Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Phase 2 Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, 16-week Placebo-controlled Study with a 36–week Extension to Investigate the Use of Benralizumab for Patients with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Despite Treatment with Topical Medications (The HILLIER Study)

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2020-000285-42
    Trial protocol
    CZ   BG   FR   PL  
    Global end of trial date
    13 Sep 2022

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    28 Mar 2023
    First version publication date
    28 Mar 2023
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    D3256C00001
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04605094
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    AstraZeneca
    Sponsor organisation address
    Karlebyhusentren, B674 Astraallen, Södertälje, Sweden, 151 85
    Public contact
    Global Clinical Lead, AstraZeneca, +1 877-240-9479, information.center@astrazeneca.com
    Scientific contact
    Global Clinical Lead, AstraZeneca, +1 877-240-9479, information.center@astrazeneca.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    Yes
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    13 Sep 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    13 Sep 2022
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of benralizumab 30 milligram (mg) with placebo in participants with atopic dermatitis (AD) despite treatment with topical medications.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent with International Council for Harmonisation/Good Clinical Practice (GCP), applicable regulatory requirements, and the AstraZeneca policy on Bioethics.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    12 Nov 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czechia: 28
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 22
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 5
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 38
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 39
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Australia: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Korea, Republic of: 38
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    194
    EEA total number of subjects
    105
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    53
    Adults (18-64 years)
    133
    From 65 to 84 years
    8
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    This Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in participants with moderate to severe AD at 48 study centers in 8 countries.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    This study consisted of a screening period (up to 4 weeks), placebo-controlled double-blind treatment period (up to 16 weeks) and an extension period (up to 36 weeks). A total of 194 participants were randomized and received treatment in this study.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Benralizumab
    Arm description
    Participants received benralizumab 30 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 visit for every 4 weeks (Q4W) until Week 16 visit. In extension phase, participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for either Q4W or every 8 weeks (Q8W) until Week 52 visit.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Benralizumab
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Benralizumab was administered as a SC injection of 1 milliliter (mL) volume containing 30 mg dose to participants by health care professionals in arms, abdominal wall and thighs in rotation.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Participants received placebo matching benralizumab on Day 1 visit for Q4W until Week 16. In extension phase, participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for Q4W until Week 28 visit and then followed by benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for Q8W until Week 52 visit.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    A matching placebo was administered as a SC injection to participants by health care professionals in arms, abdominal wall and thighs in rotation.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Benralizumab Placebo
    Started
    96
    98
    Completed
    37
    37
    Not completed
    59
    61
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    22
    19
         Physician decision
    2
    2
         Study terminated by Sponsor
    31
    33
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    2
    2
         Unspecified
    1
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    4

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Benralizumab
    Reporting group description
    Participants received benralizumab 30 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 visit for every 4 weeks (Q4W) until Week 16 visit. In extension phase, participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for either Q4W or every 8 weeks (Q8W) until Week 52 visit.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Participants received placebo matching benralizumab on Day 1 visit for Q4W until Week 16. In extension phase, participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for Q4W until Week 28 visit and then followed by benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for Q8W until Week 52 visit.

    Reporting group values
    Benralizumab Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    96 98 194
    Age Categorical
    Units: Subjects
    Age Continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    29.8 ± 15.87 29.5 ± 16.00 -
    Gender Categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    40 32 72
        Male
    56 66 122
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        Black or African American
    6 6 12
        Asian
    24 20 44
        White
    65 70 135
        Other
    1 2 3
    Ethnicity
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    11 13 24
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    85 85 170

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Benralizumab
    Reporting group description
    Participants received benralizumab 30 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 visit for every 4 weeks (Q4W) until Week 16 visit. In extension phase, participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for either Q4W or every 8 weeks (Q8W) until Week 52 visit.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Participants received placebo matching benralizumab on Day 1 visit for Q4W until Week 16. In extension phase, participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for Q4W until Week 28 visit and then followed by benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for Q8W until Week 52 visit.

    Subject analysis set title
    Benralizumab Q4W -> Q4W
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection on Day 1 visit Q4W until Week 16 visit. In extension phase, these participants again received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection Q4W until Week 52 visit.

    Subject analysis set title
    Benralizumab Q4W -> Q8W
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection on Day 1 visit Q4W until Week 16 visit. In extension phase, these participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection Q8W until Week 52 visit.

    Primary: Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 and a Decrease in IGA of ≥2 Points at Week 16 Relative to Baseline

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 and a Decrease in IGA of ≥2 Points at Week 16 Relative to Baseline
    End point description
    The IGA is an instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild disease; 3 = moderate disease; 4 = severe disease. The IGA used clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment. A higher score indicated greater severity. A responder at Week 16 was defined as having IGA 0/1 and a decrease in IGA of ≥2 points at Week 16 relative to baseline. Participants who withdrew from the study/required rescue therapy after Day 28 were considered as non-responders from the time these events occurred. Baseline was defined as the last recorded value on or prior to the date of randomization. The Full Analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 16
    End point values
    Benralizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    98
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    9.4 (3.36 to 14.93)
    17.3 (10.40 to 25.12)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment difference in IGA responders
    Statistical analysis description
    Estimates were from a logistic regression model that included treatment group, age as recorded on electronic case report form (eCRF) at screening (>=12 to <18 years; >=18 years), blood eosinophils as recorded on eCRF at screening (<300 cells/microliters [µL]; >=300 cells/µL) and baseline value of IGA score.
    Comparison groups
    Benralizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    194
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.08
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Difference in response rate
    Point estimate
    -8.62
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -17.94
         upper limit
    0.71

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced 75/90% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75/90) at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Experienced 75/90% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75/90) at Week 16
    End point description
    The EASI assessed the severity and extent of AD. Severity of 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation [scratching], lichenification) each were assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) in each of 4 body regions (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Total body total score=sum of the region total scores; ranged from 0 to 72. Participants were classified as responders if they achieved at least 75/90% reduction from baseline in their EASI total score at Week 16. Participants who withdrew from study/required rescue therapy after Day 28 were non-responders from the time these events occurred. Higher scores indicated a more severe or more extensive condition. Baseline was defined as the last recorded value on or prior to the date of randomization. The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 16
    End point values
    Benralizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    98
    Units: percentage of participants
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        EASI-75
    19.8 (11.71 to 27.45)
    24.5 (16.27 to 33.19)
        EASI-90
    7.3 (2.05 to 12.42)
    15.3 (8.33 to 22.50)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment difference in EASI-75 responders
    Statistical analysis description
    Estimates were from a logistic regression model that included treatment group, age as recorded on eCRF at screening (>=12 to < 18 years; >=18 years), blood eosinophils as recorded on eCRF at screening (<300 cells/µL; >=300 cells/µL) and baseline EASI total score.
    Comparison groups
    Benralizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    194
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.384
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Difference in response rate
    Point estimate
    -5.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -16.67
         upper limit
    6.36
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment difference in EASI-90 responders
    Statistical analysis description
    Estimates were from a logistic regression model that included treatment group, age as recorded on eCRF at screening (>=12 to < 18 years; >=18 years), blood eosinophils as recorded on eCRF at screening (<300 cells/µL; >=300 cells/µL) and baseline EASI total score.
    Comparison groups
    Benralizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    194
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.078
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Difference in response rate
    Point estimate
    -8.18
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -16.94
         upper limit
    0.59

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of ≥4 or More Points in Peak Pruritus Weekly Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants With an Improvement of ≥4 or More Points in Peak Pruritus Weekly Score
    End point description
    The Peak Pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) was a 1-item daily assessment of the worst itch the participant experienced over the past 24 hours. The score ranged from 0 to 10, with 0 being “no itch” and 10 being “worst itch imaginable.” and so a reduction in score was considered an improvement. A responder was defined as having an improvement of 4 or more points relative to baseline. Participants who withdrew from the study/required rescue therapy after Day 28 were considered as non-responders from the time these events occurred. The Week 16 weekly scores were defined as the average of the daily scores for the 7 days prior to the weekly score. The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Week 16
    End point values
    Benralizumab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    98
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    14.6 (7.87 to 21.70)
    14.3 (7.28 to 20.90)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment difference in Peak Pruritus NRS
    Statistical analysis description
    Estimates were from a logistic regression model that included treatment group, age as recorded on eCRF at screening (>=12 to < 18 years; >=18 years), blood eosinophils as recorded on eCRF at screening (<300 cells/µL; >=300 cells/µL) and baseline Peak Pruritus score.
    Comparison groups
    Benralizumab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    194
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.889
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Difference in response rate
    Point estimate
    0.69
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -8.93
         upper limit
    10.32

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Adverse events in the on-study period were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up, approximately a maximum up to Week 60
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    The Safety Analysis set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    24.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Benralizumab
    Reporting group description
    Participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection on Day 1 visit for Q4W until Week 16 visit. In extension phase participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for either Q4W or Q8W until Week 52 visit.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Participants received placebo matching benralizumab on Day 1 visit for Q4W until Week 16. In extension phase participants received benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for Q4W until Week 28 visit and then followed by benralizumab 30 mg SC injection for Q8W until Week 52 visit.

    Serious adverse events
    Benralizumab Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 96 (3.13%)
    2 / 98 (2.04%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Hodgkin's disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 96 (0.00%)
    1 / 98 (1.02%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Cardiac failure congestive
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 96 (1.04%)
    0 / 98 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Migraine
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 96 (0.00%)
    1 / 98 (1.02%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Paranasal sinus inflammation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 96 (1.04%)
    0 / 98 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dermatitis atopic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 96 (1.04%)
    0 / 98 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Benralizumab Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    38 / 96 (39.58%)
    39 / 98 (39.80%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 96 (4.17%)
    6 / 98 (6.12%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    13
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 96 (5.21%)
    5 / 98 (5.10%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    6
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    21 / 96 (21.88%)
    19 / 98 (19.39%)
         occurrences all number
    23
    20
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 96 (9.38%)
    7 / 98 (7.14%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    9
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 96 (9.38%)
    6 / 98 (6.12%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    8
    Conjunctivitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 96 (3.13%)
    9 / 98 (9.18%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    11

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    18 Jun 2020
    The primary rationale for this amendment was to add study mitigation language to provide sites with measures that were implemented if a participant was not able to visit a study site to ensure that the clinical trial could continue while minimizing risk to the participant, maintaining compliance with GCP, and minimize risks to the study integrity. Photography at some site visits was added to support the potential for use during study mitigation and as a tool for future trials. Other changes were made as points of clarification and correction of minor errors or omissions.
    04 May 2021
    The primary rationale for amendment was to align the contents of the clinical study protocol with the updated project specific safety requirements for benralizumab studies. Other changes were made as points of clarification, alignment with the updated protocol template, and correction of minor errors or omissions.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    The study was terminated as the study did not support the continued development of benralizumab for the indication of AD.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun Apr 28 03:01:04 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA