Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43873   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7293   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2021-002166-40
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:RD.06.SPR.201591
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2021-10-19
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2021-002166-40
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis with Inadequate Response to or for Whom Cyclosporine A is not Medically Advisable
    Estudio aleatorizado, doble ciego y controlado con placebo para evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad de nemolizumab en sujetos con dermatitis atópica de moderada a severa que han tenido una respuesta insuficiente a la ciclosporina A o para los que no es médicamente aconsejable
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    A Multicenter trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Nemolizumab in Subjects with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
    Estudio multicéntrico para evaluar la seguridad y eficacia del Nemolizumab in pacientes con dermatitis atópica de moderada a severa.
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberRD.06.SPR.201591
    A.5.4Other Identifiers
    Name:IND numberNumber:117122
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorGalderma S.A.
    B.1.3.4CountrySwitzerland
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportGalderma S.A.
    B.4.2CountrySwitzerland
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationGalderma S.A.
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointClinical Trial Information Desk
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressRue entre-deux-Ville 10
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityLa Tour-de-Peilz
    B.5.3.3Post code1814
    B.5.3.4CountrySwitzerland
    B.5.4Telephone number+34900834223
    B.5.6E-mailRegistroEspanolDeEstudiosClinicos@druginfo.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameNemolizumab
    D.3.2Product code CD14152
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Powder and solution for solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNNEMOLIZUMAB
    D.3.9.1CAS number 1476039-58-3
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeCD14152 / CIM331
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameHumanised monoclonal antibody IgG2 recognising the interleukin-31 receptor A
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB191036
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number30
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Yes
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboPowder and solution for solution for injection
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSubcutaneous use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
    Dermatitis atópica de modera a severa
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
    Dermatitis atópica de modera a severa
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases [C17]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 21.1
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10003639
    E.1.2Term Atopic dermatitis
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004858
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective is to investigate the efficacy of nemolizumab administered in combination with topical background therapy (topical corticosteroids [TCS] with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors [TCI]) in adult subjects with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are not adequately controlled with or are not advised to use oral cyclosporine A (CsA) for medical reasons.
    El objetivo principal consiste en investigar la eficacia de nemolizumab administrado en combinación con el tratamiento tópico de base (corticoides tópicos [CT] con o sin inhibidores de la calcineurina tópicos [ICT]) en sujetos adultos con dermatitis atópica (DA) de moderada a severa que no muestran un control suficiente con ciclosporina A (CsA) oral o en los que no se aconseja su uso por motivos médicos.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    The secondary objective is to investigate the safety of nemolizumab in adult subjects with moderate-to-severe AD who are not adequately controlled with or are not advised to use oral CsA for medical
    reasons.
    El objetivo secundario consiste en investigar la seguridad de nemolizumab en sujetos adultos con DA de moderada a severa que no muestran un control suficiente con CsA oral o en los que no se aconseja su uso por motivos médicos.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years at the screening visit.
    2. Chronic AD for at least 2 years before the screening visit and confirmed according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria at the time of the screening visit.
    3. EASI score ≥ 20 at both the screening and baseline visits. Subjects with an EASI score of 18-19 at the screening visit only may be reevaluated once within 48 hours.
    4. IGA score ≥ 3 (based on the IGA scale ranging from 0 to 4, in which 3 is moderate and 4 is severe) at both the screening and baseline visits.
    5. AD involvement ≥ 10% of BSA at both the screening and baseline visits.
    6. PP NRS score of at least 4.0 at the screening and baseline visit. The
    screening PP NRS score will be determined by a single PP NRS
    assessment (score ranging from 0 to 10) for the 24-hour period
    immediately preceding the screening visit. The baseline PP NRS score will be determined based on the average of the daily PP NRS scores
    (score ranging from 0 to 10) during the 7 days immediately preceding
    baseline (rounding is not permitted). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days immediately preceding baseline is required for this calculation.
    7. Documented history of one of the following:
    a. Previously exposed to CsA:
    1) Inadequate response to CsA with previous exposure (defined as flare of AD during CsA tapering from a maximum of 6 weeks of high dose [5 mg/kg/day] to maintenance dose [2 to 3 mg/kg/day] or a flare after a minimum of 3 months on maintenance dose). Flare is defined as increase in signs and/or symptoms leading to escalation of therapy (ie, increase in dose, switch to a higher-potency TCS, or start of another systemic nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drug).
    or
    2) Previous requirement for CsA at doses > 5 mg/kg/day, or duration
    beyond those specified in the prescribing information (> 1 year).
    or
    3) Intolerance and/or unacceptable toxicity (eg, elevated creatinine, elevated liver function tests, uncontrolled hypertension, paresthesia, headache, nausea, hypertrichosis) with previous CsA exposure.
    b. CsA is medically inadvisable:
    1) medical contraindications (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension on medication).
    or
    2) use of prohibited concomitant medications (e.g. statins, digoxin, macrolide antibiotics, barbiturates, anti-seizure drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, diuretics, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, St John’s Wort, etc.).
    or
    3) increased susceptibility to CsA-induced renal damage (elevated creatinine) and/or liver damage (elevated function tests).
    or
    4) increased risk of serious infections.
    or
    5) hypersensitivity to CsA active substance or excipients.
    Acceptable documentation includes patient records with information on CsA prescription and treatment outcome, other prohibitive medications/medical history, or written documentation of the conversation with the subject’s treating physician, if different than the investigator, as applicable.
    8. Documented history by a physician (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to topical medications or use of systemic therapies for control of the disease.
    Inadequate response to TCS treatment (with or without TCI) is defined as inability to achieve good disease control defined as mild disease or better (eg, IGA ≤ 2) after use of at least a moderate potency TCS as recommended by the product prescribing information. TCS may be used with or without TCIs.
    If documentation is not acceptable, subjects may be rescreened after such documentation is obtained.
    9. Agree to apply a moisturizer throughout the study from the screening visit; agree to apply an authorized TCS, with or without TCI, from the screening visit and throughout the study as determined appropriate by the investigator.

    Full list of inclusion criteria is included within the protocol.
    1.Edad ≥18 años en la visita de selección.
    2.DA crónica desde al menos 2 años antes de la visita de selección y confirmada según los criterios de consenso de la American Academy of Dermatology 2 en el momento de la visita de selección.
    3.Puntuación EASI ≥20 en las visitas de selección y basal. Los sujetos con una puntuación EASI de 18-19 en la visita de selección solo podrán ser reevaluados una vez en un plazo de 48 horas.
    4.Puntuación IGA ≥3 (según la escala IGA de 0 a 4, en la que 3 equivale a «moderada» y 4 a «severa») en las visitas de selección y basal.
    5.Afectación por la DA ≥10% de la SC en las visitas de selección y basal.
    6.Puntuación en la EVN PM ≥4,0 en las visitas de selección y basal. La puntuación en la EVN PM de selección se determinará mediante una sola evaluación de la EVN PM (puntuación de 0 a 10) durante el período de 24 horas inmediatamente anterior a la visita de selección. La puntuación basal en la EVN PM se determinará basándose en el promedio de las puntuaciones diarias (puntuación de 0 a 10) obtenidas durante los 7 días inmediatamente anteriores al momento basal (no se permite redondeo). Para este cálculo se requiere un mínimo de 4 puntuaciones diarias correspondientes a los 7 días inmediatamente anteriores al momento basal.
    7.Antecedentes documentados de una de las circunstancias siguientes:
    a.Exposición previa a CsA:
    1.Respuesta insuficiente a CsA con la exposición previa (definida como un brote de DA durante la reducción gradual de la CsA desde un máximo de 6 semanas con una dosis alta [5 mg/kg/día] hasta la dosis de mantenimiento [2 a 3 mg/kg/día] o un brote después de un mínimo de 3 meses con la dosis de mantenimiento). Un brote se define como un aumento de los signos o síntomas que motiva un incremento del tratamiento (es decir, aumento de la dosis, cambio a un CT de mayor potencia o inicio de otro inmunodepresor no esteroideo sistémico).
    o
    2.Necesidad previa de CsA en una dosis >5 mg/kg/día o duración superior a la especificada en la ficha técnica (>1 año).
    o
    3.Intolerancia o toxicidad inaceptable (por ejemplo, elevación de la creatinina, elevación de las pruebas de función hepática, hipertensión no controlada, parestesias, cefalea, náuseas o hipertricosis) con la exposición previa a CsA.
    b.Uso médicamente no aconsejable de CsA por:
    1.contraindicación médica (p. ej., hipertensión no controlada pese a la medicación)
    o
    2.uso de medicamentos prohibidos (p. ej., estatinas, digoxina, antibióticos macrólidos, barbitúricos, antiepilépticos, antiinflamatorios no esteroideos, diuréticos, inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina, hipérico, etc.)
    o
    3.mayor propensión al daño renal (creatinina elevada) o al daño hepático (pruebas funcionales elevadas) inducido por la CsA
    4.mayor riesgo de infecciones graves
    o
    5.hipersensibilidad a la CsA o a sus excipientes.
    o
    La documentación aceptable incluye la historia clínica del paciente con información sobre la prescripción de CsA y el resultado del tratamiento, otros medicamentos/historia médica prohibidos, o la documentación escrita de la conversación con el médico responsable del tratamiento del sujeto, si es diferente del investigador, según proceda.
    8.Antecedentes documentados por un médico (en los 6 meses previos a la visita de selección) de respuesta insuficiente a medicamentos tópicos o uso de tratamientos sistémicos para controlar la enfermedad.
    La respuesta insuficiente al tratamiento con CT (con o sin ICT) se define como la imposibilidad de lograr un buen control de la enfermedad, definido como enfermedad leve o mejor (por ejemplo, IGA ≤2) tras el uso de un CT de potencia moderada, como mínimo, según lo recomendado en la ficha técnica del producto. Los CT podrán utilizarse con o sin ICT.
    En caso de que la documentación no sea aceptable, podrá repetirse el proceso de selección de los sujetos una vez obtenida dicha documentación.
    9.Compromiso a aplicarse una crema hidratante durante todo el estudio a partir de la visita de selección y compromiso a aplicarse un CT autorizado, con o sin ICT, a partir de la visita de selección y durante todo el estudio, según lo considere oportuno el investigador.
    La lista completa de criterios de inclusión se incluye dentro del protocolo.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1.Body weight < 30 kg.
    2.One or more of the following criteria at screening or baseline:
    a. Exacerbation of asthma requiring hospitalization in the preceding 12 months.
    b. Asthma that has not been well controlled (ie, symptoms occurring on > 2 days per week, nighttime awakenings 2 or more times per week, or some interference with normal activities) during the preceding 3 months.
    c. Asthma Control Test (ACT) ≤ 19 (only for subjects with a history of asthma).
    d. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) < 80% of the predicted value.
    Note: In the event that PEF is < 80% of the predicted value at the screening visit, PEF testing can be repeated once within 48 hours:
    •For subjects without a history of asthma
    •For subjects with a history of asthma but if the ACT score is >19 at screening
    3. Current medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic bronchitis.
    4. Cutaneous infection within 1 week before the baseline visit, any infection requiring treatment with oral or parenteral antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics or antifungals within 2 weeks before the baseline visit, or any confirmed or suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection within 2 weeks before the screening or baseline visit. Subjects may be rescreened once the infection has resolved. Resolution of COVID-19 can be confirmed by recovery assessment methods, as described in the protocol.
    Note: Subjects with chronic, stable use of prophylactic treatment for recurrent herpes viral infection can be included in this clinical study.
    5. Positive serology results (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] or hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb], hepatitis C [HCV] antibody with positive HCV RNA, or human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] antibody) at the screening visit.
    Note: Subjects with a positive HBcAb and a negative HBsAg can be included if the hepatitis B surface antibody is positive (considered immune after a natural infection). Subjects who are positive for HCV antibody and negative for HCV RNA may be enrolled.
    In the event of rescreening, the serology tests results (eg, HBV, HCV, HIV) from the first screening can be used by the investigator to assess the eligibility of rescreened subjects if those tests were performed within 6 weeks prior to the baseline visit.
    6. Current active or latent tuberculosis (TB) infection or history of either untreated or inadequately treated active or latent TB according to the local applicable guidelines.
    Note: Subjects who have a documented history of completion of an appropriate TB treatment regimen for latent or active TB with no history of re-exposure to TB since their treatment was completed are eligible to participate in the study.
    In the event of rescreening, the TB test results from the first screening can be used by the investigator to assess the eligibility of rescreened subjects if the test was performed within 6 weeks prior to the baseline visit.
    7. Known or suspected immunosuppression or unusually frequent, recurrent, severe, or prolonged infections as per investigator judgment.
    8. History of lymphoproliferative disease or history of malignancy of any organ system within the last 5 years, except for (1) basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease), or carcinomas in situ of the cervix that have been treated and have no evidence of recurrence in the last 12 weeks before the baseline visit, or (2) actinic keratoses that have been treated.
    9. Presence of confounding skin conditions that may interfere with study assessments (eg, Netherton syndrome, psoriasis, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome], contact dermatitis, chronic actinic dermatitis, dermatitis herpetiformis).
    10. Pregnant women (positive serum pregnancy test result at the screening visit or positive urine pregnancy test [UPT] at the baseline visit), breastfeeding women, or women planning a pregnancy during the clinical study.


    Full list of exclusion criteria is included within the protocol.
    1.Peso corporal <30 kg.
    2.Uno o más de los criterios siguientes en el período de selección o el momento basal:
    a.Exacerbación asmática con necesidad de hospitalización en los 12 meses precedentes.
    b.Asma que no ha estado bien controlada (es decir, aparición de síntomas >2 días a la semana, despertares nocturnos 2 o más veces a la semana o cierta interferencia en las actividades normales) durante los 3 meses precedentes.
    c.Puntuación ACT (Prueba de control del asma) ≤19 (únicamente en los sujetos con antecedentes de asma).
    d.Flujo espiratorio máximo (PEF) <80% del valor teórico.
    Nota: En caso de que el PEF sea <80% del valor teórico en la visita de selección, podrá repetirse una vez en un plazo de 48 horas:
    •En los sujetos sin antecedentes de asma.
    •En los sujetos con antecedentes de asma, pero si la puntuación ACT es >19 en el período de selección.
    3.Historia médica presente de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica o bronquitis crónica.
    4.Infección cutánea en la semana previa a la visita basal, cualquier infección con necesidad de tratamiento con antibióticos, antivirales, antiparasitarios o antimicóticos orales o parenterales en las 2 semanas previas a la visita basal o infección por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) confirmada o sospechada en las 2 semanas previas a la visita de selección o basal. Los sujetos podrán someterse de nuevo al proceso de selección una vez resuelta la infección. La resolución de la COVID-19 puede confirmarse mediante métodos de evaluación de la recuperación, según se describe en el protocolo.
    Nota: En este estudio clínico podrán participar sujetos con uso estable y crónico de tratamiento profiláctico para la infección recurrente por virus del herpes.
    5.Resultados serológicos positivos (antígeno de superficie del virus de la hepatitis B [HBsAg] o anticuerpos contra el antígeno central del virus de la hepatitis B [anti-HBc], anticuerpos contra el virus de la hepatitis C [VHC] con ARN del VHC positivo o anticuerpos contra el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana [VIH]) en la visita de selección.
    Nota: Podrán participar sujetos con un resultado positivo para anti-HBc y negativo para HBsAg si el anticuerpo de superficie contra el virus de la hepatitis B es positivo (se consideran inmunes tras una infección natural). Podrán participar sujetos con un resultado positivo para anticuerpos contra el VHC y negativo para ARN del VHC.
    En caso de repetirse el proceso de selección, el investigador podrá utilizar los resultados de las pruebas serológicas (por ejemplo, VHB, VHC y VIH) de la primera selección para evaluar la elegibilidad de los sujetos que se sometan de nuevo al proceso de selección siempre que dichas pruebas se hayan realizado en las 6 semanas previas a la visita basal.
    6.Tuberculosis activa o latente actual o antecedentes de tuberculosis activa o latente no tratada o tratada insuficientemente según las directrices locales aplicables.
    Nota: Podrán participar sujetos con antecedentes documentados de haber completado un régimen adecuado de tratamiento antituberculoso por tuberculosis latente o activa sin antecedentes de reexposición a la tuberculosis desde el final del tratamiento.
    En caso de repetirse el proceso de selección, el investigador podrá utilizar los resultados de la prueba de tuberculosis de la primera selección para evaluar la elegibilidad de los sujetos que se sometan de nuevo al proceso de selección siempre que dicha prueba se haya realizado en las 6 semanas previas a la visita basal.
    7.Certeza o sospecha de inmunodepresión o de infecciones inusualmente frecuentes, recurrentes, severas o prolongadas, a criterio del investigador.
    8.Antecedentes de enfermedad linfoproliferativa o de neoplasia maligna de cualquier sistema orgánico en los últimos 5 años, excepto (1) carcinoma basocelular, carcinoma espinocelular in situ (enfermedad de Bowen) o carcinoma in situ del cuello uterino tratados y sin signos de recidiva en las 12 semanas previas a la visita basal o (2) queratosis actínicas tratadas.
    9.Presencia de trastornos cutáneos que puedan interferir en las evaluaciones del estudio (por ejemplo, síndrome de Netherton, psoriasis, linfoma T cutáneo [micosis fungoide o síndrome de Sézary], dermatitis de contacto, dermatitis actínica crónica o dermatitis herpetiforme).
    10.Mujeres embarazadas (resultado positivo en la prueba de embarazo en suero de la visita de selección o prueba de embarazo en orina [PEO] positiva en la visita basal), lactantes o que tengan previsto quedarse embarazadas durante el estudio clínico.
    La lista completa de criterios de inclusión se incluye dentro del protocolo.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Proportion of subjects with EASI-75 (≥ 75% improvement in EASI from
    baseline) at Week 16

    Proportion of subjects with an improvement of PP NRS ≥ 4 at Week 16
    Proporción de sujetos con respuesta EASI-75 (mejora ≥75% de la puntuación EASI con respecto al momento basal) en la semana 16.
    Proporción de sujetos con una mejora de la EVN PM ≥4 en la semana 16.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Week 16
    Semana 16
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    • Percent change from baseline in EASI at each visit through Week 16
    • Proportion of subjects with at least 50%, 75%, or 90% improvement from baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90) at each visit through Week 16.
    • Percent change from baseline in PP NRS at each visit through Week 16.
    • Proportion of subjects with an improvement of PP NRS ≥ 4 at Week 1, Week 2, and each visit through Week 16.
    • Proportion of subjects with PP NRS < 2 at each visit through Week 16.
    • Proportion of subjects with an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) success (defined as an IGA of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] and a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline) at each visit through Week 16.
    • Proportion of subjects with EASI-75 and improvement of PP NRS ≥ 4 at each visit through Week 16.
    • Proportion of subjects with IGA success and improvement of PP NRS ≥ 4 at each visit through Week 16.
    • Proportion of subjects with an improvement of sleep disturbance NRS (SD NRS) ≥ 4 at each visit through Week 16.
    • Percent change from baseline in SD NRS at each visit through Week 16.
    • Percent change from baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and its components at each visit through Week 16.
    • Change from baseline in percent of body surface area (BSA) affected by AD at each visit through Week 16.
    • Proportion of subjects with prior CsA use achieving EASI-75 at each visit through Week 16.
    • Change from baseline in individual components of the EASI (averaged across body regions) at each visit through Week 16.
    • Change from baseline in AD-associated pain frequency through Week 16.
    • Change from baseline in AD-associated pain intensity through Week 16.
    • Incidence of rescue therapy use through Week 16.
    • Change from baseline in percentage of itch-free days (based on PP NRS = 0/1) through Week 16
    •Variación porcentual de la puntuación EASI entre el momento basal y cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Proporción de sujetos con una mejora del 50%, 75% o 90%, como mínimo, con respecto al momento basal de la puntuación EASI (respuestas EASI-50, EASI-75 y EASI-90) en cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Variación porcentual de la EVN PM entre el momento basal y cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Proporción de sujetos con una mejora de la EVN PM ≥4 en las semanas 1 y 2 y en cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Proporción de sujetos con una EVN PM <2 en cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Proporción de sujetos con éxito en la escala IGA (Evaluación global por parte del investigador; éxito definido como una puntuación IGA de 0 [remisión] o 1 [casi remisión] y una reducción ≥2 puntos con respecto al momento basal) en cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Proporción de sujetos con respuesta EASI-75 y mejora de la EVN PM ≥4 en cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Proporción de sujetos con éxito en la escala IGA y mejora de la EVN PM ≥4 en cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Proporción de sujetos con una mejora de la EVN de trastorno del sueño (EVN TS) ≥4 en cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Variación porcentual de la EVN TS entre el momento basal y cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Variación porcentual de la puntuación SCORAD (Puntuación de dermatitis atópica) y sus componentes entre el momento basal y cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Variación del porcentaje de la superficie corporal (SC) afectada por la DA entre el momento basal y cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Proporción de sujetos con uso previo de CsA que logren una respuesta EASI-75 en cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Variación de los componentes individuales de la puntuación EASI (promediados entre todas las regiones corporales) entre el momento basal y cada visita hasta la semana 16.
    •Variación de la frecuencia del dolor asociado a la DA entre el momento basal y la semana 16.
    •Variación de la intensidad del dolor asociado a la DA entre el momento basal y la semana 16.
    •Incidencia del uso de tratamiento de rescate hasta la semana 16.
    •Variación del porcentaje de días sin prurito (según una EVN PM = 0/1) entre el momento basal y la semana 16.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Week 16
    Semana 16
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others Yes
    E.6.13.1Other scope of the trial description
    Immunogenicity
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned7
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA70
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV) Follow-up included
    Ultima visita Ultimo paciente (UVUP) incluido seguimiento
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months5
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days13
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years1
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months7
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days13
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 264
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 6
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state21
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 270
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 270
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Patient will revert back to their primary physician for further evaluation. Long-term open label extension study planned (SPR.118163) those who are eligible.
    El paciente volverá a su médico de cabecera para una evaluación adicional. Se planificó un estudio de extensión abierto a largo plazo (SPR.118163) para aquellos que son elegibles.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2021-11-04
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2021-10-22
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Tue May 07 22:39:23 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA