Clinical Trial Results:
Efficacy of roflumilast in the treatment of psoriasis – a randomised controlled trial
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2020-000711-76 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
25 Apr 2024
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
16 Aug 2025
|
First version publication date |
16 Aug 2025
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
N/A
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Alexander Egeberg, Bispebjerg Hospital
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Bispebjerg Bakke 23, Copenhagen, Denmark,
|
||
Public contact |
Bispebjerg Hospital, Alexander Egeberg, alexander.egeberg@gmail.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Bispebjerg Hospital, Alexander Egeberg, alexander.egeberg@gmail.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
25 Apr 2024
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
25 Apr 2024
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
25 Apr 2024
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To investigate the efficacy of roflumilast in the treatment of psoriasis (PASI75)
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Regulatory approvals were obtained from The Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-20013697), the Danish Medicine Agency, and the Danish Data Protection Agency. The trial was registered at EudraCT (2020-000711-76) and conducted in accordance with national data protection acts and the Edinburgh, Scotland, amendment (2000) to the Declaration of Helsinki 1964. Monitoring was performed by the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) units at University of Copenhagen and Aarhus University, Denmark.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
20 Jul 2020
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 46
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
46
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
46
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
23
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
23
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Participants were recruited from study sites and dermatology private practices, and through advertising. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, chronic stable plaque psoriasis (min. six months duration), psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) ≥8, body mass index (BMI) ≥20 kg/m2, indication for systemic treatment of psoriasis, and safe anticonception during the study period (...) For further details, please see published paper. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Active | |||||||||
Arm description |
n=18 particiants completed w12. n=5 were failure due to e.g. AEs. There seems to be a technical problem with the software, as the information is not by the system. Please see published paper for more details. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Roflumilast
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, soft + tablet
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
500 microgram once-daily
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||
Arm description |
n=22 particiants completed w12. n=1 were failure due to AEs. There seems to be a technical problem with the software, as this information cannot be accepted by the system. Please see published paper for more details. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, soft + tablet
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Once-daily
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Active
|
||
Reporting group description |
n=18 particiants completed w12. n=5 were failure due to e.g. AEs. There seems to be a technical problem with the software, as the information is not by the system. Please see published paper for more details. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
n=22 particiants completed w12. n=1 were failure due to AEs. There seems to be a technical problem with the software, as this information cannot be accepted by the system. Please see published paper for more details. |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
PASI75 | |||||||||
End point description |
The primary study endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients achieving at least 75% reduction from baseline PASI (PASI75) at week 12.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
w0-12
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
See below | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations (SD) (normally distributed data) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) (non-normally distributed data). Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. Efficacy data were assessed by intention to treat (..) For further details, se published paper.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
Active v Placebo
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
46
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||
P-value |
< 5 | |||||||||
Method |
N/A | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
w0-96
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
N/A | ||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: No SAEs were reported, and no significant biochemical changes were observed. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |