Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Early thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 (ETHIC trial): an open label, randomized phase IIIb trial of community-based prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) versus standard of care (no enoxaparin) in COVID-19 positive patients

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2020-003125-39
    Trial protocol
    BE   GB   DE  
    Global end of trial date
    30 Nov 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    13 Oct 2022
    First version publication date
    13 Oct 2022
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Clinical Study Report

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    TRI-08892
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04492254
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    TRI
    Sponsor organisation address
    1b Manresa Road , London, United Kingdom, SW3 6LR
    Public contact
    Clinical Operations Lead, Thrombosis Research Institute, +44 02031989898, afernandez@tri-london.ac.uk
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Operations Lead, Thrombosis Research Institute, +44 02031989898, afernandez@tri-london.ac.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    29 Jun 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    30 Nov 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To demonstrate the superiority of prophylactic enoxaparin compared to the current standard of care (no enoxaparin) in reducing hospital admission and/or death within 21 days of randomisation in symptomatic individuals with COVID-19 in a community setting
    Protection of trial subjects
    NA
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    25 Sep 2020
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 83
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Brazil: 36
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    South Africa: 30
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    India: 57
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    219
    EEA total number of subjects
    93
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    144
    From 65 to 84 years
    75
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    In the Screening phase patients will be reviewed in order to confirm that they meet inclusion and not exclusion criteria.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    219
    Number of subjects completed
    219

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Enrollment until day 21 (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Clexane
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Clexane

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Enoxaparine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    40mg once a day if IBM<100 or 40mg twice a day if IBM>100

    Arm title
    Standard of Care
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Standard of Care

    Investigational medicinal product name
    No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
    Number of subjects in period 1
    Clexane Standard of Care
    Started
    105
    114
    Completed
    98
    109
    Not completed
    7
    5
         Adverse event, serious fatal
    1
    1
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    4
    1
         Physician decision
    1
    3
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Clexane
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    Standard of Care
    Reporting group description
    -

    Primary: death or hospitalization to 21 days

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    death or hospitalization to 21 days
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    21 days from enrolment
    End point values
    Clexane Standard of Care
    Number of subjects analysed
    105
    114
    Units: hospitalisations and deaths
    105
    114
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary outcome of death or hospitalization to 21
    Statistical analysis description
    A log-rank test was used for statistical significance. Data were displayed using Kaplan-Meier curves by treatment. The unadjusted hazard ratio was calculated using a cox proportional hazards model.
    Comparison groups
    Clexane v Standard of Care
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    219
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 219
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From Day 0-enrolment until day 21
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    1
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: Non Serious Adverse Events are collected in the study so because of that none has bee registered

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes
    Date
    Interruption
    Restart date
    04 Oct 2021
    This letter is to inform you that on the 30th of September the Steering Committee of the ETHIC Study decided to terminate the study following a recommendation by the study Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) after reviewing the unblinded treatment-specific endpoint data. The Steering Committee requested the DSMB review the data because the average event rate (study end point) has been much lower than expected. The observed combined event rate across the treatment and control groups was 11.6% while the study design assumed a combined event rate of approximately 21%. With an event rate of 11.6% for the rest of the study, and assuming a 25% treatment effect, the study would require an increase in the sample size from 1370 to 2,930 in order to maintain the same level of statistical power. The DSMB found no treatment signal in the observed data and the futility probability (the probability that we will not be able to state a significant treatment difference given our current data) is 96%, which is very high. Enrolment is already behind target and with the impact of vaccination on enrolment rates, it is unlikely that the study will be able to achieve the required increased sample size in a feasible time scale. We would like to note the DSMB did not identify any safety concerns with bleeding and their recommendation was exclusively based on efficacy issues. Since the DSMB met, the ACTIV-4B trial results were published (JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.17272). This trial stopped after 657 of the intended 7000 (9%) patients were enrolled because the event rate was lower than expected. Thus our experience is not unique. After the publication of the ETHIC results, we will collaborate with the OVID study investigators on a meta-analysis of all outpatient thromboprophylaxis trials. The OVID trial is very similar in design to ETHIC so the combination of these two trials alone will provide important information to the field.
    -

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon Apr 29 14:16:13 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA