Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2) as a treat-ment for patients with COVID-19

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2020-001172-15
    Trial protocol
    DE   DK   AT   GB  
    Global end of trial date
    26 Dec 2020

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    09 Aug 2022
    First version publication date
    09 Aug 2022
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    APN01-01-COVID19
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04335136
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    IND: 151312
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    APEIRON Biologics AG
    Sponsor organisation address
    Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 5, Vienna, Austria, 1030
    Public contact
    Sponsor, APEIRON Biologics AG, dwi@invios.com
    Scientific contact
    Sponsor, APEIRON Biologics AG, dwi@invios.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    26 Dec 2020
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    26 Dec 2020
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    26 Dec 2020
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    Primary objective: To assess clinical efficacy of APN01 using a composite outcome of all cause-death or need of invasive mechanical ventilation up to 28 days. Secondary objectives: - To assess the efficacy of APN01 using log-transformed levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a surrogate marker for organ damage. - To monitor other biomarker changes in patients with severe Corona-virusdisease 2019 (COVID-19) treated with APN01. - To evaluate the safety of APN01 in patients with severe COVID-19.
    Protection of trial subjects
    A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) was established to protect the safety of study participants. Patients who experienced any kind of hypersensitivity reaction had to stop treatment with the IMP. Treatment could be discontinued if in the opinion of the investigator or of the medical monitor there was a risk to the patient’s safety if they further received IMP.
    Background therapy
    Both treatments (APN01 [0.4 mg/kg BID] or placebo [0.9% sodium chloride, BID]) were given on top of best standard of care. Details of the standard care provided (concomitant medication, remdesivir, if approved and available, and ventilation techniques) were documented in the patient’s eCRF and submitted to statistical analysis.
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    14 Apr 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Austria: 40
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 5
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 139
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 1
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    185
    EEA total number of subjects
    46
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    121
    From 65 to 84 years
    64
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    17 centers in Austria, Denmark, Germany, and Russia recruited for the clinical trial. The recruitment period was 7 months (Apr-Nov 2020).

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    185 patients were screened; Screening failures n=4 --> Inclusion criteria not met or exlcusion criteria applied. 181 patients were randomized. N = 3 patients were excluded before treatment due to screening failure, randomization key pressed by mistake (2) or withdrew for private reasons (1). 178 patients received IMP.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    185
    Intermediate milestone: Number of subjects
    Randomized: 181
    Number of subjects completed
    178

    Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
    Reason: Number of subjects
    screening failure: 4
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Excluded before treatment: 3
    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Treated set (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Carer
    Blinding implementation details
    The entire study team was blinded expect for the pharmacist or another unblinded team member, e.g., unblinded clinical research assistant, who prepared the IMP, the statistician who compiled the necessary information for the DSMB, DSMB members, and data managers involved in the generation and upload of treatment listings and biomarker data to the eCRF.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    APN01
    Arm description
    APN01 is the active treatment: it is a soluble recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2) that is currently under development as a therapy for coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19). N=90 subjects were randomized to APN01, but N=3 subjects were excluded from APN01 arm before receiving treatment due to screening failure, randomization key pressed by mistake (2) and 1 subject withdrew for private reasons. Thus, N=88 subjects were treated with APN01.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    APN01
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    GSK2586881
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Infusion, Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Infusion , Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    APN01 was administered intravenously every 12 hours (±1 hour) for 7 days (14 doses in total). If the patient was discharged from hospital before Day 7, treatment could be stopped on the day of discharge.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    The placebo is physiological saline.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Infusion, Solution for solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Infusion , Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo (physiological saline; 0,9 % NaCl) was administered intravenously BID for 7 days (14 doses in total). If the patient was discharged from hospital before Day 7, treatment could be stopped on the day of discharge. Administration: slow intravenous infusion (3 to 30 minutes) using a polypropylene syringe with a 0.22 micron filter.

    Number of subjects in period 1 [1]
    APN01 Placebo
    Started
    88
    90
    Completed
    77
    83
    Not completed
    11
    7
         Adverse event, serious fatal
    8
    4
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    -
    1
         Day 28 assessment by phone; no protocol option yet
    1
    -
         Suspected SAE
    -
    1
         Health-threatening condition
    -
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    2
    -
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: Justification: N=185 patients were screened; there were N=4 Screening failures (Inclusion criteria not met or exlcusion criteria applied). N=181 patients were randomized to APN01 (N=91) and Placebo (N=90). N=3 patients in the APN01-arm were excluded before treatment due to screening failure, randomization key pressed by mistake (2) or withdrew for private reasons (1). Thus, N=88 patients of the active arm received APN01. The FAS included these N=178 patients receiving APN01 or Placebo.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    APN01
    Reporting group description
    APN01 is the active treatment: it is a soluble recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2) that is currently under development as a therapy for coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19). N=90 subjects were randomized to APN01, but N=3 subjects were excluded from APN01 arm before receiving treatment due to screening failure, randomization key pressed by mistake (2) and 1 subject withdrew for private reasons. Thus, N=88 subjects were treated with APN01.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    The placebo is physiological saline.

    Reporting group values
    APN01 Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    88 90 178
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    58 60 118
        From 65-84 years
    30 30 60
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    33 31 64
        Male
    55 59 114
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        Missing
    0 1 1
        Asian
    1 1 2
        Black or African American
    1 0 1
        Caucasian or White
    86 88 174
    Ethnicity
    Units: Subjects
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    88 90 178

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    APN01
    Reporting group description
    APN01 is the active treatment: it is a soluble recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2) that is currently under development as a therapy for coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19). N=90 subjects were randomized to APN01, but N=3 subjects were excluded from APN01 arm before receiving treatment due to screening failure, randomization key pressed by mistake (2) and 1 subject withdrew for private reasons. Thus, N=88 subjects were treated with APN01.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    The placebo is physiological saline.

    Primary: All-cause death or invasive mechanical ventilation (up to 28 days or hospital discharge)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    All-cause death or invasive mechanical ventilation (up to 28 days or hospital discharge)
    End point description
    Primary efficacy endpoint = composite endpoint of all-cause death or invasive mechanical ventilation (up to 28 days or hospital discharge). Primary endpoint was based on FAS; FAS=178 patients.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days or hospital discharge.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [1]
    90 [2]
    Units: Patients
    9
    12
    Notes
    [1] - FAS
    [2] - FAS
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary endpoint: Chi-squared test
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary endpoint: composite endpoint. The following null hypothesis was tested: • H0: pAPN01 = placebo versus the alternative • H1: pAPN01 ≠ placebo H0 was tested using a Chi-squared test. The level of significance is 5% (two-sided).
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.5207
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary endpoint: Logistic regression analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    A logistic regression with the responder (yes/no) as independent variable was applied. The following co-factors were included in the logistic regression: Arterial hypertension, Diabetes, Coronary artery disease, Age (<65 years vs. >=65 years), Center The odds ratio along with its associated 95% confidence intervals will be were reported. Shown: The odds ratio of treatment group (APN01/placebo) was calculated as APN01/PBO (FAS, N = 178).
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.3588
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.63
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.23
         upper limit
    1.7

    Secondary: 28-day mortality (all-cause death)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    28-day mortality (all-cause death)
    End point description
    28-day mortality (all-cause death) was analyzed using both the chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Depending on the expected frequency for each cell, either the results of the chisquared test (all expected frequencies ≥5) or the results of Fischer’s test were used for the evaluation and interpretation of the data. In addition, logistic regression analysis including the 5 cofactors specified for the primary analysis was carried out. Endpoint was based on FAS; FAS=178 patients.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Day 28.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [3]
    90 [4]
    Units: Percentage of patients
    10
    8
    Notes
    [3] - FAS
    [4] - FAS
    Statistical analysis title
    28-day mortality - 2°endpoint: Chi-squared test
    Statistical analysis description
    Chi-squared test: Proportion of responder, i.e. those patients that died, as well as the p-value (two-sided) were reported.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.5678
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    28-day mortality - logistic regression
    Statistical analysis description
    The following co-factors will be included in the logistic regression: Arterial hypertension, Diabetes, Coronary artery disease, Age (<65 years vs. >=65 years), Center. The odds ratio along with its associated 95% confidence intervals were reported. Shown: Treatment group (as randomized): APN01 vs Placebo.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.7914
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.16
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.38
         upper limit
    3.57

    Secondary: Ventilator-free days (VFD) up to 28 days or hospital discharge

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Ventilator-free days (VFD) up to 28 days or hospital discharge
    End point description
    Ventilator-free days (VFD) were compared between treatments using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and bootstrap methods. VFD and mechanical-VFD (mVFD) were calculated as time in the study minus duration of ventilation and were set to zero if the duration of ventilation exceeded the time in the study. 3 analysis types were used: 1. Deaths not censored: VFD/mVFD were set to zero for patients who died; 2. Deaths censored: Patients who died before or on Day 28 were censored at the day before death; 3. Alive patients: Only patients who were alive at Day 28, hospital discharge, or early termination were included. Endpoint was based on FAS; FAS=178 patients.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days or hospital discharge.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [5]
    90 [6]
    Units: days
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        VFD (deaths not censored)
    17.2 ( 8.8 )
    16.7 ( 8.4 )
        VFD (deaths censored)
    17.4 ( 8.6 )
    16.7 ( 8.4 )
        VFD (alive patients)
    18.9 ( 7.3 )
    17.9 ( 7.4 )
        mVFD (deaths not censored)
    25.7 ( 8.4 )
    25.1 ( 8.7 )
        mVFD (deaths censored)
    26.3 ( 6.6 )
    25.6 ( 7.6 )
        mVFD (alive patients)
    28.2 ( 1.9 )
    26.9 ( 5.8 )
    Notes
    [5] - FAS; with exception VFD (alive patients) ): N=80 and mVFD (alive patients): N=79
    [6] - FAS; with exception VFD (alive patients): N=84 and mVFD (alive patients): N=83
    Statistical analysis title
    VFD (alive patients) - Wilcoxon rank sum test
    Statistical analysis description
    VFD was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test at a significance level of 5% (two-sided) and p-value (two-sided) was reported.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v APN01
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [7]
    P-value
    = 0.0273
    Method
    Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [7] - The Wilcoxon rank sum test showed a statistically significant difference in mechanical-VFDs for the population of patients who were alive at Day 28, hospital discharge, or early termination (P <0.05).
    Statistical analysis title
    VFD (deaths not censored) - bootstrap methods
    Statistical analysis description
    Bootstrap methods will be applied to calculate 95% confidence intervals and two-sided p-values for the difference in means between treatment groups. VFD (deaths not censored): VFD was set to zero for patients who died.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.7215
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    bootstrap methods
    Point estimate
    0.47
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.99
         upper limit
    2.96
    Statistical analysis title
    VFD (deaths censored) - bootstrap methods
    Statistical analysis description
    Bootstrap methods will be applied to calculate 95% confidence intervals and two-sided p-values for the difference in means between treatment groups. Patients who died before Day 28 were censored at the day before death.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.6381
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    bootstrap method
    Point estimate
    0.66
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.77
         upper limit
    3.14
    Statistical analysis title
    VFD (alive patients) - bootstrap method
    Statistical analysis description
    Bootstrap methods will be applied to calculate 95% confidence intervals and two-sided p-values for the difference in means between treatment groups. Only patients who were alive until Day 28 or hospital discharge/early termination were included in the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.5296
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    bootstrap method
    Point estimate
    1.02
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.2
         upper limit
    3.25

    Secondary: Proportion of responders, defined as ≥2 point improvement in WHO’s 11-point score system at Days 7, 10, 14 and 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of responders, defined as ≥2 point improvement in WHO’s 11-point score system at Days 7, 10, 14 and 28
    End point description
    The WHO 11-point scale assessment was not done at in-home visits at Day 28. Missing values were included in the calculation of percentages but not used for statistical testing. It was analyzed using both the chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Depending on the expected frequency for each cell, either the results of the chisquared test (all expected frequencies ≥ 5) or the results of Fischer’s test were used for the evaluation and interpretation of the data. In addition, logistic regression analysis including the 5 cofactors specified for the primary analysis was carried out. The odds ratio along with its associated 95% confidence intervals was reported. Endpoint was based on FAS; FAS=178 patients.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measurements at Days 7, 10, 14 and 28.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [8]
    90 [9]
    Units: Patients
        Day 7
    2
    0
        Day 10
    17
    13
        Day 14
    38
    32
        Day 28
    72
    74
    Notes
    [8] - FAS, with exceptions: Day 10: N=86 Day 14: N=83 Day 28: N=79
    [9] - FAS, with exceptions: D10: N=85 D14: N=85 D28: N=83
    Statistical analysis title
    Day 7 - Fisher’s exact test
    Statistical analysis description
    Fisher’s exact test Proportion of responder, as well as th the p-value (two-sided) was reported for Day 7.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [10]
    P-value
    = 0.4971 [11]
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [10] - Exception from FAS: Patient numbers Day 7: APN01 and Placebo both N=88.
    [11] - Exception from FAS: Patient numbers Day 7: APN01 and Placebo both N=88.
    Statistical analysis title
    Day 10 - chi-squared test
    Statistical analysis description
    Chi-squared test Proportion of responder, i.e. those patients that have >= 2 improvement in WHO’s 11-Point Score system, as well as the p-value (two-sided) was reported for Day 10, 14 and 28.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [12]
    P-value
    = 0.4631 [13]
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [12] - Exception from FAS: Patient numbers Day 10: APN01 N=86 and Placebo N=85.
    [13] - Exception from FAS: Patient numbers Day 10: APN01 N=86 and Placebo N=85.
    Statistical analysis title
    Day 14 - chi-squared test
    Statistical analysis description
    Chi-squared test Proportion of responder, i.e. those patients that have >= 2 improvement in WHO’s 11-Point Score system, as well as the p-value (two-sided) was reported for Day 10, 14 and 28.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [14]
    P-value
    = 0.3116 [15]
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [14] - Exception from FAS: Patient numbers Day 14: APN01 N=83 and Placebo N=85.
    [15] - Exception from FAS: Patient numbers Day 14: APN01 N=83 and Placebo N=85.
    Statistical analysis title
    Day 28 - chi squared test
    Statistical analysis description
    Chi-squared test Proportion of responder, i.e. those patients that have >= 2 improvement in WHO’s 11-Point Score system, as well as the p-value (two-sided) was reported for Day 10, 14 and 28.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [16]
    P-value
    = 0.3306 [17]
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [16] - Exception from FAS: Day 28: Patients in APN01 N=79 and Placebo N=84.
    [17] - Exception from FAS: Day 28: Patients in APN01 N=79 and Placebo N=84.

    Secondary: Time to death (all causes)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to death (all causes)
    End point description
    Patients who were alive at Day 28, or were discharged from hospital/early terminated before Day 28 were censored at discharge/early termination if they could not be reached at or after Day 28 by means of a telephone interview. Patients who were reached at or after Day 28 by means of a telephone interview were censored at the date of telephone contact if they were alive. Analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and plots (not shown), log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models (adjusted for center and age adjusted for center and age to derive hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals). Endpoint was based on FAS; FAS=178 patients. Median or quartile times to death could not be estimated. The Cox proportional hazards model of time to death specified in the SAP was not uniquely estimable -> thus, no results reported for this analysis.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days. Time to death [days] = Date of death - Date of randomization
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [18]
    90 [19]
    Units: days
    median (confidence interval 95%)
        Probability of being alive at Day 28
    0.898 (0.81 to 0.95)
    0.899 (0.78 to 0.96)
    Notes
    [18] - FAS
    [19] - FAS
    Statistical analysis title
    log-rank test
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatments groups were compared with Log-rank test.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.608
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Time to first use of invasive mechanical ventilation up to 28 days or hospital discharge

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to first use of invasive mechanical ventilation up to 28 days or hospital discharge
    End point description
    Analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and plots (not shown), log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for center and age. Median or quartile times to first invasive mechanical ventilation could not be estimated. The Cox proportional hazards model of time to first use of invasive mechanical ventilation specified in the SAP was not uniquely estimable. Endpoint was based on FAS; FAS=178 patients. Patients without documented invasive mechanical ventilation were censored at the date of study completion or discontinuation/discharge from hospital, respectively. N=81 patients from the APN01 group and N=83 patients from placebo group were censored.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days or hospital discharge.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [20]
    90
    Units: Days
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    0.920 (0.84 to 0.96)
    0.921 (0.84 to 0.96)
    Notes
    [20] - FAS; N= 81 patients from the APN01 group were censored.
    Statistical analysis title
    log-rank test
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatments groups were compared with Log-rank test.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.9944
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Absolute values and absolute change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio over time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Absolute values and absolute change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio over time
    End point description
    PaO2 = partial pressure of arterial oxygen; FiO2 = fraction of inspired oxygen. Was evaluated on each visit for ventilated patients only. If entries were not changed compared to previous entries, no entry was done within the eCRF. If ventilation was ongoing and/or no stop date was available, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio ware considered until date of study completion/discontinuation or date of death respectively. Baseline was defined as first observation of PaO2/FiO2 ratio (individual start value). Basic statistics for the PaO2/FiO2 ratio for both the absolute values and the absolute change from baseline were tabulated by day of ventilation. Daily = used when more than one assessment was available per day. Endpoint was based on FAS; FAS=178 patients. In the analyses the high number of missing values must be taken into consideration.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to Day 28.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [21]
    90 [22]
    Units: Patients
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 1
    223.07 ( 99.70 )
    185.14 ( 79.79 )
        Day 7
    218.74 ( 91.66 )
    192.21 ( 92.71 )
        Day 10
    290.00 ( 204.70 )
    186.62 ( 87.83 )
        Day 14
    197.00 ( 99.42 )
    185.00 ( 67.20 )
        Day 28
    261.00 ( 0 )
    185.00 ( 116.73 )
    Notes
    [21] - FAS: D1: N=30 D7: N=19 D10: N=14 D14: N=9 D28: N=1, standard deviation not available
    [22] - FAS: D1: N=28 D7: N=24 D10: N=13 D14: N=11 D28: N=3
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Absolute values and absolute change in modified sequential organ failure assessment (mSOFA) score over time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Absolute values and absolute change in modified sequential organ failure assessment (mSOFA) score over time
    End point description
    The modified sequential organ failure assessment score (mSOFA) score was introduced with protocol version 5.0 and was available for patients who were included with protocol version 5.0 and higher. For patients who were included with previous protocol versions (protocol version 4.0 and lower), mSOFA score was available from the time when protocol was in effect at the centers. Basic statistics for the mSOFA score for both the absolute values and the absolute change from baseline were be tabulated by visit. Endpoint based on FAS; FAS N=178.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [23]
    88 [24]
    Units: Patients
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day -1
    2.6 ( 1.2 )
    2.2 ( 1.4 )
        Day 7
    1.8 ( 2.5 )
    1.6 ( 2.1 )
        FU Day 10
    1.0 ( 1.7 )
    1.0 ( 1.6 )
        FU Day 14
    1.0 ( 2.4 )
    0.9 ( 1.7 )
        FU Day 28/EOS
    0.2 ( 0.6 )
    0.8 ( 1.8 )
    Notes
    [23] - FAS: D-1: N=80 D7: N=83 D10: N=80 D14: N=79 D28: N=39
    [24] - FAS: D-1: N=80 D7: N=77 D10: N=77 D14: N=75 D28: N=38
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to a 2-point decrease in WHO’s 11-point score system (WHO clinical progression scale [CPS])

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to a 2-point decrease in WHO’s 11-point score system (WHO clinical progression scale [CPS])
    End point description
    Patients without documented 2-point decrease who completed the study or were early terminated or discharged from hospital before Day 28 were censored at the date of last WHO assessment available. Analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and plots (not shown), log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for center and age. Endpoint based on FAS; FAS: N=178. N=14 patients from the APN01 group and N=15 patients from placebo group were censored.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [25]
    90 [26]
    Units: Days
    median (confidence interval 95%)
        Median time to improvement
    27 (14.00 to 27.00)
    27 (17.00 to 27.00)
    Notes
    [25] - FAS
    [26] - FAS
    Statistical analysis title
    log-rank test
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatments groups were compared with Log-rank test.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.2173
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Cox proportional hazards regression analyses
    Statistical analysis description
    Cox proportional hazards model The hazards ratio along with its associated 95% confidence intervals as well as parameter estimate and p-value (two-sided) were reported.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.3725 [27]
    Method
    Cox regression: Wald Tests
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [27] - P-value for paramenter "Treatment group (as randomized)".

    Secondary: Absolute values and absolute change in lymphocyte count over time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Absolute values and absolute change in lymphocyte count over time
    End point description
    Lymphocytes assessed in blood samples of patients. Endpoint based on FAS; FAS: N=178. Note: Analysis with a high number of missing values; number of evaluable patients varied between visits. Summarized with descriptive statistics.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [28]
    90 [29]
    Units: 10^9/L
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Screening (Day -1)
    1.13 ( 0.694 )
    1.06 ( 0.629 )
        Day 1
    0.96 ( 0.376 )
    0.92 ( 0.372 )
        Day 2
    1.14 ( 0.628 )
    1.14 ( 0.629 )
        Day 3
    1.25 ( 0.843 )
    1.16 ( 0.662 )
        Day 5
    1.35 ( 1.026 )
    1.40 ( 0.757 )
        Day 7
    1.45 ( 0.948 )
    1.62 ( 0.940 )
        Day 8
    1.09 ( 0.773 )
    1.35 ( 0.349 )
        FU Day 10
    1.74 ( 1.444 )
    1.79 ( 0.782 )
        FU Day 14
    1.70 ( 0.773 )
    1.71 ( 0.730 )
        FU Day 28/EOS
    2.28 ( 3.420 )
    1.72 ( 0.559 )
    Notes
    [28] - FAS: D-1: 82 D1: 14 D2: 83 D3: 85 D5: 81 D7: 82 D8: 7 D10: 81 D14: 77 D28: 37
    [29] - FAS: D-1: 82 D1: 14 D2: 78 D3: 83 D5: 79 D7: 80 D8: 4 D10: 75 D14: 73 D28 EOS: 37
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Absolute values and absolute change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels over time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Absolute values and absolute change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels over time
    End point description
    CRP assessed in blood samples of patients. Endpoint based on FAS; FAS: N=178. Note: Analysis with a high number of missing values; number of evaluable patients varied between visits. Summarized with descriptive statistics.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [30]
    90 [31]
    Units: mg/L
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Screening (Day -1)
    56.0 ( 64.53 )
    62.8 ( 51.75 )
        Day 1
    85.8 ( 100.54 )
    94.5 ( 73.02 )
        Day 2
    48.1 ( 66.45 )
    51.8 ( 43.35 )
        Day 3
    36.1 ( 53.75 )
    43.7 ( 45.13 )
        Day 5
    28.7 ( 57.06 )
    37.1 ( 42.04 )
        Day 7
    21.7 ( 41.58 )
    26.1 ( 38.71 )
        Day 8
    39.3 ( 54.11 )
    8.4 ( 7.60 )
        FU Day 10
    13.9 ( 24.24 )
    26.3 ( 48.75 )
        FU Day 14
    15.8 ( 29.66 )
    38.3 ( 133.24 )
        FU Day 28/EOS
    4.9 ( 5.69 )
    8.5 ( 11.54 )
    Notes
    [30] - Pt D-1: 77 D1: 12 D2: 78 D3: 80 D5: 76 D7: 78 D8: 7 FU D10: 74 FU D14: 69 FU D28/EOS: 36
    [31] - Pt D-1: 79 D1: 13 D2: 74 D3: 74 D5: 73 D7: 76 D8: 3 FU D10: 71 FU D14: 73 FU D28/EOS: 37
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Absolute values and absolute change in D-dimer levels over time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Absolute values and absolute change in D-dimer levels over time
    End point description
    D-Dimer assessed in blood samples of patients. Endpoint based on FAS; FAS: N=178. Note: Analysis with a high number of missing values; number of evaluable patients varied between visits. Summarized with descriptive statistics.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [32]
    90 [33]
    Units: µg/L
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Screening (Day -1)
    1341 ( 2757 )
    1187 ( 3994 )
        Day 1
    965 ( 796 )
    3787 ( 9918 )
        Day 2
    1133 ( 1538 )
    909 ( 1013 )
        Day 3
    1109 ( 1316 )
    881 ( 959 )
        Day 5
    1286 ( 1588 )
    1023 ( 1132 )
        Day 7
    1208 ( 1485 )
    1139 ( 1590 )
        Day 8
    1473 ( 1609 )
    1303 ( 970 )
        FU Day 10
    988 ( 1135 )
    1219 ( 2228 )
        FU Day 14
    1015 ( 1520 )
    1013 ( 2243 )
        FU Day 28/EOS
    573 ( 629 )
    685 ( 939 )
    Notes
    [32] - Pt # D-1: 71 D1: 11 D2: 73 D3: 69 D5: 72 D7: 73 D8: 7 FU D10: 70 FU D14: 70 FU D28/EOS: 32
    [33] - Pt # D-1: 73 D1: 12 D2: 69 D3: 74 D5: 69 D7: 68 D8: 3 FU D10: 66 FU D14: 66 FU D28/EOS: 31
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Absolute values and absolute change in log-transformed levels of LDH over time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Absolute values and absolute change in log-transformed levels of LDH over time
    End point description
    Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was assessed in blood samples of patients. Endpoint based on FAS; FAS: N=178. Note: Analysis with a high number of missing values; number of evaluable patients varied between visits. Summarized with descriptive statistics.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [34]
    90 [35]
    Units: U/L
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Screening (Day -1)
    5.91 ( 0.442 )
    5.87 ( 5.87 )
        Day 1
    5.74 ( 0.402 )
    5.85 ( 5.85 )
        Day 2
    5.89 ( 0.468 )
    5.92 ( 0.366 )
        Day 3
    5.86 ( 0.440 )
    5.88 ( 0.422 )
        Day 5
    5.82 ( 0.470 )
    5.80 ( 0.433 )
        Day 7
    5.77 ( 0.459 )
    5.75 ( 0.387 )
        Day 8
    6.11 ( 0.528 )
    6.23 ( 0.292 )
        FU Day 10
    5.66 ( 0.464 )
    5.67 ( 0.401 )
        FU Day 14
    5.55 ( 0.467 )
    5.52 ( 0.406 )
        FU Day 28/EOS
    5.43 ( 0.305 )
    5.50 ( 0.383 )
    Notes
    [34] - Pt # D-1: 78 D1: 14 D2: 74 D3: 76 D5: 74 D7: 78 D8: 7 FU D10: 72 FU D14: 69 FU D28/EOS: 38
    [35] - Pt # D-1: 77 D1: 14 D2: 73 D3: 76 D5: 74 D7: 74 D8: 3 FU D10: 74 FU D14: 71 FU D28/EOS: 38
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to hospital discharge

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to hospital discharge
    End point description
    Dased on FAS; FAS=178. Analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for center and age. Time to hospital discharge [days] = date of first discharge from hospital - date of randomization. Patients without documented hospital discharge were censored at the date of study completion or discontinuation. Patients who died before Day 28 were censored at the date of death even if early terminated before. N = 14 patients from each group were censored.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [36]
    90 [37]
    Units: Days
        median (full range (min-max))
    14 (12.00 to 15.00)
    14 (13.00 to 15.00)
    Notes
    [36] - FAS
    [37] - FAS
    Statistical analysis title
    Log-rank test
    Statistical analysis description
    The log-rank test did not reveal any statistically significant difference between the no-discharge probabilities over time.
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.829
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Cox proportional hazards regression analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that patients ≥65 years were less likely to be discharged from hospital within 28 days (hazard ratio 0.594, 95% CI, 0.40–0.88; P = 0.0101. The analysis indicated that the time to hospital discharge differed between centers (Wald test, P < 0.01).
    Comparison groups
    APN01 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    178
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.0101
    Method
    Regression, Cox
    Parameter type
    Cox proportional hazard
    Point estimate
    0.594
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.4
         upper limit
    0.88
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.2027

    Secondary: Change in viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) over time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) over time
    End point description
    Viral RNA was assessed in blood samples of patients. Endpoint based on FAS; FAS: N=178. Note: The number of missing values was relatively high and varied between visits. Assessments could be omitted for Day 28/EOS phone visits. Only results that could be converted to standard units were submitted to analysis. “No SARS-CoV2 detected” was set to 0. Summarized with descriptive statistics.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [38]
    90 [39]
    Units: copies/mL
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 1
    27996 ( 78877 )
    3900 ( 5848 )
        Day 3
    20931 ( 53182 )
    13681 ( 45287 )
        Day 5
    9825 ( 32979 )
    11912 ( 75457 )
        Day 7
    5229 ( 24514 )
    2094 ( 8742 )
        FU Day 14
    9274 ( 78304 )
    53 ( 455 )
        FU Day 28/EOS
    36 ( 217 )
    0 ( 0 )
    Notes
    [38] - Pt numbers D1: 59 D3: 47 D5: 56 D7: 65 FU D14: 73 FU D28 EOS: 37
    [39] - Pt numbers D1: 49 D3: 58 D5: 64 D7: 61 FU D14: 73 FU D28 EOS: 36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Log-transformed levels of LDH at Day 5 as a surrogate marker for organ damage (powered secondary endpoint)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Log-transformed levels of LDH at Day 5 as a surrogate marker for organ damage (powered secondary endpoint)
    End point description
    Powered secondary endpoint: Log transformed levels of LDH were analyzed using linear regression adjusted for baseline log levels of LDH, center and age. 95% confidence intervals were additionally calculated. Both the mean and the median log-transformed LDH concentrations at Day 5 were similar in both treatment groupsThe linear regression model of log-transformed. LDH data specified in the SAP was not uniquely estimable. Assesed in patients blood as a surrogate marker for organ damage. The endpoint was based on FAS; FAS=178 patients.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measurement at Day 5.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [40]
    90 [41]
    Units: Concentration (U/L)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    5.82 ( 0.470 )
    5.80 ( 0.433 )
    Notes
    [40] - Based on FAS; analysed patients N=74
    [41] - Based on FAS; analysed patients N=74
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Proportion of patients with any use of invasive mechanical ventilation up to 28 days or hospital discharge

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of patients with any use of invasive mechanical ventilation up to 28 days or hospital discharge
    End point description
    Based on FAS; FAS=175 patients. The number of patients receiving mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen was evaluated. A patient may have received ventilations/supplemental oxygen multiple times and of different types during the study. Analyzed using both the chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. In addition, logistic regression analysis including the 5 cofactors specified for the primary analysis was carried out.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 28 days or hospital discharge.
    End point values
    APN01 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    88 [42]
    90 [43]
    Units: Percentage of patients
        Invasive mechanical ventilation
    8
    8
        Total receiving ventilation/supplemental oxygen
    98
    98
        No supplemental oxygen/ventilation
    2
    2
        Missing data
    2
    2
    Notes
    [42] - FAS
    [43] - FAS
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    30-Apr-2020 until 26-Dec-2020
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    The investigator was responsible for ensuring that all adverse events observed by the investigator or reported by patient are properly captured in the patients' medical records. Adverse events were recorded in the AE page of the eCRF using a recognized medical term or diagnosis that accurately reflects the event.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    23.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Study participants receiving placebo. Reports of fatal AEs are available for 6 of the 7 patients from the placebo group.

    Reporting group title
    APN01 (IMP)
    Reporting group description
    All patients receiving IMP (APN01). All AEs were treatment-emergent. 9 spatients had died by Day 28, a 10th patients had died by Day 78. Reports of fatal AEs are available for 9 of the 10 patients from the APN01 group.

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo APN01 (IMP)
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 90 (13.33%)
    10 / 88 (11.36%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    7
    10
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    6
    9
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Muscle rupture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 90 (1.11%)
    0 / 88 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Infarction
    Additional description: MedDRA v23.0 preferred terms listed for both patients was "Infarction (myocardial)".
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 90 (1.11%)
    1 / 88 (1.14%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    Thrombosis
    Additional description: MedDRA v23.0 preferred terms listed for the respective patient was "Pulmonary oedema, thrombosis" - fatality was entered in AE catergory "Pulmonary oedema".
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 90 (0.00%)
    1 / 88 (1.14%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebral infarction
    Additional description: MedDRA v23.0 preferred terms listed for the respective patient was "Respiratory failure, cerebral infarction" - fatality was entered in AE catergory "respiratory infarction".
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 90 (1.11%)
    0 / 88 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemorrhagic stroke
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 90 (1.11%)
    0 / 88 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Syncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 90 (1.11%)
    0 / 88 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    General physical health deterioration
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 90 (1.11%)
    1 / 88 (1.14%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Acute respiratory failure
    Additional description: MedDRA v23.0 preferred terms listed for the respective patient was "Acute respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism" - fatality was entered in in AE catergory "Acute respiratory failure".
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 90 (0.00%)
    1 / 88 (1.14%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Pulmonary embolism
    Additional description: MedDRA v23.0 preferred terms listed for the respective patient was "Acute respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism" - fatality was entered in "Acute respiratory failure".
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 90 (0.00%)
    1 / 88 (1.14%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary oedema
    Additional description: MedDRA v23.0 preferred terms listed for the respective patient was "Pulmonary oedema, thrombosis" - fatality was entered here.
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 90 (0.00%)
    1 / 88 (1.14%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Respiratory distress
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 90 (1.11%)
    0 / 88 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory failure
    Additional description: MedDRA v23.0 preferred terms listed for one patient in the Placebo arm was "Respiratory failure, cerebral infarction" and for one patient in the APN01 arm was "Respiratory failure, spesis" - fatality was entered here.
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 90 (7.78%)
    6 / 88 (6.82%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 7
    0 / 6
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 6
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 90 (0.00%)
    1 / 88 (1.14%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 90 (0.00%)
    1 / 88 (1.14%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo APN01 (IMP)
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    24 / 90 (26.67%)
    14 / 88 (15.91%)
    Investigations
    Alanine aminotransferase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 90 (12.22%)
    10 / 88 (11.36%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    10
    Blood potassium increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 90 (4.44%)
    5 / 88 (5.68%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    5
    Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 90 (6.67%)
    2 / 88 (2.27%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    2
    Hepatic enzyme increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 90 (5.56%)
    0 / 88 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    23 Apr 2020
    After the first patient was enrolled under v3.0, the protocol was amended 4 times as follows: Version 4.0, dated 23-Apr-2020: o Inclusion criterion 4 was removed to include patients with a lower respiratory frequency (≥25 breaths/min) o Included that the time interval between start of screening procedures and start of treatment must not exceed 24 hours. Randomization and treatment initiation may be performed on the day of screening, if possible o Collection tubes for individual Biomarkers were corrected according to the Lab Manual
    04 May 2020
    Version 5.0, dated 04-May-2020: o Number of planned study centers was increased to 16 and the USA was added as possible participating country o Allowed body weight for inclusion of patients was increased to up to 100 kg (inclusion criterion 7) o The specification, that any patient whose clinical condition deteriorates rapidly, i.e., in whom the clinician anticipates that the patient will need invasive mechanical ventilation within 12 hours, was removed as an exclusion criterion (exclusion criterion 1) o Clarified that patients with a history of positive hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, or HIV antibody were not eligible (exclusion criterion 2) Clarified that vital signs must be tested within 30 minutes before and after IMP administration during the treatment period o Clarified that if serology results are not available before randomization, previous results obtained within 4 weeks before randomization are acceptable o Clarified that as an alternative to the pharmacist, an unblinded member of the study team may also provide the principal investigator with the blinded treatment o Clarified that physical examination could also be documented as a part of a general visit/health status (e.g., during a general clinical review assessment) o Included that standard of care treatment (concomitant medication and ventilation techniques) has to be followed to national guidelines (https://www.ersnet.org/covid-19-guidelines-and-recommendations-directory), documented in the eCRF and considered for evaluation of study data o Clarified that the first dosing could be done either in the morning of Day 1 or in the evening of Day -1 o The mSOFA score was introduced instead of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to assess the degree of organ dysfunction to determine mortality risk o The study rationale had been updated regarding new findings
    08 Jun 2020
    V6.0 o # planned study centers was increased to 40 & Russia was added as participating country. The restriction that each site should target between 10 &20 patients was removed o Incl. criterion 1 was modified to include patients between 18 & 80 years of age o Deletion incl. criterion 5 “Presence of at least 1 relevant co-morbid condition (defined as arterial hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery disease) if age <65 years” o Body weight restriction for incl. (incl. criterion 7) was removed for the US sites o Removal excl. criterion 10 to include patients with history of sensitivity to heparin or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia o Specification excl. criterion 18 to exclude only patients who are in clin. trials with an IMP for COVID-19 o PCR for quantitative and qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid has been allowed. If the test was performed within 5 days before the screening visit, it did not need to be repeated at screening & available test results could be used o Pulse oximetry was added as an alternative to blood gas analysis (oxygenation index, blood lactic acid) to assess the patient’s respiratory status o Clarified that follow-up visit on D28 could be performed as phone visit/in-home visit (in Russia) o Clarified that pre-existing conditions that were present at screening were not to be reported as AEs. An AE reported between screening & IMP application was defined as pre-treatment AE. Changes in lab values that were clinically significant & specific for COVID-19 did not need to be documented as AE. Clin. significant changes in lab values that were not due to COVID-19 needed to be documented as AEs o Presence of at least 1 relevant co-morbid condition (hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease) was removed as a stratification factor for randomization o Remote/video monitoring strategy during COVID-19 pandemic was added o Issues arising from the change to the mSOFA score but not yet implemented in protocol v5.0 were adjusted
    10 Aug 2020
    Version 7.0, dated 10-Aug-2020: o Body weight restriction for inclusion (inclusion criterion 6) was removed for all participating sites o Change in viral RNA over time was added as secondary endpoint o If a patient was discharged from hospital before Day 7, treatment could be stopped at day of discharge o Remdesivir was added as potential standard of care treatment o For endpoint calculation (28-day mortality), patients discharged from the hospital or terminating the study early before Day 28 will be considered as not-event-free (i.e., death) on the day of discharge or early termination, if the alive/death status is unknown o Clarified that follow-up visits could be performed as outpatients/phone visits o A placebo strength of 10 mL physiological saline was added o It was clarified that the entire study team will be blinded except for an unblinded pharmacist or an unblinded team member (including team members involved in the IMP preparation, unblinded statisticians and DSMB members involved in DSMB, unblinded data managers involved in generation and the upload of treatment listings to eCRF) o Clarified that the DSMB had to review the overall options for COVID-19 patients to make a recommendation to adjust the study design, if necessary

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3313160
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3233383
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 27 00:23:27 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA