = 7) [22] - Outcome data missing (n = 3) |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Days of mother-infant separation | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Quantile regression on the median days of mother-infant separation.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [23] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Median difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.58 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.58 | ||||||||||||
| Notes [23] - Quantile regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects. |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Breast milk feeding | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [24] - Outcome data missing (n = 143) [25] - Outcome data missing (n = 132) |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Breast milk feeding (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk ratio for any breast milk feeding, analysed using Poisson regression. Breast milk feeding is defined as (a) any breast milk feeding during neonatal hospital stay, (b) any breast milk feeding at hospital discharge and (c) exclusive breast milk feeding at hospital discharge.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1240
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [26] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.02
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.96 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.08 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [26] - Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Breast milk feeding (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk difference for any breast milk feeding, analysed using Poisson regression. Breast milk feeding is defined as (a) any breast milk feeding during neonatal hospital stay, (b) any breast milk feeding at hospital discharge and (c) exclusive breast milk feeding at hospital discharge.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1240
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [27] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.02
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.03 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.06 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [27] - Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Late-onset sepsis | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [28] - Outcome data missing (n = 7) [29] - Outcome data missing (n = 3) |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Late-onset sepsis (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk ratio for late-onset sepsis, analysed using Poisson regression.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [30] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.25
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.6 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.63 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [30] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Late-onset sepsis (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk difference for late-onset sepsis, analysed using Poisson regression.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [31] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.01
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.01 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.02 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [31] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [32] - Outcome data missing (n = 7) [33] - Outcome data missing (n = 3) |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk ratio for need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy, analysed using Poisson regression.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [34] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.62
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.6 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.4 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [34] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk difference for need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy, analysed using Poisson regression.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.01 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Medical respiratory diagnoses | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Medical respiratory diagnoses (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk ratio for any medical respiratory diagnoses, analysed using Poisson regression. An infant had a medical respiratory diagnosis if, at any time post-randomisation, they were diagnosed with at least on pre-defined respiratory condition.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1515
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [35] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.99
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.99 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [35] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Medical respiratory diagnoses (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk difference for any medical respiratory diagnoses, analysed using Poisson regression. An infant had a medical respiratory diagnosis if, at any time post-randomisation, they were diagnosed with at least on pre-defined respiratory condition.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1515
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [36] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.01
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.01 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [36] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Surfactant administration | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Surfactant administration (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk ratio for need for surfactant administration, analysed using Poisson regression. Surfactant administration is defined as (a) administration of any non-trial doses of surfactant in infants randomised to receive early surfactant (including infants who did not receive trial intervention but went on to receive rescue surfactant) or (b) administration of any surfactant in infants receiving expectant management.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1515
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [37] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.43
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.29 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.65 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [37] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Surfactant administration (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Risk difference for need for surfactant administration, analysed using Poisson regression. Surfactant administration is defined as (a) administration of any non-trial doses of surfactant in infants randomised to receive early surfactant (including infants who did not receive trial intervention but went on to receive rescue surfactant) or (b) administration of any surfactant in infants receiving expectant management.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1515
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [38] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.17
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.22 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.11 | |||||||||||||||
| Notes [38] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Need for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (descriptive) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Descriptive analysis only.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [39] - Outcome data missing (n = 7) [40] - Outcome data missing (n = 3) |
||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | ||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Maternal length of hospitalisation | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to maternal discharge home
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Notes [41] - Outcome data missing (n = 8) [42] - Outcome data missing (n = 6) |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Maternal length of hospitalisation | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Quantile regression on the length of maternal hospitalisation, in days.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1501
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [43] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Median difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.53 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.53 | ||||||||||||
| Notes [43] - Quantile regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects. |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Discharged home on oxygen (descriptive) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Descriptive analysis only.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [44] - Outcome data missing (n = 10) [45] - Outcome data missing (n = 5) |
||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | ||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Neonatal death (descriptive) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Descriptive analysis only.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to 28 days of age.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mother has confirmed COVID-19 (descriptive) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Descriptive analysis only. Question was introduced during the trial, so question will not have been asked for all participating mothers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Infant has confirmed COVID-19 (descriptive) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Descriptive analysis only. Question was introduced during the trial, so question will not have been asked for all infants.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Total duration of neonatal intensive care (days) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From randomisation to discharge home
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Total duration of neonatal intensive care (days) | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Quantile regression on the median total duration of neonatal intensive care days.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1505
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [46] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Median difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.33
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.54 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.13 | ||||||||||||
| Notes [46] - Quantile model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects. |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adverse events information [1]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From randomization to infant’s discharge home
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
In this population day-to-day fluctuations of pre-existing conditions were anticipated. As a result, many adverse events were foreseeable due to the nature of the participant population and their routine care/treatment. Consequently, only those adverse events identified as serious were reported for the trial.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
No dictionary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Early Surfactant
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Serious Adverse Events reported for infants allocated to the Early Surfactant (intervention) arm. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Expectant Management
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Serious Adverse Events reported for infants allocated to the Expectant Management (control) arm. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: In this population day-to-day fluctuations of pre-existing conditions were anticipated. As a result, many adverse events were foreseeable due to the nature of the participant population and their routine care/treatment. Consequently, only those adverse events identified as serious were reported for the trial. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
||||||||||
| Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | ||||||||||
Date |
Amendment |
|||||||||
27 May 2020 |
Substantial Amendment 1
i) Addition of a Secondary Outcome: The health economic outcomes have been amended to include survival at one year of age, corrected for prematurity;
ii) Local Translation Services: Following feedback from sites, regarding the importance of not excluding those that do not have a good understanding of-English, detail has been included in the Protocol to allow the use of routinely used translation services in obtaining consent;
iii) Surfactant being Animal Derived: In the REC’s initial application review, it was requested that the PIL include detail that surfactant is an animal derived product. This has now been included in both the PIL and Protocol;
iv) Personal Identifiers to be Shared with National Databases: As requested by NHS Digital, details have been included in the Consent Form and PIL, regarding the personal identifiers that will be shared with National Databases, when collecting follow-up data;
v) Additional Detail on Safety Reporting: Further detail is provided on serious adverse events that are foreseeable in the patient population and do not require reporting as SAEs. Amends have also been made to the review and reporting of SAEs.
Replaces the first Protocol, PIL and Consent Form V2.0 5th Feb 2020 on the study.
|
|||||||||
21 Jul 2020 |
Substantial Amendment 2
i) Addition of 8x Recruiting Sites;
ii) Change of Principal Investigator (PI) at Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust;
iii) Addition of 150x Continuing Care Sites.
During their postnatal stay, infants on SurfON study could be transferred from their Recruiting Site to another hospital. By gaining approval pre-emptively for as many Continuing Care Sites as possible, we hope to allow transferred infants to continue to participate in SurfON without disruption and to allow Recruiting Sites to complete data collection using Case Report Forms by liaising with the Continuing Care Sites. |
|||||||||
02 Sep 2020 |
Substantial Amendment 3
i) Addition of 1x Recruiting Site;
ii) Change of PI at Northern Lincolnshire & Goole NHS Foundation Trust. |
|||||||||
11 Dec 2020 |
Substantial Amendment 4
i) Protocol updated to include: change of Trial Manager; addition of use of Laryngeal Mask for method of administration of IMP; clarification of SAE reporting in relation to category level of infant transfers; removal of reference to SAE reporting method via Fax; removal of ‘Once reported online, forms will be printed by the local PI to perform a causality review’;
ii) Change of Trust Name to previously approved sites: Luton & Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust changed to Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust changed to University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust:
iii) Addition of new recruiting site: Birmingham Women’s & Children’s NHS Foundation Trust. |
|||||||||
15 Mar 2021 |
Substantial Amendment 5
i) Addition of OID for Continuing Care Sites;
ii) Addition of new recruiting site - North Bristol NHS Trust;
iii) Change of PI - at Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust. |
|||||||||
10 Jun 2021 |
Substantial Amendment 6
i) Protocol updated to include: Clarification regarding counter-signature by mother on consent form; change of place of data entry for Mothers Trial Entry and Trial Discharge questionnaires;
ii) Addition of 11x Continuing Care Sites. |
|||||||||
31 Mar 2022 |
Substantial Amendment 7
i) Protocol Changes: Rationale & inclusion of ANNPs to confirm eligibility; Minor formatting errors corrected and contact details updated; Recently published systematic review included; Inclusion of Special Care Units as participating centres; Clarification on optional participation for mother when they have provided consent to complete questionnaire; Clarification on hospital transfers only related to early respiratory management will need to be reported to the trial team as a SAE and further explanation;
ii) Consent Form Changes: Minor formatting and guidance provided to indicate that the mother’s countersignature must be obtained as soon as possible if other parent has provided original consent; Guidance provided to indicate that the mother can complete questionnaires only if consent has been provided in the mother’s section which will also require signature from health professional obtaining consent;
iii) Trial Questionnaire Changes: Donor breast milk added as an option in the question pertaining to how the baby has fed since delivery in both questionnaires;
iv) Changes to Trial Timeline: Extension approved by funder for a further period of 7 months taking the overall trial end date to June 2023. No change in research activities or recruitment numbers. |
|||||||||
25 Apr 2024 |
Substantial Amendment 8
Protocol changes:
1) Addition of a reference to the 'Background and rationale' section
2) Clarification for inclusion criteria #3: Definition of 'respiratory distress' has been refined
3) Sentence about providing women having a planned caesarean section at 37-38 weeks with study information antenatally reworded for clarity
4) The timeframe for completing the Discharge Questionnaire has been updated to reflect that it occurs around the time of discharge.
5) Sentance about withdrawal of participants reworded for clarity.
6) Section defining events that need to be reported as SAEs reworded for clarity.
7) Development Safety Update Reports' section updated to reflect that the trial is now approved under the notification scheme rather than expected to be.
8) Edit to reflect that the HTA Programme Manager will not be invited to attend all TSC meetings.
Minor changes to study documents
1) New document - SurfON Parent Card - QR card to scan to access SurfON Introduction Podcast
2) Amendments to SurfON General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for Patients - to reflect changes to the HRA Patient Data and Research leaflet.
Study Design
Extension approved by funder for a further period of 26 months taking the overall trial end date to 31st August 2025. No change in research activities or recruitment numbers. |
|||||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
||||||||||
| Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Limitations and caveats |
||||||||||
| Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | ||||||||||
| None reported | ||||||||||