E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
This is a pharmacokinetic trial for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It will be investigated whether cardiopulmonary bypass priming substituted with human albumin 20% has an effect on the pharmacokinetics of prophylactic Cefazolin versus standard priming. The information retrieved by these investigations will help to optimize antiinfective treatment in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Investigation of the influence of albumin on the pharmacokinetics of prophylactic Cefazolin in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Bacterial Infections and Mycoses [C01] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Hypoalbuminemia is a common feature in patients undergoing cardiac surgery due to the initial volume load provided by the heart lung machine. The use of crystalloid priming was shown to be safe in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in adults. However, there is some debate on the impact of low plasma colloid pressure, especially hypoalbuminemia and the changes in pharmacokinetics of plasma protein bound antibiotics. Hypoalbuminemia leads to an increased clearance and therefore a decreased AUC of the effective unbound form of plasma protein bound antibiotics. In this study, we want to investigate the pharmacokinetic effects of Cefazolin comparing patients with normal and patients with reduced albumin levels during cardiac surgery. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
We further want to evaluate if the substitution of the cardiopulmonary bypass priming with albumin has an effect on ICU stay, hospital, stay, time to extubation and rate of postoperative infections. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
• Written informed consent • Patients undergoing elective aortic valve repair • Patients undergoing elective mitral valve repair • Patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting • Age: 18 – 85 years of age • BMI: 20 -35 kg/m2 • No former allergic reaction to albumin • No former allergic reaction to cefazolin • Ejection fraction > 25% • No former cardiac surgery • Hemoglobin concentration > 11 mg/dL prior to surgery • Serum creatinin < 2 mg/dL • No significant hepatic disease (liver function tests < 3 X upper limit of normal) • No history of coagulation disorders • No signs of local or systemic infection • No antibiotic therapy within the last 3 days
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
• No informed consent • Emergency cardiac surgery • History of hypersensitivity to ß-lactam antibiotics • History of allergic reaction to albumin • Infection at site of surgery • Systemic infection (endocarditis) • Antimicrobial therapy within 3 days of surgery • Former cardiac surgery • Hemoglobin concentration < 11 mg/dL prior to surgery • Congestive heart failure with ejection fraction < 25% • Significant hepatic disease (liver function tests < 3 X upper limit of normal) • Renal impairment with serum creatinine > 2 mg/L and/or GFR <60mL/min • Body Mass Index (BMI) < 20 kg/m2 or BMI > 35 kg/m2 • Pregnancy or missing pregnancy test • Perioperative need of Levosimendan (will lead to drop out) • Aortic clamping time >240 minutes (will lead to drop out) • Extra corporal circuit time >400 minutes (will lead to drop out)
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Area under the concentration time curve (AUC) Max.Concentration (Cmax) Clearance (CL) |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
After administration of albumin (single dose) on the study day. |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Volume distribution (Vd) Total proteins Albumin concnetration ICU Stay Hospital Stay Time to extubation Rate of postoperative infections |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
on study days, for the whole duration of the study including follow-up of adverse events if necessary. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | No |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
adverse events occur wich are so serious that the resulting resikbenefit ratio becomes unacceptable the number of drop outs is so large that proper conclusion of the trial is no longer a realistic possibility parallel trialsreveal unacceptable risk results of interim analyses and the status of drug development change, such that the trial would no longer be necessary attempted or proven fraud slow recruitment poor quality of data non-compliance with protocol |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |