E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in patients with Systemic sclerosis (SSc) |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Raynaud's phenomenon affects the peripheral circulation i.e. fingers and toes. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Immune System Diseases [C20] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10037917 |
E.1.2 | Term | Raynauds |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004866 |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 21.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10042953 |
E.1.2 | Term | Systemic sclerosis |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004859 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | Yes |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To determine the safety and efficacy of GS-248 versus placebo on RP in subjects with SSc. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
To determine the efficacy of GS-248 on peripheral vascular blood flow in patients with SSc. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Subjects must provide signed and dated written informed consent before the conduct of any study-specific procedures. 2. Male and female subjects aged 18-75 years inclusive. 3. SSc diagnosed according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (van den Hoogen F et al. 2013). Subjects with signs of other autoimmune diseases (e.g. Sjögren’s syndrome, myositis, rheumatoid arthritis) could be included if SSc is the dominating phenotype. 4. Raynaud attacks typically ≥7 times per week during the last 4 weeks prior to screening despite background medication (only allowed vasodilatory therapy is calcium channel blockers or PDE-5 inhibitors). 5. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using a highly effective method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for 4 weeks after the last dose of IMP in such manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimised.* 6. Women must not be pregnant or breastfeeding. 7. Male subjects to agree to use condom in combination with use of contraceptive methods with a failure rate of <1% to prevent pregnancy and drug exposure of a partner and refrain from donating sperm from the first date of dosing until 3 months after last dosing of the IMP. 8. Ability of subjects to participate fully in all aspects of this clinical trial. * A woman is considered of childbearing potential, i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. A high follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the postmenopausal range may be used to confirm a post-menopausal state in women not using hormonal contraception or hormonal replacement therapy. However, in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhea, a single FSH measurement is insufficient. *Methods that can achieve a failure rate of <1% per year when used consistently and correctly are considered as highly effective birth control methods. Such methods include combined (oestrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, Intravaginal, and/or transdermal); progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, and/or implantable2); intrauterine device (IUD)2; intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS); bilateral tubal occlusion2; vasectomised partner; sexual abstinence. |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. SSc disease duration of greater than 120 months from first non-Raynaud manifestation 2. Current smokers or stopped smoking or used nicotine in any form <3 months prior to Visit 1. 3. Dose-change or initiation of vasodilating substances (calcium blockers or PDE-5 inhibitors) within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Subjects are not allowed to use a combination of calcium blockers and PDE-5 inhibitors from 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and throughout the study. Note: The subjects could be re-screened if they fulfil this exclusion criterion. 4. Use of iloprost or other intravenous (iv) or per os (po) prostacyclin receptor agonist within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. 5. Ongoing treatment with immunosuppressive therapies (other than mycophenolate) including, but not restricted to; cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, or cyclosporine, or use of those medications within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Note: Subjects could be included if they have been treated with a stable dose of mycophenolic acid during 4 weeks prior to study entry. 6. Use of systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the course of the study. 7. Use of moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors within 5 terminal half-lives or one week, whichever is longer, prior to Visit 2. Examples of a moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors are diltiazem, verapamil and grapefruit juice 8. Concurrent serious medical condition, with special attention to cardiovascular conditions, which in the opinion of the Investigator makes the subject not suitable for this study. 9. Prolonged corrected QT interval by Fredericia (QTcF) defined as a mean QTcF >450 msec at Visit 1, or at Visit 2 (prior randomisation). 10. Creatinine clearance <50 mL/min (determined by Cockcroft-Gault equation). 11. Active digital ulcer (DU) within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. 12. Have known allergies to any components of the GS-248 formulation. 13. Clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities at Screening (Visit 1), as determined and documented by the Investigator. 14. Positive test results for HBsAg, HCVAb or HIV-1 and/or -2 antibodies at Screening (Visit 1). 15. Subjects known or suspected of not being able to comply with this trial protocol (e.g. due to alcoholism, drug dependency or psychological disorder). 16. Subject is mentally or legally incapacitated at the time of screening or has a history of clinically significant psychiatric disorders that would impact the subject’s ability to participate in the study according to the Investigator. 17. Malignancy within the past 5 years except for in situ removal of basal cell carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade I. 18. Planned major surgery within the duration of the study. 19. Blood donation (or corresponding blood loss) within 12 weeks prior to Visit 1. 20. Participation in another interventional clinical study involving IMP within 4 weeks or given an experimental drug within 5 half-lives, whichever longest, prior to Visit 1.
Exclusion Criterion for Cold Challenge At Visit 2: Finger temperature below 27°C after acclimatising at an ambient temperature of 23°C (±2°C) for a period of 20 minutes.
Randomization Criteria: In addition to fulfilling all inclusion and exclusion criteria, subjects must fulfil the following criteria to be randomised: 1. ≥7 RP attacks during the last week of the run-in period as captured in the eDiary, with no more than 2 days without RP attacks. 2. Compliance with the eDiary during the 7 most recent days prior to baseline (Visit 2), excluding the visit day itself, defined as having submitted ≥5 days of eDiary records (out of a possible 7 days) for RCS and RP during that period. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Primary efficacy endpoint: Mean change from baseline to week 4 in the number of Raynaud’s Phenomenon attacks per week. Primary safety endpoints: • Incidence of Adverse events • Incidence of Serious Adverse Events • Clinical laboratory and vital signs. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Key Secondary efficacy endpoints: Mean change from baseline to week 4 in the Raynaud’s Condition Score (RCS) Mean change from baseline to week 4 in the cumulative duration of Raynaud’s Phenomenon attacks Mean change from baseline to week 4 in pain experienced during RP attacks Other secondary endpoints: Mean change from baseline to week 4 in peripheral blood flow prior to cold challenge and IMP administration. Mean change from baseline to week 4 in peripheral blood flow from pre-IMP, to post-IMP administration at Visit 2. Mean change in recovery of peripheral blood flow after cold challenge from pre-IMP to post-IMP administration at Visit 2 Mean change from baseline to week 4 in recovery of peripheral blood flow after cold challenge.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Efficacy endpoints: Baseline to week 4 Other endpoints: Week 2 and week 4 |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | Yes |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 3 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 15 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 8 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 1 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 8 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |