Clinical Trial Results:
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose EP-104IAR for 24 Weeks in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2021-000859-39 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
04 Dec 2023
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
10 Oct 2024
|
First version publication date |
10 Oct 2024
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
EP-104IAR-201
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT04120402 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
201-2067 Cadboro Bay Rd., Victoria, Canada, V8R 5G4
|
||
Public contact |
Amanda Malone, PhD, Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, +1 250-590-3968, amalone@eupraxiapharma.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Amanda Malone, PhD, Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, +1 250-590-3968, amalone@eupraxiapharma.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
04 Dec 2023
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
04 Dec 2023
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the efficacy of a single intra-articular (IA) injection of EP-104IAR in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee for up to 24 weeks
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The Index (treated) knee was prepared with chlorhexidine or betadine per the site’s standard injection protocol. Lidocaine (also known as lignocaine) could be administered prior to the injection procedure to make the procedure more comfortable. Lidocaine could be injected into subcutaneous tissues along the needle pathway but was not injected into the suprapatellar bursal space.
Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg (up to a maximum of 3,000 mg per day) was permitted from the start of the Washout and Baseline Period until the end of the study, for the treatment of breakthrough OA pain in the Index knee. If required, the provided rescue medication could also be used to treat other painful events not related to the Index knee.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
02 Aug 2021
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 74
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Czechia: 75
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 170
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
319
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
319
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
164
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
154
|
||
85 years and over |
1
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Between Sept 10, 2021, and Nov 16, 2022, 1294 people were screened for eligibility, at 12 research sites in Denmark, Poland, and Czech Republic. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
On 1294 people screened for eligibility, and 319 were randomly assigned to EP-104IAR (n=164) or vehicle control (n=155). | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
319 | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
319 | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Subjects and assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. Due to the impossibility of obtaining identical presentations of study drug and vehicle, blinding at each site was achieved by appointing 1 unblinded individual responsible for administering treatments and 1 blinded assessor who performed all follow-up assessments. The blinded assessor was not present at the time of injection.
Subjects were blinded to treatment by shielding the subject’s view of the injection field.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
EP-104IAR 25 mg | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
EP-104IAR
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraarticular use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR. Each single use vial of EP-104IAR Powder contains a sufficient quantity of powder to deliver a dose of 25 mg of FP. A small overage is included in each vial to account for losses to the vial and syringe during constitution prior to injection.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Vehicle Control | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
A single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing no active ingredients | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Vehicle Control
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraarticular use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A single 5 mL intra-articular injection of the injection vehicle without the active ingredient, ie, a sterile liquid containing sterile water and excipients.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
EP-104IAR 25 mg
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle Control
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
A single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing no active ingredients | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
EP-104IAR 25 mg
|
||
Reporting group description |
Single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR | ||
Reporting group title |
Vehicle Control
|
||
Reporting group description |
A single 5 mL intra-articular injection containing no active ingredients |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC pain subscale (Week 12) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Change from score at baseline to score at week 12 post-dose
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - One participant was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an AE |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
From a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
318
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.004 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.66
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-1.108 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.206 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.229
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC function subscale (Week 12) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Function subscale includes questions related to the physical functioning of osteoarthritis e.g. stair use, standing, walking etc. From a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC function score.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Change from score at baseline to score at week 12 post-dose
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Change from score at baseline to score at week 12 post-dose |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Least squares mean difference in WOMAC function | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Change from score at baseline to score at week 12 post-dose
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
318
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.014 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.55
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.978 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.113 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.22
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Difference between EP-104IAR in vehicle in the area under the curve of WOMAC pain subscale (Week 12) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Area under the curve in change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) from Week 0 to Week 12 was calculated on a per-individual basis using the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC was normalized to account for subjects whose actual days and nominal days at Week 12 differed. Treatments were compared using an ANCOVA model containing site; individual baseline WOMAC Pain; and treatment group as covariates.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Area under the curve from Week 0 to Week 12 post-dose
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - One participant was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an AE |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain AUC | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
From an ANCOVA model with treatment, site, and baseline WOMAC Pain as covariates.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
318
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-68.89
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-100.092 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-37.689 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
15.853
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Difference in change from baseline between EP-104IAR and vehicle in WOMAC pain subscale (Week 24) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Change from score at baseline to score at week 24 post-dose
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [4] - One participant was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an AE |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
318
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.518 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.15
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.613 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.309 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.234
|
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Difference between EP-104IAR in vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI strict responders (Week 12) | |||||||||
End point description |
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) strict responders are defined as at least 50% improvement (decrease from baseline) in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain or function subscales (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) and an absolute change of at least 2 in the respective score. Patients who discontinued prior to Week 12 were considered non-responders.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Proportion of strict responders at week 12 post-dose
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [5] - One participant was excluded from all analyses because treatment was not administered due to an AE |
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in proportion of strict responders | |||||||||
Comparison groups |
EP-104IAR 25 mg v Vehicle Control
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
318
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [6] | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.028 | |||||||||
Method |
Fisher exact | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
Notes [6] - From Fisher’s exact test comparing the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders between treatment and vehicle. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized and analyzed for safety evaluations i.e, events which occurred from the time of the EP-104IAR or vehicle injection procedure until the Week 24/End-of-Study/Early Exit Visit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
24.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Safety population - Vehicle control arm
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The safety population consisted of all randomized subjects who were administered a dose of study drug. The subjects in this group were analysed based on the treatment they received. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Safety population - EP-104IAR arm
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
17 Dec 2019 |
Following regulatory agency input, the following changes were made:
Change to single dose level (25 mg), previously dose escalation up to 50 mg was included.
Inclusion criteria revised to require unsatisfactory pain control from, or intolerance of, at least 2 prior standard osteoarthritis (OA) treatments.
Exclusion of participants considered by the investigator to be non-responsive to corticosteroids.
Increase in sample size from 76 to 95 per arm.
Requirement for ultrasound guidance of the injection (previously optional).
|
||
28 Apr 2021 |
Change of study location from the United States based to Denmark.
Added recording of rescue pain medication use.
Requirement added for typical knee pain at Screening to be ≥4.0 out of 10.
Requirement for average daily index knee numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score in the second week of the Washout and Baseline Period changed from ≥5·0 / ≤9·0 to ≥4·0 / ≤10·0.
Requirement for non-index knee pain scores at Screening changed from a single NPRS score ≤4 to both weekly Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain scores and the average daily NPRS scores in the second week of Washout and Baseline Period ≤4.0.
Exclusion of chondrocalcinosis relaxed to only exclude chondrocalcinosis likely to affect the outcome of this study in the opinion of the investigator.
Removal synovial fluid collection for pharmacokinetic (PK) and biomarker analyses.
Added precautions in the event of symptoms and signs of COVID-19.
|
||
06 Jul 2021 |
Changes to align protocol language with that appearing on the electronic Patient Reported Outcomes (ePRO) device, in other study documents, and in typical site procedures.
Requirement updated for the injection to be performed by suitably qualified and experienced physician, previously this may have been a suitably qualified and experienced physician’s assistant/nurse practitioner.
|
||
15 Oct 2021 |
Number of sites and countries increased.
Removed requirements for average daily index knee NPRS score in the second week of the Washout and Baseline Period ≥4.0 and ≤10.0 and individual daily index knee NPRS scores to not vary by more than 4 points.
Requirement for non-index knee pain scores at screening changed from both weekly WOMAC pain scores and the average daily NPRS scores in the second week of Washout and Baseline Period ≤4.0, to only WOMAC pain scores at the end each week both ≤6.0.
Morning serum cortisol no longer required at Screening, instead the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test was to be performed in all participants during Screening.
Criteria added for selection index knee, covering the event both knees were potentially eligible.
|
||
10 Nov 2021 |
Requirement for weekly WOMAC pain subscale scores for the index knee (end of each week of the Washout and Baseline Period) from both ≥5.0 and ≤9.0 to both ≥4.0 and ≤9.0 (and not vary by >3 points). |
||
13 Apr 2022 |
Allowed inclusion of well-controlled, non-insulin dependent diabetics (i.e., HbA1c levels ≤7·9% (63 mmol/mol). Previously, patients with diabetes mellitus defined as a haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value of ≥6·5% (47 mmol/mol) were excluded.
Allowance for re-starting the Washout and Baseline Period (within the 8-week screening period) if baseline WOMAC pain scores were not completed due to reasons beyond the participant’s control eg, technical issues with the ePRO device.
Statistical methods revised such that they were to be described in detail in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) which will be finalised prior to unblinding of the study.
|
||
17 Aug 2022 |
Addition of an optional imaging sub-study extending the maximum duration per participant to approximately 60 weeks with additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) site visits. |
||
24 Mar 2023 |
Addition of an optional extended PK sub-study to detect the amount of corticosteroid FP in subjects following Week 24/End of study visit. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |