E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Pediatric lower limb (LL) spasticity (SP) caused by cerebral palsy (CP) |
Spastyczność kończyn dolnych u dzieci z mózgowym porażeniem dziecięcym. |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Pediatric lower limb spasticity caused by cerebral palsy.
|
Spastyczność kończyn dolnych u dzieci z mózgowym porażeniem dziecięcym. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10041416 |
E.1.2 | Term | Spasticity |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004852 |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 21.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10024132 |
E.1.2 | Term | Leg spasticity |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004852 |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10021740 |
E.1.2 | Term | Infantile cerebral palsy |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004850 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To demonstrate efficacy by showing superiority of NT 201 compared intra-individually to placebo in children and adolescents with LL SP caused by CP at week 4 to week 6 after a single injection. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
To demonstrate the relevance of the effect of NT 201 compared to placebo in children and adolescents with LL SP caused by CP in terms of response rates in derived MAS score of plantar flexors at week 4 or week 6 after a single injection.
To demonstrate the relevance of the effect of NT 201 compared to placebo in children and adolescents with LL SP caused by CP assessed on a Global Impression of Change of Plantar Flexor Spasticity Scale (GICS-PF) at week 4 to week 6 after a single injection.
To demonstrate the relevance of the effect of NT 201 compared to placebo in children and adolescents with LL SP caused by CP assessed on a Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) at week 4 to week 6 after a single injection. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
• Male and female subjects ≥ 2 to ≤ 17 years of age; • Bilateral, symmetrical pes equinus due to LL SP caused by CP in subjects with any Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level; and • Identical MAS plantar flexor score of ≥ 2 for pes equinus clinical patterns in both legs at neutral ankle position and knee at maximum extension.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
• Pre-dominant forms of muscle hypertonia/hyperactivity other than LL SP (e.g., rigidity, dystonia, dyskinesia); • Previous treatment with Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) of any serotype in any body region within the last four months before injection at baseline visit; and • Fixed contracture in at least one of both pes equinus. • Significant involuntary movements or limitations that hinder MAS assessment or positioning. • Clinically significant SP in LL clinical patterns other than pes equinus; or gait patterns drop foot, crouch gait, and equinus with jump knee. • Limitation of hip abduction to less than 40° or pre-diagnosed migrational percentage greater than 30°.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Change in derived modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of plantar flexors from baseline at control visits at week 4 and week 6. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
From baseline to week 4 and 6 |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Secondary End Point 1: Response in derived MAS score of plantar flexors at control visits at week 4 or week 6 with response defined as improvement of at least 1 point on the derived MAS score as compared to study baseline. Secondary End Point 2: GICS-PF score at control visits at week 4 and week 6 by investigator. Secondary End Point 3: GAS T-score at control visits at week 4 and week 6. |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Secondary End Point 1: From baseline to week 4 or week 6 Secondary End Point 2: Week 4 and week 6 Secondary End Point 3: Week 4 and week 6 |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes |
E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |
|
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 2 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
Poland |
Russian Federation |
Ukraine |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 6 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 1 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 8 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |