Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2020-003971-16
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:FEMODRIC
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2021-09-01
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2020-003971-16
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A randomised, double-blind, comparative clinical trial of the effectiveness and tolerability of fentanyl in continuous parenteral perfusion versus on-demand bolus of morphine for the treatment of refractory dyspnoea in patients hospitalised for acute decompensation of heart failure.
    Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego, comparativo de la efectividad y la tolerabilidad de fentanilo en perfusión parenteral continua versus morfina en bolus parenteral a demanda, para el tratamiento de la disnea refractaria en los pacientes hospitalizados por descompensación aguda de insuficiencia cardíaca
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of fentanyl in continuous infusion versus on demand morphine in patients with heart failure
    Ensayo clínico para evaluar la eficacia y tolerabilidad de fentanilo en infusión continua versus morfina a demanda en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberFEMODRIC
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorFundació Assistencial Mútua Terrassa
    B.1.3.4CountrySpain
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportFundació Assistencial Mútua Terrassa
    B.4.2CountrySpain
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationFundació de recerca Mútua Terrassa
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointAdministrative clinical trial desk
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressStreet/ Sant Antoni 19
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityTerrassa
    B.5.3.3Post code08221
    B.5.3.4CountrySpain
    B.5.4Telephone number+34937365050
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name FENTANEST 0,05 mg/ml SOLUCION INYECTABLE , 5 ampollas de 3 ml
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderKERN PHARMA, S.L.
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationSpain
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    Subcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNFENTANYL
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameFENTANYL
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB07597MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number0,05
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboInfusion
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSubcutaneous use
    D.8 Placebo: 2
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboInfusion
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboIntravenous use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Refractory dyspnoea in patients hospitalised for acute decompensation of heart failure
    Disnea refractaria en pacientes hospitalizados por descompensación de insuficiencia cardíaca
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Drowning from decompensated heart failure
    Ahogo por descompensación del fallo cardíaco
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Cardiovascular Diseases [C14]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of fentanyl in continuous parenteral infusion, compared to morphine administration in bolus on demand, for the treatment of refractory dyspnoea in patients hospitalized for acute decompensation of heart failure.
    Evaluar la efectividad y la tolerabilidad del fentanilo en perfusión contínua, comparada con la administración de morfina en bolus a demanda, para el tratamiento de la disnea refractaria en pacientes hospitalizados por descompensación aguda de insuficiencia cardíaca.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Not applicable
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. 18 years or more.
    2. Hospitalized at the Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa in the internal medicine unit and complex chronic patient unit, due to decompensation of the heart failure, of any etiology. Patients may be included only once in each hospital admission; in case of re-admission for the same reason they may be included again.
    3. In optimized treatment of their heart failure decompensation at the discretion of the responsible physician .
    4. Persists with refractory dyspnea despite treatment.
    5. Patient has received two or more doses of 3mg of subcutaneous morphine on demand for dyspnea in the previous 24 hours, by indication of the responsible physician.
    6. The patient gives informed consent attesting to his correct understanding of the purposes and procedures of the study and his willingness to voluntarily participate in the study. In the event that the patient, due to his/her personal conditions or clinical situation, is unable to give consent, the family member or primary caregiver of reference will receive the explanations and give consent.
    7. It is expected that the patient will be able to complete the questionnaires on the efficacy and tolerability of the drugs administered. Otherwise, it is expected that the family member or primary caregiver of reference may complete these questionnaires.
    1. Edad igual o superior a 18 años.
    2. Hospitalizado en el Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa en las unidades de medicina interna y unidad de paciente crónico complejo, por descompensación de la insuficiencia cardíaca, de cualquier etiología. Los pacientes podrán ser incluidos en una sola ocasión en cada ingreso hospitalario; en caso de reingreso por el mismo motivo podrán ser incluidos de nuevo.
    3. En tratamiento optimizado de su descompensación de insuficiencia cardíaca a criterio del médico especialista responsable del caso.
    4. Persiste con disnea refractaria a pesar del tratamiento.
    5. Ha recibido dos o más dosis de 3mg de morfina subcuatánea a demanda por disnea en las 24 horas previas, por indicación de su médico responsable.
    6. El paciente otorga su consentimiento informado que atestigua su correcta comprensión de los propósitos y los procedimientos del estudio y su deseo de participar voluntariamente en el mismo. En caso que el paciente, por sus condiciones personales o por la situación clínica, no pueda otorgar el consentimiento será el familiar o el cuidador principal de referencia quien reciba las explicaciones y otorgue el consentimiento.
    7. Se prevé que el paciente podrá completar los cuestionarios sobre la eficacia y tolerabilidad de los fármacos administrados. En caso contrario, se prevé que el familiar o el cuidador principal de referencia podrá completar dichos cuestionarios.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1. History of alcohol or drug abuse
    2. Allergy to fentanyl or morphine
    3. Contraindication for the use of opioids: Known hypersensitivity to morphine. Patients with respiratory depression or severe obstructive respiratory disease. Patients with acute bronchial asthma. Patients treated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors or during the 14 days following the suspension of such treatment. Patients with acute and/or severe liver disease. Patients with head injury; increased intracranial pressure. Patients in coma. Patients with spasms of the renal and biliary tract. Patients with acute alcoholism. Patients at risk of paralytic ileus. Patients with ulcerative colitis. Patients in states of shock. In case of infection at the injection site and in patients with severe coagulation disorders, administration by epidural or intrathecal route is contraindicated.
    4. Concomitant treatment with opioids for other causes.
    5. Simultaneous participation in another study or clinical trial.
    6. Grade C liver disease (Child-Pugh score > 12.5)
    7. Concomitant use of drugs that can alter fentanyl concentrations such as cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors and inducers (CYP3A4).
    Inhibitors: amiodarone, cimetidine, clarithromycin, diltiazem, erythromycin, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, nefazodone, ritonavir, verapamil and voriconazole.
    Inducers: carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and rifampicin.
    8. The risk of mortality in the next 48 hours is considered high.
    9. The patient refuses informed consent.
    10. The patient is unable to give consent and the family member or primary caregiver referral is unable to give consent or refuses consent.
    11. Patients in whom the physician responsible for the patient during his/her hospitalization considers that they should not enter the study, either because they believe that the administration of opioids in continuous perfusion is indicated or contraindicated, or for any other reason. These patients will not be randomized, although they will be asked for informed consent to collect their data, including the various scales that will be passed on to the rest of the patients included.
    1. Antecedentes de abuso de alcohol o drogas.
    2. Alergia a fentanilo o morfina
    3. Contraindicación para el uso de opioides: Hipersensibilidad conocida a la morfina. Pacientes con depresión respiratoria o enfermedad respiratoria obstructiva grave. Pacientes con asma bronquial agudo. Pacientes tratados con inhibidores de la monoaminooxidasa o durante los 14 días siguientes a la suspensión del tal tratamiento. Pacientes con enfermedad hepática aguda y/o grave. Pacientes con lesión craneal; aumento de la presión intracraneal. Pacientes en coma. Pacientes con espasmos del tracto renal y biliar. Pacientes con alcoholismo agudo. Pacientes en riesgo de íleo paralítico. Pacientes con colitis ulcerosa. Pacientes en estados de shock. En caso de infección en el lugar de inyección y en pacientes con alteraciones graves de la coagulación, la administración por vía epidural o intratecal está contraindicada.
    4. Tratamiento concomitante con opioides por otras causas.
    5. Participación simultánea en otro estudio o ensayo clínico.
    6. Enfermedad hepática grado C (puntuación Child-Pugh > 12.5)
    7. Uso concomitante de fármacos que pueden alterar las concentraciones de fentanilo como los inhibidores e inductores del citocromo P450 3A4 (CYP3A4).
    Inhibidores: amiodarona, cimetidina, claritromicina, diltiazem, eritromicina, fluconazol, itraconazol, ketoconazol, nefazodona, ritonavir, verapamilo y voriconazol.
    Inductores: carbamazepina, fenobarbital, fenitoína y rifampicina.
    8. Se considera que el riesgo de mortalidad en las siguientes 48 horas es alto.
    9. El paciente niega el consentimiento informado.
    10. El paciente no puede otorgar el consentimiento y el familiar o el cuidador principal de referencia tampoco lo puede otorgar o niega el consentimiento.
    11. Pacientes en los que el médico responsable del paciente durante su hospitalización considere que no deban entrar en el estudio, bien porque crean indicada o contraindicada la administración de opioides en perfusión continua o por cualquier otra causa. Estos pacientes no serán aleatorizados, aunque se les pedirá un consentimiento informado para recoger sus datos, incluyendo las diversas escalas que se pasarán al resto de los pacientes incluidos.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Decrease in the average daily intensity of dyspnea, is the main criterion of effectiveness. The intensity of the dyspnea is evaluated by the patient himself by means of a Numerical Analogical Scale (ENA) and a Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) of dyspnea. The effectiveness of the treatment is evaluated by comparing the ANE and VAS of dyspnea in the first evaluation or 0h with the ANE and VAS of dyspnea in the following consecutive evaluations or 24h, 48h and 72h. We consider clinically significant improvement the decrease of 2 points or more in the ANE, or 20mm or more in the VAS, or 30% or more in the ANE and VAS score.
    Disminución de la intensidad diaria promedio de disnea, es el criterio principal de eficacia. La intensidad de la disnea la evalúa el propio paciente mediante una Escala Numérica Analógica (ENA) y una Escala Visual Analógica (EVA) de disnea. La eficacia del tratamiento se evalúa comparando las ENA y EVA de disnea en la primera evaluación o 0h con las ENA y EVA de disnea en las siguientes evaluaciones consecutivas o 24h, 48h y 72h. Consideramos mejoría clínicamente significativa la disminución de 2 puntos o más en la ENA, o de 20mm o más en la EVA, o de un 30% o más en la puntuación ENA y EVA.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    24 hours, 48 hours and 72h. After treatment discontinuation a follow-up will be performed every 24 hours for 5 days
    24 h, 48 h i 72 horas. Al finalizar el tratamiento farmacológico se realizará un seguimiento cada 24 horas durante 5 días
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    A- Improvement of punctuation in the dyspnea-12 scale
    B- Improvement of the patient's general condition. The patient evaluates his/her general condition using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and the Patient Global Improvement Impression Scale (PGIC-I for the patient); see the end of this section. The reference clinician also evaluates the change in the patient's overall condition using the Clinician's Global Improvement Impression Scale (CGIC-I for the clinician); see the end of this section. We consider clinically significant changes of 2 points or more, or 30% or more, in each of the AES that make up the ESAS, or 30% or more of the average total score of the ESAS, or 1 point or more in the ICG (59). We expect to find significant correlation between changes in the ENA and changes in the GIC. We also expect to find significant correlation between the PGIC and the CGIC.
    C- Decrease in the number of doses of rescue medication (3mg morphine sc)
    D- Absence of neurological toxicity by opioids. Opioid neurological toxicity is understood to be the appearance of nausea and/or drowsiness, and is determined by the patient him/herself by means of ANA and EVA of both symptoms. Neurological toxicity is evaluated by comparing the EVA and EVA of nausea and somnolence in the first evaluation with the ENA and EVA of the following consecutive evaluations or 24h, 48h and 72h. Increase of 2 points or more in the ANE, or 20mm or more in the EVA, or 30% or more in the ANE or EVA score will be interpreted as development of opioid neurological toxicity.
    E- Absence of intestinal toxicity. The presence of intestinal toxicity is determined by the physician of the research team through abdominal auscultation, evaluating the intestinal sounds as normal, increased, decreased or absent; to conclude absence of intestinal sounds, auscultation should last three minutes.
    F- Absence of other adverse events
    G- That the interruption of treatment due to lack of efficacy or adverse effects is minimal or non-existent.
    A- Mejora en la puntuación de la escala Disnea-12
    B- Mejora del estado general de paciente. El paciente evalúa su estado general mediante el Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) y la escala de impresión de mejoría global del paciente (PGIC-I para el paciente); ver al final de este apartado. El clínico de referencia también evalúa el cambio del estado general del paciente mediante la escala de impresión de mejoría global del clínico (CGIC-I para el clínico); ver al final de este apartado. Consideramos que son clínicamente significativos cambios de 2 puntos o más, o de un 30% o más, en cada una de las ENA que conforman la ESAS, o bien un 30% o más de la puntuación total media de la ESAS, o bien 1 punto o más en el GIC (59). Esperamos encontrar correlación significativa entre los cambios en el ENA y los cambios en el GIC. También esperamos encontrar correlación significativa entre el PGIC y el CGIC.
    C- Disminución del número de dosis de la medicación de rescates (3mg morfina sc).
    D- Ausencia de toxicidad neurológica por opioides. La toxicidad neurológica opioide se entiende por la aparición de náuseas y/o somnolencia, y la determina el propio paciente mediante ENA y EVA de ambos síntomas. La toxicidad neurológica se evalúa comparando las EVA y EVA de náuseas y somnolencia en la primera evaluación con las ENA y EVA de las siguientes evaluaciones consecutivas o 24h, 48h y 72h. Aumento de 2 puntos o más en la ENA, o 20mm o más en la EVA, o de un 30% o más en la puntuación ENA o EVA serán interpretados como desarrollo de toxicidad neurológica opioide.
    E- Ausencia de toxicidad intestinal. La presencia de toxicidad intestinal la determina el médico del equipo investigador mediante la auscultación abdominal, evaluando los ruidos intestinales como normales, aumentados, disminuidos o ausentes; para concluir ausencia de ruidos intestinales la auscultación debe durar tres minutos.
    F- Ausencia de otros acontecimientos adversos.
    G- Que la interrupción del tratamiento por falta de eficacia o por efectos adversos sea mínima o nulo.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    24 hours, 48 hours and 72h. After treatment discontinuation a follow-up will be performed every 24 hours for 5 days
    24 h, 48 h i 72 horas. Al finalizar el tratamiento farmacológico se realizará un seguimiento cada 24 horas durante 5 días
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years3
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years3
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 4
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 36
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation Yes
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally Yes
    F.3.3.6.1Details of subjects incapable of giving consent
    In the event that the patient, due to his/her personal conditions or the clinical situation, cannot give consent, the family member or primary caregiver of reference will be the one to receive the explanations and give consent.
    En caso que el paciente, por sus condiciones personales o por la situación clínica, no pueda otorgar el consentimiento será el familiar o el cuidador principal de referencia quien reciba las explicaciones y otorgue el consentimiento.
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state40
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2021-06-07
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2021-06-04
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 04 05:31:01 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA