Clinical Trial Results:
Double-blind, randomized, crossover design for evaluation of efficacy and safety of methylphenidate in cognition in patients with Parkinson's disease using electrophysiological measures
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2020-005073-28 |
Trial protocol |
ES |
Global end of trial date |
14 Dec 2024
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
01 Jan 2025
|
First version publication date |
01 Jan 2025
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
MPD2024 |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ParKMetil/001
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
University of Rey Juan Carlos
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Avenida de Atenas,, Alcorcon, Spain, 28922
|
||
Public contact |
Sponsor , Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, nfogelson@gmail.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Sponsor , Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, nfogelson@gmail.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
14 Dec 2024
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
01 Feb 2024
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
14 Dec 2024
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To examine the cognitive effects of a single 20 mg dose of methylphenidate (MPD) in non-demented patients with Parkinson's disease, using behavioural and electrophysiological measures, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, cross-over clinical trial study. Specifically we evaluated reaction time and event-related potentials associated with different types of stimuli and compared these for the MPD and placebo sessions in the patients.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Patients with the following criteria were excluded from the study: dementia, clinically significant depression, patients who have suffered from hallucinations, delusions or psychosis, severe motor fluctuations and prominent ON dyskinesia, unbalanced arterial hypertension of more than 140/80 during siting on the day of the study, uncontrolled hypertension, hepatic or renal failure, uncontrolled malignancy, or untreated glaucoma, and patients treated with Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors.
|
||
Background therapy |
Patients were asked to take their regular medication on the day of the experiment, including Parkinsonian treatment with levopdopa. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
We recorded EEG, during the performance of the task, in PD patients after the administration of methylphenidate (MPD) and placebo. Each subject performed a total of two recording sessions, one after the administration of 20 mg of MPD and another after the administration of a placebo saccharine pill. Each session was performed on a different day, 7 to 14 days apart, using the same procedures. EEG recordings were performed 90 mins after the administration of either the MPD or placebo pill. The order of administration of MPD versus placebo was randomized and counterbalanced across the subjects. All the sessions were recorded in the morning hours to control for environmental effects on attention, while the patients were in ON state. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Feb 2022
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 22
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
22
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
22
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
5
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
17
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Forty patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcon, Spain fit the inclusion criteria and were contacted to participate in the study between February 2022 and 2024. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Patients diagnosed with PD fit the inclusion criteria and were contacted to participate in the study. Fourteen patients refused to participate, and four patients were unable to perform at least one of the recording sessions due to high blood pressure measurements on the day of the experiment. | ||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||
Number of subjects started |
40 [1] | ||||||
Number of subjects completed |
22 | ||||||
Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
|
|||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
Physician decision: 4 | ||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
Consent withdrawn by subject: 14 | ||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to have started the pre-assignment period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: Fourteen subjects did not give their consent to proceed with the trial. Fouir subjects could not proceed on the day of the recordings due to high blood pressure. |
|||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Methylphenidate
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor | ||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Patients, clinicians assesing the patients, the researchers performing the EEG recordings and analyzing the data were blinded to the administration of either metghylphenidate or a placebo saccharine pill.
|
||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Methylphenidate | ||||||
Arm description |
Parkinson's disease patients administered 20 mg of methylphenidate | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Methylphenidate
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
20 mg of methylphenidate swallowed orally
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||
Period 2 title |
Placebo
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||
Arm description |
Placebo session | ||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Saccarine
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1 pill of saccarine swallowed with water
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Methylphenidate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Twenty two patients performing two crossover sessions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Methylphenidate
|
||
Reporting group description |
Parkinson's disease patients administered 20 mg of methylphenidate | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Placebo session |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change between MPD and placebo | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
P3b latency for targets for MPD session and placebo session in each subject
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Comparison of P3b latency between MPD and placebo | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Methylphenidate
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
44
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
≤ 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
- | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
- |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
No adverse events
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
regular | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Methylphenidate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Parkinson's disease patients administered 20 mg of methylphenidate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Parkinson's disease patients administered saccarine placebo pill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |