Clinical Trial Results:
Prospective phase II pilot study, assessing imaging performance of 89Zirconium-labelled Girentuximab (89Zr-TLX250) PET-CT in metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients
OPALESCENCE: zircon PET-CT imaging TLX metastatic triple Negative Cancer
|
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2020-003805-71 |
Trial protocol |
FR |
Global end of trial date |
13 Sep 2023
|
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Jul 2026
|
First version publication date |
08 Jul 2026
|
Other versions |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
|
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ICO-2020-25
|
||
|
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT04758780 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
|
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
INSTITUT DE CANCEROLOGIE DE L'OUEST
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Boulevard Jacques Monod, SAINT HERBLAIN, France, 44800
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Research Dept- Promotion R, INSTITUT DE CANCEROLOGIE DE L'OUEST, +33 240679900, promotionrc@ico.unicancer.fr
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Research Dept- Promotion R, INSTITUT DE CANCEROLOGIE DE L'OUEST, +33 2406799000, promotionrc@ico.unicancer.fr
|
||
|
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
|
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
13 Sep 2023
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
13 Sep 2023
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
13 Sep 2023
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
|
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess the concordance for tumor lesion detection using 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus a conventional 18FDG PET/CT scan where comparison will be made on a per lesion analysis basis
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
In order to ensure the protection of the rights, safety and well-being of trial subjects, this clinical trial was performed in compliance with the principles laid down in the declaration of Helsinki, good Clinical Practice and European regulation.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Not applicable | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Feb 2021
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Safety | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
3 Months | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
|
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 12
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
12
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
12
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
5
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
7
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
||
|
|||||||
|
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
The first patient signed the informed consent and was included on 21 SEP 2021. The last patient was included on 17 MAY 2023 | ||||||
|
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Patient with metatstatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). 12 patients have been screened and included in the trial. | ||||||
|
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
|
Arms
|
|||||||
|
Arm title
|
89Zr- Girentuximab (89Zr-TLX250) | ||||||
Arm description |
89Zr-TLX250 is administred on day 0. a whole body PET/CT scan is perormed on day 5 (+/-2). | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
89Zr-TLX250
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
89Zr- Girentuxima
|
||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in vial
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The mass dose of 89Zr-TLX250 to be used in this study will be 10 mg, labelled with 37 MBq (±10%) 89Zr per dose. Each patient will receive a single slow intravenous (IV) administration over a minimum of 3 minutes on Day 0 (after pre-dose assessments), at the nuclear medicine service of the respective study site. On D5 (± 2) days post administration of 89Zr-TLX250, a whole body PET/CT scan will be acquired from skull to mid-thigh using 6-8 bed positions with 10 minute acquisition time per bed position.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
89Zr- Girentuximab (89Zr-TLX250)
|
||
Reporting group description |
89Zr-TLX250 is administred on day 0. a whole body PET/CT scan is perormed on day 5 (+/-2). | ||
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Number of total lesions [1] | ||||||||||
End point description |
The number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT is reported to assess the concordance for tumor lesion detection using 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and 18FDG) PET/CT during the study period.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
5 days after 89Zr-TLX250 administration
|
||||||||||
| Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No inferential statistical analysis was planned for this endpoint. The results are presented descriptively as a comparison of the number of total lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Number of brain lesions [2] | ||||||||||
End point description |
Number of brain lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT.
The detection performance of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT for identifying brain lesions has been compared.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
5 days after 89Zr-TLX250 administration
|
||||||||||
| Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No inferential statistical analysis was planned for this endpoint. The results are presented descriptively as a comparison of the number of bone lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Number of breast lesions [3] | ||||||||||
End point description |
Number of breast lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
5 days aftre 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT administration
|
||||||||||
| Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No inferential statistical analysis was planned for this endpoint. The results are presented descriptively as a comparison of the number of lymph nodes lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Number of bone lesions [4] | ||||||||||
End point description |
Number of bone lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
5 days aftre 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT administration
|
||||||||||
| Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No inferential statistical analysis was planned for this endpoint. The results are presented descriptively as a comparison of the number of lung lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Number of lymph nodes lesions [5] | ||||||||||
End point description |
Number of lymph nodes lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
5 days aftre 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT administration
|
||||||||||
| Notes [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No inferential statistical analysis was planned for this endpoint. The results are presented descriptively as a comparison of the number of liver lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Number of lung lesions [6] | ||||||||||
End point description |
Number of lung lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
5 days aftre 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT administration
|
||||||||||
| Notes [6] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No inferential statistical analysis was planned for this endpoint. The results are presented descriptively as a comparison of the number of brain lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Number of liver lesions [7] | ||||||||||
End point description |
Number of liver lesions seen on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT will be reported in order to evaluate the sensitivity of 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT and on 18FDG PET/CT
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
5 days aftre 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT administration
|
||||||||||
| Notes [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No inferential statistical analysis was planned for this endpoint. The results are presented descriptively as a comparison of the number of breast lesions detected on 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT versus 18FDG PET/CT |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
concordance between 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT uptake and CAIX histological expression | ||||||||||
End point description |
Number of patients with a concordance between the 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT uptake and CAIX histological expression considered as positive or negative
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
5 days aftre 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT administration
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
30 days after 89Zr-TLX250 PET/CT administration
|
||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
All Adverse Events related to 89Zr-TLX250 are reported and assessed using CTCAE v5.0 scale
|
||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||
|
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||
Dictionary version |
10.0
|
||||||||||
|
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Safety of 89Zr-TLX250
|
||||||||||
Reporting group description |
safety data collected 30 days after 89Zr-TLX250 administration | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: No adverse events (serious or non-serious) and no deaths were reported during the study period. |
|||||||||||
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
21 Jun 2022 |
Extension of the recruitment period by 18 months and amendment of an inclusion criterion. Transmission of patients safety data. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
| Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
| None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41174094 |
|||