Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44364   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7388   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Multicenter 24 to 52 Week Variable Length Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) Relative to Budesonide and Formoterol Fumarate MDI and Symbicort® Pressurized MDI in Adult and Adolescent Participants with Inadequately Controlled Asthma (LOGOS)

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2020-001521-31
    Trial protocol
    SK   DE   CZ   PT  
    Global end of trial date
    20 Mar 2025

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    23 Oct 2025
    First version publication date
    23 Oct 2025
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    D5982C00008
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04609904
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    AstraZeneca
    Sponsor organisation address
    1800 Concorde Pike, Wilmington, United States, DE 19803
    Public contact
    Global Clinical Head, AstraZeneca, +1 8772409479, information.center@astrazeneca.com
    Scientific contact
    Global Clinical Head, AstraZeneca, +1 8772409479, information.center@astrazeneca.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    Yes
    EMA paediatric investigation plan number(s)
    EMEA-002063-PIP01-16
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    Yes
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    15 Apr 2025
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    20 Mar 2025
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    20 Mar 2025
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    This was a randomised, double-blind, double dummy, parallel group, multicenter 24 to 52 week variable length study to assess the efficacy and safety of budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (MDI) relative to budesonide and formoterol fumarate MDI and Symbicort® pressurized MDI in adult and adolescent participants with inadequately controlled asthma.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The protocol, protocol amendments, informed consent form (ICF), and other relevant documents (e.g., advertisements) were submitted to an Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee (IRB/IEC) by the Investigator and reviewed and approved by the IRB/IEC before the study was initiated. The Investigator or their representative explained the nature of the study to the participant or their legally authorised representative and answered all questions regarding the study. Participants were informed that their participation was voluntary. Participants or their legally authorised representative were required to sign a statement of informed consent that met the requirements of 21 CFR 50, local regulations, ICH guidelines, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements, where applicable, and the IRB/IEC or study center. The authorised person obtaining the informed consent must have also signed the ICF. Participants must have been re-consented to the most current version of the ICF(s) during their participation in the study.
    Background therapy
    Participants eligible for this study were required to be on a stable regimen of an inhaled asthma maintenance therapy defined as an Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS)/Long-Acting β2-Agonist (LABA) for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. After meeting all eligibility criteria, participants discontinued their medium or high dose ICS/LABA at Visit 1 and initiated run-in BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg taken BID until the evening prior to Visit 5 (randomisation) when the run-in BFF MDI was discontinued. All participants received albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol or salbutamol sulfate inhalation aerosol, hereinafter referred to as albuterol, at Visit 1 for rescue use during the study.
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    01 Mar 2021
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Colombia: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 5
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 211
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 196
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Greece: 41
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Portugal: 14
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Slovakia: 70
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Türkiye: 29
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czechia: 127
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Brazil: 81
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    China: 795
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Israel: 82
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Mexico: 123
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 95
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    South Africa: 295
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    2167
    EEA total number of subjects
    448
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    58
    Adults (18-64 years)
    1687
    From 65 to 84 years
    422
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    A total of 2187 subjects were randomised at 324 study centers in 15 countries from 01 March 2021. The last subject completed their last study visit on 20 March 2025. Of the 2187 randomised subjects, 2167 received treatment; all populations excluded 16 subjects due to GCP violations and 4 subjects due to not receiving study therapy.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Adult and adolescent subjects with inadequately controlled moderate to severe asthma were randomised to 1 of 4 groups: BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg, BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg, BFF MDI, and Symbicort pMDI. Those who were eligible for the study discontinued their medium or high dose ICS/LABA at Visit 1 and initiated run-in BFF MDI until randomisation.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    24 to 52-Wk Treatment Period (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    All participants were centrally assigned to 1 of 4 randomised study interventions using a Randomisation and Trial Supply Management (RTSM). Before the study was initiated, the log-in information and directions for the RTSM were provided to each site.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID
    Arm description
    Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate pressurised inhalation suspension, desiccated flow path device
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Pressurised inhalation
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Two inhalations BID of 160/7.2/4.8 μg per actuation. Total daily dose: 640/28.8/19.2 μg.

    Arm title
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID
    Arm description
    Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol fumarate pressurised inhalation suspension, desiccated flow path device
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Pressurised inhalation
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Two inhalations BID of 160/14.4/4.8 μg per actuation. Total daily dose: 640/57.6/19.2 μg.

    Arm title
    BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID
    Arm description
    Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate (BFF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/9.6 μg BID
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Budesonide/formoterol fumarate pressurised inhalation suspension, desiccated flow path device
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Pressurised inhalation
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Two inhalations BID of 160/4.8 μg per actuation. Total daily dose: 640/19.2 μg.

    Arm title
    Symbicort® pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Arm description
    Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Symbicort®
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Pressurised inhalation
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Two inhalations BID of 160/4.5 μg per actuation. Total daily dose: 640/18 μg.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID Symbicort® pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Started
    384
    585
    604
    594
    Completed
    360
    535
    540
    544
    Not completed
    24
    50
    64
    50
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    13
    29
    36
    32
         Physician decision
    1
    2
    2
    3
         Death
    -
    3
    3
    1
         Not specified
    3
    4
    6
    1
         Pregnancy
    -
    2
    -
    1
         Adverse event
    4
    5
    2
    1
         Non-compliance with study drug
    -
    1
    2
    2
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    2
    6
    7
         Development of study-specific withdrawal criteria
    1
    -
    -
    -
         Withdrawal by parent/guardian
    -
    -
    -
    1
         Lack of efficacy
    1
    2
    7
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate (BFF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/9.6 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    Symbicort® pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate pMDI 320/9 μg BID

    Reporting group values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID Symbicort® pMDI 320/9 μg BID Total
    Number of subjects
    384 585 604 594 2167
    Age Categorical
    Units: Participants
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    9 14 17 18 58
        Adults (18-64 years)
    312 447 477 451 1687
        From 65-84 years
    63 124 110 125 422
    Age Continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    51.7 ( 14.0 ) 52.0 ( 14.5 ) 51.5 ( 14.1 ) 51.6 ( 15.0 ) -
    Gender Categorical
    Units: Participants
        Female
    224 341 383 370 1318
        Male
    160 244 221 224 849
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        White
    150 268 270 264 952
        Asian
    170 222 230 231 853
        Black or African American
    11 35 35 30 111
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    9 7 5 9 30
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0 0 1 0 1
        Other
    44 53 63 60 220
    Ethnicity
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    40 71 68 60 239
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    344 514 536 534 1928
    Baseline Severe Asthma Exacerbation History Within the Prior Year
    Units: Subjects
        0 exacerbations
    170 310 311 302 1093
        1 exacerbation
    173 225 234 235 867
        ≥2 exacerbations
    40 50 57 53 200
        Missing
    1 0 2 4 7
    Prior Inhaled Corticosteroid Dose
    Units: Subjects
        Low
    0 3 2 3 8
        Medium
    283 433 440 428 1584
        High
    100 149 160 158 567
        Missing
    1 0 2 5 8
    Baseline Reversibility (%)
    Baseline reversibility (%) calculated as (Post-Albuterol FEV1 - Pre-Albuterol FEV1)/ Pre-Albuterol FEV1 x 100
    Units: Percentage
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    22.3 ( 18.1 ) 21.7 ( 17.9 ) 21.6 ( 17.2 ) 22.1 ( 17.5 ) -
    Baseline Pre-bronchodilator Percent Predicted FEV1 (%)
    Units: Percentage
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    58.6 ( 12.2 ) 57.9 ( 13.3 ) 59.6 ( 12.3 ) 59.3 ( 12.4 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate (BFF) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), 320/9.6 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    Symbicort® pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate pMDI 320/9 μg BID

    Subject analysis set title
    BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    This reporting arm combines the 2 treatment groups BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg and Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID from protocol S5982C00008 (2020-001521-31). In the EU regional multiple testing approach, BGF MDI was compared to these combined treatment groups (with a total of 1192 subjects; 602 in the BFF treatment group and 590 in the Symbicort treatment group).

    Subject analysis set title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    This reporting arm contains the pooled population of subjects from protocol D5982C00008 (2020-001521-31) and protocol D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34) who received BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID study intervention. A total of 725 subjects were included in the pooled analysis Efficacy Set comprising 383 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 342 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS) who received BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID study intervention.

    Subject analysis set title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    This reporting arm contains the pooled population of subjects from protocol D5982C00008 (2020-001521-31) and protocol D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34) who received BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID study intervention. A total of 1179 subjects were included in the pooled analysis Efficacy Set comprising 585 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 594 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS) who received BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID study intervention.

    Subject analysis set title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    This reporting arm contains the pooled population of subjects from protocol D5982C00008 (2020-001521-31) and protocol D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34) who received BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID study intervention. In the EU regional approach of both studies, BGF MDI was compared to subjects who received BFF MDI or Symbicort. A total of 2400 subjects were included in the pooled analysis Efficacy Set comprising 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS).

    Primary: Change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 (L) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 (L) over 24 weeks [1]
    End point description
    Change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) over 24 weeks. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all intercurrent events (ICEs) with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    Notes
    [1] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: In the EU regional multiple testing approach, BGF MDI was compared to the combined BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg and Symbicort 320/9 µg reporting groups. Therefore, data for these two reporting groups were presented combined, and not individually for the BFF MDI and Symbicort reporting groups
    End point values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    382
    582
    1183
    Units: Litres
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Estimate (SE)
    0.178 ( 0.015 )
    0.171 ( 0.013 )
    0.074 ( 0.010 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Change from BL in Pre-dose Trough FEV1 (L)
    Statistical analysis description
    The repeated measures ANCOVA model included treatment, visit, prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), and treatment-by-visit interaction as categorical covariates and baseline trough FEV1 and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1765
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [2]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [3]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.097
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.07
         upper limit
    0.123
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.014
    Notes
    [2] - An increase in estimate for comparison favors study drug. The number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times at sites or studies within the program. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates used in the analysis model were included in the analysis.
    [3] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Change from BL in Pre-dose Trough FEV1 (L)
    Statistical analysis description
    The repeated measures ANCOVA model included treatment, visit, prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), and treatment-by-visit interaction as categorical covariates and baseline trough FEV1 and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1565
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [4]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [5]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.103
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.073
         upper limit
    0.134
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.016
    Notes
    [4] - An increase in estimate for comparison favors study drug. The number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times at sites or studies within the program. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates used in the analysis model were included in the analysis.
    [5] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.

    Primary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Rate of severe asthma exacerbations

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Rate of severe asthma exacerbations
    End point description
    Rate of severe asthma exacerbations was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). An asthma exacerbation was severe if it resulted in at least 1 of the following: a course of systemic corticosteroids for 3 days to treat symptoms of asthma worsening, an ER/urgent care visit that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids, an inpatient hospitalisation, or death related to asthma. Consecutive exacerbations with start/stop days ≤7 days apart were considered the same event of the highest severity. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 52 Weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    725
    1179
    2400 [6]
    Units: Exacerbations/Subject Years
    number (not applicable)
        Number of subjects with exacerbations
    257
    398
    914
        Percentage of subjects with exacerbations
    35.4
    33.8
    38.1
        Number of exacerbations
    422
    612
    1444
        Total time at risk (subject-years)
    723.6
    1077.9
    2188.7
        Adjusted exacerbation rate per year
    0.533
    0.541
    0.633
    Notes
    [6] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, and study.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3125
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [7]
    P-value
    = 0.017 [8]
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.842
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.731
         upper limit
    0.97
    Notes
    [7] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [8] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, and study.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3579
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [9]
    P-value
    = 0.012 [10]
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.855
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.757
         upper limit
    0.966
    Notes
    [9] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [10] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0-3 (L) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0-3 (L) over 24 weeks [11]
    End point description
    Change from baseline in FEV1 area under the curve 0 to 3 hours (AUC0-3) over 24 weeks. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    Notes
    [11] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: In the EU regional multiple testing approach, BGF MDI was compared to the combined BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg and Symbicort 320/9 µg reporting groups. Therefore, data for these two reporting groups were presented combined, and not individually for the BFF MDI and Symbicort reporting groups
    End point values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    382
    582
    1186
    Units: Litres
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Estimate (SE)
    0.347 ( 0.014 )
    0.345 ( 0.012 )
    0.232 ( 0.009 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in baseline in FEV1 AUC0-3 (L)
    Statistical analysis description
    The repeated measures ANCOVA model included treatment, visit, prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), and treatment-by-visit interaction as categorical covariates and baseline trough FEV1 and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1768
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [12]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [13]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.112
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.087
         upper limit
    0.138
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.013
    Notes
    [12] - An increase in estimate for comparison favors study drug. The number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times at sites or studies within the program. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates used in the analysis model were included in the analysis.
    [13] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in Baseline in FEV1 AUC0-3 (L)
    Statistical analysis description
    The repeated measures ANCOVA model included treatment, visit, prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), and treatment-by-visit interaction as categorical covariates and baseline trough FEV1 and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1568
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [14]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [15]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.115
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.085
         upper limit
    0.145
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.015
    Notes
    [14] - An increase in estimate for comparison favors study drug. The number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times at sites or studies within the program. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates used in the analysis model were included in the analysis.
    [15] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Onset of action on Day 1: Absolute change in FEV1 (L) at 5 minutes on Day 1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Onset of action on Day 1: Absolute change in FEV1 (L) at 5 minutes on Day 1
    End point description
    Onset of action (L) on Day 1: Absolute change in FEV1 at 5 minutes on Day 1. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    On Day 1
    End point values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID Symbicort® pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    363
    553
    573
    564
    Units: Litres
    number (standard deviation)
        Mean change from Baseline (SD)
    0.155
    0.180
    0.134
    0.143
    Statistical analysis title
    Absolute Change in FEV1 at 5 Min on Day 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis was performed using a within-active-treatment group T-test to demonstrate that the mean change from baseline in FEV1 at 5 minutes post-dose was statistically greater than 0.1 L.
    Comparison groups
    BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID v Symbicort® pMDI 320/9 μg BID v BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1690
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [16]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [17]
    Method
    t-test, 1-sided
    Parameter type
    Within BGF MDI group T-test estimate
    Point estimate
    0.18
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.162
         upper limit
    0.197
    Notes
    [16] - Analysis was within the BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg treatment group. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing value at the visit were included in the analysis.
    [17] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Absolute Change in FEV1 at 5 Min on Day 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis was performed using a within-active-treatment group T-test to demonstrate that the mean change from baseline in FEV1 at 5 minutes post-dose was statistically greater than 0.1 L.
    Comparison groups
    BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID v Symbicort® pMDI 320/9 μg BID v BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1500
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [18]
    P-value
    < 0.001 [19]
    Method
    t-test, 1-sided
    Parameter type
    Within BGF MDI group T-test estimate
    Point estimate
    0.155
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.133
         upper limit
    0.177
    Notes
    [18] - Analysis was within the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg treatment group. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing value at the visit were included in the analysis.
    [19] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Rate of severe asthma exacerbations

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Rate of severe asthma exacerbations [20]
    End point description
    Rate of severe asthma exacerbations. An asthma exacerbation was severe if it resulted in at least 1 of the following: a course of systemic corticosteroids for 3 days to treat symptoms of asthma worsening, an ER/urgent care visit that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids, an inpatient hospitalisation, or death related to asthma. Consecutive exacerbations with start/stop days ≤7 days apart were considered the same event of the highest severity. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 52 Weeks
    Notes
    [20] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: In the EU regional multiple testing approach, BGF MDI was compared to the combined BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg and Symbicort 320/9 µg reporting groups. Therefore, data for these two reporting groups were presented combined, and not individually for the BFF MDI and Symbicort reporting groups
    End point values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    383
    585
    1192
    Units: Exacerbations/Subject Years
    number (not applicable)
        Number of subjects with exacerbations
    114
    180
    386
        Percentage of subjects with exacerbations
    29.8
    30.8
    32.4
        Number of exacerbations
    180
    259
    567
        Total time at risk (subject-years)
    387.0
    537.4
    1091.2
        Adjusted exacerbation rate per year
    0.44
    0.47
    0.50
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), and region.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1777
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [21]
    P-value
    = 0.399
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.923
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.767
         upper limit
    1.111
    Notes
    [21] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), and region.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1575
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [22]
    P-value
    = 0.234
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.879
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.71
         upper limit
    1.087
    Notes
    [22] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.

    Secondary: Percentage of responders in ACQ-7 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of responders in ACQ-7 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks [23]
    End point description
    Percentage of responders in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    Notes
    [23] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: In the EU regional multiple testing approach, BGF MDI was compared to the combined BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg and Symbicort 320/9 µg reporting groups. Therefore, data for these two reporting groups were presented combined, and not individually for the BFF MDI and Symbicort reporting groups
    End point values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    382
    581
    1180
    Units: Responders
    number (not applicable)
        Number of responders
    264
    403
    757
        Percentage (%)
    69.1
    69.4
    64.2
    Statistical analysis title
    Percentage of Responders in ACQ-7
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline ACQ-7 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1562
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [24]
    P-value
    = 0.061
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.27
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.99
         upper limit
    1.64
    Notes
    [24] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    Statistical analysis title
    Percentage of Responders in ACQ-7
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline ACQ-7 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1761
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [25]
    P-value
    = 0.012 [26]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.32
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.06
         upper limit
    1.64
    Notes
    [25] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [26] - Nominally significant due to placement in Type I error control for EU submission.

    Secondary: Percentage of responders in ACQ-5 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of responders in ACQ-5 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks [27]
    End point description
    Percentage of responders in the ACQ-5 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    Notes
    [27] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: In the EU regional multiple testing approach, BGF MDI was compared to the combined BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg and Symbicort 320/9 µg reporting groups. Therefore, data for these two reporting groups were presented combined, and not individually for the BFF MDI and Symbicort reporting groups
    End point values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    382
    581
    1180
    Units: Responders
    number (not applicable)
        Number of responders
    283
    425
    826
        Percentage (%)
    74.1
    73.1
    70.0
    Statistical analysis title
    Percentage of Responders in ACQ-5
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline ACQ-5 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1761
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [28]
    P-value
    = 0.085
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.22
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.97
         upper limit
    1.53
    Notes
    [28] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    Statistical analysis title
    Percentage of Responders in ACQ-5
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline ACQ-5 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1562
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [29]
    P-value
    = 0.082
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.26
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.97
         upper limit
    1.65
    Notes
    [29] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.

    Secondary: Percentage of responders in the AQLQ(s)+12 (≥0.5 increase equals response) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of responders in the AQLQ(s)+12 (≥0.5 increase equals response) over 24 weeks [30]
    End point description
    Percentage of responders in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older (AQLQ(s)+12) (≥0.5 increase equals response) over 24 weeks. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    Notes
    [30] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: In the EU regional multiple testing approach, BGF MDI was compared to the combined BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg and Symbicort 320/9 µg reporting groups. Therefore, data for these two reporting groups were presented combined, and not individually for the BFF MDI and Symbicort reporting groups
    End point values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    372
    558
    1137
    Units: Responders
    number (not applicable)
        Number of responders
    228
    321
    648
        Percentage (%)
    61.3
    57.5
    57.0
    Statistical analysis title
    Percentage of Responders in AQLQ(s)+12
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline AQLQ(s)+12 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1695
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [31]
    P-value
    = 0.305
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.12
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.9
         upper limit
    1.4
    Notes
    [31] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    Statistical analysis title
    Percentage of Responders in AQLQ(s)+12
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline AQLQ(s)+12 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1509
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [32]
    P-value
    = 0.111
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.23
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.95
         upper limit
    1.59
    Notes
    [32] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.

    Secondary: Percentage of responders in SGRQ (≥4.0 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of responders in SGRQ (≥4.0 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks [33]
    End point description
    Percentage of responders in the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (≥0.4 unit decrease equals response) over 24 weeks. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    Notes
    [33] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: In the EU regional multiple testing approach, BGF MDI was compared to the combined BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg and Symbicort 320/9 µg reporting groups. Therefore, data for these two reporting groups were presented combined, and not individually for the BFF MDI and Symbicort reporting groups
    End point values
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    373
    565
    1140
    Units: Responders
    number (not applicable)
        Number of responders
    275
    406
    836
        Percentage (%)
    73.7
    71.9
    73.3
    Statistical analysis title
    Percentage of Responders in SGRQ
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline SGRQ score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1705
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [34]
    P-value
    = 0.974
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.79
         upper limit
    1.27
    Notes
    [34] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    Statistical analysis title
    Percentage of Responders in SGRQ
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline SGRQ score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID v BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID or Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1513
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [35]
    P-value
    = 0.76
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.04
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.79
         upper limit
    1.38
    Notes
    [35] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.

    Secondary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Rate of severe asthma exacerbations for participants with percent predicted FEV1 ≤55% at baseline

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Rate of severe asthma exacerbations for participants with percent predicted FEV1 ≤55% at baseline
    End point description
    Rate of severe asthma exacerbations for participants with percent predicted FEV1 ≤55% at baseline was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). An asthma exacerbation was considered severe if it resulted in at least 1 of the following: a course of systemic corticosteroids for 3 days to treat symptoms of asthma worsening, an ER/urgent care visit that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids, an inpatient hospitalisation, or death related to asthma. Consecutive exacerbations with start/stop days ≤7 days apart were considered the same event of the highest severity. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 52 weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    251
    417
    814 [36]
    Units: Exacerbations/Subject Years
    number (not applicable)
        Number of subjects with exacerbations
    106
    162
    363
        Percentage of subjects with exacerbations
    42.2
    38.8
    44.6
        Number of exacerbations
    194
    264
    605
        Total time at risk (subject-years)
    249.1
    377.4
    739.2
        Adjusted exacerbation rate per year
    0.733
    0.663
    0.797
    Notes
    [36] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, and study.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1231
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [37]
    P-value
    = 0.058 [38]
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.831
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.686
         upper limit
    1.006
    Notes
    [37] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [38] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, and study.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1065
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [39]
    P-value
    = 0.455 [40]
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.92
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.738
         upper limit
    1.146
    Notes
    [39] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [40] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Rate of severe asthma exacerbations for participants with ≥1 severe exacerbation in the 12 months prior to Visit 1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Rate of severe asthma exacerbations for participants with ≥1 severe exacerbation in the 12 months prior to Visit 1
    End point description
    Rate of severe asthma exacerbations for participants with ≥1 severe exacerbation in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). An asthma exacerbation was severe if it resulted in at least 1 of the following: a course of systemic corticosteroids for 3 days to treat symptoms of asthma worsening, an ER/urgent care visit that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids, an inpatient hospitalisation, or death related to asthma. Consecutive exacerbations with start/stop days ≤7 days apart were considered the same event of the highest severity. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 52 weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    481
    665
    1367 [41]
    Units: Exacerbations/Subject Years
    number (not applicable)
        Number of subjects with exacerbations
    200
    255
    590
        Percentage of subjects with exacerbations
    41.6
    38.3
    43.2
        Number of exacerbations
    341
    419
    976
        Total time at risk (subject-years)
    478.7
    626.3
    1279.2
        Adjusted exacerbation rate per year
    0.707
    0.653
    0.757
    Notes
    [41] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, and study.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    2032
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [42]
    P-value
    = 0.055 [43]
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.863
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.741
         upper limit
    1.003
    Notes
    [42] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [43] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, and study.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1848
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [44]
    P-value
    = 0.417 [45]
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.934
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.791
         upper limit
    1.102
    Notes
    [44] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [45] - Statistically significant per the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Time to first severe asthma exacerbation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Time to first severe asthma exacerbation
    End point description
    Time to first severe asthma exacerbation was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). Time to first severe asthma exacerbation was the time from the first dose of study medication to the time of onset of the first severe asthma exacerbation. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 52 weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    723
    1175
    2392 [46]
    Units: Weeks
    number (not applicable)
        Number of subjects with exacerbations
    257
    398
    914
        Percentage of subjects with exacerbations
    35.5
    33.9
    38.2
        Kaplan-Meier estimate at 24 weeks (%)
    18.9
    18.6
    21.6
        Kaplan-Meier estimate at 52 weeks (%)
    36.0
    35.5
    40.3
    Notes
    [46] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to First Severe Asthma Exacerbation
    Statistical analysis description
    The Cox regression model adjusted for baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, study, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3567
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [47]
    P-value
    = 0.005 [48]
    Method
    Regression, Cox
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.845
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.751
         upper limit
    0.951
    Notes
    [47] - A hazard ratio below 1 value favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [48] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to First Severe Asthma Exacerbation
    Statistical analysis description
    The Cox regression model adjusted for baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, study, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3115
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [49]
    P-value
    = 0.03 [50]
    Method
    Regression, Cox
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.858
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.747
         upper limit
    0.986
    Notes
    [49] - A hazard ratio below 1 value favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [50] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Rate of moderate or severe asthma exacerbations

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Rate of moderate or severe asthma exacerbations
    End point description
    Rate of moderate or severe asthma exacerbations was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). An asthma exacerbation was severe if it resulted in at least 1 of the following: systemic corticosteroids for 3 days, an ER/urgent care visit that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids, an inpatient hospitalisation, or death related to asthma. A moderate asthma exacerbation was a worsening of symptoms that resulted in an additional ICS for 3 days. Consecutive exacerbations with start/stop days ≤7 days apart were considered the same event of the highest severity. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 52 weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    725
    1179
    2400 [51]
    Units: Exacerbations/Subject Years
    number (not applicable)
        Number of subjects with exacerbations
    259
    406
    933
        Percentage of subjects with exacerbations
    35.7
    34.4
    38.9
        Number of exacerbations
    429
    625
    1483
        Total time at risk (subject-years)
    723.3
    1077.3
    2187.0
        Adjusted exacerbation rate per year
    0.545
    0.555
    0.653
    Notes
    [51] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Moderate or Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, and study.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3579
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [52]
    P-value
    = 0.008 [53]
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.85
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.754
         upper limit
    0.959
    Notes
    [52] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [53] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rate of Moderate or Severe Asthma Exacerbations
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis for rate ratio used a negative binomial regression. Treatments were compared adjusting for baseline trough FEV1, percent reversibility, baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, and study.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3125
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [54]
    P-value
    = 0.011 [55]
    Method
    Negative binomial regression
    Parameter type
    Rate ratio
    Point estimate
    0.834
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.725
         upper limit
    0.96
    Notes
    [54] - A rate ratio below 1 favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed is based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [55] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Time to first moderate or severe asthma exacerbation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Time to first moderate or severe asthma exacerbation
    End point description
    Time to first moderate or severe asthma exacerbation was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). Time to first moderate or severe asthma exacerbation was the time from the first dose of study medication to the time of onset of the first moderate or severe asthma exacerbation. Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to 52 weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    723
    1175
    2392 [56]
    Units: Weeks
    number (not applicable)
        Number of subjects with exacerbations
    259
    406
    933
        Kaplan-Meier estimate at 24 weeks (%)
    19.1
    19.1
    22.1
        Kaplan-Meier estimate at 52 weeks (%)
    36.3
    36.2
    41.1
    Notes
    [56] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to First Moderate/Severe Asthma Exacerbation
    Statistical analysis description
    The Cox regression model adjusted for baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, study, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3567
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [57]
    P-value
    = 0.004 [58]
    Method
    Regression, Cox
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.843
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.751
         upper limit
    0.948
    Notes
    [57] - A hazard ratio below 1 value favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [58] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to First Moderate/Severe Asthma Exacerbation
    Statistical analysis description
    The Cox regression model adjusted for baseline severe asthma exacerbation history (0, 1, ≥2), prior ICS dose (medium vs. high), region, study, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3115
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [59]
    P-value
    = 0.017 [60]
    Method
    Regression, Cox
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.845
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.736
         upper limit
    0.97
    Notes
    [59] - A hazard ratio below 1 value favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [60] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Percentage of responders in ACQ-7 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Percentage of responders in ACQ-7 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks
    End point description
    Percentage responders in the ACQ-7 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    721
    1173
    2383 [61]
    Units: Responders
    number (not applicable)
        Number of responders
    486
    821
    1556
        Percentage (%)
    67.4
    70.0
    65.3
    Notes
    [61] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Pooled Percentage of Responders in ACQ-7
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment, study, and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline ACQ-7 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3556
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [62]
    P-value
    = 0.003 [63]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.26
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.08
         upper limit
    1.47
    Notes
    [62] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [63] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Pooled Percentage of Responders in ACQ-7
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment, study, and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline ACQ-7 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3104
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [64]
    P-value
    = 0.217 [65]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.12
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.94
         upper limit
    1.34
    Notes
    [64] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [65] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Percentage of responders in ACQ-5 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Percentage of responders in ACQ-5 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks
    End point description
    Percentage responders in the ACQ-5 (≥0.5 decrease equals response) over 24 weeks was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    722
    1173
    2383 [66]
    Units: Responders
    number (not applicable)
        Number of responders
    520
    853
    1666
        Percentage (%)
    72.0
    72.7
    69.9
    Notes
    [66] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Pooled Percentage of Responders in ACQ-5
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment, study, and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline ACQ-5 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3556
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [67]
    P-value
    = 0.057 [68]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.17
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1
         upper limit
    1.37
    Notes
    [67] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [68] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Pooled Percentage of Responders in ACQ-5
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment, study, and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline ACQ-5 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3105
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [69]
    P-value
    = 0.173 [70]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.14
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.94
         upper limit
    1.38
    Notes
    [69] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [70] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.

    Secondary: Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Percentage of responders in AQLQ(s)+12 (≥0.5 increase equals response) over 24 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS): Percentage of responders in AQLQ(s)+12 (≥0.5 increase equals response) over 24 weeks
    End point description
    Percentage of responders in the AQLQ(s)+12 (≥0.5 increase equals response) over 24 weeks was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies D5982C00008 and D5982C00007 (2020-001520-34). Treatment policy was implemented to handle all ICEs with the exception of initiation of new asthma therapy or use of prohibited medications thought to impact efficacy in conjunction with premature discontinuation of study intervention, for which the composite strategy was implemented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Over 24 weeks
    End point values
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects analysed
    695
    1124
    2290 [71]
    Units: Responders
    number (not applicable)
        Number of responders
    415
    654
    1293
        Percentage (%)
    59.7
    58.2
    56.5
    Notes
    [71] - N=2400; 1192 subjects from D5982C00008 (LOGOS) and 1208 subjects from D5982C00007 (KALOS)
    Statistical analysis title
    Pooled Percentage of Responders in AQLQ(s)+12
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment, study, and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline AQLQ(s)+12 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    3414
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [72]
    P-value
    = 0.215 [73]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.94
         upper limit
    1.29
    Notes
    [72] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [73] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.
    Statistical analysis title
    Pooled Percentage of Responders in AQLQ(s)+12
    Statistical analysis description
    The logistic regression model included treatment, study, and prior ICS dose (medium vs. high) as categorical covariates and baseline AQLQ(s)+12 score, baseline trough FEV1, and percent reversibility as continuous covariates.
    Comparison groups
    Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 µg BID v Pooled (LOGOS/KALOS) BFF MDI or Symbicort pMDI BID
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    2985
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [74]
    P-value
    = 0.275 [75]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.11
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.92
         upper limit
    1.33
    Notes
    [74] - An odds ratio >1 for the comparison favors study drug. Number of subjects analysed based on the Efficacy Set, which excluded 7 subjects who were randomised multiple times. Only subjects with nonmissing covariates were included in the analysis.
    [75] - Endpoint not included in the Type I error control procedure.

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From first intake of study intervention after Visit 1, during screening, and throughout the Treatment Period and including the follow-up period. Serious adverse events were recorded from the time of signing of the informed consent form.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Adverse events were reported by the participant (or, when appropriate, by a caregiver, surrogate, or the participant's legally authorised representative). The Investigator and any designees were responsible for detecting, documenting, and recording events that met the definition of an AE.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    27.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate MDI, 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate MDI, 320/9.6 μg BID

    Reporting group title
    BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID
    Reporting group description
    Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate MDI, 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID

    Serious adverse events
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    31 / 384 (8.07%)
    36 / 594 (6.06%)
    49 / 604 (8.11%)
    41 / 585 (7.01%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    1
    3
    1
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    1
    3
    1
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Adenocarcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholangiocarcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colorectal adenoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Invasive ductal breast carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lipoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Uterine leiomyoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peripheral ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Sudden cardiac death
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chest discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Immune system disorders
    Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Adenomyosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Nasal polyps
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    3 / 604 (0.50%)
    2 / 585 (0.34%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 3
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Asthma
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 384 (1.82%)
    13 / 594 (2.19%)
    20 / 604 (3.31%)
    14 / 585 (2.39%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 8
    1 / 16
    1 / 23
    0 / 14
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dysphonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diaphragmatic paralysis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchiectasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumothorax
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sleep apnoea syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rhinitis allergic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Mania
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Humerus fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Multiple fractures
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thoracic vertebral fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal compression fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rib fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Radius fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Patella fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hand fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower limb fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
    Myocardial bridging
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Angina unstable
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Acute myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    2 / 594 (0.34%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac failure acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Acute left ventricular failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Angina pectoris
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tachyarrhythmia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dilated cardiomyopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebral infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    3 / 604 (0.50%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Migraine
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    2 / 604 (0.33%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Brain hypoxia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Transient ischaemic attack
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Syncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Status epilepticus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Monoparesis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyperammonaemic encephalopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebrovascular accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Vertebrobasilar insufficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    2 / 604 (0.33%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thrombotic cerebral infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebral haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    Cataract
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    2 / 604 (0.33%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Open angle glaucoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Inguinal hernia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastritis erosive
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastric polyps
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Appendicitis noninfective
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rectal polyp
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Large intestine polyp
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Irritable bowel syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal polyp
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholecystitis acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholelithiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    2 / 594 (0.34%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholangitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bile duct stone
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Nephrolithiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Endocrine disorders
    Thyroid mass
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Intervertebral disc protrusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Osteonecrosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal osteoarthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Osteoarthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gouty arthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bursitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Arthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    COVID-19 pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    2 / 585 (0.34%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 384 (1.04%)
    4 / 594 (0.67%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    4 / 585 (0.68%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    1 / 4
    0 / 2
    0 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia bacterial
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Sinusitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    2 / 594 (0.34%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pelvic inflammatory disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 384 (0.26%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower respiratory tract infection bacterial
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Herpes zoster
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia mycoplasmal
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    1 / 604 (0.17%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chronic sinusitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia pneumococcal
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    0 / 594 (0.00%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    1 / 585 (0.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia viral
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Type 2 diabetes mellitus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 384 (0.00%)
    1 / 594 (0.17%)
    0 / 604 (0.00%)
    0 / 585 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID Symbicort pMDI 320/9 μg BID BFF MDI 320/9.6 μg BID BGF MDI 320/28.8/9.6 μg BID
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    122 / 384 (31.77%)
    162 / 594 (27.27%)
    169 / 604 (27.98%)
    157 / 585 (26.84%)
    Infections and infestations
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    29 / 384 (7.55%)
    38 / 594 (6.40%)
    38 / 604 (6.29%)
    43 / 585 (7.35%)
         occurrences all number
    29
    38
    39
    43
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    58 / 384 (15.10%)
    83 / 594 (13.97%)
    93 / 604 (15.40%)
    74 / 585 (12.65%)
         occurrences all number
    79
    121
    131
    97
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    46 / 384 (11.98%)
    61 / 594 (10.27%)
    51 / 604 (8.44%)
    62 / 585 (10.60%)
         occurrences all number
    53
    82
    66
    87

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    27 Oct 2020
    Clarity was required for the Type 1 Error Control for each region, an equivalence table was added for oral corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma exacerbations, and contraceptive language was updated to address Europe’s (EU) recommendation for contraception and pregnancy testing in clinical trials.
    07 Jan 2022
    An amendment was required due to recruitment challenges, and to make 1) updates to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2) adjustment to the multiple testing procedures, 3) a reduction in sample size, and 4) an update to the primary estimand for the US approach to address FDA recommendations.
    21 Feb 2023
    An amendment was required due to recruitment challenges, to make 1) an update to stop recruitment to the BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg treatment arm, 2) an update to the Type I error control procedure and power estimates, and 3) updates to statistical methodology, including changes to estimands, covariates in the analysis models, and populations for analyses.
    19 Nov 2024
    An amendment was required to update the statistical methodological approaches to handling intercurrent events and the Type I error control procedure for US, EU, China, and Japan health authorities.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    Protocol amendments were instituted during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to facilitate recruitment, including removal of the history of exacerbation criteria and terminating recruitment to the BGF 320/14.4/9.6 μg treatment group.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Nov 01 00:05:30 CET 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA