Clinical Trial Results:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Mechanism of Action of Ruxolitinib Cream for Vitiligo (TRuE-V MOA)
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2021-000361-32 |
Trial protocol |
FR |
Global end of trial date |
10 Jul 2023
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
17 May 2024
|
First version publication date |
17 May 2024
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
INCB 18424-214
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Incyte Corporation
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
1801 Augustine Cutoff Drive, Wilmington, United States, 19803
|
||
Public contact |
Study Director, Incyte Corporation, 1 8554633463, medinfo@incyte.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Study Director, Incyte Corporation, 1 8554633463, medinfo@incyte.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
10 Jul 2023
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
10 Jul 2023
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanism of action (MOA) of ruxolitinib cream in vitiligo by assessing change in biomarkers.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was to be performed in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and conducted in adherence to the study Protocol, applicable Good Clinical Practices, and applicable laws and country-specific regulations in which the study was being conducted
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
23 Jun 2021
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Canada: 28
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 5
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 27
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
60
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
5
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
55
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
5
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
This study was conducted at a total of 11 sites in Canada, France, and the United States. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
24-Week Double-Blind Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ruxolitinib
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1.5% cream twice daily
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle cream BID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants applied matching vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Vehicle
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
twice daily
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
28-Week Treatment-Extension Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment-Extension (TE) Period: Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants who completed the Week 24 assessments with no safety concerns could continue into the 28-week Treatment-Extension Period. Participants who applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID during the Double-Blind Period continued to apply ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for an additional 28 weeks in the Treatment-Extension Period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ruxolitinib
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1.5% cream twice daily
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
TE Period: Vehicle cream to Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants who completed the Week 24 assessments with no safety concerns could continue into the 28-week Treatment-Extension Period. Participants who applied vehicle cream BID during the Double-Blind Period applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 28 weeks in the Treatment-Extension Period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ruxolitinib
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1.5% cream twice daily
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Vehicle
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
twice daily
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle cream BID
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants applied matching vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. | ||
Reporting group title |
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle cream BID
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants applied matching vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks. | ||
Reporting group title |
Treatment-Extension (TE) Period: Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants who completed the Week 24 assessments with no safety concerns could continue into the 28-week Treatment-Extension Period. Participants who applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID during the Double-Blind Period continued to apply ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for an additional 28 weeks in the Treatment-Extension Period. | ||
Reporting group title |
TE Period: Vehicle cream to Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants who completed the Week 24 assessments with no safety concerns could continue into the 28-week Treatment-Extension Period. Participants who applied vehicle cream BID during the Double-Blind Period applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 28 weeks in the Treatment-Extension Period. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage change from Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an immune biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24 [1] | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement obtained on or before the first application of study drug. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] / Baseline value)*100.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline; Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not conducted for this endpoint. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Only participants with available data were analyzed. [3] - Only participants with available data were analyzed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Correlation of key skin inflammatory biomarkers of vitiligo in target lesions to efficacy readouts at Week 12 and Week 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical scores (facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index [F-VASI] and total body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index [T-VASI]) were evaluated for correlation with skin CXCL10 levels.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - Participants with values at each of 3 timepoints (Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24) were analyzed. [5] - Participants with values at each of 3 timepoints (Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24) were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the Double-Blind Period | |||||||||
End point description |
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
from the time of Informed Consent Form signing until the start of the Treatment-Extension Period or 30 days after the last application of study drug during the Double-Blind Period (up to Week 24 + 30 days)
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with TEAEs during the Treatment-Extension Period | |||||||||
End point description |
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
from the completion of the Week 24 assessments until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug at Week 52 + 30 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with a Grade 3 or higher TEAE during the Double-Blind Period | |||||||||
End point description |
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. AE severity was assessed per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated; Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
from the time of Informed Consent Form signing until the start of the Treatment-Extension Period or 30 days after the last application of study drug during the Double-Blind Period (up to Week 24 + 30 days)
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with a Grade 3 or higher TEAE during the Treatment-Extension Period | |||||||||
End point description |
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. AE severity was assessed per the CTCAE, version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated; Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
from the completion of the Week 24 assessments until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug at Week 52 + 30 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
from the time of Informed Consent Form signing until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug (up to Week 52 + 30 days)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
For the Double-Blind Period, TEAEs are reported for members of the Safety Population: all participants who applied ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream at least once. For the Treatment-Extension (TE) Period, TEAEs are reported for the TE Evaluable Population: all participants who applied ruxolitinib cream at least once in the TE Period.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
22
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants applied ruxolitinib cream during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and the Treatment-Extension Period. Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID for 24 weeks. Participants who completed the Week 24 assessments with no safety concerns could continue into the 28-week Treatment-Extension Period. Participants who applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID during the Double-Blind Period continued to apply ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for an additional 28 weeks in the Treatment-Extension Period. Participants who applied vehicle cream BID during the Double-Blind Period applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 28 weeks in the Treatment-Extension Period. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle cream BID
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants applied matching vehicle cream twice a day (BID) for 24 weeks in the Double-Blind Period. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |