Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

    • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).

    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2020-001969-37
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:19386A
    National Competent Authority:Netherlands - Competent Authority
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Prematurely Ended
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2021-02-24
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedNetherlands - Competent Authority
    A.2EudraCT number2020-001969-37
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Interventional, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled delayed-start study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with episodic Cluster Headache
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    A study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with episodic cluster headache
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code number19386A
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorH. Lundbeck A/S
    B.1.3.4CountryDenmark
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportH. Lundbeck A/S
    B.4.2CountryDenmark
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationH. Lundbeck A/S
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointLundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressOttiliavej 9
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityValby
    B.5.3.3Post code2500
    B.5.3.4CountryDenmark
    B.5.4Telephone number+4536391311
    B.5.5Fax number+4536301940
    B.5.6E-mailLundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameEptinezumab
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Concentrate for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNEPTINEZUMAB
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeLu AG09221
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB188646
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number100
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSolution for infusion
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboIntravenous use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Episodic cluster headache
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Recurrent severe headaches on one side of the head
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 24.0
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10059133
    E.1.2Term Cluster headache
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10029205 - Nervous system disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of eptinezumab in patients with episodic Cluster Headache (eCH)
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy of eptinezumab on health-related quality of life, health care resource utilization, and work productivity
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    • The patient has episodic cluster headache, as defined by IHS ICHD-3 classification, with an adequately documented record or reliable documented history of eCH of at least 12 months prior
    to Screening Visit 1.
    • The patient has a prior history of cluster period(s) lasting 6 weeks or longer, when untreated.
    • The patient is able to distinguish cluster headache attacks from other headaches (i.e. tension-type headaches, migraine).
    • The patient is, at Screening Visit 2, in cluster headache bout, characterized by the presence of at least one typical cluster headache attack, that started not later than 1 week prior to Screening Visit 2.
    • The patient has a medical history of cluster headache from <60 years of age.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    • The patient has experienced failure on a previous treatment targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway (anti-CGRP mAbs and gepants).
    • The patient has confounding and clinically significant pain syndromes (for example, fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome).
    • The patient has a history or diagnosis of hypnic headache, hemicrania continua, new daily persistent headache, chronic migraine or unusual migraine subtypes such as hemiplegic migraine (sporadic and familial), recurrent painful ophthalmoplegic neuropathy, migraine with brainstem aura and migraine with neurological accompaniments that are not typical of migraine aura (diplopia, altered consciousness, or long duration).
    • Patients with a lifetime history of psychosis, bipolar mania, or dementia are excluded. Patients with other psychiatric conditions whose symptoms are not controlled or who have not been adequately treated for a minimum of 6 months prior to Screening Visit 2 are also excluded.
    • The patient is, at Screening Visit 2, at significant risk of suicide.
    • The patient has a history of clinically significant cardiovascular disease, including uncontrolled hypertension, ischaemia or thromboembolic events (for example, cerebrovascular accident, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism).
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    1. Change from baseline in number of weekly attacks
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    1. Weeks 1-2
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    2. Response: >= 50% reduction in number of weekly attacks
    3. Change from baseline in weekly number of times an abortive therapy was used
    4. Change from baseline in the number of daily attacks
    5. Change from baseline in weekly number of days with less than 3 attacks per day
    6. Time to resolution of cluster headache bout within 4 weeks after the first Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) infusion
    7. Number of attacks starting within 24 hours of the start of the first infusion
    8. Change from baseline in the daily mean score on 5-point self-rating pain severity scale
    9. Change from baseline to Week 1 in number of attacks
    10. Change from baseline to Week 2 in number of attacks
    11. Response: >= 50% reduction in number of attacks in Week 1
    12. Response: >= 30% reduction in number of attacks in Week 1
    13. Response: >= 30% reduction in number of weekly attacks (Weeks 1-2)
    14. Change from baseline in weekly integrated measure of frequency and intensity of pain (Weeks 1-2): For each week add the intensity (worst pain on 5-point self-rating pain severity scale) for each attack experienced during that week
    15. Change from baseline to Week 1 in integrated measure of frequency and intensity of pain: For Week 1 add the intensity (worst pain on 5-point self-rating pain severity scale) for each attack experienced during that week
    16. Change from baseline to Week 2 in weekly integrated measure of frequency and intensity of pain: For Week 2 add the intensity (worst pain on 5-point self-rating pain severity scale) for each attack experienced during that week
    17. Change from baseline in the number of weekly attacks
    18. Change from baseline in weekly integrated measure of frequency and intensity of pain (Weeks 1-4). For each week add the intensity (worst pain on 5-point self-rating pain severity scale) for each attack experienced during that week for each attack experienced during that week.
    19. Change from baseline in the mean score on 5-point selfrating pain severity scale (average per week) for Weeks 1,2,3 and 4
    20. Change from baseline in number of attacks for Week 1,2,3 and 4
    21. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score at Week 1,2 and 4
    22. Change from baseline in Sleep Impact Scale (SIS) domain scores at Weeks 2 and 4
    23. Change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 and 4
    24 Health Care Resources Utilization (HCRU) at Week 4
    25. Change from baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Questionnaire at Week 4. General Health second version (WPAI:GH2.0) subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work productivity loss, Activity
    impairment)
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    2. Weeks 1-2
    3. Weeks 1-2
    4. Days 1-3
    5. Weeks 1-2
    6. From baseline to Week 4
    7. From first infusion to 24-hours post dose
    8. Days 1-3
    9. From baseline to Week 1
    10. From baseline to Week 2
    11. Week 1
    12. Week 1
    13. Weeks 1-2
    14. Weeks 1-2
    15. Week 1
    16. Week 2
    17. Weeks 1-4
    18. Weeks 1-4
    19. Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4
    20. Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4
    21. Weeks 1, 2 and 4
    22. Weeks 2 and 4
    23. Weeks 2 and 4
    24. Week 4
    25. Week 4
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned3
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA86
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    United States
    Estonia
    Finland
    France
    Sweden
    Netherlands
    Spain
    Czechia
    Germany
    Greece
    Italy
    Belgium
    Denmark
    Georgia
    Norway
    Portugal
    Russian Federation
    United Kingdom
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years3
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months1
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years3
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months1
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 295
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 9
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state24
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 230
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 304
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2021-02-24
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2022-01-03
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusPrematurely Ended
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon Apr 29 18:15:43 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA