Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A multicentre, randomized, open label clinical trial for the safety evaluation of a short dose escalation scheme using one strength for allergen immunotherapy with an aluminium-hydroxide adsorbed native allergen preparation of house dust mite allergens in adult and adolescent patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2020-004328-41
    Trial protocol
    DE   PL  
    Global end of trial date
    14 Jul 2022

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    12 Mar 2023
    First version publication date
    12 Mar 2023
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    AL0001nh
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG
    Sponsor organisation address
    Hermann-Körner-Straße 52, Reinbek, Germany, 21465
    Public contact
    Clinical Project Leader, Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG, +49 40727650, clinicaltrials@allergopharma.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Project Leader, Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG, +49 40727650, clinicaltrials@allergopharma.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    Yes
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    25 Aug 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    14 Jul 2022
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    14 Jul 2022
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The main objective of this therapeutic phase II trial was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of an accelerated high dose escalation scheme with one strength for allergen immunotherapy with NHD D.p./D.f. 50%/50% compared to the standard escalation scheme involving 3 strengths. Adults and adolescents with rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis triggered by house dust mite allergens, with or without allergic asthma on a well controlled level, were enrolled. The trial consisted of a dose escalation phase (T1 to T6) for the accelerated dose escalation (One Strength) or (T1 to T14) for the standard dose escalation (Standard). Maintenance treatment phase T7-T8 (One Strength) and T15-T16 (Standard), and a follow-up phase of 14-28 days after the last IMP (final visit [FV]). The whole treatment duration (escalation + maintenance phase) lasted for approx. 16 weeks and 24 weeks, respectively, for the two treatment groups. Data are presented as subgroups: Adults and adolescents per treatment group.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The trial was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and are consistent with the International Conference on Harmonization of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use (ICH) guidance for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the applicable regulatory requirements. Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB ) was in place throughout the trial; DSMB consisted of 3 independent physicians, experienced in the field of allergy. The primary function of the DSMB was to ensure the subjects’ safety. At the beginning of the trial, only adult patients were included. After 15 adult patients of the One Strength group completed their dose escalation phase and reached the maximum tolerated dose, the DSMB assessed safety and tolerability of the One Strength dose escalation and concluded on an acceptable safety profile for adults with no objections against the enrollment of adolescent patients. Only after this favorable opinion of the DSMB, enrollment and randomization of adolescents was started. During the further course of the trial, the DSMB team reviewed an update of the safety data from all treated patients. After each administration of the IMP, each patient in the study was kept under supervision of a qualified and trained investigator for at least 120 min. Safety evaluation during supervision after IMP administration consisted of: FEV1, Systolic BP, Diastolic BP, Heart rate (Pulse rate), Respiratory rate. Other than routine care, no specific measures were implemented for the protection of trial subjects.
    Background therapy
    There was no background therapy planned in this trial. Concomitant medication was defined as any medication other than the IMP that was taken during the clinical trial. Any relevant medication taken before entering the clinical trial was considered as “previous medication”. All anti-allergic medication administered in the last 2 years and other medication used during the last 6 weeks prior to enrollment to the trial had to be documented at the screening visit. Medication against rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis was permitted, but had to be documented as concomitant medication. Patients with bronchial asthma who required regular basic treatment of their allergic asthma were treated as recommended by GINA (GINA, 2020) to control their asthma. Any asthma medication had to be documented as concomitant medication. Restricted medication and nonpermitted medications were clearly defined in the trial protocol.
    Evidence for comparator
    There was no comparator used in this trial. Abbreviations used in this document: AE=Adverse event AIT=Allergen immunotherapy BP=Blood pressure bpm=Beats per minute D.f. = Dermatophagoides farinae D.p. = Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus DSMB=Data Safety Monitoring Board FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in 1 second GINA=Global Initiative for Asthma ICF=Informed consent form IgE = Immunoglobulin E IgG=Immunoglobulin G kU/L=kilo Units per Litre IMP=Investigational medicinal product IS=Injection site MedDRA=Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities RBC=Red blood cells T=Treatment (as in T1 =Treatment visit 1, etc.) TEAE=Treatment-emergent adverse event TU=Therapeutic units WAO=World Allergy Organization y=year
    Actual start date of recruitment
    24 Jun 2021
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 176
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 8
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    184
    EEA total number of subjects
    184
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    83
    Adults (18-64 years)
    101
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Overall, 184 male and female patients (11 to ≤ 65 y) were screened for eligibility; of these, 143 were randomised to treatment according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria and 142 were actually treated with IMP (75 patients in the One Strength group and 67 patients in the Standard group).

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Trial patients (outpatients) were included if they were suffering from immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated moderate to severe allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without allergic asthma, triggered by house dust mite (HDM) allergens documented by skin prick test (SPT) wheal for HDM and specific IgE value of ≥ 0.70 kU/L to HDM.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Treatment (Overall trial) (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    One Strength
    Arm description
    Patients randomized to the 'One Strength' dose escalation scheme received 6 injections with one strength of the IMP (strength 3: 5,000 therapeutic units [TU]/mL), followed by 2 injections with the maximum recommended dose (5,000 TU). Duration of the treatment was approximately 16 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Novo-Helisen Depot house dust mite mixture allergen preparation [NHD (D.p./D.f.)]
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    IMP is an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed allergen preparation of house dust mites (D.p.:D.f. /50:50% by volume). IMP was available in 3 concentrations (strength 1: 50 TU/mL; 2: 500 TU/mL; 3: 5,000 TU/mL). In the One Strength group, only strength 3 (5,000 TU/mL) was used. IMP was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm. Doses were escalated once every 7 days in 6 steps in the One Strength group: (250; 500; 1,000; 2,000; 3,000; 5,000 TU). Maintenance 2 weeks after last dose: 5,000 TU, then 4 weeks after last dose: 5,000 TU. Patients had to demonstrate an FEV1 of at least 70% of predicted normal ranges before injection, otherwise no injection was to be given and the visit was rescheduled. If the FEV1 decreased after injection compared with the value measured before injection, the investigator checked whether an AE occurred that needed documentation and medical treatment. In this group, 80.0% of patients reached the 1st IMP injection of the maintenance phase without dose adjustment.

    Arm title
    Standard
    Arm description
    Patients randomized to the 'Standard' dose escalation scheme received 14 injections with 3 different strengths of the IMP (strength 1: 50 TU/mL; 2: 500 TU/mL; 3: 5,000 TU/mL), followed by 2 injections with the maximum recommended dose (5,000 TU). Duration of the treatment was approximately 24 weeks.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Novo-Helisen Depot house dust mite mixture allergen preparation [NHD (D.p./D.f.)]
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    IMP is an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed allergen preparation of house dust mites (D.p.:D.f. /50:50% by volume). IMP was available in 3 concentrations (1: 50 TU/mL; 2: 500 TU/mL; 3: 5,000 TU/mL). In the Standard group, all strengths were used. IMP was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm. Doses were escalated once every 7 days in 14 steps in the Standard group: (5; 10; 20; 40; 50; 100; 200; 400; 500; 1,000; 2,000; 3,000; 4,000; 5,000 TU). Maintenance 2 weeks after last dose: 5,000 TU, then 4 weeks after last dose: 5,000 TU. Patients had to demonstrate an FEV1 of at least 70% of predicted normal ranges before injection, otherwise no injection was to be given and the visit was rescheduled. If the FEV1 decreased after injection compared with the value measured before injection, the investigator checked whether an AE occurred that needed documentation and medical treatment. In this group, 85.1% of patients reached the 1st IMP injection of the maintenance phase without dose adjustment

    Number of subjects in period 1 [1]
    One Strength Standard
    Started
    75
    67
    Completed
    70
    62
    Not completed
    5
    5
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    -
    2
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    4
    2
         Lost to follow-up
    -
    1
         Sponsor/DSMB decision
    1
    -
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: The number of patients enrolled worldwide includes screening failures (i.e. patients that signed the informed consent form, but were not randomized; N=41) and patients that were randomized, but never treated (N= 1). The number of patients in the baseline period equals the number of patients who were actually treated with IMP (= number of patients in the safety set, which was used for all analyses of this trial).

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    One Strength
    Reporting group description
    Patients randomized to the 'One Strength' dose escalation scheme received 6 injections with one strength of the IMP (strength 3: 5,000 therapeutic units [TU]/mL), followed by 2 injections with the maximum recommended dose (5,000 TU). Duration of the treatment was approximately 16 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Standard
    Reporting group description
    Patients randomized to the 'Standard' dose escalation scheme received 14 injections with 3 different strengths of the IMP (strength 1: 50 TU/mL; 2: 500 TU/mL; 3: 5,000 TU/mL), followed by 2 injections with the maximum recommended dose (5,000 TU). Duration of the treatment was approximately 24 weeks.

    Reporting group values
    One Strength Standard Total
    Number of subjects
    75 67 142
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adolescents (12 to < 18 y)
    33 30 63
        Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y)
    42 37 79
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    25.1 ( 13.3 ) 23.9 ( 11.3 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    39 27 66
        Male
    36 40 76
    Ethnic group
    Units: Subjects
        White
    75 67 142
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y), randomized to and treated according to One Strength dose escaltion scheme

    Subject analysis set title
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y), randomized to and treated according to Standard dose escaltion scheme

    Subject analysis set title
    Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) randomized to and treated according to the One Strength dose escalation scheme

    Subject analysis set title
    Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) randomized to and treated according to the Standard dose escalation scheme

    Subject analysis sets values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects
    42
    37
    33
    30
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adolescents (12 to < 18 y)
    0
    0
    33
    30
        Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y)
    42
    37
    0
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    33.4 ( 12.4 )
    31.5 ( 10.2 )
    14.5 ( 1.8 )
    14.7 ( 1.6 )
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    25
    18
    14
    9
        Male
    17
    19
    19
    21
    Ethnic group
    Units: Subjects
        White
    42
    37
    33
    30

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    One Strength
    Reporting group description
    Patients randomized to the 'One Strength' dose escalation scheme received 6 injections with one strength of the IMP (strength 3: 5,000 therapeutic units [TU]/mL), followed by 2 injections with the maximum recommended dose (5,000 TU). Duration of the treatment was approximately 16 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Standard
    Reporting group description
    Patients randomized to the 'Standard' dose escalation scheme received 14 injections with 3 different strengths of the IMP (strength 1: 50 TU/mL; 2: 500 TU/mL; 3: 5,000 TU/mL), followed by 2 injections with the maximum recommended dose (5,000 TU). Duration of the treatment was approximately 24 weeks.

    Subject analysis set title
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y), randomized to and treated according to One Strength dose escaltion scheme

    Subject analysis set title
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y), randomized to and treated according to Standard dose escaltion scheme

    Subject analysis set title
    Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) randomized to and treated according to the One Strength dose escalation scheme

    Subject analysis set title
    Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) randomized to and treated according to the Standard dose escalation scheme

    Primary: 1_Treament emergent adverse events - Overall

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    1_Treament emergent adverse events - Overall [1]
    End point description
    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an IMP, whether or not related to the IMP. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE that started or worsened after the first use of trial medication until 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure. Results in the table below summarize the number of patients affected by a TEAE; the number of the respective events (n) is also shown. The TEAEs (as System Organ Class and as Preferred Term) are listed under the section 'Adverse events'.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure. Approx. 16 weeks for patients in One Strength and 24 weeks for patients in Standard treatment group
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This was a safety-focused trial. No statistical analysis was performed. Results were evaluated descriptively.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [2]
    37 [3]
    33 [4]
    30 [5]
    Units: Patients with at least one event
        1_Patients with TEAE
    23
    21
    18
    12
        2_Patients with serious TEAE
    1
    0
    2
    0
        3_Patients with TEAEs related to IMP
    19
    10
    10
    5
        4_Patients with TEAE leading to discontinuation
    2
    1
    2
    1
    Notes
    [2] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups 1_n=211 2_n=1 3_n=132 4_n=2
    [3] - 1_n=142 2_n=0 3_n=73 4_n=1
    [4] - 1_n=84 2_n=2 3_n=41 4_n=2
    [5] - 1_n=46 2_n=0 3_n=7 4_n=1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: 2_Treatment emergent adverse events - Maximum intensity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    2_Treatment emergent adverse events - Maximum intensity [6]
    End point description
    A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE that started or worsened after the first use of trial medication until 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure. The intensity of the TEAE was assessed by the the investigator. Mild=Transient symptoms, no interference with the patient’s daily activities. Moderate=Marked symptoms, moderate interference with the patient’s daily activities. Severe=Considerable interference with the patient’s daily activities.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    Notes
    [6] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This was a safety-focused trial. No statistical analysis was performed. Results were evaluated descriptively.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [7]
    37
    33
    30
    Units: Patients with maximum event intensity
        Mild
    17
    17
    10
    5
        Moderate
    6
    4
    5
    6
        Severe
    0
    0
    3
    1
    Notes
    [7] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: 3_Treatment emergent adverse events - Causal Relationship (IMP-related)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    3_Treatment emergent adverse events - Causal Relationship (IMP-related) [8]
    End point description
    TEAEs - causal relationship to IMP. Results in the table below show the number of subjects with at least one TEAE related to IMP, as assessed by the investigator. The number of the respective events (n) is also shown. The actual number of TEAEs are listed under the section 'Adverse events'. Most of the related TEAEs were mild in intensity in both treatment groups (>95% adults and >75% adolescent). Related TEAEs experienced by more than 2 patients per age group were: Injection site (IS) swelling, IS erythema, IS pruritus, IS pain, IS oedema, Hypersensitivity and Arthralgia.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    Notes
    [8] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This was a safety-focused trial. No statistical analysis was performed. Results were evaluated descriptively.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [9]
    37 [10]
    33 [11]
    30 [12]
    Units: Patients with at least one event
        1_Patients with TEAEs related to IMP
    19
    10
    10
    5
        2_Patients with serious TEAEs related to IMP
    1
    0
    2
    0
    Notes
    [9] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups 1_n=132 2_n=1
    [10] - 1_n=73 2_n=0
    [11] - 1_n=41 2_n=2
    [12] - 1_n=7 2_n=0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 4_Treatment emergent adverse events - Systemic allergic reactions related to IMP according to WAO

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    4_Treatment emergent adverse events - Systemic allergic reactions related to IMP according to WAO
    End point description
    Systemic allergic reaction related to IMP: TEAE were graded by the investigator according to the WAO grading system, which is based on the organ systems involved and the severity of the reaction. Dose reductions for systemic reactions acc. to WAO : • Grade 1: reduction by 1 dose step of the last applied dose. • Grade 2: reduction by 2 dose steps of the last applied dose. • Grade 3: patient must have been withdrawn from the trial. For WAO Grade 1 and WAO Grade 2: if the 1st dose reduction was not tolerated, a 2nd dose reduction by 1 dose step of the last applied dose was administered. All 19 systemic allergic reactions were assessed by the investigator as IMP-related. Adults: Hypersensitivity, Rhinorrhoea, Cough, FEV1 decreased, Dizziness, Dermatitis atopic, Urticaria; Adolescents: Anaphylactic reaction, Hypersensitivity, FEV1 decreased, Dyspnoea, Erythema. Intensity: mild: 9, moderate: 7, severe: 3. 3 systemic allergic reaction were serious adverse events (adults: 1; adolescents: 2).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [13]
    37
    33
    30
    Units: Systemic TEAEs related to IMP
        Grade 1
    5
    5
    2
    1
        Grade 2
    3
    0
    1
    1
        Grade 3
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Notes
    [13] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 5_Treatment emergent adverse events - Local reactions related to IMP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    5_Treatment emergent adverse events - Local reactions related to IMP
    End point description
    Treatment-emergent adverse event - Local reactions. Results in the table below summarize the number of subjects affected by TEAEs 'local reactions', that were assessed by the investigators as related to the IMP. The number of the respective events (n) is also shown. Local reactions related to IMP were: Adults: Injection site (IS) erythema, IS oedema, IS pain, IS pruritus, IS swelling, IS induration, IS papule, IS warmth, Arthralgia, Pain in extremity, Fine moter skill dysfunction; Adolescents: IS erythema, IS pain, IS pruritus, IS swelling, IS oedema, IS rash, Arthralgia, Pain in extremity, Peripheral swelling.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [14]
    37 [15]
    33 [16]
    30 [17]
    Units: Patients with at least one event
    19
    9
    8
    4
    Notes
    [14] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups n=114
    [15] - n=65
    [16] - n=35
    [17] - n=5
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 6_Numer of patients reaching the maintenance period without dose adjustment due to TEAE

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    6_Numer of patients reaching the maintenance period without dose adjustment due to TEAE
    End point description
    Number of patients reaching the maintenance period without dose adjustment due to TEAE. The start of the maintenance period was defined as the second injection of the maximum tolerated dose of IMP (5,000 TU = M1). Patients not reaching the maintenance period without dose adjustments due to other reasons (such as visit window deviations) are not respected here.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [18]
    37
    33
    30
    Units: Number of patients
    35
    36
    29
    28
    Notes
    [18] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 7_Vital signs - Heart rate (Pulse rate)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    7_Vital signs - Heart rate (Pulse rate)
    End point description
    Vital signs (BP, heart rate, resp. rate) were assessed at: screening, during treatment visits / any unscheduled visit, and at the final visit. Vital signs are summarized by a representative parameter Heart rate (Pulse rate). Results are shown as the change from pre- to 30 min post administration of IMP on the first- (T1), last (regular) dose escalation visit (T6/T14), and last maintenance visit (T8/T16 = M2). The number of patients missing at each visit is also shown.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At IMP treatment visits (dose escalation and maintenance phase): before and 30/120 min after administration.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [19]
    37 [20]
    33 [21]
    30 [22]
    Units: bpm
    median (full range (min-max))
        T1 First escalation dose
    -2.0 (-18 to 10)
    -2.0 (-14 to 10)
    -1.0 (-7 to 12)
    -2.0 (-14 to 4)
        T6/T14 Last escalation dose
    -2.5 (-15 to 11)
    0.0 (-9 to 6)
    -1.0 (-10 to 20)
    -0.5 (-8 to 19)
        M2 Last maintenance dose
    -1.0 (-11 to 2)
    -1.0 (-12 to 10)
    -1.0 (-8 to 4)
    0.0 (-26.0 to 6)
    Notes
    [19] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups missings: T6=2; M2=3
    [20] - missings: T14=4; M2=4
    [21] - missings: T6=1; M2=2
    [22] - missings: M2=1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 8_Lung function test - FEV1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    8_Lung function test - FEV1
    End point description
    Subjects had to demonstrate FEV1 of at least 70% of predicted normal ranges before IMP injection, otherwise no injection was given and the visit was rescheduled. If the FEV1 decreased after injection compared to the value measured before injection, the investigator checked if an AE had to be documented and adequate medical treatment initiated. An FEV1 decrease of ≥ 20% after injection as compared to the value measured before injection, was documented as an AE. Results shown are representative for the study visits at the first escalation dose visit (T1), at the last (regular) dose escalation dose (T6/T14), and at the last maintenance dose visit (T8/T16 = M2); before and 30 min after injection of IMP. The number of patients missing at each visit is also shown. Neither for adults nor for adolescents systematic differences were detected between groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At IMP treatment visits (dose escalation and maintenance phase): before and 30/120 min after administration.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [23]
    37 [24]
    33 [25]
    30 [26]
    Units: measured values (L/s)
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        T1 First escalation dose, before IMP
    3.435 ( 0.763 )
    3.591 ( 0.721 )
    3.515 ( 0.812 )
    3.596 ( 0.918 )
        T1 First escalation dose, 30 min after IMP
    3.381 ( 0.773 )
    3.590 ( 0.706 )
    3.563 ( 0.817 )
    3.582 ( 0.957 )
        T6/T14 Last escalation dose, before IMP
    3.453 ( 0.732 )
    3.517 ( 0.824 )
    3.599 ( 0.821 )
    3.671 ( 0.855 )
        T6/T14 Last escalation dose, 30 min after IMP
    3.440 ( 0.745 )
    3.512 ( 0.820 )
    3.593 ( 0.857 )
    3.641 ( 0.826 )
        M2 Last maintenance dose, before IMP
    3.547 ( 0.734 )
    3.584 ( 0.813 )
    3.726 ( 0.866 )
    3.726 ( 0.841 )
        M2 Last maintenance dose, 30 min after IMP
    3.479 ( 0.716 )
    3.577 ( 0.834 )
    3.700 ( 0.876 )
    3.717 ( 0.885 )
    Notes
    [23] - missings: T6=2; M2=3
    [24] - missings: T14=4; M2=4
    [25] - missings: T6=1; M2=2
    [26] - missings: M2=1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 9a_Tolerability: Likert scale at Final Visit - Investigator

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    9a_Tolerability: Likert scale at Final Visit - Investigator
    End point description
    Assessment of the overall tolerability by the investigator using a 5-point Likert scale. Likert scale score system: 1=Very bad; 2=Bad; 3=Average; 4=Good; 5=Very good. Table below shows the number of patients in each tolerability category of the Likert scale, as assessed by the investigator. The majority of investigators (> 95%) assessed tolerability as 'good' or 'very good'. All patients with assessment 'bad' or 'average' prematurely terminated the trial due to IMP-related TEAEs.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Tolerability assessment of the entire trial period at Final Visit.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [27]
    37
    33
    30
    Units: Number of patients
        Missing
    0
    2
    0
    0
        Very Bad
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Bad
    2
    0
    0
    0
        Average
    0
    0
    2
    1
        Good
    5
    3
    0
    0
        Very Good
    35
    32
    31
    29
    Notes
    [27] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 9b_Tolerability: Likert scale at Final Visit - Patient

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    9b_Tolerability: Likert scale at Final Visit - Patient
    End point description
    Assessment of the overall tolerability by the patient using a 5-point Likert scale. Likert scale score system: 1=Very bad; 2=Bad; 3=Average; 4=Good; 5=Very good. Table below shows the number of patients in each tolerability category of the Likert scale, as assessed by the patient. The majority of patients (> 95%) assessed tolerability as 'good' or 'very good'. All patients with assessment 'very bad', 'bad' or 'average' prematurely terminated the trial due to IMP-related TEAEs.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Tolerability assessment of the entire trial period at Final Visit.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [28]
    37
    33
    30
    Units: Number of patients
        Missing
    0
    2
    0
    0
        Very Bad
    1
    0
    0
    1
        Bad
    1
    1
    0
    0
        Average
    0
    0
    2
    0
        Good
    6
    4
    2
    5
        Very Good
    34
    30
    29
    24
    Notes
    [28] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 10a_Treatment emergent adverse events related to IMP (all) - Time to onset

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    10a_Treatment emergent adverse events related to IMP (all) - Time to onset
    End point description
    Results show time to onset of all IMP-related TEAEs.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [29]
    37
    33
    30
    Units: TEAEs realated to IMP
        Overall
    132
    73
    41
    7
        ≤ 30 min
    15
    7
    12
    3
        > 30 min ≤ 6 h
    88
    51
    10
    3
        > 6 h ≤ 24 h
    19
    13
    14
    1
        > 24 h
    10
    2
    5
    0
    Notes
    [29] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 10b_Treatment emergent adverse events related to IMP (systemic) - Time to onset

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    10b_Treatment emergent adverse events related to IMP (systemic) - Time to onset
    End point description
    Results show time to onset of all systemic IMP-related TEAEs.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [30]
    37
    33
    30
    Units: TEAEs related to IMP
        Overall
    8
    5
    4
    2
        ≤ 30 min
    1
    2
    4
    1
        > 30 min ≤ 6 h
    5
    1
    0
    1
        > 6 h ≤ 24 h
    2
    1
    0
    0
        > 24 h
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Notes
    [30] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 10c_Treatment emergent adverse events related to IMP (local) - Time to onset

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    10c_Treatment emergent adverse events related to IMP (local) - Time to onset
    End point description
    Results show time to onset of all local IMP-related TEAEs.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [31]
    37
    33
    30
    Units: TEAEs related to IMP
        Overall
    114
    65
    35
    5
        ≤ 30 min
    14
    3
    8
    2
        > 30 min ≤ 6 h
    74
    49
    9
    2
        > 6 h ≤ 24 h
    17
    12
    13
    1
        > 24 h
    9
    1
    5
    0
    Notes
    [31] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Other pre-specified: 11_Immunological profile (specific IgG4 against house dust mites)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    11_Immunological profile (specific IgG4 against house dust mites)
    End point description
    According to the study inclusion criteria, all patients had IgE-mediated allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis (with or without allergic asthma), triggered by house dust mite allergens. Changes in the immunological profile of specific IgG4 against house dust mites provide valuable information and evidence for the immunogenic activity of the active preparation. Changes in IgG4 were analyzed as an exploratory parameter. The results (shown as changes from baseline) indicate that for all patients (adults and adolescents), during the course of the trial, the median IgG4 levels against Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (D.p.) and Dermatophagoides farinae (D.f.) increased notably over time in both treatment groups [p-values for all patients (adults and adolescents) < 0.0001]. The number of subjects contributing to the data is also shown (N).
    End point type
    Other pre-specified
    End point timeframe
    To determine the immunological profile, blood was taken at screening (baseline) and the final visit/premature termination of the study.
    End point values
    Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤ 65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to < 18 y) Standard
    Number of subjects analysed
    42 [32]
    37 [33]
    33 [34]
    30 [35]
    Units: mg/L
    median (full range (min-max))
        D.p.
    1.130 (-0.07 to 11.52)
    1.700 (-0.20 to 6.60)
    1.720 (0.23 to 19.67)
    1.425 (-0.03 to 5.82)
        D.f.
    1.190 (-0.02 to 6.22)
    1.750 (0.23 to 6.48)
    2.240 (0.13 to 17.91)
    1.900 (0.02 to 5.97)
    Notes
    [32] - Safety analysis set was used for all treatment groups D.p.: N= 40; D.f.: N=42
    [33] - D.p.: N= 33; D.f.: N=34
    [34] - D.p.: N= 33; D.f.: N=33
    [35] - D.p.: N= 30; D.f.: N=30
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Between the signature date of the ICF and the final visit, until approx. 30 days after the last IMP administration or trial-related procedure.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Results are shown for the safety analysis set and show treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE): any AE that started or worsened after first use of IMP until 30 days after last use of IMP or trial-related procedure. For further clarification of AEs see 'Description' section for end point 1. Frequency threshold (≥2%) was set for each age-group.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    25.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Adults (18 to ≤65 y) One Strength
    Reporting group description
    Adults (18 to ≤65 y), randomized to and treated according to the One Strength dose escalation scheme.

    Reporting group title
    Adults (18 to ≤65 y) Standard
    Reporting group description
    Adults (18 to ≤65 y), randomized to and treated according to the Standard dose escalation scheme.

    Reporting group title
    Adolescents (12 to <18 y) One Strength
    Reporting group description
    Adolescents (12 to <18 y), randomized to and treated according to the One Strength dose escalation scheme.

    Reporting group title
    Adolescents (12 to <18 y) Standard
    Reporting group description
    Adolescents (12 to <18 y), randomized to and treated according to the Standard dose escalation scheme.

    Serious adverse events
    Adults (18 to ≤65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to <18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to <18 y) Standard
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    2 / 33 (6.06%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Immune system disorders
    Hypersensitivity
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Anaphylactic reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 2%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Adults (18 to ≤65 y) One Strength Adults (18 to ≤65 y) Standard Adolescents (12 to <18 y) One Strength Adolescents (12 to <18 y) Standard
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 42 (54.76%)
    21 / 37 (56.76%)
    18 / 33 (54.55%)
    12 / 30 (40.00%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 42 (23.81%)
    11 / 37 (29.73%)
    8 / 33 (24.24%)
    4 / 30 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    29
    20
    16
    4
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    2 / 37 (5.41%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    0
    0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Injection site erythema
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 42 (11.90%)
    4 / 37 (10.81%)
    3 / 33 (9.09%)
    1 / 30 (3.33%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    13
    8
    1
    Injection site pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 42 (21.43%)
    4 / 37 (10.81%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    22
    14
    1
    0
    Injection site pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 42 (14.29%)
    4 / 37 (10.81%)
    3 / 33 (9.09%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    32
    17
    8
    0
    Injection site swelling
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 42 (26.19%)
    7 / 37 (18.92%)
    6 / 33 (18.18%)
    1 / 30 (3.33%)
         occurrences all number
    40
    18
    14
    1
    Injection site oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 42 (9.52%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    1
    2
    0
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    3 / 37 (8.11%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    2 / 30 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    4
    1
    2
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 42 (4.76%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    0
    0
    Immune system disorders
    Hypersensitivity
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 42 (9.52%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    1 / 30 (3.33%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    0
    1
    1
    Eye disorders
    Eye pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    2 / 37 (5.41%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    2
    0
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain upper
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    2 / 37 (5.41%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    2 / 30 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    0
    10
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    0
    0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Dysmenorrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    2 / 33 (6.06%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    2
    0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    2 / 37 (5.41%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    2
    1
    0
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    2 / 37 (5.41%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    1
    0
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    3 / 37 (8.11%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    2 / 30 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    3
    2
    2
    Rhinorrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 42 (4.76%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    1 / 30 (3.33%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    1
    0
    1
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    0
    0
    Urticaria
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    0
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    2 / 30 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    2
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 42 (4.76%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    2 / 33 (6.06%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    1
    2
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 42 (7.14%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    4 / 30 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    1
    1
    4
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    2 / 30 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    2
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    2 / 37 (5.41%)
    3 / 33 (9.09%)
    1 / 30 (3.33%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    3
    3
    1
    Oral herpes
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    2 / 30 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    2
    Rhinitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 42 (11.90%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    2 / 30 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    14
    1
    1
    2
    Viral upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 33 (0.00%)
    3 / 30 (10.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    3
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    1 / 30 (3.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    1
    Otitis media
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 33 (3.03%)
    1 / 30 (3.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    1
    Respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    2 / 33 (6.06%)
    0 / 30 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    3
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun May 05 19:12:33 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA