E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Clinically significant agitation in Alzheimer's Diseases |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Clinically significant agitation in Alzheimer's Diseases |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Psychiatry and Psychology [F] - Behaviours [F01] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 21.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10001499 |
E.1.2 | Term | Agitation mental |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10037175 - Psychiatric disorders |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10001497 |
E.1.2 | Term | Agitation |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10037175 - Psychiatric disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Feasibility: To employ a mixed methods approach to explore the feasibility of a definitive multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) within residential nursing home settings of Sativex® for treatment of agitation and aggression in AD. Further, our primary objectives will be;
1. To explore rate of recruitment and retention in the target population, including determining facilitators and barriers.
2. To determine whether the cut-off of ‘clinically significant’ agitation for CMAI or NPI-NH influences rate of recruitment fora future confirmatory trial
3. To investigate the acceptability of an oral mucosal method of administration for this indication in terms of compliance and to care home staff in terms of adherence to the titration schedule.
4. To investigate the acceptability of a cannabinoid-based medicine, and explore impact of societal attitudes and stigma within this patient population as part of the qualitative evaluation. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
- To estimate the parameters in a sample size for a later RCT for the treatment effect of Sativex® for agitation and aggression in dementia. - To explore the overall response rate of Sativex® in the trial population, including other neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as sleep disturbances and changes in appetite, and pain relief. - Explore Actigraphy data for sleep, physical activity and linked to NPS assessments (exploratory analyses) weeks 2-4
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Yes |
E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives |
Sativex for the treatment of agitation in dementia - a qualitative evaluation Aims: 1. To investigate the acceptability of a cannabinoid-based medicine, and explore impact of societal attitudes and stigma within this patient population as part of the qualitative evaluation.
2. To investigate the acceptability and feasibility of an oral-mucosal method of administration for this indication in this population
Synopsis: This study will include a concurrent Qualitative Evaluation (QE) to evaluate contextual factors that may impact implementation in real-world practice. This will be facilitated via recorded semi-structured interviews with nursing home staff & the participant themselves (when possible). Nursing staff will be given an information sheet and asked to sign a consent form specific to the QE; resident consent for QE will be included in the initial consenting process when entering the study. In collaboration with our qualitative expert collaborator, study researchers will develop an interview topic guide that explores attitudes towards cannabis-based medicines; issues/benefits of administering via an oromucosal method in this population; and factors of regular care home activities/procedures that may facilitate or inhibit effective implementation of Sativex® in practice.
Interviews will be conducted before and after treatment phase with the first 20 recruited participants (approximately balanced 10:10 randomly between active & placebo arm to not risk unblinding of researchers). Interviews will be transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Summary results will be included within the main study report, and an in-depth qualitative report will be produced separately. |
|
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Age: 55-90.
Probable Alzheimer’s Disease diagnosis according to the criteria of National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDSADRDA).
Clinically significant A/A that requires treatment, defined by CMAI >/= 45 (Cohen-Mansfield et al., 1989) and/or NPI-NH Agitation total score >/= 4 (Livingston et al., 2017).
Residential within a nursing home at recruitment to the study with a history of at least 2 weeks behavioural disturbance.
Written and witnessed informed consent from participant (if deemed having mental capacity), or from personal legal representative (next of kin/power of attorney), or from professional legal representative (non R/F member who can attest to knowing prospective participant for significant period of time). - Informed consent will be sought in this order from these potential sources.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
- Anti-psychotic, anti-epileptic, antidepressant, benzodiazepine, lithium or hypnotic dosage alteration in the 2 weeks prior to the start of the study (and must be expected to maintain dosage throughout study). - ChEIs (donepezil, rivastigmine or galantamine) and/or memantine, dosage alteration in the 6 weeks prior to the start of the study. - Currently using cannabis-based medicine(s) (defined as being a UK licensed product prescribed by a doctor) - Concomitant treatment with strong enzyme inducers (rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, St John’s Wort) and/or CYP3A4 inhibitors - Hypersensitivity to Sativex® or any of the excipients in the formulation (ethanol anhydrous, Propylene glycol, peppermint oil). - Severe cardiovascular disease, recent myocardial infarction (‘recency’ determined by study doctor according to clinical significance), uncompensated congestive heart failure and uncontrolled hypertension. o QT interval by Fredericia (QTcF) greater than 450 will be excluded if ECG conducted - Severe, unstable or poorly controlled medical illness. - Renal Impairment as defined by estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 45ml/min - Hepatic impairment as defined by Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/ Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels 3 times greater than reference value of laboratory (165 IU/L+ for ALT; 150 IU/L+ for AST) - Any disability that may interfere with the patient completing the study procedure. - History or family history of schizophrenia, or other psychotic illness; history of severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with their underlying condition. - Delirium, pain or any medical illness as a clear cause of agitation - Females of child-bearing potential, defined as ‘having experienced menarche and are not permanently sterilised (e.g. by hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy) or post-menopausal (defined as at least 1 year since last regular menstrual period)’. - Evidence of ‘suicidality risk’ determined by >0 on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) - History/current seizure disorder - History/current of alcohol or other substance abuse - History of fall(s) within the last 6 months 7.2.1 COVID-19 specific exclusion criteria - Positive COVID test result within previous 4 weeks - Currently experiencing CV19 symptoms (continuous cough, high temperature, loss of taste/smell). NB. can be re-screened after 2 weeks
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Feasibility outcomes:
To consent and randomise 60 participants within a 12-month data collection period (equalling a recruitment rate of 5 participants a month).
To follow up at least 75% of those randomised at 4 weeks.
For a minimum of 80% of participants to demonstrate adherence to the allocation.
To estimate a clinically meaningful effect size of at least 0.3
|
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Feasibility endpoints will be evaluated at the end of the trial. |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Safety and tolerability:
Tolerability: Assessed by self- & carer-report of side-effects & medication discontinuation.
Safety parameters: Bloods for Haematology (Full blood count and Haemoglobin) and Biochemistry (Urea & Electrolytes, liver function test, thyroid function test, lipid profile); Vital signs: Heart rate and Blood pressure; Physical examination.
Follow up phone calls for self-reported side effects, including incidence of falls and compliance (week 2 and 6).
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms, cognition, pain, quality of life:
Tertiary Endpoints - Change in CMAI at 2 & 8 weeks - Neuropsychiatric Inventory – Nursing Home (NPI-NH) 2, 4 & 8 weeks - Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) 4 & 8 weeks - Functional Assessment Staging of Alzheimer’s Disease (FAST) 4 weeks - Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) 4 weeks - Quality of Life with resident 4 & 8 weeks (QOL-AD care home) - Quality of Life with proxy informant 4 & 8 weeks (QAULID) - Change in pain; Abbey Pain Scale (APS) 4 weeks - Adverse Events (from baseline to 8 weeks) - Serious Adverse Events (from baseline to 8 weeks) - Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep disturbances from raw accelerometer data (weeks 2-4) - Co-prescribed psychotropic medications, (from baseline to 8 weeks) - Number of recorded incidents of aggression, and number of occasions rescue treatment utilised (from baseline to 8 weeks
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Safety & tolerability: - ongoing evaluation throughout trial, and end of trial Neuropsychiatric Symptoms, cognition, pain, quality of life: - Change in CMAI at 2 & 8 weeks - NPI-NH - 2, 4 & 8 weeks - MMSE - 4 & 8 weeks - FAST - 4 weeks - CFS - 4 weeks - QOL-AD with resident 4 & 8 weeks - QOLID with proxy informant 4 & 8 weeks - Change in pain; APS - 4 weeks - Adverse Events (from baseline to 8 weeks) - Serious Adverse Events (from baseline to 8 weeks) - Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep disturbances from raw accelerometer data (weeks 2-4) - Co-prescribed psychotropic medications, - from baseline to 8 weeks - Number of recorded incidents of aggression, and number of occasions rescue treatment utilised - from baseline to 8 weeks
|
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | No |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | Yes |
E.6.13.1 | Other scope of the trial description |
|
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
The end of the trial will be defined as database lock following the last patient visit plus an additional six-week period. |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 2 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 29 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 2 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 29 |