E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Psychiatry and Psychology [F] - Mental Disorders [F03] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The aim of our study is two folded: first, we aim to improve cognition after ECT, improving its acceptability and tolerability and hence increase its application. If ECT would be used for the calculated 26% of patients who have chronic severe depression, morbidity and mortality of this disorder would decrease steeply. Second, we aim to develop a prediction method based on clinical and EEG characteristics, to accurately predict who will respond to ECT. If it is possible to accurately predict ECT response (and non-response), it could be prevented that patients with a low chance of recovery receives ECT without response but with the associated risks. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
To investigate quality of life related measures after rivastigmine addition. To investigate whether free speech is predictive of the antidepressant effects. To investigate whether EEG could predict cognitive impairment. To investigate how network related measures change during an ECT course. To investigate how blood and DNA methylation change during ECT. To develop a comprehensive prediction method based on the available parameters. To investigate subjective measures of (anticipation) of response and side effects. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
- Age over 18 years - Clinical indication for ECT (as indicated by the treating physician/psychiatrist) - Uni- or bipolar depression (as assessed by the treating psychiatrist) - Dutch as first language |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
- Currently receiving, or having received ECT 6 months prior to the start of the treatment/study. - Currently using rivastigmine, galantamine, donezepil (all cholinesterase inhibitors for mild to moderate Alzheimer’s Disease). - Pregnancy and/or lactation/breast feeding - Suspicion of neurodegenerative disorders (as diagnosed earlier) - Contraindications for ECT (recent myocardinfarct, recent cerebrovasculair accident, recent intracranial surgery, pheochromocytoma and instable angina pectoris) - Contraindications for rivastigmine (bradycardia or atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders (first degree AV-block excluded)) - Patients who have had an allergic reaction to rivastigmine - Cognitive disorder not explained by the depressive episode |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
- No change in the rivastigmine group on cognitive and memory related measures (compared to an effect in the placebo group): significant interaction term between placebo and rivastigmine AND non-significant comparison on cognition and memory measures in the rivastigmine group between the timepoints (versus significant difference in the placebo group): at p <0.05 - Classification algorithm for ECT response: accurate and statistically significant at p<0.05 - Classification algorithm for side effects: accurate and statistically significant at p<0.05 |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Baseline versus end-of-treatment and baseline versus follow-up (3 months), and end-of-treament versus follow-up |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
To investigate quality of life related measures after rivastigmine addition: significant for the different measures at p<0.05 To investigate whether free speech is predictive of the antidepressant effects: classification (significant at p<0.05) AND significant (non)linear modelling at p<0.05 To investigate whether EEG could predict cognitive impairment: accurate and statistically significant at p<0.05 To investigate how network related measures change during an ECT course: statistically significant change between timepoints (p<0.05) To investigate how blood and DNA methylation change during ECT (or are predictive): p<0.05 To develop a comprehensive prediction method based on the available parameters: statistically significant change between timepoints (p<0.05) To investigate subjective measures of (anticipation) of response and side effects: p < 0.05 |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Baseline versus end-of-treatment and baseline versus follow-up (3 months), and end-of-treament versus follow-up And baseline vs timepoint after 1st ECT session timepoint after 1st ECT session vs end-of-treatment and follow-up |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | Yes |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 4 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 5 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |