Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43841   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7281   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2021-002481-40
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:TAK-935-3002
    National Competent Authority:France - ANSM
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2021-07-29
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedFrance - ANSM
    A.2EudraCT number2021-002481-40
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Soticlestat as Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric and Adult Subjects With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS)
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Study of Soticlestat as Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric and Adult Subjects With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberTAK-935-3002
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan Yes
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation PlanP/317/2020
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc.
    B.1.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportakeda Development Center Americas, Inc.
    B.4.2CountryUnited States
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc.
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointMedical Director
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street Address95 Hayden Avenue
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityLexington, MA
    B.5.3.3Post code02421
    B.5.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.5.4Telephone number16174441422
    B.5.6E-mailDimitrios.Arkilo@takeda.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product namesoticlestat
    D.3.2Product code TAK-935
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Film-coated tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Yes
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPGastroenteral use
    Oral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNsoticlestat
    D.3.9.1CAS number 1429505-03-2
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeTAK-935
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB198078
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number100
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameSoticlestat
    D.3.2Product code TAK-935
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Film-coated tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Yes
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPGastroenteral use
    Oral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNsoticlestat
    D.3.9.1CAS number 1429505-03-2
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeTAK-935
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB198078
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number20
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboFilm-coated tablet
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboOral use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS)
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Seizures
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 20.1
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10048816
    E.1.2Term Lennox-Gastaut syndrome
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10029205 - Nervous system disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease Yes
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    - To assess the efficacy and safety of soticlestat in reducing MMD seizure frequency as add-on therapy to standard of care (SOC) as compared with placebo during the full treatment period (titration + maintenance).

    For EMA registration:
    - To assess the efficacy and safety of soticlestat in reducing MMD seizure frequency as add-on
    therapy to SOC compared with placebo during the maintenance period only.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    To assess the following in subjects taking soticlestat as compared with placebo during the full treatment period, unless otherwise noted:
    - Proportion of treatment responders defined as those with ≥50% reduction in MMD seizures from baseline during the maintenance period and the full treatment period.
    -Effect on total seizure frequency of all seizure types during the maintenance period and the full treatment period.
    - Change from baseline in proportion of MMD seizure-free days.
    - Longest MMD seizure-free interval.
    - Number of days when rescue ASMs are used.
    - Effect on the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) (clinician) and Caregiver Global Impression of Improvement (Care GI-I).
    - Effect on CGI-I Seizure Intensity and Duration.
    - Effect on the CGI-I Nonseizure Symptoms completed by clinician with input from the caregiver.
    - Effect on Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability).
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. In the opinion of the investigator, the subject and/or parent or legal guardian is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements including the use of digital tools, complete appropriate assessments, maintain an accurate and complete daily seizure diary and take study drug for the duration of the study.
    2. The subject or the subject’s parent or legal guardian are willing and able to read, understand, and sign and date a written or an electronic informed consent form (ICF), assent form (if applicable), and any required privacy authorization before the initiation of any study procedures.
    3. The subject is male or female and aged 2 to 35 years, inclusive, at the time of informed consent.
    4. Documented clinical diagnosis of LGS supported by:
    – Onset of seizures usually between the ages of 1 and 8 years.
    – Presence of multiple seizure types: including drop seizures (eg, tonic-atonic seizures) and other seizure types including atypical absence seizures, tonic-clonic, myoclonic, and partial seizures.
    – History of abnormal EEG (eg, slow spike and wave [<2.5 Hz], slow or disorganized EEG background, generalized paroxysmal fast activity).
    – Developmental delay or intellectual disability consistent with LGS.
    5. The participant has ≥8 MMD seizures each month in the 3 months prior to screening based on the historical information and has ≥8 MMD seizures per 28 days during the 4- to 6-week prospective baseline period.
    6. Weighs ≥10 kg at the screening visit (Visit 1).
    7. Failure to control seizures despite appropriate trials of at least 2 ASMs based on historical information and is currently on an anti-seizure therapy (eg, ASMs, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), ketogenic/modified Atkins diet), or other treatment options considered as SOC.
    8. Currently taking 0 to 3 ASMs at stable doses for at least 4 weeks before the screening visit (Visit 1); benzodiazepines used chronically (daily) to treat seizures are considered ASMs. ASM dosing regimen must remain constant throughout the study.
    9. If using a VNS, the subject must have had VNS placed at least 3 months before the screening visit with stable settings for >1 month; and VNS parameters must remain constant throughout the study (VNS will not be counted as an ASM).
    10. If on ketogenic diet (or any other diet used for treatment of epilepsy, such as modified Atkins diet), the subject must have started the diet at least 3 months before the screening visit (Visit 1), and the subject’s diet should be stable for 1 month before the screening visit (Visit 1); should continue this diet throughout the duration of the study (ketogenic diet, or any other diet for the treatment of epilepsy will not be counted as an ASM).
    11. The use of felbamate is allowed provided that the subject does not meet the liver function test(LFT) exclusion criteria, the dose has been stable for at least 6 months before screening, and the subject has had stable liver function (as determined by serum aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] levels) and hematology laboratory tests during the course of treatment.
    12. Approved to participate by the sponsor and/or designee (ie, TESC) after review of medical history and seizure classification.
    13. Female subjects of childbearing potential (defined as first menarche) must have a negative pregnancy test and agree to use an effective method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug.
    Effective contraceptive methods are as follows:
    a) Double-barrier method (contraceptive sponge, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal jellies or creams PLUS male condom).
    b) Progestogen-only hormonal contraception, where inhibition of ovulation is not the primary mode of action, PLUS condom with or without spermicide.
    c) Sexual abstinence:
    i. Sexual abstinence may be considered as a method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse and determined to be the usual lifestyle before entering the study with reliability of abstinence for the duration of the study participation and for 30 days after last dose of study drug.
    d) Sterilization:
    i. Bilateral tubal occlusion.
    ii. Vasectomized partner (provided that the partner is the sole sexual partner of the subject and the absence of sperm in the ejaculate has been confirmed).
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1. Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate family. Note: Immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling, whether biological or legally adopted.
    2. Takeda employees or immediate family members.
    3. Currently enrolled in a clinical study involving an investigational product or nonapproved use of a drug or device (other than the investigational product used in this study), or concurrently enrolled in any other type of medical research judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with this study. Note: Compatibility will be determined based on consultation with the medical monitor or
    the sponsor.
    4. Participated in a clinical study involving another study drug in the last 30 days (or 5 halflives of the study drug, whichever is longer) before screening (Visit 1).
    5. Received soticlestat in a previous clinical study.
    6. Known hypersensitivity to any component of the soticlestat formulation.
    7. Admitted to a medical facility and intubated for treatment of status epilepticus 2 or more times in the 3 months immediately before screening (Visit 1). Status epilepticus is defined as continuous seizure activity lasting longer than 5 minutes or repeated seizures without return to baseline in between seizures.
    8. Unstable, clinically significant neurologic (other than the disease being studied), psychiatric, cardiovascular, ophthalmologic, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, metabolic, gastrointestinal, urologic, immunologic, hematopoietic, endocrine disease, malignancy including progressive tumors, or other abnormality that may impact the ability to participate in the study or that may potentially confound the study results. It is the responsibility of the investigator to assess the clinical significance; however, consultation with the medical monitor may be warranted.
    9. Any history of alcohol, opioid, or other drug use disorder, as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-V), within the 2 years immediately before the screening Visit (Visit 1).
    10. Considered by the investigator to be at imminent risk of suicide or injury to self, others, or property, or the subject has attempted suicide within 12 months before the screening visit (Visit 1). Subjects who have positive answers on item numbers 4 or 5 on the C-SSRS before randomization/dosing (Visit 2) are excluded. This scale will only be administered to subjects
    aged ≥ 6 years.
    11. History of HIV infection (subject has tested positive for HIV-1 or HIV-2 antibodies), history of hepatitis B infection, or current active hepatitis C infection.
    Note: Subjects who have been vaccinated against hepatitis B (hepatitis B surface antibodypositive]
    and who test negative for other markers of prior hepatitis B infection (eg, negative for hepatitis B core antibody) are eligible. Also note that subjects who test positive for hepatitis C antibody are eligible if they have a negative hepatitis C viral load by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
    12. Abnormal and clinically significant ECG abnormality at screening (Visit 1) or before randomization/dosing (Visit 2), including QT interval with Fridericia correction method (QTcF) >450 ms confirmed with a repeat ECG using manual measurement of QTcF. Clinically significant ECG abnormalities should be discussed with the medical monitor.
    13. Abnormal clinical laboratory test results at screening (Visit 1) that suggest a clinically significant underlying disease that would compromise the well-being of the subject. If the subject has serum ALT and/or AST level >2.5 × the upper limit of normal (ULN), the medical monitor should be consulted.
    14. Unable to withhold the use of strong inducers and inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4
    during the entire clinical trial, except for ASMs (eg, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin).
    15. Unwilling to withhold the fruit and juice of grapefruit, Seville oranges, and starfruit from their diet during the entire clinical trial.
    16. Use of herbal preparations (when used as an ASM) or artisanal cannabidiol (CBD) during the entire clinical trial.
    17. Currently pregnant or breastfeeding or is planning to become pregnant within 30 days of the
    last dose of study drug.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    - Percent change from baseline in MMD seizure frequency per 28 days in subjects receiving soticlestat as compared with placebo during the full treatment period.
    For EMA registration:
    - Percent change from baseline in MMD seizure frequency per 28 days in subjects receiving soticlestat as compared with placebo during the maintenance period.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Primary end points will be assessed throughout the study.
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    To assess the following in subjects receiving soticlestat as compared with placebo during the full treatment period, unless otherwise noted:
    - Proportion of responders defined as those with ≥50% reduction from baseline in MMD seizures during the maintenance period and the full treatment period.
    - Percent change from baseline in frequency of all seizures per 28 days during the maintenance period and the full treatment period.
    - Percent change from baseline in MMD seizure frequency per 28 days during the maintenance period.
    - Responder analysis of the proportion of subjects with ≤0%, >0% to ≤25%, >25% to ≤50%, >50% to ≤75%, and >75% to ≤100% reduction from baseline in MMD seizures in a cumulative response curve.
    - Change from baseline in proportion of MMD seizure-free days.
    - Longest MMD seizure-free interval.
    - Number of days when rescue ASM is used.
    - CGI-I (clinician).
    - Care GI-I (caregiver).
    - CGI-I Seizure Intensity and Duration.
    - CGI-I Nonseizure Symptoms.
    - Change in QI-Disability score.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Secondary end points will be assessed throughout the study.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned3
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Australia
    Canada
    China
    Japan
    Russian Federation
    Serbia
    Ukraine
    United States
    Belgium
    France
    Hungary
    Italy
    Latvia
    Netherlands
    Poland
    Spain
    United Kingdom
    Greece
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months22
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months22
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 Yes
    F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 164
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) Yes
    F.1.1.5.1Number of subjects for this age range: 105
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Yes
    F.1.1.6.1Number of subjects for this age range: 59
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 70
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) No
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 234
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Study drug will not be available upon completion of the subject's participation in the study. The subject should be returned to the care of a physician and standard therapies initiated or resumed as required.
    However, following completion of the study, subjects will have the option to enroll in an OLE study, as per the OLE study's inclusion/exclusion criteria.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2021-09-28
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial application
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial Status
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Tue Apr 16 21:28:40 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA