Clinical Trial Results:
Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Block an Analgesic Alternative to LIA for
Total Knee Arthroplasty. Randomized clinical trial.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2019-005010-19 |
Trial protocol |
ES |
Global end of trial date |
30 Apr 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
07 Sep 2022
|
First version publication date |
07 Sep 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
HCB/2019/1148
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT04681547 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Hospital CLÍNIC
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Villaroel 170, Barcelona, Spain, 08036
|
||
Public contact |
Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 34 932275558, cunat@clinic.cat
|
||
Scientific contact |
Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 645152055 932275558, cunat@clinic.cat
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
30 Apr 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Apr 2021
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
30 Apr 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The main objective is to verify that the ultrasound-guided blockade of the genicular nerves is not inferior in terms of analgesic efficacy in comparison with the LIA in the first 24 hours of the postoperative period of primary TKA and during the first mobilization using the NRS score.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
As the experimental technique was performed as part of the standard care protocol, no additional measures were taken.
|
||
Background therapy |
Standard care for TKA | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Ultrasound-guided genicular nerves blockade (GNB) is a technique that has been effectively used for a variety of chronic knee pain conditions and as an analgesic technique in the surgical and acute pain settings selectively targeting sensory branches from the knee capsule. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
15 Dec 2020
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 60
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
60
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
60
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
10
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
49
|
||
85 years and over |
1
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
A total of 83 subjects were screened and 60 were enrolled and randomized. One subject in the GNB group was discontinued due to difficulties adhering to study protocol amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Ultimately, 29 patients in the GNB group and 30 patients in the LIA group were included for analysis. | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 83 subjects were examined. Finally, 15 refused to participate. Five subjects were excluded because of obesity, 2 because of preference for general anesthesia, and 1 because of excessive baseline opioid use. | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Recruitment (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Single blind [1] | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Monitor, Data analyst [2] | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and ward nurses, as well a physical therapists and research assistants, were blinded for treatment allocation.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Local infiltration analgesia | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Local infiltration analgesia | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ropivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
N01BB09
|
|||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The LIA was performed at the end of the surgical procedure and was based on the administration of ropivacaine 0.2% 150 ml (100 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% with 1 mg of adrenaline during the ischemia period and subsequently, before closure of the surgical wound, 50 ml of ropivacaine 0.2%).
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Adrenaline
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
C01CA24
|
|||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Administration of ropivacaine 0.2% 150 ml (100 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% with 1 mg of adrenaline during the period of intraoperative ischemia and, before closure of the surgical wound, 50 ml of ropivacaine 0.2%).
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Genicular nerves block | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Genicular nerves block | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ropivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
N01BB09
|
|||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
GNB (geniculate nerve block): 4 ml of ropivacaine 0.2%, with adrenaline 1:100 000 was administered in each of the 5 nerves to be blocked (20 ml in total).
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Adrenaline
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
C01CA24
|
|||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Four ml of ropivacaine 0.2%, with adrenaline 1:100 000 were administered in each of the 5 nerves to be blocked (20 ml in total).
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of roles blinded appears inconsistent with a single blinded trial. It is expected that there will be one role blinded in a single blind trial. Justification: Post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and ward nurses, as well a physical therapists and research assistants, were blinded for treatment allocation. [2] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial. Justification: Post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and ward nurses, as well a physical therapists and research assistants, were blinded for treatment allocation. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Overall analysis
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Age, gendre, ASA physical status, BMI, WOMAC score and BPI inference and intensity scores were recorded.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Local infiltration analgesia
|
||
Reporting group description |
Local infiltration analgesia | ||
Reporting group title |
Genicular nerves block
|
||
Reporting group description |
Genicular nerves block | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Overall analysis
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Age, gendre, ASA physical status, BMI, WOMAC score and BPI inference and intensity scores were recorded.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
24 h rest NRS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
24 h NRS at rest
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 h
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
24 h NRS at rest | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Genicular nerves block v Local infiltration analgesia
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
59
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.025 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
PACU NRS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PACU
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
PACU NRS | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Local infiltration analgesia v Genicular nerves block
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
59
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.025 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
12 h NRS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 h
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
12 h NRS | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Local infiltration analgesia v Genicular nerves block
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
59
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.025 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
24 physiotherapy NRS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 h
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
24 h physiotherapy NRS | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Local infiltration analgesia v Genicular nerves block
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
59
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.025 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Cumulative OME 24 h consumption | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 h
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Cumulative OME 24 h consumption | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Local infiltration analgesia v Genicular nerves block
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
59
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.025 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Minimum articular range | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 h
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Minimum articular range | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Local infiltration analgesia v Genicular nerves block
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
59
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximum articular balance | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 h
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Maximum articular range | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Local infiltration analgesia v Genicular nerves block
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
59
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Intra and postoperative period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
23
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Local infiltration analgesia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Genicular nerves block
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
15 Feb 2021 |
The sample size was modified from 54 to 60 patients (27 to 30 patients per arm). This change was motivated by the need to use unilateral contrast tests in the calculation of the sample size (and therefore with an alpha error of 0.025) when the primary objective is noninferiority and taking into account a dropout of 10%. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |