Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    An open-label, adaptive randomized, controlled multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RESP301 plus standard of care (SoC) compared to SoC alone in hospitalized participants with COVID-19 World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 & 4 (NOCoV2)

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2020-002120-37
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    21 May 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    26 May 2022
    First version publication date
    26 May 2022
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    RESP301-002
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Thirty Respiratory Limited
    Sponsor organisation address
    1 Red Place, London, United Kingdom, W1K 6PL
    Public contact
    Clinical department, Thirty Respiratory Limited, +44 (0)1235 431 201, contact@30.technology
    Scientific contact
    Clinical department, Thirty Respiratory Limited, +44 (0)1235 431 201, contact@30.technology
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    09 Nov 2021
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    21 May 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate efficacy of RESP301 in preventing progression of hospitalized COVID-19 participants at level 3 or 4 in the modified WHO ordinal scale into higher levels.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The protocol, protocol amendments, informed consent form (ICF), Investigator’s Brochure (IB), and other relevant documents (e.g. advertisements) were submitted to an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) by the Investigator and reviewed and approved by the IRB/IEC before the study was initiated. This study was conducted in accordance with the protocol and with consensus ethical principles derived from international guidelines including the Declaration of Helsinki and Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) International Ethical Guidelines; Applicable International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines; Applicable laws and regulations. Overall conduct of the study at the site and adherence to requirements of 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), ICH GCP guidelines, the IRB/IEC, European regulation 536/2014 for clinical studies (if applicable), and all other applicable local regulations. The Investigator or his/her representative explained the nature of the study to the participant or his/her legally authorized representative and answered all questions regarding the study. Participants were informed that their participation was voluntary. Participants or their legally authorized representative were required to sign a statement of informed consent that meets the requirements of 21 CFR 50, local regulations, ICH guidelines, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act requirements, where applicable, and the IRB/IEC or study center.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    29 Jul 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 19
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    19
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    15
    From 65 to 84 years
    3
    85 years and over
    1

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    This study was conducted at 2 centers in the United Kingdom (UK) that enrolled 19 participants from29-Jul-2020 (first subject first visit) to 21-May-2021 (last subject's last visit).

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    The screening period was 2 days. All the study assessments were performed as per the schedule of assessment. Participants were randomized in the ratio 2:1 to the investigational arm or the control arm either inhaled RESP301 in addition to the standard of care (SoC) or SoC alone.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    This is open-label study.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    RESP301+SoC
    Arm description
    Participants received inhaled RESP301 administered using a nebulizer three times a day (TID) for up to 10 days in addition to the standard of care (SoC).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    RESP301
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Nebuliser solution
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants received inhaled RESP301 administered using a nebulizer (6 mL; Delivered dose (62 mg) sodium nitrite (NaNO2)) TID (every 8 hours) with at least 6 hours between 2 consecutive doses for up to 10 days.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Standard of Care (SoC)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Nebuliser solution
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants received institutional SOC alone for the treatment of COVID-19.

    Arm title
    Standard of Care (SoC)
    Arm description
    Participants received institutional SOC alone for the treatment of COVID-19.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Standard of care (SoC)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Nebuliser solution
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants received institutional SoC for the treatment of COVID 19.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Started
    14
    5
    Completed
    10
    4
    Not completed
    4
    1
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    1
    -
         Lost to follow-up
    3
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RESP301+SoC
    Reporting group description
    Participants received inhaled RESP301 administered using a nebulizer three times a day (TID) for up to 10 days in addition to the standard of care (SoC).

    Reporting group title
    Standard of Care (SoC)
    Reporting group description
    Participants received institutional SOC alone for the treatment of COVID-19.

    Reporting group values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC) Total
    Number of subjects
    14 5 19
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    59.6 ± 10.94 58.8 ± 8.53 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    7 2 9
        Male
    7 3 10

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RESP301+SoC
    Reporting group description
    Participants received inhaled RESP301 administered using a nebulizer three times a day (TID) for up to 10 days in addition to the standard of care (SoC).

    Reporting group title
    Standard of Care (SoC)
    Reporting group description
    Participants received institutional SOC alone for the treatment of COVID-19.

    Primary: Proportion of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of Participants Who Progress by at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale [1]
    End point description
    A modified WHO ordinal scale was used for consistency with the recent study in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, to record the participant's status at the time of assessment. The modified WHO ordinal scale included the following levels : 1 = Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2= Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 3= Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4= Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 6= Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 7= Death. Higher scores mean worse outcomes. The proportion of participants who progress by at least one level higher on the modified WHO ordinal scale was assessed. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Day 2 and Day 3
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical analysis is available for the primary endpoint.
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    5
    Units: Count of Participants
        Baseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 1
    0
    0
        Baseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 2
    0
    0
        Baseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 3
    0
    0
        Baseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 4
    1
    0
        Baseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 5
    0
    0
        Baseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 6
    0
    0
        Baseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 7
    0
    0
        Baseline : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: >3
    1
    0
        Day 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 1
    0
    0
        Day 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 2
    0
    0
        Day 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 3
    0
    0
        Day 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 4
    1
    0
        Day 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 5
    0
    0
        Day 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 6
    0
    0
        Day 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 7
    0
    0
        Day 2 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: >3
    1
    0
        Day 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 1
    0
    0
        Day 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 2
    0
    0
        Day 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 3
    0
    0
        Day 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 4
    0
    0
        Day 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 5
    1
    0
        Day 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 6
    0
    0
        Day 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: 7
    0
    0
        Day 3 : WHO 7-point ordinal scale: >3
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change Time in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over Time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change Time in Room Air Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) From Baseline Over Time
    End point description
    Pulse oximetry measurements were performed to evaluate SpO2. The effect of RESP301 as measured by room air SpO2 was assessed. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Justification: 9999.9999 is an arbitrary number that refers to 0 participant being present in the arm for specific timepoints; data was not available. 99.99 is an arbitrary number that refers to Post-dose nebulization that did not occur in the SOC arm on Day 1. Soc arm data is not applicable.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    5
    Units: Percentage change of Spo2
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 1 - Change from baseline (n=11,5)
    0.1 ± 2.84
    99.99 ± 99.99
        Day 2- Change from baseline (n=9,2)
    -1.7 ± 4.09
    1.5 ± 2.12
        Day 3- Change from baseline (n=8,3)
    0.9 ± 2.80
    3.3 ± 2.08
        Day 4- Change from baseline (n=5,3)
    1.4 ± 2.61
    3.0 ± 2.00
        Day 5- Change from baseline (n=4,3)
    0.3 ± 1.26
    4.0 ± 1.0
        Day 6- Change from baseline (n=2,2)
    -1.0 ± 1.41
    4.5 ± 3.54
        Day 7- Change from baseline (n=2,0)
    3.0 ± 2.83
    9.999 ± 9.999
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over Time

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 Symptom Score From Baseline Over Time
    End point description
    The NEWS is based on a simple aggregate scoring system in which a score is allocated to physiological measurements, already recorded in routine practice, when patients present to, or are being monitored in hospital. Six simple physiological parameters form the basis of the scoring system: 1. Respiration rate; 2. Oxygen saturation; 3. Systolic blood pressure; 4. Pulse rate; 5. Level of consciousness or new confusion; 6. Temperature. Each score is 0–3 and individual scores are added together for an overall score. An additional two points are added if the patient is receiving oxygen therapy. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher the score the greater the clinical risk. Higher scores indicate the need for escalation, medical review and possible clinical intervention, and more intensive monitoring. Justification: 9999.9999 is an arbitrary number that refers to 0 participant being present in the arm for specific timepoints; data was not available.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    5
    Units: Score on a NEWS scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Change from Baseline: Day 2 (n=12, 5)
    -0.8 ± 1.99
    1.4 ± 0.89
        Change from Baseline: Day 3 (n=9,5)
    -1.3 ± 1.87
    -0.2 ± 1.3
        Change from Baseline: Day 4 (n=5,4)
    1.0 ± 2.55
    0.5 ± 0.58
        Change from Baseline: Day 5 (4,4)
    -2.0 ± 3.37
    -0.5 ± 3.11
        Change from Baseline: Day 6 (n=2,3)
    -1.5 ± 2.12
    -2.0 ± 0.00
        Change from Baseline: Day 7 (n=2,0)
    -1.0 ± 2.83
    9999.9999 ± 9999.9999
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each Visit

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline for Number of Participants on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale at Each Visit
    End point description
    A modified WHO ordinal scale was used for consistency with the recent study in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, to record the participant's status at the time of assessment. The modified WHO ordinal scale included the following levels : 1 = Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities; 2= Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 3= Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4= Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 6= Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 7= Death. Higher scores mean worse outcome. Change from baseline for Number of participants on the modified WHO ordinal scale was assesed. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    5
    Units: Count of Participants
        Day 2: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -3
    0
    0
        Day 2: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -2
    0
    0
        Day 2:Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -1
    4
    0
        Day 2: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 0
    8
    5
        Day 2: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 1
    0
    0
        Day 2: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 2
    0
    0
        Day 2: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 3
    0
    0
        Day 2: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 4
    0
    0
        Day 3: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -3
    0
    0
        Day 3: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -2
    3
    1
        Day 3: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -1
    1
    0
        Day 3: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 0
    4
    4
        Day 3: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 1
    1
    0
        Day 3: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 2
    0
    0
        Day 3: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 3
    0
    0
        Day 3: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 4
    0
    0
        Day 4: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -3
    0
    0
        Day 4: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -2
    1
    0
        Day 4: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -1
    0
    0
        Day 4: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 0
    4
    4
        Day 4: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 1
    0
    0
        Day 4: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 2
    0
    0
        Day 4: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 3
    0
    0
        Day 4: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 4
    0
    0
        Day 5: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -3
    0
    0
        Day 5: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -2
    2
    1
        Day 5: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -1
    0
    2
        Day 5: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 0
    2
    1
        Day 5: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 1
    0
    0
        Day 5: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 2
    0
    0
        Day 5: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 3
    0
    0
        Day 5: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 4
    0
    0
        Day 6: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -3
    0
    0
        Day 6: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -2
    0
    2
        Day 6: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -1
    1
    0
        Day 6: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 0
    1
    0
        Day 6: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 1
    0
    0
        Day 6: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 2
    0
    0
        Day 6: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 3
    0
    0
        Day 6: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 4
    0
    0
        Day 7: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -3
    0
    0
        Day 7: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -2
    1
    0
        Day 7: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale -1
    0
    0
        Day 7: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 0
    0
    0
        Day 7: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 1
    0
    0
        Day 7: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 2
    0
    0
        Day 7: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 3
    0
    0
        Day 7: Modified WHO 7-point ordinal scale 4
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to Improvement of at Least One Level Lower on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to Improvement of at Least One Level Lower on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale
    End point description
    Time to improvement is the time in which the participant sees a decrease after first study treatment in the WHO 7-point ordinal scale from baseline to a value at least one level lower in days (date of decrease in WHO scale - first dose date + 1). In the case that a patient has not decreased in the WHO scale at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline to Day 28
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    5
    Units: day
        median (full range (min-max))
    4.00 (2.00 to 10.50)
    5.00 (3.00 to 5.00)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to Progression of at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to Progression of at Least One Level Higher on the Modified WHO Ordinal Scale
    End point description
    Time to progression is the time in which the patient sees an increase after first study treatment in the WHO 7-point ordinal scale from baseline to a value at least one level higher in days (date of increase in WHO scale - first dose date + 1). In the case that a patient has not increased in the WHO scale at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Justification: 999.99 is an arbitrary number that refers to only 1 participant was evaluable, hence Median and Full range is not calculable.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline to Day 28
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    1
    0 [2]
    Units: day
        median (full range (min-max))
    999.99 (999.99 to 999.99)
    ( to )
    Notes
    [2] - Data is not available.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Participants With Adverse Events
    End point description
    AEs (non-serious) as variables of safety and tolerability of RESP301 were assessed. The safety analysis set included the safety population (SP) would include all randomized participants who inhale any amount of study intervention or were randomized to the control arm. The SP would be analyzed according to the actual treatment received. This set will be used for the safety analyses.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From screening to safety follow up (Day 28)
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    5
    Units: Participants
        Participants with at least one AE
    10
    2
        Participants with at least 1 AE of Grade 3/ higher
    1
    0
        Participants with at least 1 treatment-related AE
    3
    0
        Participants with at least one severe AE
    1
    0
        At least 1 AE leading to study drug withdrawal
    3
    0
        Atleast 1 treatment-related AE leading to withdraw
    1
    0
        At least one AE leading to dose interruption
    1
    0
        Atleast 1 treatment-related AE lead to interrupt
    1
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to Hospital Discharge

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to Hospital Discharge
    End point description
    Time to hospital discharge is the time in the hospital after first study treatment in days (date of discharge - first dose date + 1). Patients who die before leaving the hospital would be considered failures (did not achieve hospital discharge) and censored. In the case that a patient is still hospitalized at time of analysis or withdraws from the study before leaving the hospital, they would be censored at their date of last assessment in the data cut or early discontinuation date, respectively.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 10
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    5
    Units: day
        median (full range (min-max))
    4.00 (3.00 to 6.00)
    6.00 (5.00 to 6.00)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Participants with Mortality

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Participants with Mortality
    End point description
    Incidence of mortality by Day 28 is the number of patients who have died by Day 28 and the percentage of patients reaching this endpoint would be summarized by treatment group. The safety analysis set included the safety population (SP) would include all randomized participants who inhale any amount of study intervention or were randomized to the control arm. The SP would be analyzed according to the actual treatment received. This set will be used for the safety analyses.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 28
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    5
    Units: Count of Participants
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Reduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Reduction in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) to <90%
    End point description
    Room Air SpO2 for a summary of participants with reduction to < 90%, unless well clinically tolerated according to Investigator's opinion was assessed. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Justification: 99.999 is an arbitrary number that refers to Post-dose nebulization that did not occur in the SOC arm on specific timepoints. Soc arm data is not applicable. 999.99 is an arbitrary number that refers to only 1 participant was evaluable, hence SD is not calculable. 9999.9999 is an arbitrary number that refers to 0 participant being present in the arm for specific timepoints; Data not available.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2, Day 3
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    5
    Units: Percentage of SpO2
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 1 Pre-Nebulization (n=1,0)
    95.0 ± 999.99
    9999.9999 ± 9999.9999
        Day 1 Post-Nebulization (n= 2,5)
    93.5 ± 2.12
    99.999 ± 99.999
        Day 2 Pre-Nebulization (n=1,0)
    94.0 ± 999.99
    9999.9999 ± 9999.9999
        Day 2 Post-Nebulization (n=1,5)
    86.0 ± 999.99
    99.999 ± 99.999
        Day 3 Pre-Nebulization (n=1,0)
    96.0 ± 999.99
    9999.9999 ± 9999.9999
        Day 3 Post-Nebulization (n=1,5)
    94.0 ± 999.99
    99.999 ± 99.999
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Events of Clinical Bronchial Hyper Responsiveness Related to Nebulization

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Events of Clinical Bronchial Hyper Responsiveness Related to Nebulization
    End point description
    Incidence of clinical bronchial hyper responsiveness related to nebulization was assessed. Oxygen saturation decreased and wheezing was assessed as an incidence of clinical bronchial hyper-responsiveness related to nebulization, requiring temporal increase of supplemental oxygen. The safety analysis set included the safety population (SP) would include all randomized participants who inhale any amount of study intervention or were randomized to the control arm. The SP was analyzed according to the actual treatment received. This set was used for the safety analyses.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From screening to safety follow up (Day 28)
    End point values
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Number of subjects analysed
    14
    5
    Units: Events
    2
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From screening to safety follow up (30 days)
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Severe AEs is defined as an event that prevents normal everyday activities. An AE that is assessed as severe should not be confused with an SAE. Severe is a category utilized for rating the intensity of an event; and both AE and SAE can be assessed as severe.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    23.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RESP301+SoC
    Reporting group description
    Participants received inhaled RESP301 administered using a nebulizer three times a day (TID) for up to 10 days in addition to the standard of care (SoC).

    Reporting group title
    Standard of Care (SoC)
    Reporting group description
    Participants received institutional SOC alone for the treatment of COVID-19.

    Serious adverse events
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    RESP301+SoC Standard of Care (SoC)
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 14 (71.43%)
    2 / 5 (40.00%)
    Investigations
    Oxygen Saturation Decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 14 (14.29%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    0
    Liver Function Test Increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Lymphocyte Count Decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    Loss Of Consciousness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Paraesthesia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Non-Cardiac Chest Pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Peripheral swelling
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    Abdominal Pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    Oropharyngeal discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 14 (14.29%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Epistaxis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Haemoptysis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Wheezing
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
    1 / 5 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Respiratory Tract Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
    0 / 5 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    05 Jun 2020
    The original protocol was updated to include important safety guidelines for RESP301 administration for the first 10 participants (i.e., up to the first IDMC safety review). It was also updated to align with the IB Version 2.0, dated 27 May 2020.
    10 Jun 2020
    The protocol was updated to clarify that staggered dosing was required for all participants treated before completion of the first IDMC review, and to clarify exclusionary criteria and monitoring of mHb. Information was added to ensure that Investigators are aware of the potential risk of interaction between NO and other NO donor agents.
    16 Sep 2020
    The amendment included changes to (a) expand the inclusion criteria to allow enrolment also of patients in hospital with COVID-19 but not yet requiring supplemental oxygen, (b) to allow a minor temporary temperature excursion in the storage conditions of RESP301 to facilitate transport from the manufacturer to the clinical site or from the clinical site pharmacy to the bedside, and (c) to raise the exclusionary level for mHb to >2%.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 04 05:27:44 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA