Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2021-000829-27
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:LPS16747
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2021-07-13
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2021-000829-27
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A randomized, double-blind, head-to-head comparison of dupilumab versus omalizumab in severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) and comorbid asthma patients
    Estudio comparativo directo, aleatorizado, doble ciego, de dupilumab frente a omalizumab en pacientes con rinosinusitis crónica grave con pólipos nasales (RSC con PN) y asma concomitante
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    EVEREST: EValuating trEatment RESponses of dupilumab versus omalizumab in Type 2 patients
    EVEREST: Evaluación de las respuestas al tratamiento de dupilumab frente a omalizumab en pacientes de Tipo 2
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    EVEREST
    EVEREST
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberLPS16747
    A.5.3WHO Universal Trial Reference Number (UTRN)U1111-1255-4713
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorSanofi-aventis Recherche & Développement
    B.1.3.4CountryFrance
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportSanofi-aventis Recherche & Développement
    B.4.2CountryFrance
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationSanofi-Aventis, S.A
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointUnidad de Estudios Clínicos
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressC/ Josep Pla 2, 4ª planta
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityBarcelona
    B.5.3.3Post code08019
    B.5.3.4CountrySpain
    B.5.4Telephone number+3493485 94 00
    B.5.6E-mailes-unidadestudiosclinicos@sanofi.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameDupilumab
    D.3.2Product code SAR231893
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNDupilumab
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeSAR231893
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameREGN668
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB88511
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number150
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Xolair
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderNovartis Europharm Limited
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameOmalizumab
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNOMALIZUMAB
    D.3.9.1CAS number 242138-07-4
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB12543MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number150
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 3
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Xolair
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderNovartis Europharm Limited
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameOmalizumab
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNOMALIZUMAB
    D.3.9.1CAS number 242138-07-4
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB12543MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number150
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSolution for injection in pre-filled syringe
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSubcutaneous use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
    Risnosinusitis crónica con pólipos nasales
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
    Risnosinusitis crónica con pólipos nasales
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Respiratory Tract Diseases [C08]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 20.1
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10080060
    E.1.2Term Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    -To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to omalizumab in reducing the polyp size and improving sense of smell
    -Evaluar la eficacia de dupilumab en comparación con omalizumab en la reducción del tamaño de los pólipos y la mejora del sentido del olfato.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP symptoms at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
    - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving lung function at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
    - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
    - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on health realted quality of life (HRQoL) at week 24 compared to omalizumab
    - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving nasal peak inspiratory flow at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
    - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on CRSwNP overall disease severity at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
    - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on asthma control at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
    - To evaluate the safety of dupilumab and omalizumab
    - Evaluar la eficacia de dupilumab en la mejora de los síntomas de rinosinusitis crónica con pólipos nasales (RSC con PN) en la semana 24 en comparación con omalizumab.
    - Evaluar la eficacia de dupilumab en la mejora de la función pulmonar en la semana 24 en comparación con omalizumab.
    - Evaluar la eficacia de dupilumab en la mejora de la puntuación total de síntomas (PTS) de la RSC con PN en la semana 24 en comparación con omalizumab.
    - Evaluar el efecto de dupilumab sobre la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) en la semana 24 en comparación con omalizumab.
    - Evaluar la eficacia de dupilumab en la mejora del flujo inspiratorio nasal máximo en la semana 24 en comparación con omalizumab.
    - Evaluar el efecto de dupilumab sobre la gravedad general de la RSC con PN en la semana 24 en comparación con omalizumab.
    - Evaluar el efecto de dupilumab sobre el control del asma en la semana 24 en comparación con omalizumab.
    - Evaluar la seguridad de dupilumab y omalizumab.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    -Participant must be at least 18 (or the legal age of consent in the jurisdiction in which the study is taking place) years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.

    -Participants with bilateral sino-nasal polyposis, that despite prior treatment with SCS anytime within the past 2 years; and/or medical contraindication/intolerance to SCS; and/or prior surgery for NP have:
    -- An endoscopic bilateral NPS of at least 5 out of a maximum score of 8 (with a minimum score of 2 in each nasal cavity) at visit 1; AND
    -- Ongoing symptoms of Nasal congestion/blockade/obstruction and loss of smell for at least 8 weeks before screening (Visit 1), AND
    -- Nasal congestion/blockade/obstruction and a weekly average severity greater than 1 at randomization (Visit 2) AND
    -- loss of smell symptom severity score 2 or 3 at screening (Visit 1) and a weekly average severity of greater than 1 at time of randomization (Visit 2).

    -Participants with a physician diagnosis of asthma based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2020 for ≥12 months treated with low, medium or high dose ICS and a second controller (ie, LABA), a third controller is allowed but not mandatory. The dose regimen should be stable for at least 1 month before Visit 1 (screening visit) and during the screening and run-in period.

    -Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤85% of predicted normal at Visit 1 (screening visit) and Visit 2, prior to randomization.

    -Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-question version (ACQ-5) score ≥1.5 at Visits 1 and 2.

    -Treatment with intranasal mometasone ≥200 μg QD (or equivalent of another INCS) for 1 month prior to Visit 1 and during the run-in period (for CRSwNP).

    -Eligibility as per omalizumab drug-dosing table (serum IgE level ≥30 to ≤1500 IU/mL and body weight ≥30 to ≤150 kg) and ability to be dosed per the dosing table.
    - El participante debe tener por lo menos 18 años (o la edad legal de consentimiento en la jurisdicción donde se esté llevando a cabo el estudio) en el momento de firmar el consentimiento informado.
    - Participantes con poliposis nasosinusal bilateral que, a pesar del tratamiento previo con CES en cualquier momento en los 2 años anteriores y/o de la contraindicación/intolerancia médica a CES y/o de la cirugía de PN previa, tienen:
    -una PPN bilateral endoscópica de al menos 5 en una puntuación
    máxima de 8 (con una puntuación mínima de 2 en cada fosa
    nasal) en la visita 1 (visita de selección), Y
    -síntomas en curso de congestión/bloqueo/obstrucción nasal y
    pérdida del olfato durante al menos 8 semanas antes de la
    selección (visita 1), Y
    - congestión/bloqueo/obstrucción nasal y una intensidad media
    semanal superior a 1 en la aleatorización (visita 2), Y
    - puntuación de la intensidad de los síntomas de pérdida del
    olfato de 2 o 3 en la selección (visita 1) y una intensidad media
    semanal superior a 1 en el momento de la aleatorización (visita
    2).
    - Participantes con un diagnóstico médico de asma basado en la Iniciativa Global para el Asma (GINA) 2020 (55) durante ≥12 meses, tratada con dosis bajas, medias o altas de CEI y un segundo medicamento de control (es decir, LABA). Se permite un tercer medicamento de control, pero no es obligatorio. La posología debe ser estable durante al menos 1 mes antes de la visita 1 (visita de selección) y durante el periodo de selección y preliminar.
    - VEF1 prebroncodilatador ≤85 % del valor normal previsto en la visita 1 (visita de selección) y en la visita 2 antes de la aleatorización.
    - Puntuación ≥1,5 en el Cuestionario de control del asma versión de 5 preguntas (ACQ-5) en las visitas 1 y 2.
    - Tratamiento con mometasona intranasal ≥200 μg 1 v/d (o equivalente de otro CEIN) durante 1 mes antes de la visita 1 y durante el periodo preliminar (para la RSC con PN).
    -Elegibilidad según la tabla de administración del medicamento omalizumab (nivel de IgE sérica ≥30 a ≤1500 UI/ml y peso corporal ≥30 a ≤150 kg) y la idoneidad para recibir la dosis según la tabla de administración (véase la Figura 2).
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    - Participants who have undergone any sinus intranasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months before Visit 1.
    - Participants who have had a sino-nasal surgery changing the lateral wall structure of the nose, making impossible the evaluation of NPS.
    - Participants with conditions/concomitant diseases making them non evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy endpoint such as: Antrochoanal polyps, Nasal septal deviation that would occlude at least one nostril, Acute sinusitis, nasal infection, or upper respiratory infection.
    - Severe asthma exacerbation requiring treatment with SCS in the last 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during screening.
    - Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the Investigator’s judgment, would adversely affect the participant’s participation in the study
    - Diagnosed with, suspected of, or at high risk of endoparasitic infection, and/or use of antiparasitic drugs within 2 weeks before Visit 1 (screening visit) or during the screening and run-in period.
    - History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV 1/2 serology at Visit 1 (screening visit).
    - Known or suspected immunodeficiency, including history of invasive opportunistic infections
    - Active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years before Visit 1 (screening visit), except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix and completely treated and resolved non metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
    - History of systemic hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to dupilumab and omalizumab, including any excipient
    - Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks before Visit 1 (screening visit).
    - Participantes que se hayan sometido a cualquier cirugía intranasal de los senos paranasales (incluida la polipectomía) en los 6 meses anteriores a la visita 1.
    - Participantes que se hayan sometido a cirugía nasosinusal con cambio de la estructura de las paredes laterales de la nariz que imposibilita la evaluación de la PPN.
    - Participantes con afecciones/enfermedades concomitantes que impidan su evaluación en la visita 1 o para el criterio de valoración de eficacia principal, tales como:
    - pólipos antrocoanales;
    - desviación del tabique nasal que podría ocluir al menos un
    orificio nasal;
    - sinusitis aguda, infección nasal o infección de las vías
    respiratorias superiores;
    - Exacerbación grave del asma que requiera tratamiento con CES en las últimas 4 semanas antes de la visita 1 y durante la selección.
    - Enfermedad(es) concomitante(s) grave(s) que, a criterio del investigador, pudiera(n) afectar negativamente a la participación del participante en el estudio.
    - Participante diagnosticado, con sospecha o con alto riesgo de infección endoparasitaria y/o uso de fármacos antiparasitarios en las 2 semanas previas a la visita 1 (visita de selección) o durante el periodo de selección y preliminar.
    - Antecedentes de infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) o pruebas serológicas positivas de VIH 1/2 en la visita 1 (visita de selección).
    - Inmunodeficiencia conocida o sospechada, incluidos los antecedentes de infecciones oportunistas invasivas
    - Neoplasia maligna activa o antecedentes de neoplasia maligna en los 5 años previos a la visita 1 (visita de selección), excepto carcinoma de cuello uterino in situ completamente tratado y carcinoma cutáneo basocelular o de células escamosas no metastásico completamente tratado y resuelto.
    - Antecedentes de hipersensibilidad sistémica o anafilaxia a dupilumab y omalizumab, incluido cualquier excipiente.
    - Tratamiento con una vacuna viva (atenuada) en las 4 semanas anteriores a la visita 1 (visita de selección).
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    1 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) ; The total nasal polyps score (NPS) is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps causing complete obstruction).
    2 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) ; The UPSIT score ranges from 0 to 40, with 40 being the best possible score.
    1 - Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en la puntuación de los pólipos nasales (PPN). La puntuación total de pólipos nasales es la suma de los de la fosa nasal izquierda y derecha, puntuando de 0 (no pólipos) hasta 8 (grandes pólipos causando obstrucción completa).
    2 - Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en la prueba de identificación de olores de la Universidad de Pensilvania (UPSIT). Los rangos de puntuación de la UPSIT van de 0 a 40, siendo 40 la mejor puntuación.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    1, 2 - Baseline to Week 24
    1, 2 – Desde el inicio a la semana 24
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    1 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in the loss of smell score of the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary ; Loss of smell scores are scored from 0 ('No symptoms') to 3 ('Severe symptoms').
    2 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in the NC score of the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary ; NC scores are scored from 0 ('No symptoms') to 3 ('Severe symptoms').
    3 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in pre­bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ; Pre-broncodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (volume of air in liters)
    4 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS) derived from the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary ; TSS ranges from 0 to 9. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity
    5 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in 22-Item Sino­nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) ; SNOT-22 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire. Score ranges from 0 to 110 with higher score indicating greater rhinosinusitis related health burden.
    6 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in SNOT-22 nasal domain score ; SNOT-22 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire. Nasal domain score ranges from 0-40 with high score representing higher disease burden.
    7 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF) ; Nasal Peak Inspiratory flow (nasal flow in liter per minute)
    8 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in rhinosinusitis VAS ; Severity of the rhinosinusitis from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe symptom.
    9 - Change from baseline to Week 24 in 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) ; Asthma control with 6 questions plus FEV1 measure. Score ranges from 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicates lower asthma control.
    10 - Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) ; Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
    11 - Incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) ; Incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs)
    1- Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en la puntuación de pérdida del olfato del Diario de síntomas nasales de RSC con PN. La puntuación de la pérdida de olfato va desde 0 ('No síntomas') a 3 ('Síntomas graves').
    2 - Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en la puntuación de congestión nasal (CN) del Diario de síntomas nasales de RSC con PN. La puntuación de la congestión nasal va desde 0 ('No síntomas') a 3 ('Síntomas graves').
    3 - Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en el volumen espiratorio forzado en un segundo (VEF1) prebroncodilatador. Volumen del aire en litros.
    4 - Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en la PTS obtenida del Diario de síntomas nasales de RSC con PN. Las puntuaciones más altas en la PTS indican una serveridad mayor en los síntomas.
    5 - Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en la puntuación total de la prueba de resultados nasosinusales de 22 ítems (SNOT22). El SNOT-22 es un cuestionario de resultados registrado por el paciente. Los rangos de puntuación van desde 0 a 110 donde la puntuación más alta indica un empeoramiento de la salud en relación a la rinosinusitis.
    6- Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en la puntuación de los dominios nasales de la SNOT-22. El SNOT-22 es un cuestionario de resultados registrado por el paciente. La puntuación de los dominios nasales es de 0-40 donde la puntuación más alta significa empeoramiento de la enfermedad.
    7- Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en el flujo inspiratorio nasal máximo (FINM). (Flujo nasal en litros por minuto).
    8- Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en la escala visual análoga (EVA) de la rinosinusitis. La gravedad de la rinosinusitis va desde 0 a 10. La puntuación más alta indica síntomas más severos.
    9- Cambio desde el inicio hasta la semana 24 en el cuestionario de control del asma de 7 ítems (ACQ-7); control del asma con 6 preguntas más la puntuación VEF1. Rangos de puntuación desde 0 (completamente controlado) hasta 6 (gravemente no controlado). La puntuación más alta indica un control menor del asma.
    10- Incidencia de acontecimientos adversos surgidos durante el tratamiento (AADT) y acontecimientos adversos graves (AAG).
    11- Incidencia de los acontecimientos adversos de interés especial (AAIE).
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 - Baseline to Week 24
    10, 11 - Baseline to Week 36
    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 – Desde el inicio hasta semana 24
    10, 11 – Desde el inicio hasta semana 36
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) Yes
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) Yes
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned6
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA71
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    United States
    Belgium
    Denmark
    Finland
    France
    Germany
    Hungary
    Italy
    Poland
    Portugal
    Romania
    Spain
    Sweden
    United Kingdom
    Czechia
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    La última visita del último paciente
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months4
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days13
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months4
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days13
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 800
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 44
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state31
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 662
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 844
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2021-07-12
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2021-07-08
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 03:39:27 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA