E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Non infectious non anterior uveitis |
Uveítis no infecciosas y no anteriores |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Non infectious non anterior uveitis |
Uveítis no infecciosas y no anteriores |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Eye Diseases [C11] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | Yes |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To compare the proportion of patients achieving a Good Clinical Response by week 16 that is maintained in every study visit until week 52. |
Comparar la proporción de pacientes que logran una buena respuesta clínica en la semana 16 que se mantiene en cada visita de estudio hasta la semana 52. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
To compare the clinical components of the Good Clinical Response variable between treatment strategies (see page 71 for a complete list of the components) To compare the proportion of patients achieving a Good Clinical Response by week 16 To compare several Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (health- and vision-related quality of life, anxiety and depression) between treatment strategies To compare the time to relapse after week 16 between treatment strategies To assess the safety of each treatment strategy To assess the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness from both a Health System and a Societal perspectives of the combination therapy and the ADA monotherapy compared with MTX given alone To identify genetic and proteomic biomarkers associated with drug response to each treatment strategy. |
Comparar los componentes clínicos de la variable buena respuesta clínica entre las estrategias de tratamiento; Comparar la proporción de pacientes que logran una buena respuesta clínica en la semana 16; Comparar varias medidas de resultados informados por el paciente (calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y la visión, ansiedad y depresión) entre las estrategias de tratamiento; Comparar el tiempo de recaída después de la semana 16 entre las estrategias de tratamiento; Evaluar la seguridad de cada estrategia de tratamiento; Evaluar coste-utilidad y coste-eficacia desde la perspectiva del Sistema de Salud y de la Sociedad de la terapia combinada y la monoterapia con ADA en comparación con la monoterapia con MTX, e; Identificar biomarcadores genéticos y proteómicos asociados con la respuesta del fármaco a cada estrategia de tratamiento |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Yes |
E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives |
Biobank Substudy We will carry out a substudy with the objective of building a public access biobank with peripheral blood derived samples to carry out future studies in uveitis. |
Substudio Biobanco Se planteará un subestudio cuyo objetivo sea la construcción de un biobanco de acceso público con muestras derivadas de sangre periférica para llevar a cabo futuros estudios sobre la uveítis. |
|
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Subjects diagnosed with non-infectious intermediate-, posterior-, or pan-uveitis in at least one eye; 2. Adult patients (≥18 years); 3. Subjects with at least one flare of active eye inflammation in the previous 180 days before Baseline visit, defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following parameters in either eye: a. Active chorioretinal or retinal vascular lesion, AND/OR b. Presence of macular edema by optical coherence tomography (OCT: thickness >350 µm AND cysts or intraretinal fluid), AND/OR c. ≥ 2+ anterior chamber cells , AND/OR d. ≥ 2+ vitreous haze 4. Subjects with active eye inflammation at Baseline visit, defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following parameters in either eye: a. Active chorioretinal or retinal vascular lesion, AND/OR b. Presence of macular edema by OCT (thickness >350 µm AND cysts or intraretinal fluid), AND/OR c. ≥ 1+ ACC, AND/OR d. ≥ 1+ vitreous haze. |
• Sujetos diagnosticados de uveítis no infecciosa intermedia, posterior o panuveítis, en al menos un ojo; • Mayores>18 años • Sujetos con inflamación ocular activa en los 180 días previos a la Visita Basal, definidos por la presencia de al menos 1 de los siguientes parámetros: o Lesión vascular coriorretiniana o retiniana activa, Y/O o Presencia de edema macular por tomografía de coherencia óptica (OCT: espesor> 350 µm Y quistes o líquido intrarretiniano) y evidencia de inflamación intraocular, Y/O o ≥ 2+ células de la cámara anterior, Y/O o ≥ 2+ vitritis • Sujetos con inflamación ocular activa en la Visita Basal, definida por la presencia de al menos 1 de los siguientes parámetros en cualquiera de los ojos: o Lesión vascular coriorretiniana o retiniana activa, Y/O o Presencia de edema macular por tomografía de coherencia óptica (OCT: espesor> 350 µm Y quistes o líquido intrarretiniano) y evidencia de inflamación intraocular, Y/O o ≥ 1+ CCA, Y/O o ≥ 1+ vitritis |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Subjects with confirmed or suspected infectious uveitis, including ocular histoplasmosis syndrome 2. Subjects with previous intolerability, safety issues according to investigator criteria, AND/OR previous failure to control ocular or other inflammation with MTX 3. Subjects with previous exposure to any biological therapy at any time (excluding anti-VEGF and denosumab), including those with that have a potential or known association with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (i.e. natalizumab, rituximab or efalizumab); 4. Subjects with previous exposure to synthetic immunosuppressive therapy (such as mycophenolate or cyclosporine) other than corticosteroids in the past 6 months before Baseline; 5. Subjects with chronic structural eye damage considered by the Site’s Investigator to: a. Interfere with the measurement of any of the study outcomes, AND/OR b. Cause eye damage regardless of the inflammatory process, AND/OR c. Prevent the normalization of the eye structures; |
• Sujetos con uveítis infecciosa confirmada o sospechada, incluido el síndrome de histoplasmosis ocular; • Sujetos con intolerabilidad previa, problemas de seguridad Y/O fallo previo para controlar la inflamación ocular u en otra localización con MTX; • Sujetos con exposición previa a cualquier terapia biológica en cualquier momento (excluyendo anti-VEGF), incluyendo aquellas con una asociación potencial o conocida con leucoencefalopatía multifocal progresiva (es decir, natalizumab, rituximab o efalizumab); • Sujetos con exposición previa a la terapia inmunosupresora sintética que no sean corticosteroides en los últimos 6 meses antes del inicio del estudio; • Sujetos con daño ocular estructural crónico en los que el Investigador considera que pueda: Interferir con la medición de cualquiera de los resultados del estudio, Y/O Causar daño ocular independientemente del proceso inflamatorio, Y/O Evitar la normalización de las estructuras oculares; |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
To compare the proportion of patients achieving a Good Clinical Response by week 16 that is maintained in every study visit until week 52. |
Comparar la proporción de pacientes que logran una buena respuesta clínica en la semana 16 que se mantiene en cada visita de estudio hasta la semana 52. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
To compare the clinical components of the Good Clinical Response variable between treatment strategies (see page 71 for a complete list of the components) To compare the proportion of patients achieving a Good Clinical Response by week 16 To compare several Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (health- and vision-related quality of life, anxiety and depression) between treatment strategies To compare the time to relapse after week 16 between treatment strategies To assess the safety of each treatment strategy To assess the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness from both a Health System and a Societal perspectives of the combination therapy and the ADA monotherapy compared with MTX given alone To identify genetic and proteomic biomarkers associated with drug response to each treatment strategy. |
Comparar los componentes clínicos de la variable buena respuesta clínica entre las estrategias de tratamiento; Comparar la proporción de pacientes que logran una buena respuesta clínica en la semana 16; Comparar varias medidas de resultados informados por el paciente (calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y la visión, ansiedad y depresión) entre las estrategias de tratamiento; Comparar el tiempo de recaída después de la semana 16 entre las estrategias de tratamiento; Evaluar la seguridad de cada estrategia de tratamiento; Evaluar coste-utilidad y coste-eficacia desde la perspectiva del Sistema de Salud y de la Sociedad de la terapia combinada y la monoterapia con ADA en comparación con la monoterapia con MTX, e; Identificar biomarcadores genéticos y proteómicos asociados con la respuesta del fármaco a cada estrategia de tratamiento. |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | Yes |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | Yes |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | Yes |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes |
E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |
Evaluador ciego |
Blinded outcome assessment |
|
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 3 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 6 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
Last patient last visit |
Último paciente última visita |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 4 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 4 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |