E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Ischemic Stroke is defined as an acute neurologic deficit caused by vascular occlusion or stenosis |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Cardiovascular Diseases [C14] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 22.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10055221 |
E.1.2 | Term | Ischemic stroke |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004852 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To show the efficacy of glenzocimab vs. placebo, on the "poor outcome" defined as a mRS score of 4-6 (vs 0-3) assessed at Day 90 |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Key sec obj: To show the efficacy of glenzocimab vs. placebo on the "favorable outcome" defined as an mRS score of 0-2 (vs 3-6) assessed at Day 90. Other sec obj: To assess the efficacy of glenzocimab vs. placebo on the: •mRS 5-6 at Day 90 •mRS 0-1 at Day 90 •Ordinal mRS at Day 90 • Utility weighted mRS (UW-mRS) at Day 90 • Change from baseline in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at Day 1 •All-cause mortality within 72 hours •All-cause mortality at Day 90 •Symptomatic and non-symptomatic ICHs • To assess recanalization in patients undergoing thrombectomy • To assess cerebral tissue reperfusion • To assess the impact on follow up imaging (follow up infarct volume, infarct growth and volume of hemorrhagic transformation) To assess the efficacy of glenzocimab vs. placebo of all endpoints, in specific subgroups: subjects who will receive thrombectomy vs who will not, by age level, baseline NIHSS level and thrombolytic agent, if feasible. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Adult male or female patients ≥ 18 years (i.e., at least 18 years old at time of randomization). 2. Having given their own written consent or legal representative's consent, or emergency consent, and in any case, in strict accordance with country-specific legal requirements. 3. Presenting with an acute disabling ischemic stroke either in the anterior or in posterior circulation, with or without visible occlusion, with a known time of onset, that is ≤ 4.5 hrs 4. Presenting with a pre-IVT NIHSS ≥ 6 5. In whom IVT is or has been initiated, whether or not patients are additionally eligible to mechanical thrombectomy (MT+IVT), according to the recommendation of the last guidelines (ASA and ESO recommendations), 6. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum/urine pregnancy test at baseline. Women of childbearing potential, i.e, fertile, are defined as women following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile, i.e, having undergone hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. 7. Post-menopausal women defined as not having menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. For WOCBP, a highly effective birth control method shoudl be in place that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year that should last for at least 2 months after IMP administration. Birth control methods which may be considered as highly effective in WOCBP include: • Combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (intravaginal, transdermal), • Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (injectable, implantable) • intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) • bilateral tubal occlusion, • vasectomized partner, Birth control methods which may be considered as highly effective for men and that should last for 4 months after IMP administration include: • vasectomy, • use of condom combined with a highly effective birth control method for their WOCBP partner. Please note that hormonal contraception is a risk factor for thromboembolic events and attention should be called to reconsider it passed the acute stroke phase. 8. Patients affiliated to a health insurance - modality depending on country legal requirements |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Coma, or NIHSS >25 2. Patients < 18 years 3. Protected adults under guardanship or curatorship 4. Prior ischemic stroke within the past 3 months 5. mRS pre-stroke known to be ≥ 2 6. Large (more than 1/3 of the middle cerebral artery) regions of clear hypodensity on Baseline Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging with vascular injection (MRA). 7. Significant mass effect with midline shift 8. Stroke of hemorrhagic origin 9. Patients likely to require dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) within the first 24 hrs after cessation of glenzocimab or placebo infusion for e.g., carotid stenting 10. Known renal insufficiency (Grades 4-5 – severe or terminal), with a creatinine clearance < 30 mL/Mn using Cockroft formula) 11. Known allergic reaction to contrast agents 12. Known ongoing anti-coagulant therapy, except preventative doses of injectable low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) 13. Known ongoing treatment with a mAb. 14. Prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation < 10 days. 15. Childbirth within < 10 days. 16. Seizures at stroke onset if it precludes obtaining an accurate baseline (pr-IVT) NIHSS 17. Life expectancy (except for stroke) < 3 months. 18. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. 19. Females of childbearing potential not using effective birth control methods. 20. Known current participation in another clinical investigation with experimental drug. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Binary "Poor Outcome" on the mRS defined by a score of 4-6 (versus 0-3) assessed at Day 90 |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Binary “Favorable Outcome” on the mRS defined by a score of 0-2 (versus 3-6) assessed at Day 90 Other Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: •All-cause mortality at Day 90 • mRS 0-1 • mRS 5-6 at Day 90 •Ordinal mRS at Day 90 • Utility-Weighted mRS •All-cause mortality within 72 hours •Symptomatic and non-symptomatic ICHs • Neurological Status Change as assessed by: o Response defined by a relative decrease (%) in NIHSS value at 24 hrs compared to pre-IVT value higher than 30%. o Relative change (%) in NIHSS value at 24 hrs compared to pre-IVT value • Recanalization rate as centrally measured by eTICI score in those patients having a post-thrombectomy angiography with a focus on successful recanalization • Infarct volume progression: o Follow-up infarct volume (FIV) at 24 hrs on non-contrast CT or diffusion weighted MRI o Infarct growth (FIV minus baseline infarct volume on non-contrast CT or diffusion-weighted MRI) • Volume of hemorrhagic transformation • Quality of Life, as assessed at Day 90 by the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
T15min 6 hrs 24 hrs 7 Days 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | Yes |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 3 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 40 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
Israel |
United Kingdom |
United States |
Belgium |
Czechia |
Denmark |
France |
Germany |
Slovakia |
Spain |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 2 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 4 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 15 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 2 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 4 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 15 |