Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44335   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose EP-104IAR for 24 Weeks in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2021-000859-39
    Trial protocol
    DK  
    Global end of trial date
    04 Dec 2023

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    10 Oct 2024
    First version publication date
    10 Oct 2024
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    EP-104IAR-201
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT04120402
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals
    Sponsor organisation address
    201-2067 Cadboro Bay Rd., Victoria, Canada, V8R 5G4
    Public contact
    Amanda Malone, PhD, Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, +1 250-590-3968, amalone@eupraxiapharma.com
    Scientific contact
    Amanda Malone, PhD, Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, +1 250-590-3968, amalone@eupraxiapharma.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    04 Dec 2023
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    04 Dec 2023
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy of a single intra-articular (IA) injection of EP-104IAR in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee for up to 24 weeks
    Protection of trial subjects
    The Index (treated) knee was prepared with chlorhexidine or betadine per the site’s standard injection protocol. Lidocaine (also known as lignocaine) could be administered prior to the injection procedure to make the procedure more comfortable. Lidocaine could be injected into subcutaneous tissues along the needle pathway but was not injected into the suprapatellar bursal space. Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg (up to a maximum of 3,000 mg per day) was permitted from the start of the Washout and Baseline Period until the end of the study, for the treatment of breakthrough OA pain in the Index knee. If required, the provided rescue medication could also be used to treat other painful events not related to the Index knee.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    02 Aug 2021
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 74
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czechia: 75
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 170
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    319
    EEA total number of subjects
    319
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    164
    From 65 to 84 years
    154
    85 years and over
    1

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Between Sept 10, 2021, and Nov 16, 2022, 1294 people were screened for eligibility, at 12 research sites in Denmark, Poland, and Czech Republic.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    On 1294 people screened for eligibility, and 319 were randomly assigned to EP-104IAR (n=164) or vehicle control (n=155).

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    319
    Number of subjects completed
    319

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    Subjects and assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. Due to the impossibility of obtaining identical presentations of study drug and vehicle, blinding at each site was achieved by appointing 1 unblinded individual responsible for administering treatments and 1 blinded assessor who performed all follow-up assessments. The blinded assessor was not present at the time of injection. Subjects were blinded to treatment by shielding the subject’s view of the injection field.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    EP-104IAR 25 mg
    Arm description
    Single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    EP-104IAR
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Injection
    Routes of administration
    Intraarticular use
    Dosage and administration details
    A single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR. Each single use vial of EP-104IAR Powder contains a sufficient quantity of powder to deliver a dose of 25 mg of FP. A small overage is included in each vial to account for losses to the vial and syringe during constitution prior to injection.

    Arm title
    Vehicle Control
    Arm description
    A single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing no active ingredients
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Vehicle Control
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Injection
    Routes of administration
    Intraarticular use
    Dosage and administration details
    A single 5 mL intra-articular injection of the injection vehicle without the active ingredient, ie, a sterile liquid containing sterile water and excipients.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    EP-104IAR 25 mg Vehicle Control
    Started
    164
    155
    Received randomized treatment
    163
    155
    Completed
    163
    155
    Not completed
    1
    0
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    1
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    EP-104IAR 25 mg
    Reporting group description
    Single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR

    Reporting group title
    Vehicle Control
    Reporting group description
    A single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing no active ingredients

    Reporting group values
    EP-104IAR 25 mg Vehicle Control Total
    Number of subjects
    164 155 319
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    82 82 164
        From 65-84 years
    81 73 154
        85 years and over
    1 0 1
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    64.0 ( 9.29 ) 63.0 ( 9.52 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Gender information was collected by self-report with options male or female.
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    95 89 184
        Male
    69 66 135
    Ethnicity
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    1 2 3
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    162 152 314
        Unknown or Not Reported
    1 1 2
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        Unknown or Not Reported
    0 0 0
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    0 1 1
        Asian
    0 1 1
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0 0 0
        Black or African American
    1 0 1
        White
    163 153 316
        More than one race
    0 0 0

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    EP-104IAR 25 mg
    Reporting group description
    Single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR

    Reporting group title
    Vehicle Control
    Reporting group description
    A single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing no active ingredients

    Primary: Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC pain subscale (Week 12)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC pain subscale (Week 12)
    End point description
    Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Change from score at baseline to score at week 12 post-dose
    End point values
    EP-104IAR 25 mg Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects analysed
    163 [1]
    155
    Units: Change from baseline in WOMAC pain score
        least squares mean (standard deviation)
    -2.89 ( 0.166 )
    -2.23 ( 0.171 )
    Notes
    [1] - One participant was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an AE
    Statistical analysis title
    Least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain
    Statistical analysis description
    From a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
    Comparison groups
    EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    318
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.004
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.66
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.108
         upper limit
    -0.206
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.229

    Secondary: Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC function subscale (Week 12)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC function subscale (Week 12)
    End point description
    Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Function subscale includes questions related to the physical functioning of osteoarthritis e.g. stair use, standing, walking etc. From a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC function score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Change from score at baseline to score at week 12 post-dose
    End point values
    EP-104IAR 25 mg Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects analysed
    163 [2]
    155
    Units: Score (0-10)
        least squares mean (standard deviation)
    -2.59 ( 0.161 )
    -2.04 ( 0.166 )
    Notes
    [2] - Change from score at baseline to score at week 12 post-dose
    Statistical analysis title
    Least squares mean difference in WOMAC function
    Statistical analysis description
    Change from score at baseline to score at week 12 post-dose
    Comparison groups
    EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    318
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.014
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.55
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.978
         upper limit
    -0.113
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.22

    Secondary: Difference between EP-104IAR in vehicle in the area under the curve of WOMAC pain subscale (Week 12)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Difference between EP-104IAR in vehicle in the area under the curve of WOMAC pain subscale (Week 12)
    End point description
    Area under the curve in change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) from Week 0 to Week 12 was calculated on a per-individual basis using the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC was normalized to account for subjects whose actual days and nominal days at Week 12 differed. Treatments were compared using an ANCOVA model containing site; individual baseline WOMAC Pain; and treatment group as covariates.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Area under the curve from Week 0 to Week 12 post-dose
    End point values
    EP-104IAR 25 mg Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects analysed
    163 [3]
    155
    Units: Area under the score (0-10)-time curve
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -235.67 ( 11.769 )
    -166.78 ( 12.169 )
    Notes
    [3] - One participant was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an AE
    Statistical analysis title
    Least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain AUC
    Statistical analysis description
    From an ANCOVA model with treatment, site, and baseline WOMAC Pain as covariates.
    Comparison groups
    EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    318
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -68.89
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -100.092
         upper limit
    -37.689
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    15.853

    Secondary: Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC pain subscale (Week 24)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC pain subscale (Week 24)
    End point description
    Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Change from score at baseline to score at week 24 post-dose
    End point values
    EP-104IAR 25 mg Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects analysed
    163 [4]
    155
    Units: Score (0-10)
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -2.26 ( 0.171 )
    -2.11 ( 0.175 )
    Notes
    [4] - One participant was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an AE
    Statistical analysis title
    Least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain
    Comparison groups
    EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    318
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.518
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.613
         upper limit
    0.309
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.234

    Secondary: Difference between EP-104IAR in vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI strict responders (Week 12)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Difference between EP-104IAR in vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI strict responders (Week 12)
    End point description
    Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) strict responders are defined as at least 50% improvement (decrease from baseline) in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain or function subscales (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) and an absolute change of at least 2 in the respective score. Patients who discontinued prior to Week 12 were considered non-responders.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Proportion of strict responders at week 12 post-dose
    End point values
    EP-104IAR 25 mg Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects analysed
    163 [5]
    155
    Units: Responders
    87
    61
    Notes
    [5] - One participant was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an AE
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference in proportion of strict responders
    Comparison groups
    EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    318
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [6]
    P-value
    = 0.028
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [6] - From Fisher’s exact test comparing the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders between treatment and vehicle.

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized and analyzed for safety evaluations i.e, events which occurred from the time of the EP-104IAR or vehicle injection procedure until the Week 24/End-of-Study/Early Exit Visit.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    24.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Safety population - Vehicle control arm
    Reporting group description
    The safety population consisted of all randomized subjects who were administered a dose of study drug. The subjects in this group were analysed based on the treatment they received.

    Reporting group title
    Safety population - EP-104IAR arm
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    Safety population - Vehicle control arm Safety population - EP-104IAR arm
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 155 (0.65%)
    4 / 163 (2.45%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Prostate cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 155 (0.65%)
    0 / 163 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Accidental overdose
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 155 (0.00%)
    1 / 163 (0.61%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebrovascular accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 155 (0.00%)
    1 / 163 (0.61%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Loss of consciousness
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 155 (0.00%)
    1 / 163 (0.61%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Acute vestibular syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 155 (0.00%)
    1 / 163 (0.61%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Safety population - Vehicle control arm Safety population - EP-104IAR arm
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    68 / 155 (43.87%)
    76 / 163 (46.63%)
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Influenza like illness
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 155 (6.45%)
    4 / 163 (2.45%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    5
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 155 (14.84%)
    38 / 163 (23.31%)
         occurrences all number
    26
    38
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 155 (7.74%)
    14 / 163 (8.59%)
         occurrences all number
    15
    16
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 155 (9.03%)
    14 / 163 (8.59%)
         occurrences all number
    14
    14
    Influenza
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 155 (5.81%)
    6 / 163 (3.68%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    6

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    17 Dec 2019
    Following regulatory agency input, the following changes were made: Change to single dose level (25 mg), previously dose escalation up to 50 mg was included. Inclusion criteria revised to require unsatisfactory pain control from, or intolerance of, at least 2 prior standard osteoarthritis (OA) treatments. Exclusion of participants considered by the investigator to be non-responsive to corticosteroids. Increase in sample size from 76 to 95 per arm. Requirement for ultrasound guidance of the injection (previously optional).
    28 Apr 2021
    Change of study location from the United States based to Denmark. Added recording of rescue pain medication use. Requirement added for typical knee pain at Screening to be ≥4.0 out of 10. Requirement for average daily index knee numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score in the second week of the Washout and Baseline Period changed from ≥5·0 / ≤9·0 to ≥4·0 / ≤10·0. Requirement for non-index knee pain scores at Screening changed from a single NPRS score ≤4 to both weekly Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain scores and the average daily NPRS scores in the second week of Washout and Baseline Period ≤4.0. Exclusion of chondrocalcinosis relaxed to only exclude chondrocalcinosis likely to affect the outcome of this study in the opinion of the investigator. Removal synovial fluid collection for pharmacokinetic (PK) and biomarker analyses. Added precautions in the event of symptoms and signs of COVID-19.
    06 Jul 2021
    Changes to align protocol language with that appearing on the electronic Patient Reported Outcomes (ePRO) device, in other study documents, and in typical site procedures. Requirement updated for the injection to be performed by suitably qualified and experienced physician, previously this may have been a suitably qualified and experienced physician’s assistant/nurse practitioner.
    15 Oct 2021
    Number of sites and countries increased. Removed requirements for average daily index knee NPRS score in the second week of the Washout and Baseline Period ≥4.0 and ≤10.0 and individual daily index knee NPRS scores to not vary by more than 4 points. Requirement for non-index knee pain scores at screening changed from both weekly WOMAC pain scores and the average daily NPRS scores in the second week of Washout and Baseline Period ≤4.0, to only WOMAC pain scores at the end each week both ≤6.0. Morning serum cortisol no longer required at Screening, instead the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test was to be performed in all participants during Screening. Criteria added for selection index knee, covering the event both knees were potentially eligible.
    10 Nov 2021
    Requirement for weekly WOMAC pain subscale scores for the index knee (end of each week of the Washout and Baseline Period) from both ≥5.0 and ≤9.0 to both ≥4.0 and ≤9.0 (and not vary by >3 points).
    13 Apr 2022
    Allowed inclusion of well-controlled, non-insulin dependent diabetics (i.e., HbA1c levels ≤7·9% (63 mmol/mol). Previously, patients with diabetes mellitus defined as a haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value of ≥6·5% (47 mmol/mol) were excluded. Allowance for re-starting the Washout and Baseline Period (within the 8-week screening period) if baseline WOMAC pain scores were not completed due to reasons beyond the participant’s control eg, technical issues with the ePRO device. Statistical methods revised such that they were to be described in detail in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) which will be finalised prior to unblinding of the study.
    17 Aug 2022
    Addition of an optional imaging sub-study extending the maximum duration per participant to approximately 60 weeks with additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) site visits.
    24 Mar 2023
    Addition of an optional extended PK sub-study to detect the amount of corticosteroid FP in subjects following Week 24/End of study visit.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 10 00:56:37 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA