Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43845   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7282   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2020-005732-29
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:MOM-M281-011
    National Competent Authority:Denmark - DHMA
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Trial now transitioned
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2021-06-25
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedDenmark - DHMA
    A.2EudraCT number2020-005732-29
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Nipocalimab Administered to Adults with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Efficacy and Safety Study of Nipocalimab IV Infusions for Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberMOM-M281-011
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorJanssen-Cilag International N.V.
    B.1.3.4CountryBelgium
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportJanssen Research & Development, LLC
    B.4.2CountryUnited States
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationJanssen-Cilag International N.V.
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointClinical Registry Group
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressArchimedesweg 29
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityLeiden
    B.5.3.3Post code2333
    B.5.3.4CountryNetherlands
    B.5.4Telephone number+31715242166
    B.5.5Fax number+31715242110
    B.5.6E-mailClinicalTrialsEU@its.jnj.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameNipocalimab
    D.3.2Product code JNJ-80202135
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNNipocalimab
    D.3.9.1CAS number 2211985-36-1
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeJNJ-80202135
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameM281
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB195356
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number30
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSolution for infusion
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboIntravenous use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Myasthenia gravis (MG).
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Myasthenia gravis, a neuromuscular disease.
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 21.1
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10028417
    E.1.2Term Myasthenia gravis
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10029205 - Nervous system disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease Yes
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab compared to placebo based on the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale, in
    seropositive generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) participants when treatment is taken as directed.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    - To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab compared to placebo based on the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scale, in seropositive gMG participants when treatment is taken as directed.
    - To evaluate the effect of nipocalimab compared to placebo in achieving the minimum clinically important difference or better based on the MGADL scale, in seropositive gMG participants when treatment is taken as directed.
    - To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab loading dose compared to placebo based on the MG-ADL scale, in seropositive gMG participants when treatment is taken as directed.
    - To evaluate sustainability of therapeutic response of nipocalimab compared to placebo based on the MGADL scale, in seropositive gMG participants when treatment is taken as directed.
    -To evaluate the effect of nipocalimab compared to placebo on the percentage of participants achieving ≥50% symptom improvement based on the MG-ADL scale, in seropositive gMG participants when treatment is taken as directed.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    RANDOMIZED PHASE:
    1. ≥18 years of age at the time of consent (and must meet the legal age of consent).
    2. Diagnosis of MG with generalized muscle weakness meeting the clinical criteria for gMG as defined by the MGFA Clinical Classification Class II a/b, III a/b, or IVa/b at screening. (Seronegative participants are no longer being recruited; all participants must have a positive serologic test for a gMG-related pathogenic autoantibody (anti-AChR, anti-MuSK and/or anti-LRP4 autoantibodies), confirmed prior to randomization.)
    3. MG-ADL score of ≥6 at screening and baseline.
    4. Has suboptimal response to current stable therapy for gMG according to the investigator.
    Stable therapy is defined in the protocol.
    5. A participant using herbal, naturopathic, traditional Chinese remedies, ayurvedic or nutritional supplements, or medical marijuana is eligible if the use is acceptable to the investigator.
    6. Participants who have undergone splenectomy must be at least 3 months post resection prior to screening and must be vaccinated as per the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention annual Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States. (https://www.cdc.gov) OR must be vaccinated as per country- or territory-specific guidelines or local regulations.
    7. Has sufficient venous access to allow drug administration by infusion and blood sampling as per the protocol.
    8. Is recommended to be up to date on all age-appropriate vaccinations prior to screening as per routine local medical guidelines. It is recommended to have COVID-19 vaccination at least 2 weeks prior study visits.
    9. Man or woman (according to their reproductive organs and functions assigned by
    chromosomal complement).
    10. A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum at Screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Day 1 prior to administration of study intervention.
    11. A woman must be
    a. Not of childbearing potential
    b. Of childbearing potential and
    - Practicing a highly effective, preferably user-independent method of contraception and agrees to remain on a highly effective method while receiving study intervention and until 60 days after last dose. The investigator should evaluate the potential for contraceptive method failure in relationship to the first dose of study intervention.
    12. A woman must agree not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes), or freeze for future use for the purposes of assisted reproduction, during the study and for a period of 30 days after the administration of study intervention.
    13. A male participant must wear a condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person during the study and for at least 90 days after receiving the last administration of study intervention. In addition, male participants with partners who are a woman of childbearing potential are highly encouraged to inform their partner to use highly effective contraception methods that result in a low
    failure rate (less than 1% per year).
    14. A male participant must agree not to donate sperm for the purpose of reproduction during the study and for a minimum 90 days after receiving the last administration of study intervention.
    15. Must sign an ICF indicating that the participant understands the purpose of, and procedures required for, the study and is willing to voluntarily participate in the study and comply with all study procedures.
    16. Must be able to read and write.

    OLE PHASE:
    Participants who have completed the 24-week double-blind placebo-controlled phase are eligible to enter the OLE phase.
    Participants who had study intervention discontinued for a reason other than the need for hospitalization or rescue therapy (IVIg, plasmapheresis), and who completed the scheduled of assessments for the full 24-week double-blind placebo-controlled phase, may enter the OLE based on the investigator’s discretion.
    Participants affected by interruption of theMOM-M281-005 study due to the COVID 19 pandemic must meet the following Inclusion Criteria:
    1. The investigator has confirmed that the participant is not receiving, or has not received since the interruption of the Phase 2 study, any medication that might put the participant at risk when receiving nipocalimab or might interfere with the assessment of the safety of nipocalimab.
    2. Randomized inclusion point 6
    3. Randomized inclusion point 7
    4. Is recommended to be up to date on all age-appropriate vaccinations prior to screening as
    per routine local medical guidelines. It is strongly recommended to have COVID-19 vaccination at least 2 weeks before the study visits.
    5. Sex and Contraceptive/Barrier Requirements as outlined in Double-blind
    Placebo-Controlled Phase inclusion criteria # 9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14 above.
    6. Randomized inclusion point 15
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1. Has a history of severe and/or uncontrolled hepatic (eg,
    viral/alcoholic/autoimmune hepatitis/cirrhosis and/or metabolic liver
    disease), gastrointestinal, renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, psychiatric, neurological or musculoskeletal disorder, hypertension or, any other medical disorder(s) (eg, diabetes mellitus), or clinically significant
    abnormalities in screening laboratory, that, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the patient's full participation in the study, and/or might jeopardize the safety of the participant or the
    validity of the study results.
    2. Has any confirmed or suspected clinical immunodeficiency syndrome not related to treatment of his/her gMG, or has a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency unless confirmed absent in the participant.
    3. Has MGFA Class I disease or presence of MG crisis (MGFA Class V) at screening, history of MG crisis within 1 month of screening, or fixed weakness (and/or ‘burnt out’ MG).
    4. Is dependent on gastric tube for nutritional needs or is ventilator-dependent.
    5. Is actively undergoing radiation or chemotherapy for an unresected thymoma/malignant thymoma.
    6. Has had a thymectomy within 12 months prior to screening, or thymectomy is planned during the study.
    7. Has current or a history of any neurologic disorder other than MG that might interfere with the accuracy of study assessments.
    8. Currently has a malignancy or has a history of malignancy within 3 years before screening.
    9. Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to nipocalimab or its excipients (refer to the IB).
    10. Has shown a previous severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction, such as anaphylaxis to therapeutic proteins (eg, monoclonal antibodies).
    11. Has experienced myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke within 12 weeks of screening.
    12. Is planning to father a child while enrolled in this study or donate sperm within 90 days after the last administration of IMP.
    13. Is currently breastfeeding, pregnant, planning pregnancy, or egg donation during the study or within 30 days after the last dose of IMP.
    14. History of moderate or severe substance or alcohol use
    15. Is currently taking IgG Fc-related protein therapeutics, or Fc-conjugated therapeutic agents, including factor or enzyme replacement.
    16. Has received, rituximab within 6 months prior to first administration of IMP, except for returning Phase 2 participants.
    17. Has received, or is expected to receive, a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to screening or has a known need to receive a live vaccine during the study, or within 8 weeks after the last administration of study intervention.
    18. Has received plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption therapy, or IVIg within 6 weeks prior to baseline.
    19. Has another medical condition that requires corticosteroids unless the dose has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline and is expected to remain stable during the study.
    20. Has another medical condition that requires an immunosuppressive agent unless the medication has been used for at least 6 months, the dose has been stable for at least 3 months prior to baseline and the medication and the dose are expected to remain stable during the study.
    21. Has previously received nipocalimab. (Not applicable to returning Phase 2 participants)
    22. Is receiving or has received an investigational intervention (including investigational vaccines) within 3 months or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 3 months before the planned first dose administration of IMP.
    23. Has a severe infection including opportunistic infections requiring parenteral anti-infectives and/or hospitalization, and/or is assessed as serious/clinically significant by the investigator, within 8 weeks prior to screening. The participant may be rescreened after the 8-week exclusionary period has passed.
    24. Has a chronic infection or requires chronic treatment with anti-infectives.
    25. Tests positive for hepatitis B virus infection
    26. Is seropositive for antibodies to hepatitis C virus unless they satisfy 1 of the following conditions listed in the protocol.
    27. History of being human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)1 or HIV2 antibody-positive, or tests positive for HIV at screening.
    28. COVID-19 infection or contact with infected persons as per the protocol
    29. Has current suicidal ideation evidenced by a “yes” response to Questions 4 or 5 in the C-SSRS at screening or baseline, or a history of suicidal ideation/behavior in the past year prior to screening.
    30. Had major surgery within 3 months before screening, or will not have fully recovered from surgery, or has surgery planned during the time of participation in the study.
    31. Criterion removed per Am 1.
    32. Is an employee of the investigator or study site
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Average change from baseline (screening and Day 1) in MG-ADL total score over Weeks 22, 23 and 24.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Throughout the double-blind phase of the study.
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    1. The average change in the QMG score over Weeks 22 and 24. Analyzed using a similar method (appropriate for the region) as for the primary efficacy endpoint, but since the QMG is not assessed at Week 23, the contrast will average the change from baseline over Weeks 22 and 24 of the double-blind placebo-controlled phase.
    2. Percentage of participants whose average MG-ADL total score over weeks 22, 23 and 24 of the double blind, placebo-controlled phase is at least a 2-point improvement compared to baseline. The average score for a participant is the average of the non-missing values at Weeks 22, 23 and 24. A participant must have a non-missing value at Week 24 and at least 1 non-missing value at Week 22 or 23 in order to have a nonmissing average score. A participant with a missing average score will be considered a nonresponder. Analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test controlling for the baseline MG-ADL total score randomization strata (≤ 9, >9), autoantibody status, and region.
    3. Loading dose response, defined for each participant as improvement in the MG-ADL total ≥2 points at Week 1 and/or Week 2. A participant with a missing assessment at either time point will be considered a nonresponder at that time point. Analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test controlling for the baseline MG-ADL total score randomization strata (≤9, >9), autoantibody status, and region.
    4. Sustainability of therapeutic response, defined as the percentage of participants with improvement in MG-ADL total score of ≥ 2 points at Week 4 through Week 24, with no more than 2 non-consecutive excursions allowed between Week 6 through Week 23 (excursions defined as loss of improvement in MG-ADL score of ≥ 2 points from baseline). A participant with a missing assessment at a time point will be considered a nonresponder at that time point. Analyzed by CochranMantel-Haenszel test controlling for the baseline MG-ADL total score randomization strata (≤9, >9), autoantibody status, and region.
    5. Percentage of participants whose average MG-ADL total score over weeks 22, 23 and 24 of the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase is at least a 50% improvement compared to baseline. The average score for a participant is the average of the non-missing values at Weeks 22, 23 and 24. A participant must have a non-missing value at Week 24 and at least 1 non-missing value at Week 22 or 23 in order to have a non-missing average score. A participant with a missing average score will be considered a nonresponder. Analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test controlling for the baseline MG-ADL total score randomization strata (≤ 9, >9), autoantibody status, and region.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    - QMG score over Weeks 22 and 24.
    - MG-ADL total score over weeks 22, 23 and 24
    - Loading dose response at Week 1 and/or Week 2.
    - Sustainability of therapeutic response Week 4 through Week 24
    - Average MG-ADL total score over weeks 22, 23 and 24
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic Yes
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic Yes
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other Yes
    E.8.1.7.1Other trial design description
    Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled phase followed by an Open Label extension phase.
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned3
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA44
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Australia
    Canada
    China
    Japan
    Korea, Republic of
    Mexico
    Taiwan
    United States
    Belgium
    Czechia
    Denmark
    France
    Germany
    Italy
    Poland
    Spain
    Sweden
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    The end of study is considered as the last visit for the last participant in the study.
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years4
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months4
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days28
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years4
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months9
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days22
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 120
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 70
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state8
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 80
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 190
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Participants who complete the double-blind placebo-controlled phase will continue to the OLE phase where treatment with nipocalimab will continue until 192 Weeks after the double-blind phase of the study has been completed. After that no further treatment and medical supervision of the patients after the end of the clinical trial is planned for the above clinical trial.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2021-08-26
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2022-01-13
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusTrial now transitioned
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri Apr 19 03:20:54 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA