Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44335   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Randomised, double-blind (within dose groups), placebo-controlled and parallel group trial to investigate the effects of different doses of oral BI 685509 given over 20 weeks on UACR reduction in patients with non-diabetic kidney disease

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2020-002930-33
    Trial protocol
    DK   SE   PT   DE   PL   ES  
    Global end of trial date
    21 Sep 2023

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    04 Oct 2024
    First version publication date
    04 Oct 2024
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    1366-0022
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04736628
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Boehringer Ingelheim
    Sponsor organisation address
    Binger Strasse 173, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany, 55216
    Public contact
    Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center, Boehringer Ingelheim, 001 18002430127, clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com
    Scientific contact
    Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center, Boehringer Ingelheim, 001 18002430127, clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    22 Nov 2023
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    15 Aug 2023
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    21 Sep 2023
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The main objectives of the trial were to determine the effectiveness of avenciguat and to characterize the dose-response relationship for avenciguat in patients with non-diabetic kidney disease by assessing 3 doses and placebo.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Only subjects that met all the study inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were to be entered in the study. All subjects were free to withdraw from the clinical trial at any time for any reason given. Close monitoring of all subjects was adhered to throughout the trial conduct.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    26 May 2021
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Argentina: 53
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Australia: 27
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 17
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    China: 19
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 25
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hong Kong: 9
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Japan: 40
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Malaysia: 15
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Mexico: 21
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    New Zealand: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 23
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Portugal: 19
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 8
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 32
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 145
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    489
    EEA total number of subjects
    109
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    277
    From 65 to 84 years
    212
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    This trial was a Phase II, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre clinical trial in patients with non-diabetic kidney disease (non-DKD) to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of avenciguat and to characterize the dose-response relationship for avenciguat in patients with non-DKD by assessing 3 doses and placebo.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Confirmed eligible at screening, patients continued in a 2-week baseline run-in period. Patients who completed the screening and baseline run-in periods and met the eligibility criteria were randomised equally into 1 of 3 parallel dose groups, and in each dose group to treatment either with avenciguat or matching placebo in a 3:1 ratio.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Data analyst, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    Patients, investigators and everyone involved in trial conduct or analysis or with any other interest except the Trial Pharmacometrician, PK programmer and Trial bioanalyst in this double-blind trial remained blinded with regard to the randomised treatment assignments within each dose group until after database lock.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID
    Arm description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Weeks 1 to 20 (included). Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    avenciguat
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    BI 685509
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Weeks 1 to 20 (included). Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food.

    Arm title
    Avenciguat 2 mg TID
    Arm description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg of avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 20 of treatment. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    avenciguat
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    BI 685509
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg of avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 20 of treatment. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food.

    Arm title
    Avenciguat 3 mg TID
    Arm description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 4 of treatment. Then if medication was tolerated, up-titration to 3 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 3 mg) TID occurred from Week 5 until Week 20. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    avenciguat
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    BI 685509
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 4 of treatment. Then if medication was tolerated, up-titration to 3 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 3 mg) TID occurred from Week 5 until Week 20. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    This arm comprises all placebo treated participants. Participants were administered film-coated tablets of placebo matching avenciguat 1mg, 2mg or 3mg 3 times a day (TID) during 20 weeks of treatment. Placebo matching avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo to avenciguat
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Film-coated tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    This arm comprises all placebo treated participants. Participants were administered film-coated tablets of placebo matching avenciguat 1mg, 2mg or 3mg 3 times a day (TID) during 20 weeks of treatment. Placebo matching avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food.

    Number of subjects in period 1 [1]
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID Avenciguat 2 mg TID Avenciguat 3 mg TID Placebo
    Started
    64
    65
    66
    66
    Treated
    64
    65
    66
    64
    Completed
    58
    60
    60
    55
    Not completed
    6
    5
    6
    11
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    3
    2
    4
    3
         Perceived lack of efficacy
    1
    -
    -
    1
         Protocol deviation
    -
    -
    -
    1
         Other reason than listed
    1
    2
    2
    3
         Burden of study procedures
    1
    -
    -
    1
         Change of residence
    -
    1
    -
    -
         Not treated
    -
    -
    -
    2
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: Out of 489 patients that were enrolled only 261 were randomized.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Weeks 1 to 20 (included). Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 2 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg of avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 20 of treatment. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 3 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 4 of treatment. Then if medication was tolerated, up-titration to 3 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 3 mg) TID occurred from Week 5 until Week 20. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    This arm comprises all placebo treated participants. Participants were administered film-coated tablets of placebo matching avenciguat 1mg, 2mg or 3mg 3 times a day (TID) during 20 weeks of treatment. Placebo matching avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group values
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID Avenciguat 2 mg TID Avenciguat 3 mg TID Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    64 65 66 66 261
    Age categorical
    Randomised Set (RS): this patient set included all entered and randomised patients.
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    41 36 39 42 158
        From 65-84 years
    22 28 27 23 100
        85 years and over
    1 1 0 1 3
    Age Continuous
    Randomised Set (RS): this patient set included all entered and randomised patients.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    54.6 ( 16.3 ) 60.4 ( 15.5 ) 59.3 ( 15.0 ) 58.1 ( 14.4 ) -
    Sex: Female, Male
    Randomised Set (RS): this patient set included all entered and randomised patients.
    Units: Participants
        Female
    21 16 26 17 80
        Male
    43 49 40 49 181
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
    Randomised Set (RS): this patient set included all entered and randomised patients.
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    18 20 11 18 67
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    46 45 55 48 194
        Unknown or Not Reported
    0 0 0 0 0
    Race (NIH/OMB)
    Randomised Set (RS): this patient set included all entered and randomised patients.
    Units: Subjects
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    3 4 1 4 12
        Asian
    18 20 12 15 65
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0 0 2 1 3
        Black or African American
    3 1 8 5 17
        White
    39 38 42 40 159
        More than one race
    1 1 0 0 2
        Unknown or Not Reported
    0 1 1 1 3
    Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use at randomization
    Number of patients in each category sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use at randomization. The reported categories of SGLT2i use at randomization are: Yes; No. (RS): this patient set included all entered and randomised patients.
    Units: Subjects
        Category "yes"
    17 14 15 16 62
        Category "No"
    47 51 51 50 199
    Baseline urine albumine creatinine ratio (UACR), 10-hour urine
    Baseline UACR measured in 10-hour urine is reported. UACR is a ratio between two measured substances i.e., albumine and creatinine and it is calculated as: (Urine albumin (milligram (mg)/deciliter (dL)))/(urine creatinine gram (g)/deciliter (dL))= UACR in mg/g. Albuminuria is present when UACR is greater than 30 mg/g and is a marker for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Baseline was defined as the mean of all non-missing assessments from visit 2 (Week -2) until prior to the first intake of trial medication. Randomised Set (RS): this patient set included all entered and randomised patients.
    Units: milligram/gram
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    1024.1 ( 920.1 ) 868.2 ( 727.7 ) 941.5 ( 1155.2 ) 1076.2 ( 1786.2 ) -
    Baseline Urine Albumine Creatinine Ratio (UACR) in First Morning Void (FMV)
    UACR measured in FMV is reported. UACR is a ratio between two measured substances i.e., albumine and creatinine and it is calculated as: (urine albumin (milligram (mg)/deciliter (dL)))/(urine creatinine gram (g)/deciliter (dL))= UACR in mg/g. Albuminuria is present when UACR is greater than 30 mg/g and is a marker for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Baseline was defined as the mean of all non-missing assessments from visit 2 (Week -2) until prior to the first intake of trial medication. Randomised Set (RS): this patient set included all entered and randomised patients.
    Units: milligram/gram
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    879.1 ( 840.8 ) 745.4 ( 661.9 ) 821.3 ( 1083.5 ) 874.1 ( 1142.0 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Weeks 1 to 20 (included). Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 2 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg of avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 20 of treatment. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 3 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 4 of treatment. Then if medication was tolerated, up-titration to 3 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 3 mg) TID occurred from Week 5 until Week 20. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    This arm comprises all placebo treated participants. Participants were administered film-coated tablets of placebo matching avenciguat 1mg, 2mg or 3mg 3 times a day (TID) during 20 weeks of treatment. Placebo matching avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Primary: Change from baseline in log transformed Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio (UACR) measured in 10-hour urine after 20 weeks of trial treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline in log transformed Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio (UACR) measured in 10-hour urine after 20 weeks of trial treatment
    End point description
    Change from baseline in log transformed Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio (UACR) measured in 10-hour urine after 20 weeks of trial treatment is reported. Least Squares Mean (Standard error) were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML)−based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient. Log transformed UACR at Week 20 was log of (average of all available scheduled measurements between week 18 and week 20). The data in the Outcome Measure Data Table represent the Least Squares Mean (Standard error) at Week 20. This endpoint reports data for the Full Analysis Set (FAS): included all patients who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR in Week -2, -1, or 0 and at least 1 post-baseline measurement after Week 6.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week -2, Week -1, Week 0 pre-dose) and Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20. The data represent the Least Squares Mean at Week 20.
    End point values
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID Avenciguat 2 mg TID Avenciguat 3 mg TID Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    64
    61
    62
    62
    Units: log (mg/g)
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -0.210 ( 0.067 )
    -0.190 ( 0.068 )
    -0.217 ( 0.068 )
    0.018 ( 0.068 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Least Squares Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML)−based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [1]
    P-value
    = 0.0179
    Method
    Mixed-effect Model repeat Measurement
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.228
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.417
         upper limit
    -0.04
    Notes
    [1] - Least Squares Mean of "Avenciguat 1 mg TID" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Least Squares Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML)−based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    123
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [2]
    P-value
    = 0.0307
    Method
    Mixed-effect Model repeat Measurement
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.209
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.398
         upper limit
    -0.02
    Notes
    [2] - Least Squares Mean of "Avenciguat 2 mg TID" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Least Squares Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML)−based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [3]
    P-value
    = 0.0151
    Method
    Mixed-effect Model repeat Measurement
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.235
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.425
         upper limit
    -0.046
    Notes
    [3] - Least Squares Mean of "Avenciguat 3 mg TID" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical analysis description
    A flat vs. non-flat dose-response relationship across the 3 doses of avenciguat and placebo was tested using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) approach which evaluated simultaneously 5 different plausible dose-response patterns (Emax, exponential, linear, quadratic, sigmoid emax) while protecting the overall probability of type I error (one-sided alpha of 0.050). The total daily dose was considered for MCP-Mod analysis (placebo, active avenciguat 3 mg, 6 mg, and 9 mg).
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    249
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [4]
    P-value
    = 0.0053
    Method
    MCP-Mod E-max model fit
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [4] - MMRM estimates were used as input for the MCP-Mod. MMRM included the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient. MCP-Mod E-max model fit assumption: 80% of the maximum effect is achieved at 6 mg.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical analysis description
    A flat vs. non-flat dose-response relationship across the 3 doses of avenciguat and placebo was tested using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) approach which evaluated simultaneously 5 different plausible dose-response patterns (Emax, exponential, linear, quadratic, sigmoid emax) while protecting the overall probability of type I error (one-sided alpha of 0.050). The total daily dose was considered for MCP-Mod analysis (placebo, active avenciguat 3 mg, 6 mg, and 9 mg).
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    249
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [5]
    P-value
    = 0.0102
    Method
    MCP-Mod quadratic model fit
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [5] - MMRM estimates were used as input for the MCP-Mod. MMRM included the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient. MCP-Mod quadratic model fit assumption: 50 % of the maximum effect is achieved at a dose of 3 mg. 90 % of the maximum effect is achieved at a dose of 6 mg.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical analysis description
    A flat vs. non-flat dose-response relationship across the 3 doses of avenciguat and placebo was tested using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) approach which evaluated simultaneously 5 different plausible dose-response patterns (Emax, exponential, linear, quadratic, sigmoid emax) while protecting the overall probability of type I error (one-sided alpha of 0.050). The total daily dose was considered for MCP-Mod analysis (placebo, active avenciguat 3 mg, 6 mg, and 9 mg).
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    249
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [6]
    P-value
    = 0.023
    Method
    MCP-Mod linear model fit
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [6] - MMRM estimates were used as input for the MCP-Mod. MMRM included the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient. MCP-Mod linear model fit assumption: no assumption is needed.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical analysis description
    A flat vs. non-flat dose-response relationship across the 3 doses of avenciguat and placebo was tested using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) approach which evaluated simultaneously 5 different plausible dose-response patterns (Emax, exponential, linear, quadratic, sigmoid emax) while protecting the overall probability of type I error (one-sided alpha of 0.050). The total daily dose was considered for MCP-Mod analysis (placebo, active avenciguat 3 mg, 6 mg, and 9 mg).
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    249
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [7]
    P-value
    = 0.0468
    Method
    MCP-Mod Exponential model fit
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [7] - MMRM estimates were used as input for the MCP-Mod. MMRM included the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient. MCP-Mod Exponential model fit assumption: 20% of the maximum effect is achieved at 3 mg.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical analysis description
    A flat vs. non-flat dose-response relationship across the 3 doses of avenciguat and placebo was tested using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) approach which evaluated simultaneously 5 different plausible dose-response patterns (Emax, exponential, linear, quadratic, sigmoid emax) while protecting the overall probability of type I error (one-sided alpha of 0.050). The total daily dose was considered for MCP-Mod analysis (placebo, active avenciguat 3 mg, 6 mg, and 9 mg).
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    249
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [8]
    P-value
    = 0.0292
    Method
    MCP-Mod Sigmoid Emax model fit
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [8] - MMRM estimates were used as input for the MCP-Mod. MMRM included the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient. MCP-Mod Sigmoid Emax model fit assumption: 30 % of the maximum effect is achieved at a dose of 3 mg. 90 % of the maximum effect is achieved at a dose of 6 mg.

    Secondary: Change from baseline in log transformed UACR measured in First Morning Void urine after 20 weeks of trial treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline in log transformed UACR measured in First Morning Void urine after 20 weeks of trial treatment
    End point description
    Change from baseline in log transformed UACR measured in First Morning Void urine after 20 weeks of trial treatment is reported. Least Squares Mean (Standard error) were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML)−based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient. The first morning void (FMV) was the first urination after the patient woke up at their usual time to start their day. Log transformed UACR at Week 20 was log of (average of all available scheduled measurements between week 18 and week 20). The data in the Outcome Measure Data Table represent the Least Squares Mean (Standard error) at Week 20. This endpoint reports data for the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    The MMRM model is a longitudinal analysis and it incorporated UACR measurements from baseline (Week -2 and Week -1) and Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20. The data represent the Least Squares Mean at Week 20.
    End point values
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID Avenciguat 2 mg TID Avenciguat 3 mg TID Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    64
    61
    62
    62
    Units: log (mg/g)
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -0.190 ( 0.071 )
    -0.180 ( 0.073 )
    -0.161 ( 0.071 )
    0.027 ( 0.072 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Least Squares Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML)−based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [9]
    P-value
    = 0.0327
    Method
    Mixed-effect Model repeat Measurement
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.217
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.416
         upper limit
    -0.018
    Notes
    [9] - Least Squares Mean of "Avenciguat 1 mg TID" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Least Squares Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML)−based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    123
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [10]
    P-value
    = 0.0447
    Method
    Mixed-effect Model repeat Measurement
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.206
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.408
         upper limit
    -0.005
    Notes
    [10] - Least Squares Mean of "Avenciguat 2 mg TID" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo".
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Least Squares Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML)−based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit (baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 20), and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit (Week 6, Week 12, and Week 20) as well as random effects of patient.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [11]
    P-value
    = 0.0654
    Method
    Mixed-effect Model repeat Measurement
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.187
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.387
         upper limit
    0.012
    Notes
    [11] - Least Squares Mean of "Avenciguat 3 mg TID" - Least Squares Mean of "Placebo".

    Secondary: Number of patients achieving UACR decreases in 10-hour urine of at least 20% from baseline after 20 weeks of trial treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients achieving UACR decreases in 10-hour urine of at least 20% from baseline after 20 weeks of trial treatment
    End point description
    Number of patients achieving urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) decreases in 10-hour urine of at least 20% from baseline after 20 weeks of trial treatment. During the 10-hour period every time the patient urinates, and the patient collected their urine into a provided container. An aliquot of this urine was taken and used as the 10-hour UACR sample. This endpoint reports data for the Full Analysis Set (FAS): included all patients who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR in Week -2, -1, or 0 and at least 1 post-baseline measurement after Week 6.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Day -14 and Day -7) and at Week 20 (Day 141) after start of trial treatment.
    End point values
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID Avenciguat 2 mg TID Avenciguat 3 mg TID Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    64
    61
    62
    62
    Units: Participants
    25
    27
    31
    14
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use at randomization were used as covariates in the logistic regression model.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [12]
    P-value
    = 0.0476 [13]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.01
         upper limit
    4.79
    Notes
    [12] - Odds ratio (Avenciguat 1 mg vs. Placebo).
    [13] - Nominal p-value.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use at randomization were used as covariates in the logistic regression model.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    123
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [14]
    P-value
    = 0.0119 [15]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.72
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.25
         upper limit
    5.94
    Notes
    [14] - Odds ratio (Avenciguat 2 mg vs. Placebo).
    [15] - Nominal p-value.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use at randomization were used as covariates in the logistic regression model.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [16]
    P-value
    = 0.0019 [17]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    3.43
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.58
         upper limit
    7.45
    Notes
    [16] - Odds ratio (Avenciguat 3 mg vs. Placebo).
    [17] - Nominal p-value.

    Secondary: Number of patients achieving UACR decreases in First Morning Void urine of at least 20% from baseline after 20 weeks of trial treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients achieving UACR decreases in First Morning Void urine of at least 20% from baseline after 20 weeks of trial treatment
    End point description
    Number of patients achieving urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) decreases in First Morning Void urine of at least 20% from baseline after 20 weeks of trial treatment is reported. The first morning void (FMV) was the first urination after the patient woke up at their usual time to start their day. This endpoint reports data for the Full Analysis Set (FAS): included all patients who had at least one baseline measurement of UACR in Week -2, -1, or 0 and at least 1 post-baseline measurement after Week 6.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At baseline (Day -14 and Day -7) and at Week 20 (Day 141) after start of trial treatment.
    End point values
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID Avenciguat 2 mg TID Avenciguat 3 mg TID Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    64
    61
    62
    62
    Units: Participants
    27
    26
    26
    16
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use at randomization were used as covariates in the logistic regression model.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    126
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [18]
    P-value
    = 0.0497 [19]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.13
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1
         upper limit
    4.55
    Notes
    [18] - Odds ratio (Avenciguat 1 mg vs. Placebo).
    [19] - Nominal p-value.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use at randomization were used as covariates in the logistic regression model.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 2 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    123
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [20]
    P-value
    = 0.0502 [21]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1
         upper limit
    4.61
    Notes
    [20] - Odds ratio (Avenciguat 2 mg vs. Placebo).
    [21] - Nominal p-value.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Treatment and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use at randomization were used as covariates in the logistic regression model.
    Comparison groups
    Avenciguat 3 mg TID v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    124
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [22]
    P-value
    = 0.0572 [23]
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    2.09
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.98
         upper limit
    4.49
    Notes
    [22] - Odds ratio (Avenciguat 3 mg vs. Placebo).
    [23] - Nominal p-value.

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    "All-Cause Mortality" "Serious Adverse Events" and "Other Adverse Events": From first avenciguat intake until last avenciguat intake or patient's trial termination date, whichever occurs earlier + 7 days of Residual effect period (REP), up to 148 days.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Treated Set (TS): this patient set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of trial medication.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    26.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Weeks 1 to 20 (included). Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 2 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg of avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 20 of treatment. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Avenciguat 3 mg TID
    Reporting group description
    Patients received daily orally one film-coated tablet of 1 milligram (mg) of avenciguat three times a day (TID) in Week 1 and Week 2. If the 1 mg TID medication was tolerated, up-titration to 2 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 2 mg) TID occurred after 2 weeks until Week 4 of treatment. Then if medication was tolerated, up-titration to 3 mg avenciguat (one film-coated tablet of 3 mg) TID occurred from Week 5 until Week 20. Avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    This arm comprises all placebo treated participants. Participants were administered film-coated tablets of placebo matching avenciguat 1mg, 2mg or 3mg 3 times a day (TID) during 20 weeks of treatment. Placebo matching avenciguat had to be taken with a glass of water and could be taken with or without food. Patients continued the treatment until undue drug toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Serious adverse events
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID Avenciguat 2 mg TID Avenciguat 3 mg TID Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 64 (4.69%)
    3 / 65 (4.62%)
    6 / 66 (9.09%)
    6 / 64 (9.38%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Investigations
    Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Squamous cell carcinoma of lung
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Incision site haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    1 / 65 (1.54%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fall
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    1 / 65 (1.54%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertensive urgency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
    1 / 65 (1.54%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Angina pectoris
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebrovascular accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Haemorrhagic diathesis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    1 / 65 (1.54%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Appendicitis noninfective
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Enteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Benign prostatic hyperplasia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Acute kidney injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    2 / 64 (3.13%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pyelonephritis acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Avenciguat 1 mg TID Avenciguat 2 mg TID Avenciguat 3 mg TID Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 64 (26.56%)
    19 / 65 (29.23%)
    26 / 66 (39.39%)
    21 / 64 (32.81%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 64 (4.69%)
    6 / 65 (9.23%)
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    3 / 64 (4.69%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    7
    10
    3
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 64 (7.81%)
    1 / 65 (1.54%)
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    3 / 64 (4.69%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    1
    5
    3
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    2 / 65 (3.08%)
    6 / 66 (9.09%)
    2 / 64 (3.13%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    6
    2
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
    4 / 65 (6.15%)
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    5 / 64 (7.81%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    5
    5
    5
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 64 (3.13%)
    3 / 65 (4.62%)
    6 / 66 (9.09%)
    4 / 64 (6.25%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    3
    6
    4
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 64 (3.13%)
    0 / 65 (0.00%)
    4 / 66 (6.06%)
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    0
    4
    1
    Infections and infestations
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 64 (6.25%)
    5 / 65 (7.69%)
    3 / 66 (4.55%)
    4 / 64 (6.25%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    5
    3
    4
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 64 (6.25%)
    2 / 65 (3.08%)
    3 / 66 (4.55%)
    2 / 64 (3.13%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    2
    3
    2
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Gout
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 64 (1.56%)
    3 / 65 (4.62%)
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    0 / 64 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    3
    5
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    15 Jul 2021
    Global amendment 3 part 1: The following main changes were introduced by the amendment: Modification of flow chart to clarify post-dose electrocardiogram (ECG) at Visit 3 and addition of a footnote explaining the timing of the last dose, for correction and clarification; Extension of the maximum time before randomisation from 28 to 35 days throughout the clinical trial protocol (CTP), to gain more time to allow screening procedures to be repeated where permitted; Specification added for Inclusion Criterion 3 that estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) had to remain ≥20 milliliter (mL)/minute (min)/1.73 square meters (m^2) after Visit 1 up to the start of Visit 3, to ensure patient safety; Rephrasing of Inclusion Criterion 6 from ‘stable on anti-hypertensives, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug(s) (NSAIDs), endothelin receptor antagonists, systemic steroids, within at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 until start of trial treatment, with no planned change of the therapy during the trial’ to ‘if the patient is taking any of the following medications they should be on a stable dose at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 until start of treatment, with no planned change of the therapy during the trial: anti-hypertensives, NSAIDs, endothelin receptor antagonists, systemic steroids or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors’, for clarification; Modification of Exclusion Criterion 3 from ‘diabetes mellitus’ to ‘diagnosed with diabetes mellitus according to local guidelines’, for clarification; Specification that trial medication shipments were also allowed for regular visits at the patient’s home, for clarification;
    15 Jul 2021
    Global amendment 3 part 2: The following main changes were introduced by the amendment: Addition of a footnote to concomitant treatments for clarification on use of restricted nitrates in an emergency; Removal of tablet count recording in the case report forms (CRF) since tablet counts were not required for compliance calculation, but were to be provided through accountability procedures at the site; Replacement of the requirement to test non-sterilized women <65 years of age with the requirement to test women of child-bearing potential for pregnancy as it was considered unnecessary for a women who was not of child-bearing potential to undergo pregnancy testing: Addition of a clarification of why a safety laboratory may not be performed at the central laboratory and addition of requirement to check creatinine to the minimum tests at the local laboratory as an important laboratory parameter to monitor kidney function.
    11 Oct 2021
    Global amendment 4 part 1 - the following main changes were introduced by this amendment: Addition of electrocardiogram (ECGs) at visits where there were previously no ECGs in the flow chart and the flow chart for procedures (3 ECGs at Visits 4 and 5 and 1 ECG at Visits 7 and 8; at Visits 3 and 6 an additional ECG was to be done in addition to the 2 already performed) to introduce more frequent ECG monitoring as a response to recent additional data; Addition of eGFR as a test that patients could be pre-screened for if consent was given, to reduce unnecessary screening procedures for patients who would not be eligible due to eGFR; Inclusion of recent data from trial 1366-0020 in the drug profile to include new information and to serve as rationale for additional measures introduced with the amendment; Inclusion of potential QT-interval (QT interval is the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave) prolongation in the overview of trial related risks, to reflect new available data; Removal of lactose monohydrate as an example of an excipient in Exclusion Criterion 11 since lactose monohydrate was not used in the Phase II formulation; Addition of the following exclusion criteria to ensure that patients with QTc (QTc is the corrected QT interval) prolongation or with the potential for QTc prolongation would not participate: o Exclusion Criterion 17 (QTcF-interval (QT interval corrected for Fridericia formula) >450 milliseconds (ms) in men or >470 ms in women at screening [Visit 1] until start of treatment); o Exclusion Criterion 18 (family history of long QT syndrome); o Exclusion Criterion 19 (concomitant use of therapies with a known risk of Torsade de Pointes at screening [Visit 1] and throughout screening and baseline run-in or planned initiation of such therapies during the trial);
    11 Oct 2021
    Global amendment 4 part 2 - the following main changes were introduced by this amendment: Clarification that the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition should be used ‘for guidance’ when assessing the criterion for treatment discontinuation in case of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), to reflect that the KDIGO guidelines are for use within a clinical setting, and patients with low urine output for reasons other than AKI could potentially have been incorrectly discontinued; Modification of the criterion for treatment discontinuation in case of intake of concomitant medication that interferes with the safety of the investigational medicinal product to include sponsor review and decision on a case-by-case basis, to enable patients to remain on trial treatment in exceptional cases if using restricted medication, if there were no safety concerns; Addition of a criterion for treatment discontinuation for patients with a QT or QTcF interval >500 ms, or an increase of QT or QTcF of >60 ms from the pre-dose value at Visit 3 and specification that such cases had to be reported as Adverse Events (AEs), as an additional safety measure; Addition of concomitant therapies with a known risk of Torsade de Pointes as restricted medications, with criteria for temporary stop and re-start of trial medication in the event of temporary concomitant use of such a therapy, to exclude use of medications that could impact QTc; Specification that vital signs were to be assessed prior to ECG and blood sampling, to ensure vital signs were assessed prior to ECG; Addition of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol laboratory test to correct erroneous omission; Addition of details on ECG timing, review, collection, and storage, to ensure ECGs were accurate and any anomalies were correctly reported, and to include a new storage procedure.
    14 Feb 2022
    Global amendment 5 part 1 - the following main changes were introduced by this amendment: Modification of the lay title of the CTP to be consistent with revisions made to the eligibility criteria; Changes of inclusion criteria to allow enrolment of patients with other non-diabetic kidney diseases whose prognosis and treatment were similar, and who therefore may have benefited from treatment with a soluble Guanylate Cyclase (sGC) activator: Expansion of Inclusion Criterion 8 by replacing ‘...hypertensive kidney disease or chronic glomerulonephritis defined as one of the following (...)’ with ‘...any kind of diagnosed chronic kidney disease1 whose primary cause is clinically not considered to be of diabetic origin’ (with footnote indicating that diagnosis could be reached by standard clinical methods, not requiring biopsy); Removal of Inclusion Criterion 7 (diagnosis of CKD as defined by KDIGO definition) due to redundancy with Inclusion Criterion 8; Replacement of ‘phosphodiesterase inhibitors’ with ‘Phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors, non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitors (such as dipyridamole and theophylline)’ in Exclusion Criterion 1 and in the restricted concomitant medications, since nitric oxide (NO)-sGC- cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway activating drugs were not to be administered due to possible synergistic effects with avenciguat; Replacement of ‘diabetes mellitus’ with ‘diagnosed with diabetic kidney disease1’ in Exclusion Criterion 3 (with footnote indicating that diagnosis could be reached by standard clinical methods, not requiring biopsy) to be consistent with the revised inclusion criteria which allowed patients with diabetes mellitus as long as the primary cause of kidney disease was not of diabetic origin;
    14 Feb 2022
    Global amendment 5 part 2 - the following main changes were introduced by this amendment: Addition of Exclusion Criterion 20 (patients with one of the following aetiologies as the underlying cause: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) secondary due to malignancy [e.g. cast-nephropathy, AL-amyloidosis], CKD secondary to infectious disease [e.g. hepatitis- or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated], autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease) as a clarification to ensure patients with certain causes of kidney disease, where sufficient benefit of this treatment was not expected, did not participate; Limitation of criterion for treatment discontinuation for patients with severe Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to those infections that ‘precluded their safe participation in the trial’ to avoid discontinuing trial treatment if it was deemed safe for patients to continue on treatment; Addition of ‘other anti-diabetic treatment (e.g. glucagon-Like Peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R) agonists)’ to restricted medications to consider that patients may have been on diabetic treatment due to broadening of inclusion criteria for diagnosis of CKD. This was added to align with restrictions on other anti-diabetic medications and allow treatment if on stable dose; Inclusion of a sentence allowing the option to complete unscheduled visits or visits outside visit window for exceptional home visits or telemedicine contacts in the case that COVID-19 or similar pandemic restrictions were in place, to allow more flexibility.
    15 Mar 2022
    Global amendment 6 - the following main change was introduced by this amendment: Modification of Exclusion Criterion 1 to exclude patients treated with NO donors including nitrates and inclusion of NO donors including nitrates as restricted medications, to ensure that no NO-sGC-cGMP pathway-activating drugs were administered due to possible synergistic effects with avenciguat.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes
    Date
    Interruption
    Restart date
    25 Feb 2022
    There was a temporary pause on site initiations and recruitment implemented on 25 Feb 2022 due to study drug resupply issues (not due to safety/efficacy reasons). Recruitment resumed in July 2022 - the pause was lifted in stages based on country and supply depot status with regards to investigational medicinal product (IMP).
    04 Jul 2022

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 09 20:20:13 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA