Clinical Trial Results:
Comparison of ultrasound-guided PENG block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative pain and early motor recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial
|
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2020-005126-28 |
Trial protocol |
BE |
Global end of trial date |
06 Jul 2022
|
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
03 Jun 2026
|
First version publication date |
03 Jun 2026
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Publication |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
|
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
NA
|
||
|
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
|
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
CHU de Liège
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Sart Tilman B35, Liège, Belgium,
|
||
Public contact |
Michele Carella, CHU de Liège, mcarella@chuliege.be
|
||
Scientific contact |
Michele Carella, CHU de Liège, mcarella@chuliege.be
|
||
|
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
|
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
06 Jul 2022
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
06 Jul 2022
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
06 Jul 2022
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
|
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
In this study we primarily aimed at evaluating the influence of ropivacaine SFICB or PENG block on postoperative pain at rest and at mobilization in patients receiving spinal anesthesia for THAPL and the non-inferiority of PENG block on postoperative pain, opioid-sparing and global functional outcomes.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
After a detailed explanation about the study rationale by the principal investigator, written informed consent was obtained before inclusion of eligible patients into the trial. This study follows the applicable CONSORT guidelines and was performed in accordance with the most recent version of the Helsinki Declaration. Data acquisition occurred be- tween 11 October 2021 and 6 July 2022 at the University Hospital of Liege, Belgium.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
11 Oct 2021
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
|
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 106
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
106
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
106
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
5
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
89
|
||
85 years and over |
12
|
||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Data acquisition occurred be- tween 11 October 2021 and 6 July 2022 at the University Hospital of Liege, Belgium. Patients scheduled to undergo elective PLTHA under spinal anaesthesia were consecutively and prospectively considered as eligible for inclusion. | |||||||||||||||
|
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Patients scheduled to undergo elective PLTHA under spinal anaesthesia | |||||||||||||||
|
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Main period
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
|
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
SFIB | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ropivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) performed after spinal anaesthesia. Single perineural injection of 40 mL ropivacaine 0.375% in the fascia iliaca compartment to target femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerve branches. No catheter placement.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
PENG | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ropivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block performed after spinal anaesthesia. Single perineural injection of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.75% into the fascial plane between the psoas tendon and pubic ramus. No catheter left in situ.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Period 2
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
|
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
PENG | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
PENG with 20ml of ropivacaine 0.75% | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ropivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block performed after spinal anaesthesia. Single perineural injection of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.75% into the fascial plane between the psoas tendon and pubic ramus. No catheter left in situ.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
SFIB | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
SFIB with 40ml of ropivacaine 0.375% | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ropivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) performed after spinal anaesthesia. Single perineural injection of 40 mL ropivacaine 0.375% in the fascia iliaca compartment to target femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerve branches. No catheter placement.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Main period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
SFIB group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Group SFIB
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
PENG group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
PENG group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
SFIB
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
PENG
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
PENG
|
||
Reporting group description |
PENG with 20ml of ropivacaine 0.75% | ||
Reporting group title |
SFIB
|
||
Reporting group description |
SFIB with 40ml of ropivacaine 0.375% | ||
Subject analysis set title |
SFIB group
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Group SFIB
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
PENG group
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
PENG group
|
||
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Rest NRS pain 6h postop | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Rest pain
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 hours after surgery
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Non-inferiority analysis | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Non-inferiority analysis of rest pain NRS at 6 hours postoperatively
A pre-specified non-inferiority analysis was performed to compare postoperative rest pain intensity between the PENG and SFIB groups at 6 hours after total hip arthroplasty. The non-inferiority margin was set at 1 numeric rating scale (NRS) point. The between-group difference was estimated using a Mann–Whitney U test, with calculation of median difference and 95% confidence interval. Non-inferiority was concluded if the uppe
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PENG v SFIB
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
102
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.001 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
Mann–Whitney U test | |||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
48 hours after surgery
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
28.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
PENG
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
SFIB
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
| Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
| None reported | |||