Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44400   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7411   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of early surfactant therapy versus expectant management in late preterm and early term infants with respiratory distress.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2019-003764-45
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    27 May 2025

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    13 Jun 2026
    First version publication date
    13 Jun 2026
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    UOL0727
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University of Leicester
    Sponsor organisation address
    Research Governance Office, Research & Enterprise Division, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 7RH
    Public contact
    Professor Elaine M Boyle, University of Leicester, 0116 252 5447, eb124@leicester.ac.uk
    Scientific contact
    Professor Elaine M Boyle, University of Leicester, 0116 252 5447, eb124@leicester.ac.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    27 May 2025
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    27 May 2025
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    27 May 2025
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The main objectives for the SurfON trial are: (i) To compare duration of neonatal hospital stay in infants randomised to receive early surfactant versus those who received expectant management (standard hospital care) (ii) To compare incidence of severe respiratory failure in infants randomised to receive early surfactant therapy versus those who received expectant management (iii) To investigate the effects of early surfactant therapy versus expectant management on perinatal secondary outcomes, and (iv) To investigate the cost-effectiveness of early surfactant therapy versus expectant management.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Surfactant is routinely used in babies and there are no extra risks involved from taking part in the study.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    02 Sep 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 1515
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    1515
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    877
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    638
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Recruitment ran from September 2020 to April 2025, with a five-month pause from February to July 2022. Across 50 participating centres (NICUs, LNUs and Special Care Units), 1515 infants were enrolled out of a target of 1522.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Infants with respiratory distress admitted to NNU were screened; parents approached for consent, sometimes antenatally. Eligibility confirmed at randomisation. Inclusion: 34+0–38+6 wks, ≤24 h, respiratory distress, need for NIV, consent. Exclusion: major anomalies, no survival, prior intubation/surfactant, HIE, airway or neuromuscular disorder

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Trial Entry
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    This is not a blinded trial. The IMP will be dispensed from the hospital stock through routine prescription.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Early Surfactant
    Arm description
    Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CUROSURF (R)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Endotracheopulmonary instillation
    Routes of administration
    Endotracheopulmonary use
    Dosage and administration details
    The recommended starting dose for the IMP is 100–200 mg/kg (1.25–2.5 ml/kg), administered in a single dose as soon as possible after diagnosing Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The administration of the IMP will be as per local site policy and procedure and may be completed by an ANNP, once eligibility is confirmed by a clinician or ANNP. As part of the intervention in this trial, surfactant will be given to infant as soon as possible after randomisation.

    Arm title
    Expectant Management
    Arm description
    Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT).
    Arm type
    No intervention

    Investigational medicinal product name
    No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
    Number of subjects in period 1
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Started
    758
    757
    Completed
    758
    757
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    Trial Analysis
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    This is not a blinded trial. The IMP will be dispensed from the hospital stock through routine prescription.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Early Surfactant
    Arm description
    Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    CUROSURF (R)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Endotracheopulmonary instillation
    Routes of administration
    Endotracheopulmonary use
    Dosage and administration details
    The recommended starting dose for the IMP is 100–200 mg/kg (1.25–2.5 ml/kg), administered in a single dose as soon as possible after diagnosing Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The administration of the IMP will be as per local site policy and procedure and may be completed by an ANNP, once eligibility is confirmed by a clinician or ANNP. As part of the intervention in this trial, surfactant will be given to infant as soon as possible after randomisation.

    Arm title
    Expectant Management
    Arm description
    Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT).
    Arm type
    No intervention

    Investigational medicinal product name
    No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
    Number of subjects in period 2
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Started
    758
    757
    Completed
    758
    757

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Early Surfactant
    Reporting group description
    Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised.

    Reporting group title
    Expectant Management
    Reporting group description
    Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT).

    Reporting group values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management Total
    Number of subjects
    758 757 1515
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0 0 0
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
        Late preterm (34+0-36+6 weeks)
    439 438 877
        Early term (37+0-38+6 weeks)
    318 319 637
        Term (39+0–40+6 weeks)
    1 0 1
    Age continuous
    Units: weeks
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    36.3 ( 1.4 ) 36.3 ( 1.4 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    271 281 552
        Male
    486 475 961
        Indeterminate
    1 1 2
    One of Multiple Pregnancy
    Units: Subjects
        Yes
    92 93 185
        No
    666 664 1330

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Early Surfactant
    Reporting group description
    Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised.

    Reporting group title
    Expectant Management
    Reporting group description
    Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT).
    Reporting group title
    Early Surfactant
    Reporting group description
    Single dose of surfactant, administered as soon as possible after the infant has been randomised.

    Reporting group title
    Expectant Management
    Reporting group description
    Standard non-invasive respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or high flow therapy (HFT).

    Primary: Length of infant's hospital stay after birth

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Length of infant's hospital stay after birth
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Number of days from birth to discharge home.
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    748 [1]
    752 [2]
    Units: days
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    10.0 ( 6.2 )
    10.3 ( 6.8 )
    Notes
    [1] - Outcome data missing (n = 9) Infant died (n = 1)
    [2] - Outcome data missing (n = 3) Infant died (n = 2)
    Statistical analysis title
    Length of Hospital Stay (HR)
    Statistical analysis description
    Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression of length of hospital stay, deaths excluded (not censored)
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1500
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [3]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.98
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.78
         upper limit
    1.22
    Notes
    [3] - Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression of length of hospital stay, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included in the model as random effects.

    Primary: Incidence of severe respiratory failure

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Incidence of severe respiratory failure
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home.
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    756 [4]
    755 [5]
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    127
    138
        No
    629
    617
    Notes
    [4] - Outcome data missing (n = 2)
    [5] - Outcome data missing (n = 2)
    Statistical analysis title
    Incidence of Severe Respiratory Failure (RR)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk ratio for severe respiratory failure, analysed using Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1511
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [6]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Point estimate
    0.92
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.75
         upper limit
    1.14
    Notes
    [6] - Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included as random effects.
    Statistical analysis title
    Incidence of Severe Respiratory Failure (RD)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference for severe respiratory failure, analysed using Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1511
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [7]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    -0.02
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.06
         upper limit
    0.02
    Notes
    [7] - Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included as random effects.

    Secondary: Total duration of neonatal unit stay (days)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Total duration of neonatal unit stay (days)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    751 [8]
    754 [9]
    Units: days
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    8.0 (5.0 to 12.0)
    8.0 (5.0 to 12.0)
    Notes
    [8] - Outcome data missing (n = 7)
    [9] - Outcome data missing (n = 3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Total duration of NNU stay (days)
    Statistical analysis description
    Quantile regression on the median total duration of neonatal (NNU) stay in days.
    Comparison groups
    Expectant Management v Early Surfactant
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [10]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.58
         upper limit
    0.58
    Notes
    [10] - Quantile model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects.

    Secondary: Duration of mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube (days)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Duration of mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube (days)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    756 [11]
    755 [12]
    Units: Number of infants with a positive value
        Yes
    150
    102
        No
    606
    653
    Notes
    [11] - Outcome data missing (n = 2)
    [12] - Outcome data missing (n = 2)
    Statistical analysis title
    Duration of mechanical ventilation via an ET tube
    Statistical analysis description
    Negative binomial regression on the duration of mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal (ET) tube, in days.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1511
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [13]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    1.29
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.94
         upper limit
    1.78
    Notes
    [13] - Negative binomial regression on the duration of mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal due to zero inflated data. Negative binomial regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation and centre were treated as fixed effects, and multiple births was treated as a random effect.

    Secondary: Duration of non-invasive respiratory support

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Duration of non-invasive respiratory support
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    756 [14]
    755 [15]
    Units: days
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    2.0 (2.0 to 4.0)
    3.0 (2.0 to 4.0)
    Notes
    [14] - Outcome data missing (n = 2)
    [15] - Outcome data missing (n = 2)
    Statistical analysis title
    Duration of non-invasive respiratory support
    Statistical analysis description
    Quantile regression on the median duration of non-invasive respiratory support, using positive airway pressure or high flow, in days.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1511
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [16]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.93
         upper limit
    -0.07
    Notes
    [16] - Quantile regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects.

    Secondary: Pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a chest drain

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a chest drain
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    751 [17]
    754 [18]
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    7
    17
        No
    744
    737
    Notes
    [17] - Outcome data missing (n = 7)
    [18] - Outcome data missing (n = 3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a drain
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk ratio for pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a chest drain, analysed using Poisson regression.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [19]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Point estimate
    0.42
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.15
         upper limit
    1.13
    Notes
    [19] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.
    Statistical analysis title
    Pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a drain
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference for pulmonary air leaks requiring insertion of a chest drain, analysed using Poisson regression.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [20]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    -0.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.03
         upper limit
    0
    Notes
    [20] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.

    Secondary: Days of mother-infant separation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Days of mother-infant separation
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    751 [21]
    754 [22]
    Units: days
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    7.0 (4.0 to 11.0)
    7.5 (5.0 to 12.0)
    Notes
    [21] - Outcome data missing (n = 7)
    [22] - Outcome data missing (n = 3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Days of mother-infant separation
    Statistical analysis description
    Quantile regression on the median days of mother-infant separation.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [23]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.58
         upper limit
    0.58
    Notes
    [23] - Quantile regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects.

    Secondary: Breast milk feeding

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Breast milk feeding
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    615 [24]
    625 [25]
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    481
    479
        No
    134
    146
    Notes
    [24] - Outcome data missing (n = 143)
    [25] - Outcome data missing (n = 132)
    Statistical analysis title
    Breast milk feeding (RR)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk ratio for any breast milk feeding, analysed using Poisson regression. Breast milk feeding is defined as (a) any breast milk feeding during neonatal hospital stay, (b) any breast milk feeding at hospital discharge and (c) exclusive breast milk feeding at hospital discharge.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1240
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [26]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Point estimate
    1.02
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.96
         upper limit
    1.08
    Notes
    [26] - Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included as random effects.
    Statistical analysis title
    Breast milk feeding (RD)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference for any breast milk feeding, analysed using Poisson regression. Breast milk feeding is defined as (a) any breast milk feeding during neonatal hospital stay, (b) any breast milk feeding at hospital discharge and (c) exclusive breast milk feeding at hospital discharge.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1240
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [27]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    0.02
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.03
         upper limit
    0.06
    Notes
    [27] - Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator, adjusted for week of gestation at birth as a fixed effect with multiple births and centre included as random effects.

    Secondary: Late-onset sepsis

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Late-onset sepsis
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    751 [28]
    754 [29]
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    15
    12
        No
    736
    742
    Notes
    [28] - Outcome data missing (n = 7)
    [29] - Outcome data missing (n = 3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Late-onset sepsis (RR)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk ratio for late-onset sepsis, analysed using Poisson regression.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [30]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Point estimate
    1.25
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.6
         upper limit
    2.63
    Notes
    [30] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.
    Statistical analysis title
    Late-onset sepsis (RD)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference for late-onset sepsis, analysed using Poisson regression.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [31]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    0.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.01
         upper limit
    0.02
    Notes
    [31] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.

    Secondary: Need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    751 [32]
    754 [33]
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    8
    5
        No
    743
    749
    Notes
    [32] - Outcome data missing (n = 7)
    [33] - Outcome data missing (n = 3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy (RR)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk ratio for need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy, analysed using Poisson regression.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [34]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Point estimate
    1.62
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.6
         upper limit
    4.4
    Notes
    [34] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.
    Statistical analysis title
    Need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy (RD)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference for need for inhaled nitric oxide therapy, analysed using Poisson regression.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    0
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0
         upper limit
    0.01

    Secondary: Medical respiratory diagnoses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Medical respiratory diagnoses
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    758
    757
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    751
    754
        No
    7
    3
    Statistical analysis title
    Medical respiratory diagnoses (RR)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk ratio for any medical respiratory diagnoses, analysed using Poisson regression. An infant had a medical respiratory diagnosis if, at any time post-randomisation, they were diagnosed with at least on pre-defined respiratory condition.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1515
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [35]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Point estimate
    0.99
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.99
         upper limit
    1
    Notes
    [35] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.
    Statistical analysis title
    Medical respiratory diagnoses (RD)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference for any medical respiratory diagnoses, analysed using Poisson regression. An infant had a medical respiratory diagnosis if, at any time post-randomisation, they were diagnosed with at least on pre-defined respiratory condition.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1515
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [36]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    -0.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.01
         upper limit
    0
    Notes
    [36] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.

    Secondary: Surfactant administration

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Surfactant administration
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    758
    757
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    91
    212
        No
    667
    545
    Statistical analysis title
    Surfactant administration (RR)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk ratio for need for surfactant administration, analysed using Poisson regression. Surfactant administration is defined as (a) administration of any non-trial doses of surfactant in infants randomised to receive early surfactant (including infants who did not receive trial intervention but went on to receive rescue surfactant) or (b) administration of any surfactant in infants receiving expectant management.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1515
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [37]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Point estimate
    0.43
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.29
         upper limit
    0.65
    Notes
    [37] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.
    Statistical analysis title
    Surfactant administration (RD)
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference for need for surfactant administration, analysed using Poisson regression. Surfactant administration is defined as (a) administration of any non-trial doses of surfactant in infants randomised to receive early surfactant (including infants who did not receive trial intervention but went on to receive rescue surfactant) or (b) administration of any surfactant in infants receiving expectant management.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1515
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [38]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    -0.17
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.22
         upper limit
    -0.11
    Notes
    [38] - Poisson regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. Week of gestation was treated as a fixed effect, and centre and multiple births were treated as random effects.

    Secondary: Need for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (descriptive)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Need for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (descriptive)
    End point description
    Descriptive analysis only.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    751 [39]
    754 [40]
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    1
    0
        No
    750
    754
    Notes
    [39] - Outcome data missing (n = 7)
    [40] - Outcome data missing (n = 3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Maternal length of hospitalisation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Maternal length of hospitalisation
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to maternal discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    750 [41]
    751 [42]
    Units: days
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    5.0 (4.0 to 8.0)
    6.0 (4.0 to 8.0)
    Notes
    [41] - Outcome data missing (n = 8)
    [42] - Outcome data missing (n = 6)
    Statistical analysis title
    Maternal length of hospitalisation
    Statistical analysis description
    Quantile regression on the length of maternal hospitalisation, in days.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1501
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [43]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.53
         upper limit
    0.53
    Notes
    [43] - Quantile regression model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects.

    Secondary: Discharged home on oxygen (descriptive)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Discharged home on oxygen (descriptive)
    End point description
    Descriptive analysis only.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    748 [44]
    752 [45]
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    4
    10
        No
    744
    742
    Notes
    [44] - Outcome data missing (n = 10)
    [45] - Outcome data missing (n = 5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Neonatal death (descriptive)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Neonatal death (descriptive)
    End point description
    Descriptive analysis only.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days of age.
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    758
    757
    Units: Number of infants
        Early (< 7 days)
    1
    0
        Late (7 - 28 days)
    0
    1
        N/A - infant did not die within 28 days from birth
    757
    756
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Mother has confirmed COVID-19 (descriptive)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mother has confirmed COVID-19 (descriptive)
    End point description
    Descriptive analysis only. Question was introduced during the trial, so question will not have been asked for all participating mothers.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    758
    757
    Units: Number of mothers
        Yes
    4
    2
        No
    52
    53
        N/A - mother not tested
    693
    698
        N/A - question not asked
    9
    4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Infant has confirmed COVID-19 (descriptive)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Infant has confirmed COVID-19 (descriptive)
    End point description
    Descriptive analysis only. Question was introduced during the trial, so question will not have been asked for all infants.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    758
    757
    Units: Number of infants
        Yes
    0
    0
        No
    48
    54
        N/A - infant not tested
    703
    699
        N/A - question not asked
    7
    4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Total duration of neonatal intensive care (days)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Total duration of neonatal intensive care (days)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomisation to discharge home
    End point values
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Number of subjects analysed
    751
    754
    Units: Days
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    3.0 (2.0 to 5.0)
    3.0 (2.0 to 5.0)
    Statistical analysis title
    Total duration of neonatal intensive care (days)
    Statistical analysis description
    Quantile regression on the median total duration of neonatal intensive care days.
    Comparison groups
    Early Surfactant v Expectant Management
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1505
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [46]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Median difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.33
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.54
         upper limit
    -0.13
    Notes
    [46] - Quantile model adjusted for week of gestation at birth, multiple birth and centre. All covariates treated as fixed effects.

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From randomization to infant’s discharge home
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    In this population day-to-day fluctuations of pre-existing conditions were anticipated. As a result, many adverse events were foreseeable due to the nature of the participant population and their routine care/treatment. Consequently, only those adverse events identified as serious were reported for the trial.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    No dictionary
    Dictionary version
    0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Early Surfactant
    Reporting group description
    Serious Adverse Events reported for infants allocated to the Early Surfactant (intervention) arm.

    Reporting group title
    Expectant Management
    Reporting group description
    Serious Adverse Events reported for infants allocated to the Expectant Management (control) arm.

    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: In this population day-to-day fluctuations of pre-existing conditions were anticipated. As a result, many adverse events were foreseeable due to the nature of the participant population and their routine care/treatment. Consequently, only those adverse events identified as serious were reported for the trial.
    Serious adverse events
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    19 / 758 (2.51%)
    23 / 757 (3.04%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    1
    2
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
    Death neonatal
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 758 (0.13%)
    2 / 757 (0.26%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    Congenital anomaly
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 758 (0.13%)
    5 / 757 (0.66%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 5
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Transfer for escalation of care
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 758 (1.06%)
    15 / 757 (1.98%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 8
    0 / 15
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Obstruction gastric
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 758 (0.13%)
    0 / 757 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Volvulus
    Additional description: Malrotation & volvulus of the gut
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 758 (0.13%)
    0 / 757 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Apnoea
    Additional description: Significant apnoeas requiring stimulation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 758 (0.13%)
    0 / 757 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Endotracheal intubation complication
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 758 (0.26%)
    0 / 757 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumothorax
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 758 (0.26%)
    0 / 757 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory distress
    Additional description: Respiratory distress (cyanosis neonatal and apnoea)
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 758 (0.13%)
    0 / 757 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Endocrine disorders
    Hypoglycaemia neonatal
    Additional description: Severe hypoglycaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 758 (0.00%)
    1 / 757 (0.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Meningitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 758 (0.13%)
    0 / 757 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Early Surfactant Expectant Management
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 758 (0.00%)
    0 / 757 (0.00%)

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    27 May 2020
    Substantial Amendment 1 i) Addition of a Secondary Outcome: The health economic outcomes have been amended to include survival at one year of age, corrected for prematurity; ii) Local Translation Services: Following feedback from sites, regarding the importance of not excluding those that do not have a good understanding of-English, detail has been included in the Protocol to allow the use of routinely used translation services in obtaining consent; iii) Surfactant being Animal Derived: In the REC’s initial application review, it was requested that the PIL include detail that surfactant is an animal derived product. This has now been included in both the PIL and Protocol; iv) Personal Identifiers to be Shared with National Databases: As requested by NHS Digital, details have been included in the Consent Form and PIL, regarding the personal identifiers that will be shared with National Databases, when collecting follow-up data; v) Additional Detail on Safety Reporting: Further detail is provided on serious adverse events that are foreseeable in the patient population and do not require reporting as SAEs. Amends have also been made to the review and reporting of SAEs. Replaces the first Protocol, PIL and Consent Form V2.0 5th Feb 2020 on the study.
    21 Jul 2020
    Substantial Amendment 2 i) Addition of 8x Recruiting Sites; ii) Change of Principal Investigator (PI) at Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust; iii) Addition of 150x Continuing Care Sites. During their postnatal stay, infants on SurfON study could be transferred from their Recruiting Site to another hospital. By gaining approval pre-emptively for as many Continuing Care Sites as possible, we hope to allow transferred infants to continue to participate in SurfON without disruption and to allow Recruiting Sites to complete data collection using Case Report Forms by liaising with the Continuing Care Sites.
    02 Sep 2020
    Substantial Amendment 3 i) Addition of 1x Recruiting Site; ii) Change of PI at Northern Lincolnshire & Goole NHS Foundation Trust.
    11 Dec 2020
    Substantial Amendment 4 i) Protocol updated to include: change of Trial Manager; addition of use of Laryngeal Mask for method of administration of IMP; clarification of SAE reporting in relation to category level of infant transfers; removal of reference to SAE reporting method via Fax; removal of ‘Once reported online, forms will be printed by the local PI to perform a causality review’; ii) Change of Trust Name to previously approved sites: Luton & Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust changed to Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust changed to University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust: iii) Addition of new recruiting site: Birmingham Women’s & Children’s NHS Foundation Trust.
    15 Mar 2021
    Substantial Amendment 5 i) Addition of OID for Continuing Care Sites; ii) Addition of new recruiting site - North Bristol NHS Trust; iii) Change of PI - at Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust.
    10 Jun 2021
    Substantial Amendment 6 i) Protocol updated to include: Clarification regarding counter-signature by mother on consent form; change of place of data entry for Mothers Trial Entry and Trial Discharge questionnaires; ii) Addition of 11x Continuing Care Sites.
    31 Mar 2022
    Substantial Amendment 7 i) Protocol Changes: Rationale & inclusion of ANNPs to confirm eligibility; Minor formatting errors corrected and contact details updated; Recently published systematic review included; Inclusion of Special Care Units as participating centres; Clarification on optional participation for mother when they have provided consent to complete questionnaire; Clarification on hospital transfers only related to early respiratory management will need to be reported to the trial team as a SAE and further explanation; ii) Consent Form Changes: Minor formatting and guidance provided to indicate that the mother’s countersignature must be obtained as soon as possible if other parent has provided original consent; Guidance provided to indicate that the mother can complete questionnaires only if consent has been provided in the mother’s section which will also require signature from health professional obtaining consent; iii) Trial Questionnaire Changes: Donor breast milk added as an option in the question pertaining to how the baby has fed since delivery in both questionnaires; iv) Changes to Trial Timeline: Extension approved by funder for a further period of 7 months taking the overall trial end date to June 2023. No change in research activities or recruitment numbers.
    25 Apr 2024
    Substantial Amendment 8 Protocol changes: 1) Addition of a reference to the 'Background and rationale' section 2) Clarification for inclusion criteria #3: Definition of 'respiratory distress' has been refined 3) Sentence about providing women having a planned caesarean section at 37-38 weeks with study information antenatally reworded for clarity 4) The timeframe for completing the Discharge Questionnaire has been updated to reflect that it occurs around the time of discharge. 5) Sentance about withdrawal of participants reworded for clarity. 6) Section defining events that need to be reported as SAEs reworded for clarity. 7) Development Safety Update Reports' section updated to reflect that the trial is now approved under the notification scheme rather than expected to be. 8) Edit to reflect that the HTA Programme Manager will not be invited to attend all TSC meetings. Minor changes to study documents 1) New document - SurfON Parent Card - QR card to scan to access SurfON Introduction Podcast 2) Amendments to SurfON General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for Patients - to reflect changes to the HRA Patient Data and Research leaflet. Study Design Extension approved by funder for a further period of 26 months taking the overall trial end date to 31st August 2025. No change in research activities or recruitment numbers.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes
    Date
    Interruption
    Restart date
    01 Jun 2019
    The planned trial duration was for 42 months with a start date of 01.06.2019. Following the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the start of the trial was delayed to 02.09.2020 and the trial was extended, with an anticipated duration of 75 months.
    02 Sep 2020
    08 Feb 2022
    Formal pause in recruitment from February to July 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    04 Jul 2022

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Jun 27 16:41:16 CEST 2026 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA